Alexsandra Gabriel

[liberalsarecool]

The history of corporate propaganda.

[pathologising]

Dismiss the idea that you are cursed to suffer for eternity and start bringing little joys into your life NOW. It will build up in time...

[alexsandragabriel]

pls the dramione reference in the summer i turned pretty 💀 they knew their audience wow

[alexsandragabriel]

y was captain hook from once upon a time so hot

[vivienvalentino]

90s outfits that just hit right

[newyork]

Lake Tekapo, New Zealand | Photographer: Kassey Downard

[perrfectly]

[ozei]

[pherfections]

[mysharona1987]

[dysfucktional-queer]

Also even like. Economically. It’s better to give money to poor people. That’s basic Keynesian economics.

Give $600 to someone with no money and they will put it back into the economy, buying groceries, clothes, accommodations, maybe some small luxuries. Give $600 to a rich person and it goes into their bank accounts and just stays there being useless.

[beaniebaneenie]

If you give a poor person $20, that same $20 will be spent easily 10x over, by 10 different people, in 10 different businesses- within a week.

1- poor guy buys groceries at a local bodega.

2- the bodega owner pays his employees from the cash in the register.

3- bodega employee goes to Starbucks and tips the barista in cash.

4- the barista owes their roommate from lunch last week and pays them back

5- roommate buys something from an indie creator on Etsy

6- Etsy creator splurges on takeout & tips in cash

7- the takeout delivery driver fills up on gas

8- gas station manager (who got paid from the register) takes their kid to the ice cream truck

9- Ice cream truck driver buys a new tire and gets an oil change

10- mechanic gets lunch on a shift

....and so on.

Giving money to poor people is the single best way to stimulate and energize the economy... because poor people do something with money that rich people don’t- THEY FUCKING SPEND IT.

[windchimes-in-my-soul]

and someone correct me if I’m wrong but... when they spend, businesses perform better, stocks rise, and your investments grow. It’s actually in everyone’s long term interest. 

[mysharona1987]

[dysfucktional-queer]

Also even like. Economically. It’s better to give money to poor people. That’s basic Keynesian economics.

Give $600 to someone with no money and they will put it back into the economy, buying groceries, clothes, accommodations, maybe some small luxuries. Give $600 to a rich person and it goes into their bank accounts and just stays there being useless.

[beaniebaneenie]

If you give a poor person $20, that same $20 will be spent easily 10x over, by 10 different people, in 10 different businesses- within a week.

1- poor guy buys groceries at a local bodega.

2- the bodega owner pays his employees from the cash in the register.

3- bodega employee goes to Starbucks and tips the barista in cash.

4- the barista owes their roommate from lunch last week and pays them back

5- roommate buys something from an indie creator on Etsy

6- Etsy creator splurges on takeout & tips in cash

7- the takeout delivery driver fills up on gas

8- gas station manager (who got paid from the register) takes their kid to the ice cream truck

9- Ice cream truck driver buys a new tire and gets an oil change

10- mechanic gets lunch on a shift

....and so on.

Giving money to poor people is the single best way to stimulate and energize the economy... because poor people do something with money that rich people don’t- THEY FUCKING SPEND IT.

[windchimes-in-my-soul]

and someone correct me if I’m wrong but... when they spend, businesses perform better, stocks rise, and your investments grow. It’s actually in everyone’s long term interest. 

[nevver]

Pollen count, Zhong Lin

[anxietyproblem]

[anxietyproblem]

[st-pam]

[alexsandragabriel]

people who don’t want to talk about movies/tv shows after watching them are weird af idc

keep that energy away from me

[alexsandragabriel]

I really just bawled my eyes out bc of the wandavision series finale.... I’m the biggest fucking loser