Kinger is anti-endo!!

[anti-willo-kinger]

Hello!

I wanted to join the anti-willo-universe and so here I am!

Disclaimer.

You can call me Kinger, or if you think Kinger is a father figure, I'm okay with being called dad, or similar.

If I get posted on reddits like r/systemcringe or r/fucksystemcringe or r/plural or whatever, don't tell me about it, please!

I am also behind @venting-about-endos and @carousel-coining

I AM A FUCKING ASSHOLE!!! I AM NOT NICE!!!! I'M GOING TO SHAME YOU FOR BREAKING BOUNDARIES!!!!

The person behind this acc prefers to remain private, but if you have a question to them specifically, you can call them Mouse! They have DID and aiming for functional multiplicity.

(if it's unclear what I mean, the alter leading this blog goes by Kinger, while the system itself as a whole is Mouse, and questions regarding Mouse shouldn't be directed at Kinger, and vice versa)

I'm not a fictive, but I just really like Kinger and stole the name. I don't even act like him. I actually curse way too much for that.

I am @pro-willo-kinger too!! that's my resource blog (WIP!!!)

I will mostly be posting CDD stuff, reposting anti-endo/willo things, and sharing support for my fellow systems!

I have no DNI, except of course non-traumagenics and supporters.

also please don't mention shipcourse and don't ask me about it. I don't care. you can interact regardless of stance, but I genuinely hate when I'm asked about it. It's triggering. stop. I'm making a hate campaign against untagged shipcourse in the anti willo verse (/half joke) because fuck you guys

credits for the graphics!!

I cannot find the artist of the pfp, if you know them please lmk

[plut0-plan3tzz]

"Endos aren't claiming to be disordered!! We're not claiming to have DID or OSDD!! 🥺"

Y'all literally added two lines to the DID/OSDD flag and called it yours??

Y'all can't create lies about yourself to make you seem less ableist when it's clearly bullshit

Stop pretending you have a neurocognitive condition that can only be caused by trauma when you don't have trauma.

— ⛔️ (?)

[anti-willo-kinger]

bello kinger

hiii!!! I'm glad to see you back!! I hope everything is okay!!!

[solivan-edu]

HELLO HELLOO!!! i hope you're well too!! everything is peam so far WAHOO

[anti-willo-kinger]

I'm so glad to hear that!!!!

[anti-willo-kinger]

bello kinger

hiii!!! I'm glad to see you back!! I hope everything is okay!!!

[almost-solace]

I want to talk about the side effects of programming that aren’t actual programs. There’s so much more to the trauma than that, such as:

- refusing to form relationships, especially if local, because of the fear that the new person knows or is affiliated with your abuser(s).

- being able to identify exactly what you are feeling, but unable to express the emotion. happy but can’t smile. sad but can’t cry. angry but can’t scream. scared but you’re not shaking.

- letting people hurt you, or hurting yourself, because you enjoy it. not even thinking you deserve it. you genuinely enjoy being hurt, because it’s all you’ve known.

- avoiding certain buildings, rooms, parks, roads, and places because they feel vaguely familiar, but you don’t know why.

- on the contrary, driving straight to those places for the same reason. you don’t know why, but you have a connection to this place, and you have to go.

- always assuming the worst out of loved ones. your partner forgot to text you before they left? they hate you and are plotting how to leave for good. friend gave you a gift? they’re testing your reaction to see if you really like them.

- struggling with hygiene. not because you deserve to not be taken care of, but because you don’t know how to take care of yourself. you don’t know how to brush your teeth. you don’t know how often to change clothes.

- not knowing the difference between good and bad smells. you’re sweaty and people keep looking at you funny? it’s fine, it’s not that strong. someone says your clothes smell dirty? they were cleaned a week ago, so they’re fine.

- finding people who are positive or happy either weird or stupid. i hate that girl, she’s too bubbly. that guy smiles too much. they’re too nice to me, they probably don’t even know what it’s like to suffer.

and it’s never on purpose. usually it’s never even noticed. this is how we survivors have lived for our whole lives. this is the environment we grew up in, the place we learned to survive. and it’s hard to adjust to a world where you are seen as weird, gross, or mentally unwell. it’s hard to open up and get help from people who think you’re too far gone.

[sa1ntg0re]

CW endo discourse

Hey I’ve just figured out my stance on Endogenic systems since I wasn’t aware of the concept before and don’t understand why they get hate.

It just seems to be a different approach to plurality as a spiritual ideal or form of identity? I’m interested in knowing why anyone has an issue with it since it doesn’t seem to be hurting anyone? They aren’t necessarily invading plural/system spaces imo since they are plural. Disorder specific communities and endo identity are different things I’ll say though.

Please don’t take this in bad faith.

they are the result from a hate group, and mainly, I have an issue with them forcing themselves on CDD spaces. you can also see on pluralpedia that they have labels that are essentially made to mock CDD systems (mockgenic, mcdonaldsgenic, sysmedgenic)

as well as harassing trauma victims by creating insults about them being victims of trauma (traumascum, for example)

and simply, there is no proof of them existing in the first place, no scientific proof of why someone could be a system without trauma, because a system forms when trauma causes the brain to create barriers between different alters, and those are what causes splitting (VERY BAD DESCRIPTION OF IT. I'M NOT A DOCTOR)

you can have your own opinion and I don't have a problem with being asked why I feel the way I do, but also I'm not the best person for it since I can't explain myself as well as others do. @/anti-willo-miku and @/anti-willo-solivan are my personal favorites when it comes to their knowledge on it so I suggest you check them out instead

I don't want them to interact with me because if you are not a system because of trauma, I'm not interested in your experiences because they're essentially different from mine, and I don't want to be compared, it very much makes me uncomfortable that something that I see as a consequence of something that ruined my life is for someone something that "just happens".

I used to be pro-endo, but endos are extremely predatory in how they are when someone suspects plurality, and they barely ever acknowledge that someone may have trauma at all.

Being unable to remember your trauma is one of the main symptoms of CDDs, I understand why some people would think they don't have any.

but considering how big their community is, would they not have anything that's a bit more reliable as proof than ccards or tumblr blogs? most of the sources I've been given are either those or some cherry picked parts of larger studies on CDD systems. Or a common misconception of the DSM V, which is a DIAGNOSTIC manual, and states that if someone is not bothered by their multiplicity, they shouldn't be diagnosed with DID (or OSDD). That is because if someone is not already bothered by their possible disorder, a diagnosis will not bring anything positive, and quite the opposite can cause the worsening of someone's symptoms because in your head, if you know something is "wrong", you'll start feeling it much more. It's basically placebo effect but on the negative side.

And also, just think very logically with me for a second. IF there is a form of multiplicity that doesn't come from trauma, it would still be considered a neurodivergency of sorts. Because that's what neurodivergency essentially is, any variation of what the average brain functions. It doesn't matter if youd born with it (like autism is something you're born with, too, for example), as many endos claim, or if you develop it later in life (like CDDs). It would still be considered a neurodivergency because it affects someone's life from a neurological way. And the fact endos claim the opposite kinda goes to show they don't know what the fuck they're talking about.

As for the history of tulpamancy, this post explains it quite well

also thanks for the CW /gen it definitely helps with seeing this as a genuine question, which I do, and again, don't mind at all

I also really hope me tagging tw syscourse doesn't bring endos here. I've had that happen before because "tagging syscourse means you want to be harassed- uhm that you want a discussion! " when I am tagging TW syscourse which is a different thing and it's just a warning.

[anti-willo-kinger]

why do I go away for two weeks and then find out there's drama in the awv. why do you people have to ruin everything

(of course it's because of the discord server and shipcourse, lmao. it really feeds my NPD whenever I'm proven right. Shipcourse is dumb and y'all worry too much about it)

I DON'T KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT IT THO DON'T ASK ME DETAILS I DO NOT KNOW.

I block all shipcourse tags from both antishippers and proshippers I don't like any side of it and I don't see any discussion about it, because it's triggering for me and I am NOT going to look into it so don't ask me please

[anti-willo-kinger]

ANTI ENDO KINGER do you or anyone else have that post about the long extensive history of endogenic "systems" and how the Empowered Multiples movement was horrible and such? I can't find it but we wanna have it handy for whenever we need it!

I have it reblogged on @pro-willo-kinger (it's an archive blog for these very cool posts) and i'll link it here

If that's not the post you meant I apologize

[anti-willo-kinger]

FUCK I LINKED THE WRONG POST I'M SORRY

HERE'S THE CORRECT ONE

[sky-does-discourse]

Prefacing: we are a system of color

USING NAMES FROM CULTURES YOU AREN'T PART OF IS FINE!!! SO LONG AS: the culture is open, you do research on the culture's naming system, and do research on the specific name's meaning, origins, and cultural significance

If the name is very culturally significant and used for like... idk, random imaginary example: royalty only or something... DON'T USE IT. But otherwise— and so long as you're following the guidelines above— literally do WHATEVER YOU WANT. NO ONE CARES

I am BEGGING people to learn what cultural appropriation actually is. This is cultural APPRECIATION, not appropriation

ALSO. Because I see this in particular alot: JAPANESE IS NOT A CLOSED CULTURE (afaik). Maybe historically, but not anymore. But again, follow the guidelines above if you wanna use a Japanese name, just like you should with any name from any culture you aren't a part of

I know this is like an age old discussion in system spaces, but if I see one more minor in a syscord say "we have an introject from an anime and we don't want to 'appropriate' so they 'need' a new name" I might tweak out. Like it's fine if the introject genuinely just wants a new name but I promise they don't NEED one unless you've done no research into their original name at all

[anti-willo-kinger]

ANTI ENDO KINGER do you or anyone else have that post about the long extensive history of endogenic "systems" and how the Empowered Multiples movement was horrible and such? I can't find it but we wanna have it handy for whenever we need it!

I have it reblogged on @pro-willo-kinger (it's an archive blog for these very cool posts) and i'll link it here

If that's not the post you meant I apologize

[anti-willo-kinger]

I WANT TESTOSTERONE

[anti-willo-dee-johnson]

“the future is plural” = “we want people to mistake their non-CDD mental disorders, neurodivergence and things that are just literally normal as plurality, and harass the systems who tell us the truth”

[t34m-c00lkiddd]

AWV please read.

so this isnt m4tt fronting but this is really important.

Plural blocklist has stated that AWV will be able to be put onto the BLOCKLIST AGAIN.

you can check for proof if you’d like. They are rebreaking boundaries.

tags for reach as this is important-

@anti-willo-kenma @anti-willo-sherbert-cookie @anti-willo-monika @anti-willo-miku @anti-willo-kinger @anti-willo-solivan @anti-willo-c00lkidd @anti-willo-nekomura @anti-willo-neru @anti-willo-recluse

[carousel-coining]

Social media has been making my mental health worse, and because of that, I decided to take a break.

now this won't be a long break, just until I'm not stuck in front anymore, because it's definitely not a whole system situation but only about the current fronter, who got frontstuck

you're still completely free to send in requests

I want to apologize though for those that are waiting for me to work on their requests, I love you guys and it makes me happy to help you but I need to take a longer break

I will eventually post everything once I feel better though

[anti-willo-kinger]

reposting it here so more people may see it

[mischiefmanifold]

A Brief Guide to Common Terms in the System Community

< back to our pinned post!

other helpful links! ☆ What is dissociative identity disorder? ☆ What does it mean to be polyfragmented? ☆ About the theory of structural dissociation

This is by far not an exhaustive list, but hopefully it serves as a good starting point for those who need it!

☆ System - Someone with a dissociative disorder that causes fragmented identity states to form.

☆ Alter(s), Part(s), Headmate(s) - Various labels for the dissociated parts found in systems. The label each system uses is individual and often based on comfort levels.

☆ Plural - Another way to refer to someone as a system. This terminology specifically is often associated with endogenic systems and their community.

☆ Endogenic or Endo - An umbrella term for those who believe that their system was formed by something other than trauma. There are many microlabels that essentially mean the same thing, as well. It is important to note that current medical research does not support the idea that the brain can fragment into dissociated parts for any reason other than early childhood trauma.

☆ Inner World or Headspace - The visualized space within a system's brain that alters can be present in and live in. Some systems don't have one of these, as they're often created and utilized via therapy to aid in communication and recovery. They can vary in size and detail, and are personalized to each system.

☆ Introject - An alter that takes on their identity from an outside source. Fictional introjects (often referred to as fictives or fictrojects) are alters that take their identity from a fictional source, and factional introjects (often referred to as factives or factrojects) are alters that take their identity from a real life source.

☆ Polyfragmentation - A complex presentation of DID that includes a wide variety of experiences.

☆ RAMCOA - An acronym that stands for Ritual Abuse, Mind Control, and Organized Abuse, also referred to as OEA (Organized and Extreme Abuse). This terms refers to a variety of severe and sadistic types of abuse that can influence the way a system forms. Some RAMCOA/OEA survivors use the term HC-DID (Highly Complex DID) to illustrate the extent of which the abuse they endured shaped the way their system formed.

This is all I can think of for now, if anyone wants to suggest terms I can edit them in! As always, discourse is not welcome on this post and anyone trying to start discourse will be blocked.

[anti-willo-miku]

ive noticed endos fundamentally misunderstand CDDs because so many think each and every split must come from severe trauma? ill split a guy if im too overwhelmed while im out shopping. they also seem to talk like there's this one BIG split at the beginning instead of following proper science that explains that we were never whole people in the first place

I think the idea of there has to be one big split at the beginning is why theres this misunderstanding that cdds have to come from one specific type of trauma. It just has to be enough that your specific child brain cannot handle it. And once that has happened, the brain can resort to that splitting and dissociating mechanism at basically any stressor that the system can’t handle.

[anti-willo-kinger]

[berdly voice] Allow me to intrude!

A majority of studies (at least according to the studies I found on the matter) describe splits as an event following trauma, but the agreed opinion on the matter is that splits are caused by severe enough dissociation! So, while it's true that many systems will not dissociate to the extent of fully splitting without something severe enough to trigger a trauma response, it's entirely possible for alters to split without a clear event tied to them!

[tussai]

This is really interesting and explains some of the experiences I have. Can you share the studies you found with me? You don't have to. I just like having resources on hand that help me and others understand themselves when it comes to CDDs.

[anti-willo-kinger]

I didn't have a main study I was quoting but I did look at this one before making the post, I think it's a reliable source but if anyone wants to correct me they should and I would appreciate it

[tussai]

I mean... it's not the *worst* source you could ever use, and works great as a primer, but it is basically like linking a blog. Primary sources are better. DID-Research.org is responsible for a few bits of misinformation in the CDD community, like the concept of cores (just from off the top of my head).

The website was made by Katherine Reuben. She's a student, and is similarly knowledgeable like SAS. And what she does is similar to what SAS does with their blog. She takes primary sources, breaks them down, and then makes them more accessible and easy to digest.

It's not a bad thing. I appreciate what she does along with SAS. They both made information more accessible for me when I was younger and learning. But I would always ALWAYS suggest looking at primary sources. I kinda treat this website like wikipedia. It's not *terrible* to use it, but you'd benefit greatly from clicking all the citations and reading for yourself where she is getting this information from.

[anti-willo-kinger]

yes yes, no worries, thanks for telling me. I really didn't look further into it because this is just stuff I know as someone who enjoys psychology and I didn't really research anything before making that post

[mogai-reblog]

Radnormal is so culturally christian it hurts. The idea that redeeming oneself is something you 'earn'/can be given comes from christianity. No one is irredeemable because anyone and everyone can work towards bettering themselves which is what redeeming oneself is. Its compensating for the faults and bad actions that one has done.

To say that theres a group of people who cannot ever do any good, who cannot ever reduce the bad they did in the past, is to say that there are groups of people who are inherently evil and that no matter what they do, even if they donate like a million dollars to charity, that their actions are 'tainted'.

And to equate fiction and kink between consenting adults to actual real child and animal abuse is frankly disgusting and just goes to show how much people totally 100% care about victims. And the assumption that 'child predators' and 'pedophiles' are a circle (something that was btw constructed by homophobes and transphobes because they believe that all gay and trans people are pedophiles and that all pedophiles must also be child predators and vice versa) and not a venn diagram with the smallest little overlap in the world doesn't help anyone. Especially because it positions abuse (of which having sex with a child is always abuse and always rape) as something that's done out of love and attraction and not something that's done because child predators want to feel powerful and in control of something and the easiest target to feel that power and control is by abusing kids.

[mogai-reblog]

"radnormals will still think of non-contact harmful paraphiles as potentially dangerous"

I can't believe I even have to say this but believing that an entire group of disordered individuals are all 'potentially dangerous' (and really, I've looked through the radnormal tags and you don't see people with paraphiliac disorders as 'potentially dangerous' you see them as inherently dangerous who should all self isolate or even better, all kill themselves) is quite literally fascist rhetoric.