"The Self-Reliant Generation"
-Reliant Generation" David Brooks, NYT, Jan 8, 2016
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

JBB: An Artblog!
macklin celebrini has autism
No title available
dirt enthusiast

祝日 / Permanent Vacation
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
Claire Keane

No title available
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
occasionally subtle
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

blake kathryn

Origami Around
Keni

No title available
Monterey Bay Aquarium

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣

Discoholic 🪩
NASA

seen from Türkiye

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from T1
seen from United States

seen from Italy
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Russia

seen from Israel
seen from Malaysia
seen from Finland
seen from Hong Kong SAR China
seen from South Africa

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
@areformation
"The Self-Reliant Generation"
-Reliant Generation" David Brooks, NYT, Jan 8, 2016
Beauty Beauty is our evolutionary ability to recognize the survival and sustenance value of nature from afar. - Dennis Dutton's evolutionary biology take on beauty, Ted talk? Via npr Beauty is an end in itself. We are drawn to beauty, and to things that are beautiful. We have the sense of beauty, an inclination to it, because we are worshippers. And to find something beautiful is to find something worthy of praise in it, even of worship. We were made to bask in the beauty of God, the beautiful one. But because we are drawn to beauty, beauty is also desirability. It is acceptability. We feel the need to be beautiful because we want to be accepted, loved, found worthy of praise. In our sin and separation from God, we crave acceptability. And so we crave beauty. We crave being beautiful. And we also demand that others be beautiful in our eyes. Estranged from God, we even warp the definition of beauty. So that what is ugly we find beautiful, and what is beautiful we find ugly. We find sin attractive - as our first mother and father did the fruit - and we find God the source of all beauty himself to be ugly and repulsive. The gospel turns our warped human beauty on its head because it says that God the Beautiful has been drawn to the ugly, to the scarred and marred and amputated. He is drawn to us. He has even chosen to take on ugliness, the repulsive, the rejectable, by becoming a man who "had no beauty that we should desire him" (Isaiah 53). And he becomes a bloody mess, scarred and shameful on the cross, where he bears our ugly sin. But in becoming the ugliest thing on earth, he takes the place of the ugly. Rejected and forsaken - not desired or accepted as beautiful - in their place. And three days later, he rises, robed in glory, supremely beautiful, drawing and attracting people around the world for ages to come. And by his spirit he renews those who are truly ugly by their sin and makes them beautiful, and accepted. Desired. And in doing all this he redefines beauty. Because he is drawn to those the world has rejected, the physically ugly. He even becomes one of them. What he finds truly beautiful is a contrite heart, one that rejects sin, one that bears the ugly and shameful cross with him.
Jonathan Merritt, "Christmas: The Greatest Story Ever Told?," The Atlantic, Dec 24, 2015
unlike the Levitical high priest, he has sat down, his work finished once and for ever, at the right hand of the Majesty on high (Heb. 1: 3). The corollary of this is the priesthood of all believers. Each of us is entitled to approach the throne with confidence (Heb. 4: 16) and when we approach it, the Son of God sits there before us, our friend at court, casting the lustre of his obedience and sacrifice over all who come in his name. Donald Macleod (2014-05-19T05:00:00+00:00). Christ Crucified: Understanding the Atonement (Kindle Locations 967-970). Kindle Edition.
The cry of dereliction We return to the synoptic account. It is now the ninth hour, the land is still in darkness, and Jesus has reached the lowest point in his humiliation and the most awful moment of his agony. The physical pain is no worse than before, perhaps less, but his soul is in torment: ‘My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?’ (Matt. 27: 46; Mark 15: 34). The words are from Psalm 22, a reminder that what Jesus suffers was not without its parallels in the lives of prophets and patriarchs, or even in the lives of Christian believers. But the parallels do not make for identity. Jesus stands where no-one ever stood before or since, knowing himself the bearer of the sin of the world, destined to pay the price for its redemption (Mark 10: 45), and now drinking the bitterest dregs of the cup which had so discomposed him in Gethsemane. In its very nature, the spiritual content of this climax of his suffering is inaccessible to us. Even he himself had to appropriate the words of the psalmist, as if he could find no words of his own; and perhaps no human words could express what his ‘hell’ meant. The most striking thing is the form of address: ‘Eloi ’ (this is Mark’s Aramaic; Matthew gives the Hebrew ‘Eli’). This is the only occasion, even on the cross, when Jesus does not invoke God as ‘Father’. In Gethsemane, for all its anguish, he had held fast to this: ‘Abba, everything is possible for you’ (Mark 14: 36). Even in the moment of his immolation he retained this sense of his own divine sonship: ‘Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing’ (Luke 23: 34). And by the end, after the dereliction, he has recovered it: ‘Father, into your hands I commit my spirit’ (Luke 23: 46). Clearly, the forsakenness is only a moment in the long journey from the third to the ninth hour; for much of the time Jesus remained in communion with his Father. But now comes a moment of well-nigh unsustainable awfulness. Abba is out of reach, not listening. The intimacy is broken: an intimacy that had never been broken before. It was a breach for which nothing could have prepared Jesus. Like Abraham and Isaac going up to Mount Moriah (Gen. 22: 2), Father and Son had gone up to Calvary together, and throughout his life Jesus had been assured that he was not alone, but that the Father was with him. Even at the cross, his Father, like his mother, had been there. But now, at the ninth hour, Abba was not there, and Jesus can say only ‘Eloi!’ God is certainly there, but not as Abba. There is now no sense of his own divine sonship, no sense of God’s love and no sense of his Father’s approval. God is not hearing him. He cries, but there is no answer, and God even seems to mock his trust (Ps. 22: 8). Trouble is near, but there is no one to help (Ps. 22: 11). There are no comfortable scriptures to fill his mind, nor any assurance of ultimate victory, nor any vision of a redeemed multitude too great to count. At every other time of crisis, Abba had spoken great words of encouragement: ‘This is my son, whom I love’ (Mark 1: 11; 9: 7). How he needed these words now! But no such words came. He hears only the derision of the spectators, the curses of the soldiers and the whispers of the Prince of Darkness. He is on his own. But did the forsakenness involve more than loss and deprivation? It clearly did. In everything he saw around him, and everything he heard, there was the hand of God. It was the Father who was delivering him up (Rom. 8: 32) and everything spoke of his anger. That anger was no additional fact or circumstance. It was in the circumstances: in the pain, in the loneliness, in Satan’s whispers and in heaven’s deafness; and under that anger his identity contracted to the point where the whole truth about him was that he was the sin of the world. He was carrying it, heaven held him answerable for it, and he was it. It was here, all of it, in his body (1 Pet. 2: 24), being condemned in his flesh (Rom. 8: 3); because of it he was a doomed and ruined man, korban, devoted to destruction. God’s pure eyes could not look on him, nor heaven entertain his cry. ‘Christ cried, “Is there not a word, dear Father, not a look?” And He answers, “No, not a look for a world.” ’[ 40] Yet, somehow, there is no despair. Even at the lowest point, in the black hole of dereliction, faith and hope still breathe, as they must, for unbelief and despair are sin, and would have rendered his sacrifice void. Faith must walk where there is no light (Isa. 50: 10). Even when Jesus cannot say ‘Abba!’, he can say ‘Eloi’, my God: the God he loves and serves and still, somehow, trusts. Maybe this is what he dreaded as he trembled in Gethsemane, that his mind would break in an unbearable anxiety of separation, when he realized that Abba was out of sight and out of hearing. But in the end, though hope may not burn, it flickers, even in the darkness. Yet there is a ‘why?’. It is not the ‘why?’ of protest or self-pity, but the ‘why?’ of the Righteous One, conscious of personal innocence and knowing that not even Holiness itself can find a spot in him. But it is also the ‘why?’ of a unique sufferer who has momentarily lost sight of the great divine purpose which his suffering was progressing, and asking, like the great Afro-American spiritual, ‘Lord, how come me here?’ Let us remember that Jesus’ human mind was finite and that at any one moment he could be in possession of only some, not all, of the facts. Had the great mutual undertakings and promises of the covenant of redemption slipped out of his mind? Had he lost sight of what he had earlier known so clearly: that his life would be a ransom for many (Mark 10: 45)? Had he forgotten that he had a future as well as a present, a rising again as well as a dying? Almost certainly, for a moment. All he ‘knows’ is that he is a ‘worm and not a man’ (Ps. 22: 6); and his faith is a question, not an answer: 'why?' Donald Macleod (2014-05-19T05:00:00+00:00). Christ Crucified: Understanding the Atonement (Kindle Locations 784-829). Kindle Edition.
Jesus, instantly alert, replies, ‘I tell you the truth, today you will be with me in paradise’ (Luke 23: 43). These are words of profound import... the words shed light on the question where Jesus was between his death and his resurrection.... The word ‘paradise’ occurs twice elsewhere in the New Testament. In Revelation 2: 7 it is the location of the tree of life; in 2 Corinthians 12: 4 it is the place to which Paul was ‘caught up’ to enjoy ‘visions and revelations’. It was to this paradise, where one sees what no earthly eye can see, that Jesus would welcome ‘the dying thief’ before the day was done. while his body lay inert in the grave, his soul was in paradise, at rest, rejoicing in the approbation of the Father, adored by the angels, acclaimed by the redeemed and at perfect peace with the outcome of his mission. Donald Macleod (2014-05-19T05:00:00+00:00). Christ Crucified: Understanding the Atonement (Kindle Locations 714-749). Kindle Edition.
‘It is written, “And he was numbered with the transgressors”; and I tell you that this must be fulfilled in me. Yes, what is written about me is reaching its fulfilment’ (Luke 22: 37). There is no doubt about the authenticity of this passage, nor about the authenticity of the original words of Isaiah, and we must take them with complete seriousness. The truth they point to, Jesus’ solidarity with sinners, did not begin at the cross; it had been a fact throughout his life. He had made himself notorious as the friend of tax collectors and sinners and repeatedly allowed himself to be compromised by associating with people of dubious reputation. But here at the cross the solidarity climaxes. He is not merely among his two co-accused. He is together with them; and he is together with them specifically in their character as transgressors and criminals. The full force of this is brought out in the original wording of Isaiah: he was numbered with the transgressors ‘for he bore the sin of the many’. It is not a matter of mere association or even, ultimately, of mere solidarity, as if he were just taking the position of a sinless one forced to endure the company of sinners. He identifies completely. He lets himself be reckoned as a sinner, and dealt with as a sinner; and not only by men, but by God. He has come to redeem sinners, but the way he will redeem them is by taking their sins as his own and becoming accursed in their place (Gal. 3: 13). By hanging him in the middle, wrote Calvin, ‘they gave Him first place as though he were the thieves’ leader’.[ 26] Luther, ever more graphic, put it even more strongly: ‘He bore the person of a sinner and of a thief – and not of one but of all sinners and thieves . . . And all the prophets saw this, that Christ was to become the greatest thief, murderer, adulterer, robber, desecrator, blasphemer, etc., that has ever been anywhere in the world.’[ 27] Here, on the cross, he not only bears, but is (2 Cor. 5: 21) the sin of the world; and so here, in solemn divine equity, the sword falls. Donald Macleod (2014-05-19T05:00:00+00:00). Christ Crucified: Understanding the Atonement (Kindle Locations 597-608). Kindle Edition.
‘It is written, “And he was numbered with the transgressors”; and I tell you that this must be fulfilled in me. Yes, what is written about me is reaching its fulfilment’ (Luke 22: 37). There is no doubt about the authenticity of this passage, nor about the authenticity of the original words of Isaiah, and we must take them with complete seriousness. The truth they point to, Jesus’ solidarity with sinners, did not begin at the cross; it had been a fact throughout his life. He had made himself notorious as the friend of tax collectors and sinners and repeatedly allowed himself to be compromised by associating with people of dubious reputation. But here at the cross the solidarity climaxes. He is not merely among his two co-accused. He is together with them; and he is together with them specifically in their character as transgressors and criminals. Donald Macleod (2014-05-19T05:00:00+00:00). Christ Crucified: Understanding the Atonement (Kindle Locations 590-597). Kindle Edition.
The underlying theological fact is that the dying of Christ is a kingly act, not merely in the sense that he dies royally and with dignity, but in the sense that his dying is his supreme achievement for his people: the act by which he conquers their foes, secures their liberty and establishes his kingdom. This, of course, was completely hidden from Pilate but, as Joseph Ratzinger points out, the death sentence he passed on Jesus ‘became with paradoxical unity the “profession of faith” ’.[ 25] It is precisely as the crucified criminal that Jesus is the Christ, the King; and the cross, as we shall see later, is the scene of his victory. Donald Macleod (2014-05-19T05:00:00+00:00). Christ Crucified: Understanding the Atonement (Kindle Locations 578-584). Kindle Edition.
When Caiaphas demanded, ‘Tell us if you are the Messiah, the Son of God,’ Jesus calmly replied, ‘You have said so’; to make his meaning unmistakeably clear, he added, ‘from now on you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of the Mighty One and coming in the clouds of heaven’ (Matt. 26: 63– 64). Not even the grim horror of his circumstances could obliterate his messianic consciousness. God is his Father: had he not made such a claim he would never have been crucified. He was condemned for what he taught, and what he taught was not simply the universal fatherhood of God and the universal brotherhood of man, but his own absolute deity. He was the Messiah, the Son of God, the promised King. Donald Macleod (2014-05-19T05:00:00+00:00). Christ Crucified: Understanding the Atonement (Kindle Locations 563-568). Kindle Edition.
But above all, Jesus must ‘taste’ death: not simply die, but taste it (Heb. 2: 9). This is why he took a long time dying, and this is why he had to die unanesthetised. He had to walk, as his people do, through the valley of the shadow of death, tasting the fear of it and the encroachments of it and the power of it, and then yielding himself to it consciously and deliberately. His life did not ebb away, slowly and peacefully, ending with a pathetic death-rattle. Instead, he shouts in triumph, ‘It is finished!’, and then dismisses his spirit into the loving hands of God his Father (Luke 23: 46). Donald Macleod (2014-05-19T05:00:00+00:00). Christ Crucified: Understanding the Atonement (Kindle Locations 542-546). Kindle Edition.
even on the cross Jesus was still ‘on service’ and needed to be in full possession of his faculties. At any moment an urgent need or claim might arise, as when one of the two men crucified with him suddenly said, ‘Jesus, remember me when you come into your kingdom’. Jesus is instantly alert and instantly reassuring: ‘Today, you will be with me in paradise’ (Luke 23: 42– 43). In the same way, Jesus in his dying moments is equally solicitous for his mother, commending her to the care of John, the beloved disciple (John 19: 26– 27). He loved and served to the end. Donald Macleod (2014-05-19T05:00:00+00:00). Christ Crucified: Understanding the Atonement (Kindle Locations 533-537). Kindle Edition.
Golgotha was ugly. there is cogent evidence that [the Church of the Holy Sepulchre] was the site of the crucifixion (though inside modern Jerusalem it lay outside the walls of the ancient city),[ 22] and it is no accident that it was (and is) a horrid, ugly place. The late Dr George Macleod of Iona expressed it memorably: ‘Jesus was not crucified in a Cathedral between two candles, but on a cross between two thieves; on the town garbage heap . . . at the kind of place where cynics talk smut, and thieves curse, and soldiers gamble.’[ 23] God had chosen the site, and the atmosphere. The act was barbaric; the site, with the detritus of previous executions still lying around, horrific; the procedure a shambles. But precisely because it was all these things it dramatized the ugliness of sin while at the same time proclaiming the Son of God a despised, accursed nobody for whom there lay beyond the cross only the horrors of hell. We cannot, dare not, reduce the cross to a crucifix or Golgotha to a rose garden. The aesthetics of the crucifixion are in keeping with its criminality. Donald Macleod (2014-05-19T05:00:00+00:00). Christ Crucified: Understanding the Atonement (Kindle Locations 519-529). Kindle Edition.
Once he had breathed his last, the humiliation was over and from that point onwards the whole trajectory was reversed. From Bethlehem onwards his path had been a steady descent into the abyss, but from the moment he shouts, ‘tetelestai!’ (John 19: 30), the trajectory is upwards. His body lies, indeed, in the tomb, but his soul is in paradise (Luke 23: 43), and after the briefest of ‘three days’ come resurrection and then enthronement. Donald Macleod (2014-05-19T05:00:00+00:00). Christ Crucified: Understanding the Atonement (Kindle Locations 508-512). Kindle Edition.
Suppose... that the redeeming power of Christ lay, as some have argued, in his vicarious repentance; that he entered fully into our sin, made its shame his own shame, confessed it to God and said ‘amen!’ to God’s condemnation. Why, then, is the atonement not complete at Gethsemane? Here, after all, is complete submission: ‘not my will, but yours be done’ (Luke 22: 42). Where, after this point, does Jesus utter any words remotely suggesting repentance? It may be said in answer that he expressed his remorse (our remorse) by meekly submitting to the sentence. But that implies that there was a sentence, that the cross was set in a context of justice, that justice was executed on Jesus, and that that execution of justice is the basis of our forgiveness. For Jesus to say ‘amen!’ to the divine condemnation is not merely to express his general sorrow for sin. It is to say ‘amen!’ to the need for expiation and propitiation; ‘amen!’ to the divine sword of justice; ‘amen!’ to God’s right to damn him, notwithstanding his submission. He will atone, not by repenting in the place of others, but by dying for them. Donald Macleod (2014-05-19T05:00:00+00:00). Christ Crucified: Understanding the Atonement (Kindle Locations 443-451). Kindle Edition.
The centrality of the cross must not beguile us into ignoring a second striking feature of the story of the passion: the cross was but the climax of Jesus’ suffering. His whole life, from the cradle to the tomb, was suffering. The principle underlying this was that from the moment of his birth Jesus was identified with sinful humanity, and all the circumstances of his life reflected the fact that he was bearing the sin of the world (John 1: 29). In solidarity with us, he was ‘the Man of Sorrows’ (Isa. 53: 3, KJV). This is not to say that his life was one of unrelieved gloom. There were moments when he rejoiced in spirit (Luke 10: 21), there was the satisfaction of doing his Father’s will and there was the constant anticipation of ‘the joy that was set before him’ (Heb. 12: 2). But none of this detracts from the fact that his whole life involved suffering. The tension is underlined by the circumstances of his birth. At one level its glory is attested by the miracle of the virgin conception and such other signs as the acclamation of the angels, the adoration of the shepherds and the visit of the Magi. At another, the details paint a picture of lowliness, poverty and exclusion. The condescension already implicit in the incarnation is aggravated by his being laid in a manger and by all that was implied in the fact that there was no room in the inn. [3] Shortly afterwards, the family are forced to flee to Egypt. On their return, they have to reside in Nazareth, out of which there could come nothing good (John 1: 46). In the eyes of the Jewish elite this would forever define him as a provincial. He clearly had few educational opportunities; in later life, in fact, people were well aware that he had never had a formal education and were amazed that nevertheless he could teach (John 7: 15). The Christian imagination has lingered lovingly over the image of him as a carpenter, and the image itself has cast lustre over that noble trade. But nothing is heard of Joseph after Jesus’ visit to the temple at the age of twelve, and his total absence from the accounts of the public ministry strongly suggests that Jesus lost his father at an early age. Once the public ministry commences, the pressures and privations are immediately obvious. They begin with the temptations in the desert, underlining the fact that though Jesus was free from sin he was not free from temptation. On the contrary, he was tempted just like ourselves ‘in every way’ (Heb. 4: 15). Behind the phraseology, sanitized by centuries of quotation, lies the harsh reality that Jesus was dogged and harassed by the Prince of Darkness throughout his life. But there were more mundane pressures as well, and they clearly took their toll, even of his physical appearance: so much so that he could be taken for a fifty-year-old (John 8: 57) when he was scarcely thirty. He was poor beyond our imagining, owning only the clothes he stood in; homeless, without a pillow for his head; oppressed by crowds demanding a sign and plying him with endless questions; often exhausted, as when he lay dead to the world in the stern of a tiny fishing boat caught in the eye of a fearful storm (Mark 4: 38). He was misunderstood by his family, who feared for his sanity; pursued by the sick and their desperate relatives; stalked by the Pharisees with their undisguised hostility and their sly coadjutors with their entrapping conundrums (Mark 12: 13). His whole life followed a pattern of rejection: rejection in ‘his own country’, Nazareth; rejection by the religious establishment; rejection by public opinion, always fickle; and rejection, at last, by his disciples, who all forsook him and fled. Add to these the sheer horror of life among sinners for one so morally and spiritually sensitive. We skip lightly over the words, ‘made his dwelling among us’ (John 1: 14), forgetting that he had come ‘from highest bliss, down to such a world as this’[ 4]: a world where he was surrounded on all sides by the sights of misery and wickedness, the sounds of profanity and blasphemy, and the stench of poverty, death and corruption. That had been the story so far. Pontius Pilate was the climax, not the commencement, of his suffering. It is tempting to surmise that because of Jesus’ inner strength he was able to rise easily above such pressures and continue on his way unruffled and serene. But Jesus’ endurance and courage were not those of the insensitive and unfeeling. The pressure hurt, and sometimes there were tears (John 11: 35), sometimes anger (Mark 3: 5), and sometimes an almost mortal sorrow (Mark 14: 34). This is what undergirds the sympathy highlighted in Hebrews 4: 15: Jesus was tested in every way, just as we are. Donald Macleod (2014-05-19T05:00:00+00:00). Christ Crucified: Understanding the Atonement (Kindle Locations 138-173). Kindle Edition.