"don't worry about them, it's just you and me right now"
No title available
Xuebing Du

No title available

pixel skylines

Kiana Khansmith
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

bliss lane
Jules of Nature
hello vonnie

shark vs the universe
Not today Justin

Origami Around
Claire Keane
YOU ARE THE REASON

titsay
tumblr dot com
EXPECTATIONS

Discoholic đȘ©

Love Begins
Noah Kahan
seen from Colombia
seen from Austria
seen from United States
seen from Netherlands
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from France

seen from Germany
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Chile
seen from Bangladesh

seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from Italy
seen from TĂŒrkiye
seen from France

seen from Germany
@abanico11
"don't worry about them, it's just you and me right now"
This would've done stupid crazy numbers as a redraw format 10 years ago.
HII I SCREAMED AFTER I SAW THAT YOU WERE ASKING FOR REQUESTS !! I WAS LEGIT JUMPING AROUND MY ROOM AND I AM NOT CAPPING đđđ» PLEASE PLEASE PLEASEEEE WRITE A ZUKOXREADER WHERE THE READER DIES IN THE END thank you i am very happy
Hearts made of glass
Synopsis: In which Zuko finds himself regretting his decisions.
Word count: 1.1k
A/N ~ THANK YOU SO MUCH ANON! This is what i mean when i tell you to send me requests. I love you so much anon, we're married now. MWAH!
zuko: we cannot stay with aang any longer, I do not want my daughterâs first words to be âflameo hotmanâ
A direct sequel to this by @ohwait-shesinspace
The Bird belongs to @justcakethanks and the fabulous eridian welcoming committee, of course
Has this been done yet
Edit: was not expecting this to blow up, and I've seen some people mistake this as an original idea, so here is the original post this is based on
Rewatching ATLA and I just can't stop wondering, how come this mf still has a fully functioning brain after this much head trauma?
im not very good at drawing rocky yet but i had to get this out there
MARRIED KATAANG YOU WILL ALWAYS BE FAMOUS!!!!!!!!
Their communication methods are getting more advanced. It's too bad the messaging isn't getting any better...
ouch ouch ouch
I just know his ahh was clingy during her pregnancies, esp the first one
I love Kataang I love Kataang I love Kataang I love Kataang I love Kataang I love Kataang I love Kataang I love Kataang I love Kataang I love Kataang I love Kataang I love Kataang I love Kataang
always some new bullshit in the ocean
Why is it always orcas or dolphins
Why can't a salmon do some bullshit for once
worry not âïž they're doing coke
the gaang
If anyone has platonic shen jiu & yue qingyuan fics where yqy reveals why he couldn't come back for shen jiu in time and they cry and hug and shen jiu finally calls him qi ge again... please lmk... thank you...
This cannot be happening to me
kind of a side thought from a couple of my posts about writing but I think it deserves its own post, so here goes:
when youâre writing a conflict between two characters or factions of characters, you need to consider whether their disagreement over the premise or over the methods. put another way: do they disagree on the problem or the solution?
this is a genuinely tricky thing to identify, especially in very complex narratives, so letâs do some very simple examples.
the situation: pacifist nation X is about to be invaded by empire Y. the laws and cultural practices of the Xians make violence and death so abhorrent that even accidental death is as minimized as possible. the Ylings, on the other hand, are totally cool with straight up murder and think diplomacy is for wimps, but are also pragmatic enough that they wonât waste troops if they donât need to. the king of X calls in his council and asks for their opinions.
character A: It is more noble to die for oneâs beliefs than to live having broken them. We should allow the Ylings to invade us and if we die, we die. character B: If all life is sacred, then our lives are also sacred. We must fight back against the Ylings, even though that means weâd be committing violence.
A and B agree on premise but not solution: they both acknowledge that the Yling invasion is a bad thing that will lead to their deaths if unopposed and that the nonviolence code is important; what they disagree on is priorities and methods.
character C: We should invite them into our nation as honored guests. Maybe theyâll spare us or at least kill us more mercifully. character D: We should propose an alliance and intentional annexation in exchange for our lives. Being part of the Yling Empire is a pretty sweet deal, actually.
C and D agree on solution but not premise: theyâre both okay with just letting the empire walk in and invade, but C thinks the invasion would be a bad thing and is just trying to minimize the damage, and D thinks it would be a good thing and wants to maximize the rewards.
character E: We should fight the Ylings and stay a sovereign nation; the nonviolence code is stupid and holding us back. character D: We shouldnât fight the Ylings and try to be peacefully part of their empire instead; weâd be true to our code and reap the rewards of an alliance.
E and F disagree on both premise and solution.
Now, all possible permutations of this argument are fine. âIs this the best way to solve the problem?â and âWhat actually is the problem?â are both great sources of conflict. Captain America: The Winter Soldierâs entire plot is an argument over the methods to prevent death and crime, but everyone agrees that crime is bad; one of Zukoâs big character development moments is when he realizes that the problem with the world isnât the other nations ungratefully rejecting the prosperity and unity offered by the Fire Nation, but that the Fire Nation routinely commits genocide in their quest to colonize the rest of the world.
The issue is when a disagreement over methods is treated like a disagreement over premise. The characters are positioned like one sideâs entire worldview is correct and the other is wrong, but it turns out they actually disagree with what the other does rather than what the other believes.
A big giveaway that what youâre seeing is about methods and not underlying beliefs? If at any point it is said or implied that one character âgoes too far.â âToo farâ implies a point before that cutoff that the other characters or the reader would be okay with. You canât go too far if going any distance in that direction is wrong. âFrollo in the Disney version of The Hunchback of Notre Dame goes too far when he tries to kill all the Romani in the cityâ implies that the problem isnât racism in general, but mass murder specifically, and that if Frollo was only nonviolently racist, that would be fine!
Like, you know the joke about the guy who offers a woman a million dollars to sleep with him, then ten dollars after she accepts the million dollar offer, and when sheâs offended and says sheâs ânot that kind of woman,â he says, âOh, we agreed you were that kind of woman, now weâre just haggling over priceâ? If your characters are arguing about the best way to solve a problem, they have already agreed about the existence and nature of the problem. Now theyâre just haggling over price.
Again: that kind of storyline is okay if you actually do want to discuss extremism v. moderation of the same basic principle. Itâs okay for two characters to argue over the best way to free all of their countryâs slaves. Itâs also okay for two characters to discuss the best way of practicing slavery, if you want to show how ingrained it is in society or how even the character you think is a moderate is still evil or something. What doesnât work is if your intention is to say how awful slavery is, but then the entire conflict is over the treatment of slaves rather than whether slavery is okay.
tl;dr: setting up the conflict as one over premise and then having all the action be a fight over methods undermines your story; at best itâs just confusing, at worst it turns your characters into hypocrites.
I would add a third piece to this (or really split out âsolutionâ into two pieces):
There is the problem, the end, and the means, and those are all things that can be disagreed with in different ways.
Letâs take a very basic scenario. Two people live together. There is a bookshelf full of books and there are books all over the floor.
Disagreement on the problem:
Person 1 thinks there are too many books on the floor. Person 2 likes having books on the floor because it makes the house feel lived-in.
Disagreement on the end:
Person 1 and 2 have agreed that there are too many books on the floor. Person 1 thinks the ideal end is that the house has exactly one bookshelf worth of books in it. Person 2 thinks the ideal solution is every book remaining in the house but simply being somewhere that is not the floor.
Disagreement on the means:
Person 1 and 2 have agreed that the ideal solution is every book remaining in the house and being on a bookshelf. Person 1 thinks they should buy more bookshelves to fit every book. Person 2 thinks they should double- or triple-stack their shelves rather than spend money on new bookshelves.
This is obviously a very light example, but I think itâs not just problem/solution but âdo we agree what problem we are solving, do we agree what the solution should be, do we agree on how to get there.â
Rocky dumbing down his speech for Grace only reinforces the idea that Grace is a kid in the other Eridians eyes and multiple conversations are happening at once..
Eridian scientist: why did they send a baby to space?!
Rocky: Grace is not a baby. Heâs a fully grown human and you all need to respect that-
At the same time another Eridian: the human is thirty!! Are you COMPLETELY sure heâs not a child? Heâs barely coordinated!
Rocky: Grace is very sick!! Of course heâs not coordinated you fucking idiot-
ALSO at the same time: did you not think to teach him how to understand us properly?? Let alone communicate with us.
Rocky: he doesnât have the vocal cords for most of our sounds!! And we were WORKING on him being able to understand proper speech but heâs delirious?! The fact heâs conscious is a miracle-
Grace who is visible stressed and half covering his ears but also trying to listen: whatâs going on?? I canât hear you guys itâs too loud- Rocky whatâs going on?!
Rocky: apology apology other Eridians ask dumb dumb dumb questions, Rocky tell Grace later. Grace sleep now Rocky handle.
Grace just nods with bleary eyes and knocks out almost immediately, and the other Eridians are giving Rocky the equivalent of a raised eyebrow in unison.