Assessment 2: Concept statement & bibliography
Can creative arts be rebellious when rebellion has become cannonised in art, design and media histories. What would contemporary rebellion look like?
Three new double-sided banners continue my critique of and protest against, child abuse within the Catholic Church; its turning a blind eye to offending priests and reluctance to disclose abuse. All images started with an initial concept that developed as work progressed. I frequently decided an image was finished part way through what I’d initially planned. These ‘incomplete’ images tell of an unfinished story. More is required before society, particularly victims, is satisfied.
For all banners, the fabric is raw and unhemmed with loose threads evident, suggestive of the Church’s fading reputation and the erosion of public trust. The religious iconography depicted is deliberately imperfect.
For my final presentation I placed the banners insitu beside a statue at St Canice Catholic Church at Rushcutters Bay and took video and still images. I also used videos of the church interior and confessional doors. I had planned to use videos taken of an empty children’s playground but as I edited the final work I felt those shots didn’t fit well so haven’t used them.
Banner 1 (side A: Disappearing Cross, side B: Blindness)
Disappearing Cross:A pale blue cross with soft edges fades into a background of lightly applied gesso on visible black denim, symbolising priests being men of the cloth and dark secrets they hold that cannot be contained regardless of whitewashing attempts. Truth breaks through.
Blindness takes a different approach; it has a strong black background and bright colours. Yet the bright images are incomplete, broken crosses drawn blindfold, with only my hands feeling for the edge of the fabric. No perfect cross exists. While a large underlying red cross is distinguishable it is rough and disjointed. The fragmented crosses evidence what happens when a blind eye is turned. No matter what glorious colours might be used, the crosses are broken.
Banner 2 (side A: Sacred Heart & Lamb, side B: Lost Heart)
Sacred Heart & Lamb combines two religious symbols. The innocent, pure sacrificial lamb references children sacrificed by the Church; first by abuse then by protecting offending priests while refusing to acknowledge and disclose awful truths. Were children sacrificed as a vehicle for offending priests to cleanse themselves of carnal desires? The sacred heart, usually representative of Jesus’ deep divine love for humanity, bleeds on the lamb suggesting dying divine love and lost protection of innocent children.
Lost Heart: We see from sparsely applied white paint that something in the shape of the Sacred Heart is disappearing with a void taking the place of deep divine love. Soon there will be nothing resembling the underlying principles of the Catholic Church.
Banner 3 (side A: Stitched Crosses, side B: Covered Underside)
Stitched Crosses: Three crosses are neatly stitched yet visibly untidy. There are loose threads and raw, crooked edges on the fabric which itself was once torn in two. The crosses are incomplete or unraveling, indicating the issue of child abuse within the Church is not yet fully dealt with; new revelations continue to surface. This is causing the structure of the Church to unravel with faith being lost. Many see the Church’s response as inadequate and incomplete. The brightly coloured stitching outlining fundamental iconography of three crosses does not compensate for the inadequacies in the fabric of the Church. Further, small almost invisible stitches are apparent on close inspection indicative of an underside cover-up.
Covered Underside: The underside of stitched cloth is not usually intended to be seen so additional fabric has been applied to this side in an attempted cover-up. However this fabric is translucent leaving the underside visible. Knotted threads show through, as do the rough edges of the covering fabric. The attempted cover-up also leaves a mark on the public side of the banner. Its stitching shows through and not being a good fit it prevents the public side from sitting well. This is a visual metaphor for the Church’s cover-up, pretending nothing wrong has occurred; its refusal for many years to acknowledge and disclose criminal sexual conduct of some priests. Ultimately this approach was futile, many truths have surfaced and become visible.
I’ve created a basic sound track using audio I taped outside a church many years back with additional audio recorded from a children’s playground. I’ve also left portions of the track silent to represent the Church’s silence and also give gravity to this issue.
D. Carrier, ‘Connoisseurship is not a dirty word’ in Hyperallergic,2 September 2018, viewed on 3 September 2018. https://hyperallergic.com/458332/the-eye-philippe-costamagna-new-vessel-press-2018/
M. Del Rosario ‘List of Catholic Symbols and Meanings’ in Owlcation, 5 June 2018, viewed on 3 August 2018. https://owlcation.com/humanities/catholic-symbols
Monika Drozynska, “Projects’ http://monika.drozynska.pl/
T Redwood, ‘Skeletons in the Nation’s Cupboard, Warwick Thornton on being an Aboriginal Artist’. Metro Magazine, Issue 181, 2014, pp. 84-87.
A. Serrano, Immersions. http://andresserrano.org/series/immersions
H. Zafiropoulos ‘Newcomers” One artist’s attempt to change the way Poland talks about migration’ in The Calvert Journal, 19 February 2018. Viewed on 9 August 2018. https://www.calvertjournal.com/articles/show/9664/newcomers-poland-migration-art
(Author not identified) ‘Andres Serrano’ in Art Net, http://www.artnet.com/artists/andres-serrano/
(Author not identified) ‘Warwick Thornton: Stranded’ in Stills Gallery. Viewed on 31 August 2018. http://www.stillsgallery.com.au/artists/thornton/
(Author not identified) “Archie Moore’ in The Commercial. Viewed on 24 August 2018. https://thecommercialgallery.com/artist/archie-moore/biography