intro
he/him, 17
proship, profic
other blogs:
starker blog - @fuckerstarker
mcu blog - @iron-man-wife
other socials:
ao3
no dni, follow ur own.
TMBGareOK. The Official They Might Be Giants tumblr
★

PR's Tumblrdome
official daine visual archive
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

if i look back, i am lost

Origami Around
taylor price

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club
Interview Vampire Daily
art blog(derogatory)

@theartofmadeline
almost home
The Stonewall Inn
untitled

bliss lane
Claire Keane
h

oozey mess

Love Begins
seen from United States
seen from Chile

seen from Bangladesh
seen from Colombia

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from France
seen from United States
seen from Philippines
seen from United Kingdom
seen from South Korea
seen from Morocco

seen from Israel

seen from United States
seen from North Macedonia

seen from Canada

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia

seen from Iraq
@alcoholicfazbeer
intro
he/him, 17
proship, profic
other blogs:
starker blog - @fuckerstarker
mcu blog - @iron-man-wife
other socials:
ao3
no dni, follow ur own.
Father, it is 2026, you cannot just say that
WillMike Week day 6: Fight/Make Up
Michael getting his dad to infodump business shit over the phone so Mike can jack off to his voice send post
not dadson not brocon but a secret third thing (dad had a kid young so his parents raised them as brothers)
also uh btw im starting a fic with jsut a bunch of willmike oneshots
https://archiveofourown.org/works/85298906
William totally gave Michael a black credit card btw. Mike tries to act all cool and tough at school but he’s really the biggest nepo-sugar baby Utah’s ever seen.
Guy who's like "yeah I pull bitches" and it's just his son
https://archiveofourown.org/works/74668561/chapters/215012111
FINALLY CHAPTER FIVE
sad daily that my favorite flavor of willmike is uncommon. that man loves his son and would never physically hurt him on purpose. that is his baby. his boy. his greatest creation. his favorite.
william adores michael and gets agitated when people call him "mike" or "mikey". michael's name is perfect, and shortening it is undermining william.
william always makes sure to take care of michael before himself. michael is his priority. william is a grown man who can wait a few minutes to finish.
he asked tiny michael to draw a new character he wanted for freddy's. william spent the most time making sure foxy looked exactly like michael imagined.
william held michael when he was born and felt alive again.
and he destroyed michael anyways.
William HATES Mike doing anything like drinking, smoking, getting high, etc, with other people. Mike, being a Rebel Teen, of course, does this anyway. to the point William has to bribe Mike with better, more expensive alcohol, cigs, and drugs, so at least he’s destroying his body with what daddy gave him.
child x adult media turns people into pedophiles in the same way queer media turns people gay
those two things aren't comparable and it's weird as hell you made that comparison
I’d like to have a conversation with you about this then.
How aren’t they comparable?
Obviously, they’re not completely one to one, but it’s the same concepts.
The belief that media about fictional sexual and/or romantic relationships can influence people to become attracted to those sort of relationships in real life.
queer media isn't comparable to pedo media because one is between two consenting parties and the other is not
people who argue queer media makes you gay do so because they're bigots
people who argue pedo media makes you a pedo do so because they worry about children
That still doesn’t explain why it would impact the human brain differently? Why would fictional nonconsensual relationships in media impact a person any differently than fictional consensual relationships?
Is it because the noncon ones would be… bad in real life?
Does that mean if a homophobic person, who thinks queer relationships are bad in real life, would become queer after engaging with queer media because they find that media bad??
>why would fictional nonconsensual relationships in media impact a person any differently than fictional consensual relationships?
yeah it is because the noncon ones would be bad in real life and are often bad in fiction too when sexualized and romanticized because it communicates to the viewer that it's okay
when you put queer media on screen and sexualize and romanticized it, it communicates that it is okay to be queer (which it is)
for the last question, no and I never claimed someone would become a pedo if they engage with pedo media
it all depends on how you feel about it
if that shit turns you on, ur probably a pedo
I think the biggest problem here is that fiction doesn’t affect people the way you think it does.
Fiction itself will not change the average person’s morals. If you are simply reading fanfic, and your MORALS are being changed, that’s something to look into.
If, say, the person engaging with the media was an impressionable child, someone with a mental disability and/or illness that can skew their view on fiction, or someone who has a third party involved (such as someone purposefully showing them this content with the intent of making it seem “okay”) then fiction can affect them in major ways.
But for the average person, that’s just not how it works, at all.
Reading child x adult fanfic will not make you believe that it is okay irl. If it does, that means there’s something else happening there (such as something listed above). If you were to read child x adult fanfic, would it make YOU think that’s okay irl? If you said yes, you’re just telling on yourself.
That last sentence is just… wrong.
Fiction and reality do not exist in the same realm, obviously. And they do not have the same rules.
Someone who has no interest in having sex irl can still like smut, and maybe even turned on by it, and still have no interest in sex irl.
Someone can like certain kinks in fiction (even “unproblematic” ones, like bondage) and not like them irl.
This especially goes for taboo things.
In fiction, no one can be hurt, or abused, or traumatized. There is no victim in fiction.
Which creates a great (and healthy!) way to explore taboo topics, interests, and feelings.
That’s the reason “forbidden love” is such a popular trope. People LOVE taboo fiction, because it’s a way to explore interests and emotions that wouldn’t be safe to explore irl.
you lost me again when u said someone can have no interest in sex irl while still liking smut
sounds like a loser
i wouldn't be reading child x adult smut because I'm not into kids
forbidden love is a bit different than toddler fucking to me
Sounds like you don’t really understand how the human brain works then.
Because people being not interested, or downright repulsed, by sex irl but enjoying it in fiction is pretty common.
So… I just think you’re a bit too uneducated to actually be speaking on his topic, and I would suggest going and doing some of your own research on how fiction does or doesn’t affect the brain, and how fictional interests impact irl interests.
Here’s a website with a bunch of sources. It is very proship centric (clearly), but it does give some good sources on fiction affecting people, and more.
proship resources/studies/articles ^.^
you gave me an inherently biased source no thanks
of course proshippers say fiction does not affect reality and of course they'll cherry pick their sources
then go out and find your own sources ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
have a nice day ^^
child x adult media turns people into pedophiles in the same way queer media turns people gay
those two things aren't comparable and it's weird as hell you made that comparison
I’d like to have a conversation with you about this then.
How aren’t they comparable?
Obviously, they’re not completely one to one, but it’s the same concepts.
The belief that media about fictional sexual and/or romantic relationships can influence people to become attracted to those sort of relationships in real life.
queer media isn't comparable to pedo media because one is between two consenting parties and the other is not
people who argue queer media makes you gay do so because they're bigots
people who argue pedo media makes you a pedo do so because they worry about children
That still doesn’t explain why it would impact the human brain differently? Why would fictional nonconsensual relationships in media impact a person any differently than fictional consensual relationships?
Is it because the noncon ones would be… bad in real life?
Does that mean if a homophobic person, who thinks queer relationships are bad in real life, would become queer after engaging with queer media because they find that media bad??
>why would fictional nonconsensual relationships in media impact a person any differently than fictional consensual relationships?
yeah it is because the noncon ones would be bad in real life and are often bad in fiction too when sexualized and romanticized because it communicates to the viewer that it's okay
when you put queer media on screen and sexualize and romanticized it, it communicates that it is okay to be queer (which it is)
for the last question, no and I never claimed someone would become a pedo if they engage with pedo media
it all depends on how you feel about it
if that shit turns you on, ur probably a pedo
I think the biggest problem here is that fiction doesn’t affect people the way you think it does.
Fiction itself will not change the average person’s morals. If you are simply reading fanfic, and your MORALS are being changed, that’s something to look into.
If, say, the person engaging with the media was an impressionable child, someone with a mental disability and/or illness that can skew their view on fiction, or someone who has a third party involved (such as someone purposefully showing them this content with the intent of making it seem “okay”) then fiction can affect them in major ways.
But for the average person, that’s just not how it works, at all.
Reading child x adult fanfic will not make you believe that it is okay irl. If it does, that means there’s something else happening there (such as something listed above). If you were to read child x adult fanfic, would it make YOU think that’s okay irl? If you said yes, you’re just telling on yourself.
That last sentence is just… wrong.
Fiction and reality do not exist in the same realm, obviously. And they do not have the same rules.
Someone who has no interest in having sex irl can still like smut, and maybe even turned on by it, and still have no interest in sex irl.
Someone can like certain kinks in fiction (even “unproblematic” ones, like bondage) and not like them irl.
This especially goes for taboo things.
In fiction, no one can be hurt, or abused, or traumatized. There is no victim in fiction.
Which creates a great (and healthy!) way to explore taboo topics, interests, and feelings.
That’s the reason “forbidden love” is such a popular trope. People LOVE taboo fiction, because it’s a way to explore interests and emotions that wouldn’t be safe to explore irl.
you lost me again when u said someone can have no interest in sex irl while still liking smut
sounds like a loser
i wouldn't be reading child x adult smut because I'm not into kids
forbidden love is a bit different than toddler fucking to me
Sounds like you don’t really understand how the human brain works then.
Because people being not interested, or downright repulsed, by sex irl but enjoying it in fiction is pretty common.
So… I just think you’re a bit too uneducated to actually be speaking on his topic, and I would suggest going and doing some of your own research on how fiction does or doesn’t affect the brain, and how fictional interests impact irl interests.
Here’s a website with a bunch of sources. It is very proship centric (clearly), but it does give some good sources on fiction affecting people, and more.
proship resources/studies/articles ^.^
child x adult media turns people into pedophiles in the same way queer media turns people gay
those two things aren't comparable and it's weird as hell you made that comparison
I’d like to have a conversation with you about this then.
How aren’t they comparable?
Obviously, they’re not completely one to one, but it’s the same concepts.
The belief that media about fictional sexual and/or romantic relationships can influence people to become attracted to those sort of relationships in real life.
queer media isn't comparable to pedo media because one is between two consenting parties and the other is not
people who argue queer media makes you gay do so because they're bigots
people who argue pedo media makes you a pedo do so because they worry about children
That still doesn’t explain why it would impact the human brain differently? Why would fictional nonconsensual relationships in media impact a person any differently than fictional consensual relationships?
Is it because the noncon ones would be… bad in real life?
Does that mean if a homophobic person, who thinks queer relationships are bad in real life, would become queer after engaging with queer media because they find that media bad??
>why would fictional nonconsensual relationships in media impact a person any differently than fictional consensual relationships?
yeah it is because the noncon ones would be bad in real life and are often bad in fiction too when sexualized and romanticized because it communicates to the viewer that it's okay
when you put queer media on screen and sexualize and romanticized it, it communicates that it is okay to be queer (which it is)
for the last question, no and I never claimed someone would become a pedo if they engage with pedo media
it all depends on how you feel about it
if that shit turns you on, ur probably a pedo
I think the biggest problem here is that fiction doesn’t affect people the way you think it does.
Fiction itself will not change the average person’s morals. If you are simply reading fanfic, and your MORALS are being changed, that’s something to look into.
If, say, the person engaging with the media was an impressionable child, someone with a mental disability and/or illness that can skew their view on fiction, or someone who has a third party involved (such as someone purposefully showing them this content with the intent of making it seem “okay”) then fiction can affect them in major ways.
But for the average person, that’s just not how it works, at all.
Reading child x adult fanfic will not make you believe that it is okay irl. If it does, that means there’s something else happening there (such as something listed above). If you were to read child x adult fanfic, would it make YOU think that’s okay irl? If you said yes, you’re just telling on yourself.
That last sentence is just… wrong.
Fiction and reality do not exist in the same realm, obviously. And they do not have the same rules.
Someone who has no interest in having sex irl can still like smut, and maybe even turned on by it, and still have no interest in sex irl.
Someone can like certain kinks in fiction (even “unproblematic” ones, like bondage) and not like them irl.
This especially goes for taboo things.
In fiction, no one can be hurt, or abused, or traumatized. There is no victim in fiction.
Which creates a great (and healthy!) way to explore taboo topics, interests, and feelings.
That’s the reason “forbidden love” is such a popular trope. People LOVE taboo fiction, because it’s a way to explore interests and emotions that wouldn’t be safe to explore irl.
child x adult media turns people into pedophiles in the same way queer media turns people gay
those two things aren't comparable and it's weird as hell you made that comparison
I’d like to have a conversation with you about this then.
How aren’t they comparable?
Obviously, they’re not completely one to one, but it’s the same concepts.
The belief that media about fictional sexual and/or romantic relationships can influence people to become attracted to those sort of relationships in real life.
queer media isn't comparable to pedo media because one is between two consenting parties and the other is not
people who argue queer media makes you gay do so because they're bigots
people who argue pedo media makes you a pedo do so because they worry about children
That still doesn’t explain why it would impact the human brain differently? Why would fictional nonconsensual relationships in media impact a person any differently than fictional consensual relationships?
Is it because the noncon ones would be… bad in real life?
Does that mean if a homophobic person, who thinks queer relationships are bad in real life, would become queer after engaging with queer media because they find that media bad??
child x adult media turns people into pedophiles in the same way queer media turns people gay
those two things aren't comparable and it's weird as hell you made that comparison
I’d like to have a conversation with you about this then.
How aren’t they comparable?
Obviously, they’re not completely one to one, but it’s the same concepts.
The belief that media about fictional sexual and/or romantic relationships can influence people to become attracted to those sort of relationships in real life.
child x adult media turns people into pedophiles in the same way queer media turns people gay
finally drew them again
what if we were rotting corpses together. and also dadson.