Devout
🪼
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

Janaina Medeiros
Not today Justin
Claire Keane

Love Begins
No title available
NASA
hello vonnie
No title available

No title available

tannertan36

Origami Around
Noah Kahan

@theartofmadeline
Cosmic Funnies
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

JVL
Peter Solarz

oozey mess
seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from China
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Indonesia
seen from Russia

seen from Germany

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from Canada

seen from Germany
seen from Singapore
seen from Czechia
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia
@alaaye
Devout
the real MVPs of arcane
In all timelines, in all possibilities.
this is not meljay lmaoo get this out of the tag… 🙄annoying asf
Every time someone says “Eloise isn’t a real feminist at least Penelope did something” I have to laugh. They are making her out to be Lois Lane when she runs a gossip column. Her feminist action is only for her. She found a way profit of the status quo thats it. Gossip isn’t feminist just because its associated with women. Gossip is how we enforce societal expectations by publicly shaming people and reminding others they can always be shamed. The idea that Penelope is a “better” feminist than Eloise is silly. Im not saying Eloise is a perfect feminist of course she isn’t she is sheltered and had to bribe a maid to learn about sex. No one that sheltered will have fully formed feminist theory or activism. But to say Penelope is a good feminist for her individualist actions is wild.
It's essential to recognize that no woman is a perfect feminist because there is no such thing as a perfect, uniform feminism. Feminism and deconstruction are personal and unique processes that each woman undergoes at her own pace, in her own way, with the information and resources available to her. Feminism is both a social and individual construct, with many facets and branches that reflect the cultural, social, and individual diversity of the women who embrace it.
For example, a high-class, white, Christian, English woman will have a different experience of feminism than a mixed-race, Latina, lower-middle-class woman in Argentina. Each positions herself on a branch of feminism that best represents her context and experiences.
With this framework in mind, my perception of Penelope as a feminist is deeply questionable. Despite founding a lucrative business without a man's help, Penelope did so at the expense of other women, which contradicts fundamental feminist principles. She does not practice sisterhood; she views other women as competitors or tools, as seen in her perception of Marina as a rival and Madame Delacroix as a means to an end. Simply being a woman and self-sustaining does not make her a feminist, as exemplified by Margaret Thatcher. Although Thatcher broke many gender barriers by becoming the first female Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, her conservative policies and lack of support for other women in politics were criticized for not aligning with feminist ideals.
Penelope Featherington presents herself as a woman who has defied social expectations by creating Lady Whistledown, but her practice of undermining other women to elevate herself and profit from it is inconsistent with feminist principles. By using her platform to spread gossip and undermine other women's reputations, Penelope perpetuates a culture of competition and surveillance among women instead of promoting solidarity and mutual support. This behavior is the antithesis of feminism, which seeks to empower all women and fight against the structures of oppression that divide us.
In contrast, Eloise Bridgerton cannot be directly labeled as a feminist, especially considering the historical context of 1815 when feminism as we know it did not yet exist. The first wave of feminism in the United Kingdom began between 1830 and 1840. However, as early as 1792, women like Eloise were starting to question traditional gender roles, laying the groundwork for the future feminist movement.
Eloise represents those early women who, without calling themselves feminists, began to entertain feminist ideas. If we placed Eloise in 1830, we could consider her one of the first feminists, perhaps even actively participating in protests. Eloise seeks to break out of her privileged bubble, learn about the world's realities, and advocate for minority rights, despite the limitations imposed by her time and social position. She is a young woman from a prestigious family, close to royalty, and her quest for freedom is hindered by her family's and society's expectations. Deciding to be a spinster is a radical statement in her context, a direct rejection of social norms dictating that women must marry and be compliant.
Eloise demonstrates a critical attitude towards established norms and a genuine curiosity to understand and challenge the injustices faced by women and minorities. She does not just seek her own benefit but is interested in the well-being of other women and the fight for meaningful societal change. While she cannot be categorized as a feminist in the modern sense, her questioning spirit and desire to break with oppressive traditions align her more with feminist principles than Penelope's actions.
On the other hand, Penelope shows no interest in learning about or advocating for minorities. She wants to belong to and benefit from the privileged social circle, seeking validation and acceptance from high society. To achieve this, she created Lady Whistledown, using rumors and secrets about other women to gain control and monetary gains, demonstrating a competitive and utilitarian view of women. Instead of using her influence to promote equity and support among women, Penelope chooses to manipulate and exploit other women's vulnerabilities for her own benefit.
The lack of sisterhood and the exploitation of other women to gain power and personal profit is profoundly problematic and antithetical to feminism. In her quest for validation and status, Penelope perpetuates a culture of division and distrust among women, something that feminism works hard to dismantle.
For all these reasons, it is absurd and offensive to claim that Penelope is more feminist than Eloise. Eloise, with her desire to challenge norms and learn about injustices, embodies the spirit of feminism much more than Penelope, whose behavior undermines the movement's fundamental principles. The true essence of feminism lies in solidarity, mutual support, and the collective struggle for equity and justice for all women, not in personal gain at the expense of others.
Setting aside the beautiful and very professional text I wrote, Penelope epitomizes the white, privileged woman who plays the victim and believes that because she has suffered, she has the right to make others suffer. Instead of confronting those who truly harmed her, she targets those who have done nothing to her. Her envy of the Bridgertons is so deep that she wants to be like them but also wants to hurt them. This is evident from her comment, "You're just a pretty Bridgerton," and her other remark, "At least I did something; you just talk."
Excuse me, Penelope, but at least Eloise talks to minorities as equals, not as if they were her servants.
isn’t it so funny how anti kataang shippers have been saying for years, prior to the release of the Netflix adaptation, that natla will finally make people realize how weird kataang is? and eventually get them to stop shipping it? only for the months following the live action to have the biggest kataang renaissance that i’ve ever seen before.
They swore that kataang was unshippable but in reality the general public loves kataang and always has 😭
Finally watching bridgerton s2 and edwina is kind of a dick, man
You did not watch the same show 😭 lmaoo
I've said it before and I'll say it again, Kate warning Edwina about Anthony in episodes 2-3 does not give Kate a free pass to ruin her sister's life. Hope that helps.
Oh my goodness. I haven't watched season one of Bridgerton in a while, but I just watched a scene where Marina tells her she looks lovely and Penelope says, "do not mock me." Jesus. That makes the whole, "well Marina called her fat" lie so much worse.
Marina was nice. Eloise was nice. Edwina was nice. Pen stans say that she's ridiculed by the Ton and yet the people who try to be kind to her end up as LW fodder and her sisters are never brought up once.
Let’s get one thing very straight. Genocide will always be horrible, impactful, and damaging. To minimize it or act like it has no effect would be obtuse, and I’m not here to debate on whether colonization or genocide is worse than the other, especially since often those things intertwine, but even alone, they are evil.
All that being said, the Water Tribes were never colonized. Genocide was definitely enacted by the fire nation onto them, but colonization never happened. Genocide alone still impacted the water tribes heavily, and you can see for yourself when you look at how the Southern Water Tribe looked before the genocides have taken place. Not only that, genocide leaves damaging effects psychologically, as evidenced by how the people at the SWT seem so visibly emotionally exhausted, and a bit hopeless. But of course losing family members due to it only makes it more difficult and heartbreaking
I’m going to say now, even if the fire nation colonized the water tribes, I’d still ship zutara. So this isn’t a defense of any kind, but this is only an answer to seeing fellow zutarians misuse the word, and I think it’s important to know the difference so we can talk about it properly
It’s good to know that this fandom is full of people who would minimize genocide and colonization because of a fictional ship. Deleting the original tweet doesn’t erase what you said babes
Okay, I may actually have to come back to the fandom now 💀 Marichat is superior
Everyone rooting for Marichat since season 1 now watching season 5 like:
WE LOVE IT HERE LMAO. Haven’t watched the show in years tho
Annabeth (+ Luke)
rb to give a snout-out to the gays
snout out too the gays
Extra: Yuri is the chef
Hansung Yu and LPB Ren deserved (ordered) some payback after what they did to Bam and Anaak in s1, so Bam and Anaak brought them revenge 🍣 No shinheuh were harmed in the making of this comic. Made in march 2022 or something, I can't remember
I'm sure I've said this before but it's like so weird to me how people tend to think of scientific interest as antithetical to sentiment like noo.. What do you think drives people to study something so intently. Do you really think there's no passion behind it. Have you ever heard a scientist talk
People will be so captivated by a certain subject they devote their lives to it & then the general public is like "numbers are the opposite of feelings though"
thinking about the thesmophoria and how it was a festival celebrating demeter and persephone’s relationship & their separation/reunion, and how that’s paralleled in real life with it being a women’s festival that allowed women to reconnect with each other within a society where most of the year they were isolated from each other, and mothers and daughters were separated at a young age…. the inherent trauma of women being torn from each other, and the joy and power in their reunion…. interwoven myth and reality….