First–Generation: Not just a burden, but also a badge of honor
The above video appeared on the New York Times website last week. The clip, along with the Laura Pappono article it accompanies, “First Generation Students Unite,” reveals insights into the under-reported lives of first-generation college students. This group of young people are diverse, creative, smart, and proud. (By no coincidence, so are Aim High students and alumni – most of whom are or will be first-generation college students). Now, as the article reports, first-generation students are finding each other on campuses, supporting one another, organizing and creating change.
Watch for the end of the video. A few of the students interviewed drop some really profound points: 1. First-generation student are transforming the institutions of higher education, 2. Their presence, their efforts, their perspectives are closing America’s empathy gap, and helping to bring about a more just society.
What’s good in Arts & Culture: Diverse responses to adverse circumstances
This American Life just aired a radio story, by Channa Joffe-Walt, that compares the high school experiences of very different students who faced very different sets of advantages, disadvantages, and pressures. The piece, called “Three Miles” (embedded below) tells us a lot of what we already know about how different people respond to differently to adversity. The piece leaves us with a lot of what we already feel about those around us who face adversity – both hope and fear.
What's new however, is how ordinary the story makes its protagonists sound. Many of us have known people who are victims of circumstance, of injustice, of an unequal society. Many of us have also know people who triumph in the face of adversity – people who persevere, despite a deck that is stacked against them like some impenetrable border fence. Yet, out of an innate resilience or some encounters with great mentors, they succeed. Pretty powerful stuff.
Re–Post – Arts & Culture: College admissions edition
This post originally went up on Sunday in response to a Frank Bruni article in the NYTimes. I’m re-posting now, because the themes have continued to surface for us at RU–C Aim High this week. Also, I don’t know if the article featured well enough.
The article, “How to Survive the College Admissions Madness,” originally appeared in the NYTimes on 3/13/15. Check it out, and then check out the RU–Camden Aim High Post by clicking “Keep reading,” below.
A Frank Bruni piece in Friday’s NYTimes – “How to Survive the College Admissions Process” – encapsulates the pressure-cooker, winner-take-all, high-stakes, make-or-break world that the college application process has become. And, Bruni bemoans this world:
What madness. And what nonsense.
FOR one thing, the admissions game is too flawed to be given so much credit. For another, the nature of a student’s college experience — the work that he or she puts into it, the self-examination that’s undertaken, the resourcefulness that’s honed — matters more than the name of the institution attended. In fact students at institutions with less hallowed names sometimes demand more of those places and of themselves. Freed from a focus on the packaging of their education, they get to the meat of it.
The op-ed profiles a few students, most from well-to-do backgrounds, who persevered through the adversity of landing on their second, third, or fourth choice institutions. Bruni argues that the ‘quality’ of college that accepts you says nothing about your value as a person, nor about the heights you can reach, “Education happens across a spectrum of settings and in infinite ways, and college has no monopoly on the ingredients for professional achievement or a life well lived.”
Nevertheless, our culture’s praise, its hagiography, of the ‘elite’ institutions subverts the very purpose of higher education. “College is a singular opportunity to rummage through and luxuriate in ideas, to realize how very large the world is and to contemplate your desired place in it. And that’s lost in the admissions mania, which sends the message that college is a sanctum to be breached — a border to be crossed — rather than a land to be inhabited and tilled for all that it’s worth.”
The piece ultimately makes a point that is too seldom made: you can succeed, you are valuable, you can discover ideas, you can have new experiences at a lot of different colleges – not just the ‘top-tier,’ three-hundred-year-old, $50k/year universities.
But, some important questions remain. First, maybe the elite institutions are not the only places where students can succeed, but what are the places? How do students identify the places that have the right mix of support, academic rigor, and opportunity?
The students that Bruni profiles, students from relatively well-to-do backgrounds, had some freedom to explore and try things. While those students might have faced some disappointment when they were not accepted to their top-choice schools, they had options. Students from lower income and minority backgrounds, however, feel high stakes not simply based on peer pressure, but also because, if they land in the ‘wrong’ school, they do not have as much to fall back on.
The take home message is this: You should aspire to schools that are right for you, not those that are right in the eyes of our consumerist culture. How to find those schools, however, is a process of discernment and introspection and a process of dialogue with parents, teachers, counselors, friends, and, hopefully, Rutgers–Camden Aim High.
What’s good in arts and culture: College admissions edition
A Frank Bruni piece in Friday’s NYTimes – “How to Survive the College Admissions Process” – encapsulates the pressure-cooker, winner-take-all, high-stakes, make-or-break world that the college application process has become. And, Bruni bemoans this world:
What madness. And what nonsense.
FOR one thing, the admissions game is too flawed to be given so much credit. For another, the nature of a student’s college experience — the work that he or she puts into it, the self-examination that’s undertaken, the resourcefulness that’s honed — matters more than the name of the institution attended. In fact students at institutions with less hallowed names sometimes demand more of those places and of themselves. Freed from a focus on the packaging of their education, they get to the meat of it.
The op-ed profiles a few students, most from well-to-do backgrounds, who persevered through the adversity of landing on their second, third, or fourth choice institutions. Bruni argues that the ‘quality’ of college that accepts you says nothing about your value as a person, nor about the heights you can reach, “Education happens across a spectrum of settings and in infinite ways, and college has no monopoly on the ingredients for professional achievement or a life well lived.”
Nevertheless, our culture’s praise, its hagiography, of the ‘elite’ institutions subverts the very purpose of higher education. “College is a singular opportunity to rummage through and luxuriate in ideas, to realize how very large the world is and to contemplate your desired place in it. And that’s lost in the admissions mania, which sends the message that college is a sanctum to be breached — a border to be crossed — rather than a land to be inhabited and tilled for all that it’s worth.”
The piece ultimately makes a point that is too seldom made: you can succeed, you are valuable, you can discover ideas, you can have new experiences at a lot of different colleges – not just the ‘top-tier,’ three-hundred-year-old, $50k/year universities.
But, some important questions remain. First, maybe the elite institutions are not the only places where students can succeed, but what are the places? How do students identify the places that have the right mix of support, academic rigor, and opportunity?
The students that Bruni profiles, students from relatively well-to-do backgrounds, had some freedom to explore and try things. While those students might have faced some disappointment when they were not accepted to their top-choice schools, they had options. Students from lower income and minority backgrounds, however, feel high stakes not simply based on peer pressure, but also because, if they land in the ‘wrong’ school, they do not have as much to fall back on.
The take home message is this: You should aspire to schools that are right for you, not those that are right in the eyes of our consumerist culture. How to find those schools, however, is a process of discernment and introspection and a process of dialogue with parents, teachers, counselors, friends, and, hopefully, Rutgers–Camden Aim High.
The 2015 Rutgers–Camden Aim High Academy is now accepting applications. Go to our official website (http://clc.camden.rutgers.edu/aimhigh.html) to apply.
The Rutgers–Camden Aim High Academy is the best chance for you to take control of you’re future. Whether you have no idea what you want to do in college or where you’d like to go, or if you already have you’re mind set on a specific major and school we will arm you with the skills and information you need to focus your dreams and make your dreams a reality.
Question? Contact Aim High Program Coordinator Matt McCaffrey – [email protected]; 856-225-2922.
What’s good in culture and science? Every now and then RU-C Aim High offers something to think about in the world of culture and science from around the internet.
This post, courtesy of Open Culture, makes for some light Sunday reading and viewing. Ever wonder weather our phones, our tablets, our devices influence the way we think and understand? Even if you haven’t, you will after taking a look at this...
areudirty
theartofmadeline
baratheonpilled
tangentwithtanner
andulkaphoto
prguitarman
germansingergirl
gummygunk
origamiaround
janainaart