Mandelbrot Resequenced Tomograph by pifactorial
NASA
Keni
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her

Kiana Khansmith
untitled
One Nice Bug Per Day

Product Placement
TMBGareOK. The Official They Might Be Giants tumblr
★

titsay
No title available
ojovivo
h

PR's Tumblrdome
Xuebing Du
Misplaced Lens Cap
todays bird
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵

@theartofmadeline

No title available

seen from Netherlands
seen from Vietnam

seen from Nepal

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Russia
seen from Singapore

seen from Germany
seen from Colombia
seen from Poland
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Dominican Republic

seen from United States
seen from Australia

seen from Netherlands

seen from Bangladesh
seen from Indonesia
seen from Brazil
seen from Saudi Arabia

seen from Türkiye

seen from India
@4dspacetime
Mandelbrot Resequenced Tomograph by pifactorial
Sally Ride was the first American woman in space. Google just honored her in a really cool way.
Sally Ride was the first American woman to travel to space.
Born on May 26, 1951, Sally Ride is best known for being the first American woman — and third woman overall — to travel to space. Since Ride’s June 1983 flight, dozens of other American women have completed missions for NASA. In total, more than 50 women have ventured into space.
She died in 2012 at the age of 61 after being diagnosed with pancreatic cancer.
Google honored her by putting together a series of four Sally Ride-themed doodles in honor of what would have been her 64th birthday.
Read her life partner Tam O'Shaughnessy’s amazing blog about Sally Ride’s legacy here.
Quantum Tunneling
Quantum tunneling refers to the quantum mechanical phenomenon where a particle tunnels through a barrier that it classically could not surmount. This plays an essential role in several physical phenomena, such as the nuclear fusion that occurs in main sequence stars like the Sun. It has important applications to modern devices such as the tunnel diode, quantum computing, and the scanning tunneling microscope. The effect was predicted in the early 20th century and its acceptance as a general physical phenomenon came mid-century.
Tunneling is often explained using the Heisenberg uncertainty principle and the wave–particle duality of matter. Pure quantum mechanical concepts are central to the phenomenon, so quantum tunneling is one of the novel implications of quantum mechanics.
source
Famed ‘A Beautiful Mind’ mathematician John Nash, wife, killed in N.J. Turnpike crash
By Ted Sherman and Myles Ma | NJ Advance Media for NJ.com Email the author on May 24, 2015 at 8:33 AM, updated May 24, 2015 at 1:20 PM
MONROE — John Forbes Nash Jr., the brilliant Princeton University mathematician whose life story was the subject of the film “A Beautiful Mind,” was killed with his wife Alicia on Saturday in a crash on the New Jersey Turnpike.
Nash was 86. Alicia Nash was 82. The couple lived in Princeton Junction.
Police said the two were in a taxi traveling southbound in the left lane of the turnpike when the driver of the Ford Crown Victoria lost control as he tried to pass a Chrysler in the center lane, crashing into a guard rail near Interchange 8A in Monroe Township, according to State Police Sgt. Gregory Williams.
(…)
Nash had been in Norway on Tuesday to receive the Abel Prize for Mathematicsfrom King Harald V for his work, along with longtime colleague Louis Nirenberg, for their work on nonlinear partial differential equations.
Reached at his home Sunday, Nirenberg, who had known Nash since the 1950s, called him a “wonderful mathematician.” After flying back with the couple back from Norway, he said they got into a taxi at the airport for the ride back home together.
Nash, a West Virginia Native, shared a Nobel Prize for Economics in 1994, the year before he joined the Princeton mathematics department as a senior research mathematician. He is known for his work in game theory and his struggle with paranoid schizophrenia, depicted in the 2001 film, “A Beautiful Mind,” starring Russell Crowe.
(continue reading at NJ.com…)
Adults recall math as a sort of NCAA tournament. Everybody gets eliminated. It's only a question of how long you stay in the game.
Great article.
Quantum probability density for a off-minimum initial state in a harmonic oscillator.
Non-normalized quantum wavefunction in a box with two exponential bumps.
Assignment
For my science/math followers...I’m coming back, slowly. Things have been really busy and they are just now starting to clear up. So until I get back to things, I’m giving you a homework assignment (also to test \( \LaTeX \)). So here is your problem:
Show that the quantum-mechanical partition function of a system of N interacting particles approaches the classical form $$ \mathcal{Z}_N = \frac{1}{N! h^{3N}} \int e^{-\beta E(\mathbf{q},\mathbf{p})} \, d^{3N}q \, d^{3N} p $$
as the mean thermal wavelength \( \lambda \) becomes much smaller than (1) the inter-particle distance \( (V/N)^{1/3} \) and (2) a characteristic length \( r_0 \) of the inter-particle potential.
Hell, if I could explain it to the average person, it wouldn't have been worth the Nobel prize.
Richard Feynman
Can anyone please discuss with me why DB Larson's Reciprocal System theory of physics is wrong. Larson's system seems to have predicted a number of physical phenomena (i.e. quasars) and seems to explain things like why cosmic radiation is diffusely scattered across the universe, & why there is gravity. He sets out ideas that propose to be a unified field theory. But nobody seems to have heard of him or his theory!
DB Larson's system is, at the the cost of seeming blunt, pseudoscience.
In his works (which can be readily found on the internet), he makes claims regarding the speed of light, atomic physics, and astrophysics, among related topics. However, all of his works share the same attribute: they are all talk. Larson makes no actual predictions in his works, and thus fails at step 2 of the scientific method. Considering that none of his work uses math (and all of modern, proven science does) he has a ways to go.
All of the theories he is claiming to be wrong have been confirmed innumerable times by physical experiment. To mention your examples, quasars, the CMB anistropy and such are currently well understood, and the current theories match the observable data very well. The interpretation may be slightly off in some cases, but the people who work on these topics know what they're doing very well.
Frankly, these kinds of people are dime a dozen. Professors in nearly every university get emails daily from people who claim to have solved major problems in theoretical physics. These people somehow manage to outsmart every highly educated expert out there (who spent their lives working on it), but also while not being educated in the subject to begin with! There is something to be said for unorthodox solutions and out-of-the-box thinking, but to make those sorts of logical deductions, one must first know where the edges of the box are.
Scientists from the University of Cambridge believe they have solved the longstanding mystery of where superconductivity emerges in high-temperature superconductors. Equipped with this knowledge, scientists may be able to tap into the astronomical potential of these materials which could have applications in a wide variety of technologies, from magnetic levitating trains to supercomputers.
VERY big news if this works out.
Via Twitter.
LHCb confirms existence of exotic hadrons
First direct evidence of cosmic inflation
Almost 14 billion years ago, the universe we inhabit burst into existence in an extraordinary event that initiated the Big Bang. In the first fleeting fraction of a second, the universe expanded exponentially, stretching far beyond the view of our best telescopes. All this, of course, was just theory.
"Detecting this signal is one of the most important goals in cosmology today. A lot of work by a lot of people has led up to this point," said John Kovac (Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics), leader of the BICEP2 collaboration.
These groundbreaking results came from observations by the BICEP2 telescope of the cosmic microwave background — a faint glow left over from the Big Bang. Tiny fluctuations in this afterglow provide clues to conditions in the early universe. For example, small differences in temperature across the sky show where parts of the universe were denser, eventually condensing into galaxies and galactic clusters.
Since the cosmic microwave background is a form of light, it exhibits all the properties of light, including polarization. On Earth, sunlight is scattered by the atmosphere and becomes polarized, which is why polarized sunglasses help reduce glare. In space, the cosmic microwave background was scattered by atoms and electrons and became polarized too.
"Our team hunted for a special type of polarization called ‘B-modes,’ which represents a twisting or ‘curl’ pattern in the polarized orientations of the ancient light," said co-leader Jamie Bock (Caltech/JPL).
(…)
Imgur is home to the web's most popular image content, curated in real time by a dedicated community through commenting, voting and sharing.
Scientists at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Report Breakthrough in Producing Fusion Reactions
The National Ignition Facility’s 192 laser beams focus onto a tiny target. Image: LLNL
Researchers at a laboratory in California say they’ve had a breakthrough in producing fusion reactions with a giant laser. The success comes after years of struggling to get the laser to work and is another step in the decades-long quest for fusion energy.
Omar Hurricane, a researcher at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, says that for the first time, they’ve produced significant amounts of fusion by zapping a target with their laser. “We’ve gotten more energy out of the fusion fuel than we put into the fusion fuel,” he says.
Strictly speaking, while more energy came from fusion than went into the hydrogen fuel, only about 1 percent of the laser’s energy ever reached the fuel. Useful levels of fusion are still a long way off. “They didn’t get more fusion power out than they put in with the laser,” says Steve Cowley, the head of a huge fusion experiment in the U.K. called the Joint European Torus, or JET.
The laser is known as the National Ignition Facility, or NIF. Constructed at a cost of more than $3 billion, it consists of 192 beams that take up the length of three football fields. For a brief moment, the beams can focus 500 trillion watts of power — more power than is being used in that same time across the entire United States — onto a target about the width of a No. 2 pencil.
The goal is fusion: a process where hydrogen atoms are squeezed together to make helium atoms. When that happens, a lot of energy comes out. It could mean the answer to the world’s energy problems, but fusion is really, really hard to do. Hurricane says that each time they try, it feels like they’re taking a test.
"Of course you want to score real well, you think you’ve learned the material, but you just have to see how you do," he says.
Over the past few years, NIF has been getting a fat “F.”For all its power, it just couldn’t get the hydrogen to fuse, and researchers didn’t know why. The failures have led NIF’s critics to label the facility an enormous waste of taxpayer dollars. In 2012, the government shifted NIF away from its fusion goals to focus on its other mission:simulating the conditions inside nuclear weapons.
But the fusion experiments continued, and Hurricane says researchers now understand why their original strategy wasn’t working. In the journal Nature, he and his colleagues report that they’ve finally figured out how to squeeze the fuel with the lasers. By doing a lot of squeezing right at the start, they were able to keep the fuel from churning and squirting out. The lasers squeezed evenly and the hydrogen turned into helium.
The new technique can’t reach “ignition,” which is the point at which the hydrogen fusion feeds on itself to make more. Even so, JET’s Cowley says, this is still a big moment for NIF.
"I think it’s still a very important step forward, they reached fusion conditions, they made some fusion happen, and that’s not been done before [with a laser]," he says.
Hurricane says no one knows for sure whether NIF can really reach the point of ignition. “It’s not up to me; it’s up to Mother Nature,” he says. “But we’re certainly going to try.”
Source
Further reading:
Nuclear fusion milestone passed at US lab
Scientists see solution to critical barrier to fusion
Nuclear Fusion In Our Time? Scientists Outline Hurdles To Potentially Transformative Energy
The film about the Large Hadron Collider “Particle Fever” is set to be released in select theaters on March 5th, 2014. Check out the website http://particlefever.com as it looks like one will also be able to stream it at some point!