Mike Driver

JVL
The Stonewall Inn

Product Placement
$LAYYYTER
EXPECTATIONS

ellievsbear
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
official daine visual archive
Keni
Not today Justin
taylor price
🪼

tannertan36
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
Monterey Bay Aquarium
Stranger Things
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
Misplaced Lens Cap

roma★

seen from Singapore
seen from Bangladesh

seen from T1
seen from Türkiye
seen from Malaysia

seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from Denmark

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from Türkiye
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Singapore
seen from France
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Peru

seen from Türkiye

seen from Canada

seen from Germany
@yesitsterriblysimple
love a character that's like. i survived (<- not a brag) (<- this is a curse that weighs on me every waking hour)
I hate the idea that Giles comes from money, and I rebuke it, I don’t think we should accept it. It's convenient for the comics in particular that Giles has an independent source of funding, but I think that convenience comes at the expense of character.
Because having money changes your world outlook. Having generational wealth and never really having to worry, and knowing you have options open to you changes your outlook. I'm not saying everyone from the same class is exactly the same, but we *can* make generalizations. The conditions you exist in shape you. And in my experience, having known a few people who grew up wealthy, having that level of security and comfort shapes their outlook quite a bit. They start to take things for granted.
Giles clearly isn't working class, but I will argue that he's middle class. I think one of the dividing lines between middle class and generational wealth is that, however comfortable middle class existence might be, there's still the acknowledgment that you have to work for that comfort. You have to do well in school and get a good job not just for the sake of pride but because if you don't, you aren't going to keep up that lifestyle. You don’t have a trust fund to save you. In the comics, Giles has a no-job needed amount of money and I hate it.
So, what really characterizes Giles when we're first introduced to him is his enthusiasm, his sense of adventure. He's stepping into the world of monsters, and he's excited about it. And I just think that attitude corresponds to someone who, up to this point, has had to put up with a certain confinement, a certain routine, and certain obligations. Someone who has been *working* towards the life they want and now has it. It doesn't match up as well with someone who had the resources to travel or otherwise pay for some kind of hit of excitement.
Giles also has a definite work ethic. He approaches training Buffy in a systematic and diligent way. He also carries out his librarian job extremely competently and without complaint. His competence speaks to someone who has had a job throughout his life.
Compare that to Wesley, who I think you could argue comes from a bit of money. He has the air of dilettante in everything he does, and is motivated by neuroses. Or Cordelia, who has utter disdain for mundane work.
Season 1 Giles didn't have a defined backstory. The whole "Ripper" thing is something they came up with in season 2. And then Giles coming from money was a way to (1) justify using Tony Head's house as a shooting location s7, (2) pay for things in the comics. But since Giles' monied history was such a late addition, it didn't inform his character at all. The writers defaulted to writing a middle class character because they themselves are PB/middle class. Without consciously choosing something different, they imbued the character with their own class. But then when they decide to define Giles' class much later, it feel disconnected, because it hadn't been part of him the whole time.
I don't have a neat conclusion. Just, let's ignore canon when it's sloppy and written for convenience rather than character. ( @mmhhch )
People have GOT to stop assuming narrative is about passing judgment on ppl, about punishing wrongdoing or rewarding the righteous
I’ve seen a lot of criticism of “Innocence” for essentially punishing Buffy for having sex.
And true Buffy suffers literally because she had sex with her boyfriend.
But then we also have the dialogue explicitly telling us that’s not the point, that’s not what we should be taking from this. We have Giles’ speech validating Buffy and saying she did nothing wrong. And also Joyce; early in the episode Joyce says to Buffy, “You just look…” implying she can tell that Buffy’s not a virgin anymore, that there’s something fundamentally changed about her – but they set-up that idea only to knock it down at the end, when Joyce tells Buffy, “You look the same to me.” Sex didn’t change her, it didn’t corrupt her, she didn’t do anything wrong.
The episode is very clearly saying that Buffy’s act of having sex was not morally bad.
You could possibly accuse Joss Whedon of trying to have it both ways, having the narrative punish Buffy and the dialogue absolve her, but I think there’s a problem with framing every bad thing that happens to a character as punishment. Not every story is a morality play. “Surprise” & “Innocence” – and the whole of season 2 actually – is a tragedy. Bad things happen as a direct result of the characters’ actions, but that doesn’t mean they deserve them.
“Innocence” is about dramatizing and mythologizing a common experience and getting catharsis out of it.
"Pangs" 04.08 (1999)
I have strong opinions about Giles' class status. He is middle class, professional middle-class. He does not have family money. Fuck canon.
sometimes i just remember that giles managed to be jobless for a year without worrying about money at all and also bought business later and just think "fuck, he's rich"
The 90s and early 2000s was a very different economic time. That a single, middle-aged man, with no dependents, who had been stably employed his whole life, should have enough money saved to take a year hiatus and then kick-start a mid-life crisis is not strange.
More broadly, I hate the idea that Giles comes from money and I rebuke it, canon be damned. It emerged as a convenience in season 7 and in the comics, but imo it does not jive with his personality or outlook. Also, the *original* conception of Watchers was *not* that they were a huge monied bureaucracy, but a small, secret group of families keeping this thing going. I think that's much more interesting, and it also matches the vibe of Giles in the early seasons.
BUFFY THE VAMPIRE SLAYER - 1.12: Prochecy Girl // 5.22: The Gift
s05e06 «Family»
Star Wars: Episode III – Revenge of the Sith dir. George Lucas | 2005
So I'm thinking of finally running a Hottest Character of All Arcane poll.
I've already done polls for season 1 and season 2, but I've never done one for all of Arcane. So we've never seen prime Silco face off against feral Jayce, for example.
But anyways, this is my real question:
Mel has handily won both season 1 and season 2 polls. To avoid a boring repeat, I'm considering keeping her out of the brackets and holding her back as, like, the Final Boss. But idk if that's fair to Mel fans.
Looking for thoughts and opinions.
I’m bored so here I’m asking questions: if Ekko found out eventually that jinx is not dead, how do you think he would feel?
Hm that's interesting. I think overwhelmingly he would be happy that she's alive. Maybe a part of him would be sad or hurt that she didn't want to build a new life with him. But I think he's emotionally mature enough to think through his feelings and realise that Jinx needed a totally fresh start. I do think his #1 feelings would be joy and relief.
"Wild at Heart" 04.06 (1999)
Well I have to say Disclosure Day is a very silly movie
I am BAFFLED by people saying it's good
Well I have to say Disclosure Day is a very silly movie
Thinking about how Viktor was not "corrupted" by the hexcore, part of the evidence of that is his astral self.
Looking at just Herald!Viktor, yeah something seems off about him, he's not himself, you could argue that the hexcore altered his personality. But then you see him on the astral plane and actually no, he's more himself than ever, he's living his best life, and this is his true self, not changed at all.
His body is like a veil that he's experiencing the world through, and that the world is experiencing him, it's muffling everything, it's a boundary.
And that's another interesting aspect of Viktor in season 2, he's so profoundly alienated from his body, that it is literally not him. He exists apart from it. In another manifestation of the theme of duality, he literally has two selves, a physical self and a spiritual self.
Thinking about it, I think that this is what "corrupts" Viktor, not him merging consciousness with the Hexcore, but being physically removed from humanity, existing on a separate plane, gives him a different perspective. Of *course* he knows what's best for humanity, he can see everything that normal people can't. It's just logical.
The hexcore doesn't change Viktor directly, it changes how he relates to people, and that's what changes him.
Just to add onto this since it's getting some reblogs:
My position is that Viktor was not "possessed" or anything by the hexcore, because (a) that's boring, (b) what exactly was the hexcore forcing Viktor to do? Everything up to and including episode 6 doesn't need any magical explanation: Viktor is doing exactly what he always wanted to do, helping Undercity.