Monterey Bay Aquarium

tannertan36
Mike Driver
KIROKAZE
No title available
Not today Justin

Andulka
No title available
h

Kiana Khansmith
RMH
Cosimo Galluzzi

pixel skylines

Kaledo Art

Discoholic đȘ©
ojovivo

â
sheepfilms

Product Placement
NASA

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from Norway
seen from Sweden

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
@abortionismurder
Relatives of Guiseppe "Joe" Ulleri, 61, spoke of a "fragmented" care approach and claimed he was denied food for almost three weeks due to m
Luke 6:28 (NKJV) - bless those who curse you, and pray for those who spitefully use you.
Unfortunately probably B.
Most definitely B since abortion cannot be defined as murder nor is it performed on children.
Assuming you arent pregnant with a giraffe, it is, indeed, performed on a child. Especially since we arent human based on where we happen to be. Like the womb.
Basic biology says we are human. Basic biology says once conception happens the baby has itâs own DNA.
Even abortionists dont use the logic that itâs a clump of cells anymore. They call the baby a baby. Because science dictates thatâs what it is.
Now, since science says it is a human, not a giraffe, that we are giving birth toâŠlogic dictates that if we kill or end the life of the human in the womb, it is in fact murder.
That is the logical conclusion. It would be third degree murder. Malice of forethought. You go to the clinic and get a checkup, you pay the hitman, you come back to the clinic, have the abortion, and the abortionist comes out 1,000 dollars richer. The abortionist counts the pieces of the baby to make sure they are all there. Brain? Check. Skull? Check. Arms? Check. Murder? Yes.
âAbortionistsâ. Lol.
Children and fetuses are two different things or so science actually says, thus item B will murder far more children than item A.
Medical care is not murder. Self-defense is not murder. As has been stated and proven over and over, murder is a legal term with specific criteria that abortion doesnât fall into.
Youâre right, a fetus is a baby in a stage of human development. Not giraffe development.
So, if forced sterilization is considered healthcare, is it permissible? What about medical suicide? Show me real law cases where it has been âshown and provenâ. And no, I dont mean the Supreme Court as all they can do is interpret laws not make them.
Murder is the taking of life with malice of forethought. Last I checked, a separate DNA is a separate person. (Human DNA)
How is that not murder? The abortion âdoctorâ counts the limbs and HUMAN body parts on a tray to make sure they are all there. Since it is HUMAN the killing of it and paying of the doctor makes it murder. Laws change.
Itâs not murder when there is a threat to someoneâs life. And since pregnancy will always present a threat to the pregnant personâs life, it should be their choice whether to remain in that threatening state or not.
Thatâs why I said abortion is also self-defense.
Yet there is no such thing as an emergency abortion. When my mother could have died with my older sister, they delivered my sister two months early.
When my baby sister was diagnosed with a calcified heart (inside and out) her statistics were thrown off by abortions. She had a 50% chance to live because MOST people aborted. 1 death without an abortion. The other 50% survived.
My friends baby was pronounced dead, but a couple weeks later there was a heartbeat again, even though they offered to clean out the baby on the spot.
Another friend took mountain dew into a planned parenthood to be tested and they came back with a positive pregnancy test.
Self defense against a baby? Wow.
Unfortunately probably B.
Most definitely B since abortion cannot be defined as murder nor is it performed on children.
Assuming you arent pregnant with a giraffe, it is, indeed, performed on a child. Especially since we arent human based on where we happen to be. Like the womb.
Basic biology says we are human. Basic biology says once conception happens the baby has itâs own DNA.
Even abortionists dont use the logic that itâs a clump of cells anymore. They call the baby a baby. Because science dictates thatâs what it is.
Now, since science says it is a human, not a giraffe, that we are giving birth toâŠlogic dictates that if we kill or end the life of the human in the womb, it is in fact murder.
That is the logical conclusion. It would be third degree murder. Malice of forethought. You go to the clinic and get a checkup, you pay the hitman, you come back to the clinic, have the abortion, and the abortionist comes out 1,000 dollars richer. The abortionist counts the pieces of the baby to make sure they are all there. Brain? Check. Skull? Check. Arms? Check. Murder? Yes.
âAbortionistsâ. Lol.
Children and fetuses are two different things or so science actually says, thus item B will murder far more children than item A.
Medical care is not murder. Self-defense is not murder. As has been stated and proven over and over, murder is a legal term with specific criteria that abortion doesnât fall into.
You're right, a fetus is a baby in a stage of human development. Not giraffe development.
So, if forced sterilization is considered healthcare, is it permissible? What about medical suicide? Show me real law cases where it has been "shown and proven". And no, I dont mean the Supreme Court as all they can do is interpret laws not make them.
Murder is the taking of life with malice of forethought. Last I checked, a separate DNA is a separate person. (Human DNA)
How is that not murder? The abortion "doctor" counts the limbs and HUMAN body parts on a tray to make sure they are all there. Since it is HUMAN the killing of it and paying of the doctor makes it murder. Laws change.
Unfortunately probably B.
Most definitely B since abortion cannot be defined as murder nor is it performed on children.
Assuming you arent pregnant with a giraffe, it is, indeed, performed on a child. Especially since we arent human based on where we happen to be. Like the womb.
Basic biology says we are human. Basic biology says once conception happens the baby has it's own DNA.
Even abortionists dont use the logic that it's a clump of cells anymore. They call the baby a baby. Because science dictates that's what it is.
Now, since science says it is a human, not a giraffe, that we are giving birth to...logic dictates that if we kill or end the life of the human in the womb, it is in fact murder.
That is the logical conclusion. It would be third degree murder. Malice of forethought. You go to the clinic and get a checkup, you pay the hitman, you come back to the clinic, have the abortion, and the abortionist comes out 1,000 dollars richer. The abortionist counts the pieces of the baby to make sure they are all there. Brain? Check. Skull? Check. Arms? Check. Murder? Yes.