First, thanks to my 8am class for the surprisingly spirited conversation about feminism today.
During class, a student brought up an article he had read about "one of the feminist leaders" (I didn't realize we had any! I am thrilled!) making a comment about "fart rape".
This seemed rather unlikely to me, and I suggested that the article might be satire (more than once I've fallen for satirical blog posts over on sites like The Onion, so I really can't blame this student for buying into the joke). After class, the student forwarded the article to me.
Here is a link to the article: Can a Fart be Misogynist? (http://thewaterpipe.wordpress.com/2013/12/22/can-a-fart-be-misogynist/)
A Little Lesson on Journalism, Credibility, Satire, and Slander
Let's look at the source: is it credible? "The Waerpipe" seems to be someone's blog (rather than a news outlet, or a site with folks who practice any kind of legitimate journalism--i.e. folks who are paid to do a job, or who answer to some kind of editor with credentials, experience, and qualifications). This site also seems to have articles with titles like "Is a chimp smarter than a feminist?" which would lead me to believe that they're, if nothing else, a little bit biased.
On further examination (I googled), while Ashley Ingle is a real person (and yes, a feminist), the only references to this "fart" situation are posted on:
Reddit - Needless to say, Reddit is not a peer reviewed news source. It's a bunch of people (predominantly men) getting together to talk about shit. Very rarely is anything on Reddit sourced or cited, therefore very rarely is it reliable.
Dissembling.org - Again, this is someone else's blog. The blog appears to be anti just about everything...anti feminism, anti global warming/climate change, anti immigration, etc...--are we seeing a political bias? Maybe a bit?
A Voice For Men - AVFM is a MRA website. Traditionally, MRAs kind of hate feminists.
What I'm trying to say here is, none of these sites are reputable, and every single one of them has a bias towards really, really hating women feminists. Kinda starts to seem like the story about the farts might be made up, right?
If you go and take a look at the youtube video of Ashley's speech (which the screencaptured picture in the article is taken from) you'll see she mentions nothing about farts, or "fart rape". She's talking about the anarchist agenda, which certainly a lot of people find silly and don't agree with, but bodily functions are not once mentioned: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fjzDKlH8xRU
It's extremely important as both a student of English and as a person in the world, to be critical of the media we consume. Be critical of feminism, if you wish. Be critical of people like Ashley Ingle. But you also need to be critical of un-sourced, un-checked articles that vaguely attempt to character assassinate political activists with hyperbolic articles that are, essentially, poorly executed fart jokes.
Getting off my soap box now, peace