A hard look into international education

[yewwahtruth-blog]

Another Anonymous Review on InternationalSchoolsReview.com

Wow. Where to begin? It has been several months since I have wanted to post this review and a great part of me just wanted to leave it be and let the awful experience I had die in my past, but a larger part of me knew that it wasn't right to keep people in the dark about the truth of the Yew Wah Foundation. Yew Wah is part of a Hong Kong foundation the is ran by Dr. Betty (who, from what I understand, never went to school for that doctorate, it was an honorary one). It is a smaller section of the more prestigious Yew Chung Foundation. Yew Chung schools cater to actual international students with foreign passports and Yew Wah caters to extremely wealthy Chinese students (especially the Guangzhou campus). Facilities: On the outside, the campus looks very nice (when it isn't raining). But if you were to take a closer look, you would see what a couple of years of constant rain will do to an open-air campus. There is mold all over the building. Inside stairwells, classrooms, the cafeteria, the hallways, and even the bathrooms are covered in unsightly, and unhealthy mold. The school makes sure to cover it up in whatever way possible before there is a scheduled tour or there is some sort of parent event. They will use paint or even tape up regular white paper to cover the mold. Of course, this is only the start of a much bigger problem, and that is structural integrity. Many pieces of walls and ceilings have collapsed in on itself due to the poor and hasty construction of the school. It is obvious that there was poor planning involved with it's construction as they didn't take into account the large amount of rain Guangzhou receives every year. Poor janitorial staff are forced to sweep massive puddles of rain off the walkways nearly everyday, even while it is raining. The classrooms are decent and the primary side is equipped with smartboards, but as they continue to accept more and more students, the classrooms are getting smaller and smaller. The gym is of a good size, but it also acts as a place for so many events that it is difficult to utilize it appropriately. It also don't help that there are leaks in the ceiling that allow rain to come down into the middle of it. Rain freely pours into stairwells, making it very dangerous to traverse them. Many students and staff have taken falls, so far no one has been seriously injured thankfully. Admissions and Academic Integrity: Admissions at Yew Wah is a joke. Right now, admissions falls under the marketing department, which definitely seems like a conflict of interest when you think about it. They will tell you that every student must complete an entrance exam before being admitted into the school, and this is true. What they don't tell you is that the students are also allowed their smartphones and are completely unobserved when they take the exam. I know this personally because I saw this happen myself on multiple occasions. This is a good stepping stone when we talk about academic integrity. While they do take the CIE (Cambridge International Examinations) seriously, students will find that their progress reports will not actually reflect what they earned in class as the school office will alter the grades before they are printed. I am aware that it happened in my classes. Of course, the school will deny this, and toss it up as a "technical issue". Many students at Yew Wah will do absolutely nothing in school and won't even attempt to learn; making them a burden on the teacher and the class. This is mostly due to the fact that their parents are multi-millionaires and they know that school doesn't really matter to their well-being. The Staff: Overall, the staff are very professional and are undervalued at every turn. Although, I must admit that it was quite a shock when a new group of staff were hired and it seemed that in order to get hired it was required that you be a practicing Christian. The school is technically a Christian foundation, but the way they operate proves otherwise. More on that later. Living conditions: Do you like being several miles away from any kind of civilization? Do you like the idea that you are secluded from the world? Do you enjoy having virtually no access to proper public transportation? Are you a fan of be dangerously far away from an emergency health center? Do you like paying money for an internet service that rarely works? If you said yes to all of these questions, then working at Yew Wah will be a breeze. DON'T GO IF YOU ARE SINGLE! There is virtually nothing for you to do except hang out with people who have families. The apartments are large and usually well-furnished, but they do not let new staff know about how isolated the school is. There is virtually nothing out there, and if you want to do anything simple, like buy groceries, you will need to buy an electric motorbike. There are no shopping centers, barbers, or even proper restaurants. There is ONE restaurant, but it is attached to a hotel that will definitely kill your pocketbook and the food is awful. More importantly, there are no hospitals nearby, or at the very least convenient. If you were to have a medical problem, it could take an hour before an ambulance could get to you. The school does have a dedicated "driver" to get you to a hospital, but you have to roll the dice on whether or not he picks up the phone. Also, snakes and rats are a thing. The Management: Oh boy. What a nightmare this is. So the first school year started without a hitch. Chris Connellan was the principal, and did his best to organize the budding school. This was no easy task and those above him didn't make it any easier, especially Tin Ip. Tin Ip is a superintendent of the foundation and after a new principal was hired and left the day before school started that year (2015-2016), he stepped in. As the acting principal, Tin Ip was largely ineffective. He proceeded to use bully and fear tactics to get his way. He even tried to fire teachers, and was almost successful until they got lawyers. He did fire a librarian for doing her job because a parent complained to him. Without any investigation or disciplinary actions, he did a wholesale termination of her contract. In the end, she did lawyer up and the school settled out of court for a very large sum of money. It became very apparent that the school does not care about its teachers after the course of one year. The management labeled the older staff as "negative" and spread that to the new staff to encourage even more isolation. Slowly, the newer staff realized that there were genuine concerns and that they had been lied to. The HR department is probably the best department that the school has, but even they are told to propagate lies on the behalf of the school. Many teachers were told that after they sign a two-year contract, that the gratuity benefit would rise from 11.11% to 20% on the completion of another contract. This was a lie. In fact, teachers saw a decrease in the gratuity benefit from 11.11% to 10%. Their excuse was to be on a more level playing field with the local staff. However, they refuse to raise the local staff's wages whatsoever. The new management seem to be perfectly happy to be yes men for Tin Ip. Tin Ip made the lives of teachers a living nightmare. This is not an exaggeration. Teachers saw a decline in physical, emotional, and mental health during their stint with Yew Wah. If you enjoy being mismanaged, undervalued, and constantly in fear for your job, then Yew Wah might be the place for you. Don't say you weren't warned. The Curriculum: The school follows the IGCSE model in the upper levels. This is virtually ineffective since many of the students cannot grasp many of the lessons taught, especially English courses. Other Yew Wah campuses are different as they promote higher learning and only accept students with some command of the English language, but in Guangzhou that does not happen. It will be interesting to see what universities the graduates actually get into. Let's not forget, the grades they get don't actually matter since they will be flubbed in the end anyway. Discipline: Nonexistent. Carrying on. Oh? You want me to give you an example? Here's one. A student forced another student to drink his own urine and NOTHING was done. Need another? A student physically assaults a teacher and NOTHING was done. One more? Several students consistently do nothing or straight up lie to their teachers and NOTHING gets done. There is a discipline committee that is supposed to keep order, but in the end, Tin Ip reverses any decision made and life continues on. Safety: Other than the treacherous hallways and stairwells, the school is actually a pretty safe place. Seeing how it is out in the middle of nowhere, possesses an unsettling amount of security guards, and surrounded by a wall that most prisons wold be happy with, it is safe. The Package: Yew Wah does pay more than most international schools in the Guangzhou area. There are only a few that top it. The pay, insurance, and living quarters are definitely adequate. Let's be honest though, many would consider that "blood money" after what they had been through. Don't believe me? Out of all of the foreign staff that were hired, only THREE stayed on to continue work. Everyone else left or in the case of two people, terminated. IT IS NOT WORTH IT! Also, the package means little when you are not even allowed to take medical leave for physical therapy or to go to a dentist. Professional Development: It is possible to receive PD. However, the benefit isn't much and it is likely you will pay out of pocket for most of it. Conclusion: I could go on and on about how I personally was lied to and mistreated by this school and its administration, but that would accomplish very little. Instead, I would like you to consider what has been written before and take mental notes. THIS IS NOT A PLACE TO DEVELOP A CAREER. Yew Wah will literally claim your health and sense of integrity. There has been no darker time in my life, than when I worked at this school. I would breakdown emotionally on a daily basis and I cannot think of a time where I drank as much as I did. If you are considering applying to this institution, you will be inviting the worst moments possible into your life. If you are a parent, please consider a school that will actually provide a meaningful education to your child. The teachers at Yew Wah are professionals, but they are hampered by an inadequate administration and a curriculum to laugh at. This is not designed to be a flame piece or an attack for what they did. This is simply the truth. Recently, I found a blog where you can find out more about the school and the truths behind it at: http://yewwahtruth.tumblr.com/ Good luck on finding a school that is right for you! Thank you for reading and God Bless.

[yewwahtruth-blog]

Once again, the school counts another victim due to its poor construction and design. Unfortunately, this victim was a student.

The student tried to take a shower and ended up breaking the glass door. This was a terrible accident, and of course the school has done everything to keep it out of the loop.Thankfully, it was only minor cuts.

The parents have no idea how unsafe this place is.

[yewwahtruth-blog]

Once again, marketing is the law of the land.

This is taken from the Yew Wah Guangzhou WeChat account. It is catering to Chinese parents and it is discussing the new “house” system that is being implemented this year. However, the photo they used was taken when the school first opened two years ago.

Marketing does this often to exploit the time when they actually had white students enrolled to push the “international” sell. Even though this picture has nothing to do with the actual event, the fact that there are two white children in the photo makes it gold.

Facade. They take the Chinese parents for fools.

[yewwahtruth-blog]

The first anonymous Teacher Review from InternationalSchoolsReview.com

Below is a review that was written last year about the school. Many of the points shared in this review are shared by many of the current and ex staff members.

As a preface, I will say that I am writing this review now because there are none yet posted and it is a time in the calendar year when new hires may be searching for information about the school online. As my last paragraph indicates, there is much to be said about this school, but I can’t do it all. It’s honestly too exhausting to recall everything that would either be useful to prospective hires or amusing as documentary. I hope others will offer their experiences as well. The school is less than two years old; it is both still being built anew and yet also falling apart in some places, often due to the wet conditions here in Guangzhou. It sits on government-donated land and is being built by government-provided construction teams. There are things that have been poorly designed or executed, but overall a quite nice campus of significant stature. Of note, a large HVAC unit fell off the back wall last year, stairwells and corridors flood and are slippery without grip in the wet seasons, and the unfinished levels or broken elements have posed risks at times. As the school (expectedly) grows, a number of other academic and dormitory buildings are planned as well as a purported Olympic-sized pool and track/field. The initial design plans that were presented to us have been modified at times and are developing in response to the actual growth (in numbers) of the school, which is to be expected. Being located in a quite remote area of northern Huadu (itself a rather remote area of Guangzhou), the school is built upon a large parcel of land surrounded on one side by mountains and the other by a newly created village housing much of the Chinese support staff as well as a few foreigners on the dormitory staff. The school is moving toward on-campus staff housing in the future, which I will write about below. Overall, things are pretty decent in terms of the physical facilities. The lack of teaching resources and adequate (or even clearly stated) budgets is a very low point of the school. For a school taking in an estimated 25K-35K USD per student yearly, sitting on government donated-land and reportedly not paying water or electricity bills for the first five years, while connected to a large and established foundation of numerous other (Yew Wah and Yew Chung) schools, it is strange that this is an issue. As examples, teachers lack stable internet connection for certain tasks, stable laptops, sufficient software and hardware for subject needs (particularly IGCSE courses), and even textbooks. Requests for even basic and necessary resources (such as art sketchbooks or English dictionaries) have been met with skepticism and hesitation; other reasonable needs are downright denied. The requisition/purchasing procedures are often a nightmare or a terrific joke (depending on one’s mood) with confusing and time-wasting bureaucracy injected into the process. Without any heads of department (current enrolment is around 260 students in K-11), all purchase orders must be reviewed by the co-principals, who are understandably not qualified or expected to comprehend the detailed needs of every subject area and year level as a HoD would be. Budgets have never been stated beforehand; typically teachers are asked to produce a budget on their own for their IGCSE class, production, or other project and submit it suddenly within a handful of days, rather than having a department budget for the whole year. This makes planning ahead difficult. Curiously, when a marketing event occurs, or the school needs dressing up for another event open to current or prospective parents, a significant amount of money is spent on catering, plants, flowers, colourful banners, and (most recently) a vast amount of wall murals. The money is there, but not easily accessed. Marketing appears a priority over actual product. The school uses a hybrid curriculum. Apart from the few foreign students (all children of staff this year; the other few left after last year), the rest are Chinese mainlanders with a handful of Hong Kong residents mixed in. The Chinese curriculum is taught through year 9 alongside an internally generated (see below regarding the CRD) western curriculum. Some subjects have Chinese and foreign co-teachers. The Specialist classes (The Arts and Physical Education) do not. In year 10, students switch to the IGCSE curriculum. Some students were happily admitted in the first year of the school well over halfway through their year 10. The majority of current year 10 & 11 students do not possess the English ability or the discipline to succeed in their IGCSE courses. Most cannot be communicated to on the level truly required; a handful of current year 10 and 11 students have so little English their classmates still have to translate for them. The current year 9 class is in the very same situation. Couple this with a lack of resources (and support or acknowledgement of the real problems) and the school has a perfect storm arriving at the end of this year when marks will come externally from Cambridge and the first wave of remaining foreign teachers will complete their contracts with the overwhelming majority not likely to return; this includes three IGCSE teachers. These real concerns are reaching the administration in some sense, but the response is not yet sufficient. An IGCSE budget is soon to be freed up near the end of the first semester, but there is no way to solve the student issue without instituting some integrity in denying certain students late entry into the school and/or providing real and intensive EAL support, which is currently non-existent. There has been little involvement or true support from the administration thus far in the school’s curriculum. Instead, there has been insistence on producing standard (generic) curriculum documents online (Atlas) or locally, whether or not it is relevant to the actual situation of student ability and lack of resources. These appear to be most likely means of appeasing higher-ranking school executives from Hong Kong who do look through such documents more than actually involving themselves directly with the situations occurring in classrooms. The lack of knowledge even about the curriculum by the administration has been apparent at times. Teacher “appraisals” involve late arrivals by the co-principals, cursory and somewhat unrelated banter, and hasty exits with no later feedback. In the first year, teachers did copy and paste materials online or from sister schools to meet deadlines and appease the administration, while on the other hand drafting realistic documents week-to-week that actually addressed the irregular and developing nature of their classes and resources. Unfortunately, these documents never look as “professional” on the surface, so teachers may spend time producing facades to please. None of these copy-paste jobs were criticized or likely even detected as far as I know. The Curriculum Research Development (CRD) team is a sort of curriculum consulting group of HK and mainland individuals that spends large amounts of time producing not enough realistic material for our situations. That’s enough said about them. Professional Development began to be provided at the end of the school’s first year and has continued into this year. Thus far, it has been only for IGCSE teachers and for a handful of marketable/networking opportunities. Most of the IGCSE teachers were hired without prior training, and though good educators, are in need of resources and support to do their job adequately and build the school’s curriculum for the future. Although a bit hesitant at first, the school has allowed these professional development opportunities, which have occurred in Hong Kong, Hangzhou, Beijing, and Shanghai. Esther Chan (the heir apparent to the Foundation when Betty Chan passes the torch) has stated that the school is moving in the direction of housing all staff on-campus in the future staff dormitory. In the first year, staff were housed a 40-minute bus drive away in the newer part of Huadu, which includes a Starbucks, two cinemas, a limited assortment of international restaurants, shopping centers, foreign markets, many bars, a number of clubs, gyms, soccer/football pitches with local clubs to play with, other foreigners, parks, and a quite nice (and large) lake. At the end of the first year, staff members were given the option (and encouraged) to relocate to Sky Villa, a somewhat massive yet fairly empty community of apartments only 5 minutes down the road from school. In the second year, new hires were given no option, but all placed in Sky Villa, where very little of the aforementioned list of social outlets is available due to its remote location. The school has provided shuttle buses to downtown Guangzhou and a nearby town where food markets, etc. are located for the staff at Sky Villa, and many seem happy with this arrangement. It is in the school’s financial interests to house staff at Sky Villa, as rent is cheaper and it attempts to allay some of the exhaustions of a long school day plus travel time to and from Huadu. The staff is split over the current situation, as many younger and single staff members prefer Huadu, while couples, families, or older singles enjoy the benefits of Sky Villa. This is certainly an important consideration for the former group. Huadu is in the process of building a stop on Line 3 of the Metro, and it may be completed sometime in 2016-17. Currently, from Huadu (not Sky Villa), you can take a 15-20 minute bus to Ren He station and then ride another 40-45 minutes to downtown Guangzhou. Apart from the general frustrations of trying to get things in one’s apartment fixed by communicating through the Chinese support staff, filling out paperwork, and waiting half a day for workers to arrive (if at all), the arrangements are quite good. By Chinese standards, the apartments are large in Huadu, and even larger at Sky Villa. Singles enjoy two bedroom apartments; couples and families enjoy larger facilities. However, I would not look forward to the future dorm life of staff at this school; it brings to mind a particular film by Stanley Kubrick set in a Colorado ski lodge. The financial compensation of the school is (sadly) the best thing about the school. It’s really quite good, with a few bonuses from time to time in addition to free housing and a good health insurance package. The United Family Health clinic downtown is excellent, though a bit of a trip. Most of the academic support staff members are very good at their job and really decent people. Issues involving visas, bank accounts, etc. are handled well with expected though manageable challenges from time to time. The maintenance support team (FMSS) exhibits a high degree of ineptitude and inefficiency, and has been a frequent source of frustration and challenge over the first year and a half. The teaching staff members are quite qualified (many Master’s Degree holders, at least one doctoral candidate), fairly experienced, and also quite decent people.  There are, however, the beginnings of division in the staff related to the original and later hires, as well as the Huadu and Sky Villas dwellers. There was not much gossip in the first year when everyone was struggling together, but in the second year certain individuals unfortunately have named the original hires as “negative” if vocal in their criticisms and voiced problems and needs and have even encouraged the new hires not to socialize with the original hires. Some of the new hires are not fully aware of how deep the problems go at the school, though many are rapidly becoming aware. Some staff are not terribly involved (with low teaching loads) or have been placed in coordinating or other administrative roles and show the early signs of becoming minor puppets of inept executives rather than true supporters of those under them and champions for the real needs of the school visible on the ground. Hopefully, some real leadership will come in 2016 (see below), and these problems might be solved. They really can be, and it’s a shame that the school has continued even deeper this year into the morass it began last year. Only time will tell how things turn out. Stella Zhou was an excellent Chinese co-principal in the first year and has moved on to help start up another Yew Wah school in Shanghai (Lingang) as co-principal there. I have only good things to say of her as a leader and administrator. Chris Connellan was a difficult western co-principal to judge in the one year I worked under him. He was removed from his position quite suddenly at the very end of the first year, with Jeff Snyder citing “visa issues”. In the same abrupt announcement at a staff meeting, we were introduced to the new western co-principal for the second year, Neil Hodgson, who was formerly vice principal in charge of curriculum with ESF in Hong Kong. Based on a variety of substantial sources, as well as my own experience, I think Chris was passively removed due to staff reports of his (at times) brusque nature, judgments of ineffectual/remote leadership, conflicts with upper executives over school matters, and perhaps the fallout of staff members in the first year. I have been told that this is how the Foundation deals with such staffing “problems”. Though this is not a review of Chris, I would say that he was a decent man who did (all criticisms aside) a solid job overall under the circumstances and many teachers are wishing he were here this year instead of the individual currently in his place. Neil Hodgson departed rather abruptly at the end of staff development week, just days before students arrived for their second year. School Superintendent Tin Ip cited “stress… or something” under his breath when asked at a staff meeting about Neil’s departure. The school executives still hold that the middle-aged, healthy rock climber of a co-principal was suddenly hospitalized for a month or so and then… who knows. Disappeared. We never really bothered to pursue the answer of why he left. I don’t know of any staff member who truly believes the school’s story, however, and many of us predicted this might happen after observing him and his wife’s reactions and attitudes during the time leading up to their departure. We could be wrong, though! Shannon Shang is the current Chinese co-principal. I think she has a good and optimistic heart and perhaps might grow under good superintending, alongside a capable western co-principal, and under less stress than the current environment generates. As it is, she exudes short-sightedness and a knee-jerk reactionary attitude, both quite unhelpful when directed toward capable staff on the ground who can actually help solve problems when listened to and collaborated with. Other than that, she gets things done, although honestly I don't know anyone who really understands or knows what the co-principals are doing in their endless meetings, Skype sessions, and email exchanges. Tin Ip is an educator of old now with the Hong Kong Foundation. He was an incredibly remote, uninvolved, and unaware superintendent of the school last year, but it fell to him this year to become the “western” co-principal in the absence of Chris or Neil. He is a good definition of ineffectual leadership, and the best example I have ever worked under. He exhibits petty rudeness, narrow-mindedness, and general foolishness when under stress, and though he is perhaps improving in this while immersed in the great learning curve of serving as co-principal, I think that fundamentally as an individual he may never have the chops to lead anything with such scope as a school. He is an academic full of interesting trivia but devoid of real and consistent common sense, which is ironically a trait he often calls staff to when unable himself to answer their real questions about resources, policies, and general organization.  He is not a “bad” person, or intentionally destructive to our school by design, but rather by what appears that kind of immaturity a person may never get over early in adulthood when choosing not to face weaknesses, shortcomings, and reality, but instead ignoring them and then protecting and insulating themselves from criticism with things like academic degrees and advancement under the eyes of similarly immature individuals above them. In a less important role, he might appear an entertaining fop or loveable clown (there are always many such characters in any work environment). But in this environment he frustrates the needs of staff and sadly earns their contempt for things like denying access to personal needs, berating staff wrongly while praising trifles, and calling teachers to produce significant work and them summarily discarding it through ineptitude or mismanagement. In general, I would tread very carefully when considering this school and an investment of at least two years of your professional and personal life. Fair enough... Different strokes for different folks, and the school may take a better turn and establish itself internally as others within the Foundation have. However, I will no longer bank on such a possibility due to its track record primarily in terms of leadership and (mis)management. This year the anticipated departure of teaching staff who will not renew their contracts is significant. As a parting story, here is one that occurred today and well sums up the direction of the school at present: Every Monday morning we assemble at 8am for our flag-raising ceremony. Chinese flag first to the national anthem, then the Hong Kong flag, finally the Foundation flag to the school’s song. The electric motor to raise the flags lasted a week or more in the beginning of our first year and then promptly broke. Since then, some poor member of the security team must crank all three up by hand. It’s almost always hilarious in various ways, eliciting stifled laughter in staff and full-blown laughter in students in its Charlie Chaplin-esque nature. Tin spoke very sternly this morning, telling the students that the flag-raising was a very solemn occasion and that we should all stand at attention and with seriousness for the duration. Well, that poor chap in the white gloves is trying to crank two flags up those very tall poles in time to the national anthem, and the crank is obviously stripped, just spinning out with every few rotations. But he’s desperately cranking. The Yew Wah song begins playing and he hasn’t even gotten to the school flag yet. It finishes and he’s still cranking away. Tin runs over to the sound booth and tells them to play the song again, which they do. He runs back to take his solemn place and that joker is at it still, cranking away and wiping the sweat off his brow as he goes, the song on solemn repeat. We are all aware of the fact that this is never going to be a solemn moment, but always a comical one whether Tin realizes it or not. At present, our school is mostly concerned with a marketable facade, and the appearance of something grand in what we are doing. In reality, it’s really just a bunch of us poor saps desperately trying to crank away with a stripped handle to get our flags up before the music stops. If the leadership simply said we were going to stop and take the time to get that motor fixed, and that in the meantime we would raise the flags earlier than the assembly and simply pay respect to them without having to raise them in the moment, the problem would be solved. But if we can’t think this way about raising flags, how will we raise a new school? Only time will tell. NOTE: This school fails in regard to points 4 and 6 of the International Teachers' Bill of Rights.

[yewwahtruth-blog]

Erasing the boards...a struggle.

This is a prime example of what it is like to do even a simple action in Yew Wah. Nothing is ever easy. The cleaning staff have been using floor cleaner to clean the boards after school and over time it has taken a toll. We have been told that they will be replaced next year. I can imagine that this will continue to be a problem.

[yewwahtruth-blog]

That didn’t take long.

Thankfully, no one was hurt when the whole ceiling collapsed. Other areas are also starting to crack and crumble. Black mold is taking hold all over the school. 

The school has a wonderful architectural design, but the people who planned its construction clearly did not have the local environment in mind. 

Not even two years old and the school is in shambles.

[yewwahtruth-blog]

It is getting worse.

It is almost as if the school is reflecting its own academic integrity.

[yewwahtruth-blog]

Once again, this school is falling apart. It is getting to the point where it is very hazardous and can potentially cause a lot of harm. 

Administration chooses not to acknowledge it.

[yewwahtruth-blog]

Lunch of champions.

This is considered a “healthy” lunch according to Yew Wah standards. We’ll just leave this here for you to consider that.

[yewwahtruth-blog]

A response from Teacher Horizons

As we have noted before, this blog is not the ramblings and frustrations of a single individual, but the general concerns and honest opinions of many teachers within the organization. This blog serves as a platform for transparency so others do not make the mistake of coming here like we did.

Below is an email response from the international teacher recruiting website www.teacherhorizons.com and their feedback of the school. Names, as always are protected.

The emails:

---------- Forwarded message ----------

From:

Alexis Toye

<

>

Date: Sat, May 14, 2016 at 1:17 AM

Subject: Re: Thanks for your feedback

To: **********************

********************** @********.com

>

Thanks ****************, I'll share this with the our Directors.  Sorry to hear it has been so bad.

Kind regards,

Alexis

On 13 May 2016 at 06:55, *********************************** <

*****************************@************************.com

On 13 May 2016 at 06:55, ************************ <

**************************@***********************.com

> wrote:

Hi Alexis. Thanks for your response. Unfortunately, short visits or conversations with organization executives are not the best way to gauge the health or quality of a school. In fact, this is the primary way that schools such as Yewwah GZ are able to enroll students. The open days and marketing events we have for prospective parents are prioritized over school structure and integrity (even after two years) and in such events, great energy and resources are directed for the sake of appearance. I am aware that other teachers like myself have given TH or other agencies the facts regarding the behavior of the school's management over the past two years. There have been at least three instances of teachers involving lawyers with the school (one which is currently in litigation). The health and safety of both staff and students has been an issue over the two years. I would not consider these "teething" problems, and such a description unfortunately writes off the seriousness of the mismanagement of the school. I have several contacts and friends within the Yew Chung organization who are department heads and teachers, both former and current. They often hear through the network issues that have occurred at our school and are often bewildered and flabbergasted. We are currently on our third western co-principal in less than two years. The school has lowered the standards of the secondary school so that a mark in the 70s (out of a 100) is an A. On the last academic report going home, the number mark was not listed so that only this (adjusted) letter grade would show. In the two classroom observations made by the superintendent and/or principals to my classroom this year, the individuals arrived late and left early. They showed little awareness of anything I was doing academically in the school, and had virtually no awareness of the curriculum I was teaching. On the second visit, the individual observing brought their laptop and was on Facebook and doing other things online for most of the observation. Recently, one of the top executives came to me and asked if it would be possible to combine both years 10 and 11 (IGCSE years) into a single class for the next year, and the same question was posed to the Music teacher. These older IGCSE students still are accepted with very low English and poor discipline, and the school typically pushes these kind of stresses onto the classroom teacher to solve, with little time (one year), little budget, and little support. There is not a sense that the school is working to seriously strengthen itself academically in these two years, though the teachers in upper secondary have offered a great deal of feedback (both positive and negative) over these first two years. This should be the priority of the school: structure, structure, structure. I really could go on. But this is not a school that a serious educator would choose or consider a movement forward in their career at this stage in its development. As I mentioned before, however, that won't stop it from being staffed. We recently had a visit from a rep from another staffing agency. It was brief enough for me to only say hello, and she was being directed around the school by the head of marketing. As you know, money makes the world go around. It's not a problem to market a school heavily-- but there really needs to be a quality product to market. Betty Chan called our school the "Harvard of Guangzhou" with no intended sarcasm last year at an impromptu dinner required of us one Friday night. The dinner was timed just after students and staff were exposed to UV light for many hours when bulbs were installed and left on one evening and overnight into the next day with no warning. Numerous individuals were taken to hospitals for the incident with rashes on the skin and some teachers with damage to their eyes. It is just hard to take the management of the school seriously when they speak so glowingly of a system which is in such need of real structure and proper management. Were the school to have admitted the problems in these two years openly, and got about the business of working with us to address them, it would be quite different. But culturally, that kind of admission and approach is not always palatable. Best regards,

****************

> wrote:

Dear ********************, I hope this email finds you well. I wanted to thank you for your feedback on Yew Wah Guangzhou.  I'm one of the lead recruiters for the Yew Chung and Yew Wah organisation. We've noted that you've fed back several times for them and have taken note of this feedback, ensuring that we share both the positive sides and the negative sides with any prospective teachers. We've also held several meeting with the senior leaders of the organisation who are aware of the issues at this particular school.  With the organisation as a whole, the experience teachers face has mostly been very positive.  They haven't got it right yet at Yew Wah Guangzhou and I suspect it will be some time before we are able to wholeheartedly recommend the school to all teachers.   We'll continue to work with the organisation to ensure that teachers are accurately informed of what they are getting into and are on a path towards improvement.  As with many new schools, there have been too many teething problems, more so in this one than others, but we feel confident that with time and our support in some way or other that they'll be able to overcome these issues.  We've met the owners of the organisation and buy into their mission and vision.  The application of such is far from perfect but their heart is in the right place.   I do apologize that you haven't had a great experience with them and hope that your next position is a more positive one.  We'll keep monitoring the situation and should we feel that we can't support them we won't do so as we have done so with numerous other schools.  We plan to carry out a visit this year and that should help further in helping us to make an informed visit.  I've been to some of the Yew Chung schools but we haven't visited the Yew Wah Schools yet. Hope this helps to explain the situation. Best regards, Alexis -- Alexis Toye

Director

www.teacherhorizons.com      

--

Alexis Toye

Director

www.teacherhorizons.com        

[yewwahtruth-blog]

Another new policy...

Below is from a word document that describes the new “display policy” that teachers will have to abide by. This immediately sent up red flags and will definitely cut into teacher effectiveness. We are only 8 weeks out from the last day of school and then they drop this on use. We are sure that this must have something to do with the influx of prospective parents visiting the school. Once again, this is reactionary, not proactive. Student work should be displayed, but this is ridiculous. They will also incorporate this into your evaluation, but you didn’t hear that from us. ;)

If you are planning to work for this school, you can look forward to this: 

Yew Wah International Education School of Guangzhou

 DISPLAY POLICY  (Draft May 2016)

Aims:

·       To ensure that displays around the school inform, celebrate and enhance students’ learning, achievement and effort.

·       To create a stimulating, vibrant and thought provoking learning environment.

Purpose:

·       to create a stimulating environment which reflects the school ethos

·       to raise the self esteem and self worth of pupils

·       to enhance understanding and appreciation and enjoyment of children’s work

·       to celebrate children’s work across the curriculum and the school

·       to inform and create a learning focus

·       Encouraging children to take an interest in each others’ work

Guidelines:

·       The main focus for all displays should be children’s learning.

·       Display needs to be thought about when teachers are planning.

·       Key vocabulary for the unit being studied needs to be on display. It must be of sufficient size for students to easily access the word and its meaning.

·       Labels should be displayed in a variety of styles e.g. computer, handwritten, cursive, capitals, children’s writing. Where appropriate they should be in English and Mandarin.

·       All communal displays should include a year group label, identify the aim and learning outcome of the work and have a large eye-catching title.

·       Individual pieces of work should be labelled with the child’s name.

·       Display labels should include information, facts and questions that provoke discussion.

·       All children should have the opportunity to have their work displayed regardless of ability.

·       Work on communal displays should be mounted and all boards should be backed and edged with a border.

·       Work on classroom displays should be mounted.

·       Irregular shapes should be avoided and display pieces and mounts should be cut out carefully. Symmetry is important.

·       Teachers are encouraged to lightly pin display pieces first until they are happy with the overall display and then to staple the display down. (Ask a colleague for their opinion before stapling the display)

·       Display boards should be used rather than the bare walls.

·       If displaying on bare walls, use blue-tac and not sticky tape or masking tape. Do not leave displays on bare walls for too long and be sure to remove all blue-tac when taking the display down.

·       Teachers are encouraged to use the great opportunities for displaying items from the ceiling, particularly in our Primary classes where railings have been installed for this purpose.

·       Communal displays should be changed at a minimum of 4 times a year

·       Communal display boards are allocated by the Division Coordinator

·       Adults and children should follow school policy and produce quality displays.

·       Not all classroom displays need to be child generated. Some boards can be informative, adult-led displays that stimulate thought, or support learning

[yewwahtruth-blog]

So this happened...

One of our academic staff members was only 9 weeks from finishing their contract when they (meaning Tin Ip) decided to terminate her contract. It first started off with a staff meeting a few months back. 

Many people concentrate in different ways. Lots of people need to be doing something with their hands to focus and she was one of those people. During that particular staff meeting, she was sitting near the front, listening in on what was being said. Tin Ip (the superintendent and acting principal) noticed that she was knitting. He asked her to stop and put it away. This meeting had nothing to do with her, but regardless, she did obey and stopped knitting. However, she did not immediately put the knitting away. This infuriated Tin in a way that was almost comical. Out of all the staff members in that meeting, picking on her was not a funny matter. It was outright bullying. There were 11 other staff members on their laptops during that meeting what were not paying any attention at all (we counted). But heaven forbid that Tin acknowledges this fact. This resulted in a written warning for insubordination. 

Last week, she was terminated due to a parent complaint. Mind you, this was NOT a current parent, but a PROSPECTIVE parent. We had our Open Day a couple of weeks ago and this parent didn’t like the way our staff member handled her child. There was no touching, no swearing, no insulting gestures, and nothing offensive about what she did to the child. We have two eyewitnesses that also claim this. She took a book away from the child that was not supposed to be looking at. There is a section of graphic novels in the library and no child is supposed to look at them without the expressed permission of a teacher. 

THAT WAS IT!

She was fired for that. “Potentially bringing the school in disrepute”. 

This staff member was harmless. What this school did was effectively the same as kicking a puppy. They had it out for her. 

I am happy to note that she is pursuing the matter legally. She has hired a lawyer for the damages they have caused. We will update when we hear a result.

If you are a professional teacher, we would recommend that you steer clear away from this school. You could find yourself getting fired for sharing an honest opinion or even worse...knitting. 

[yewwahtruth-blog]

Its been a little over two weeks since my last post and the near impossibilities of trying to teach rich and wonderful, but conceptually challenging subjects to students who barely speak a few word…

A blog post from a teacher that left last year. 

She was an excellent teacher and it is clear to see her feelings in her writing. The school truly missed her when she left. 

She is very concise when it comes to the environment of the school and living in Huadu. 

This is just an example that this blog is not the ramblings and frustrations of a single person. This is a collection of facts that need to be shared. We believe teachers should be informed.

[yewwahtruth-blog]

Open Day (aka Day of Hypocrisy)

There have definitely been a lot of posts about the mold and mildew around the school and we will touch base on it again as well, but now this is out of hand. Yesterday was Open Day. A day where prospective parents can come and learn about the school and see it’s teachers in action. Marketing sent the following texts to the official school WeChat group asking that we pray that the rain would go away.

It didn’t.

The rain let up for about an hour and a half that afternoon and the head of marketing came to the lunch table to rub it in our faces in a very “Christian” way. Technically speaking, the school is a Christian organization, but it is not official in mainland China. There are many Christians that work at the school, and many of them are decent and good people, but there are a couple that like to shove their faith into others’ faces when they get an opportunity. 

Another member of the marketing posted in his moments that the rain had stopped and a photo of a clear blue sky. This was an outright lie. We have a photo from that same day showing the rain and a very cloudy day. These people live in a world of delusion that makes us pity them. This was a clear attempt to draw more parents to the event.

Parents = Money

The workers did all they could to cover up the mold. Many places were painted over or just had paper simply taped up to cover the horrible black mess. Of course, there were still many places that were missed since the entire school is covered with the mold. And finally, one place was developing mold right next to an electrical outlet box. Most people know that this could easily be a fire hazard. But as usual, the school responds to these issues with a wave and a “nothing to see here” attitude.

[yewwahtruth-blog]

Follow up email from the next day.

Fear and shame is the name of the game.

Everything must look perfect so they can enroll as many students as they can. Marketing has a massive budget, but when it comes to academics, the priority just isn’t there.

I hope you all can see and understand how this school operates. Yew Wah is a front. Any parent who is silly enough to believe the facade in front of them deserves uneducated kids.

Simply put. Things like this are a money grab. They want teachers to make sure the student work on display has no mistakes in it so they can make parents believe that their kids can obtain perfection as well. This kind of behavior is not ethical and takes the pride away from students and their work and turns it into teacher work.

Should be interesting to see how they respond tomorrow.

[yewwahtruth-blog]

A typical email. 

The Yew Wah schools are extremely driven by marketing. We must make the school look as best as we can when parents are arriving. It is a very hypocritical mantra. “Make sure you look like you are having lively lessons when the parents walk by.” 

Side note: The marketing department is also in charge of admissions. Just let that sink in.

[yewwahtruth-blog]

Nothing like a fender bender to wake you up.

The school hires out buses and drivers in order to get the faculty and staff to and from school everyday. The commute takes about 45 minutes from the populated and somewhat convenient area if Huadu. How reliable are they? They are pretty good for the most part, but it wasn’t always so.

But if you’re worried about that long commute, don’t be. From 2016, all foreign staff will be forced to live in a community near the school called “Sky Villa”. We’ll post more about that later. Just know that it is completely isolated, zero convenience, and dangerously far from a hospital. Give you one guess why the school would do this and not provide an option.

Money.

The school saves buckets of money to keep the teachers isolated.