FROM THE ARCHIVES: Klara Hobza, Morse Code Communication (An Improved Attempt), 2005. Lights (in clerestory) and video documentation.
NASA
Keni
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her

Kiana Khansmith
untitled
One Nice Bug Per Day

Product Placement
TMBGareOK. The Official They Might Be Giants tumblr
★

titsay
No title available
ojovivo
h

PR's Tumblrdome
Xuebing Du
Misplaced Lens Cap
todays bird
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵

@theartofmadeline

No title available

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States

seen from India
seen from Thailand
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia

seen from Türkiye

seen from Germany
seen from Indonesia
seen from Vietnam

seen from Germany

seen from Lebanon
seen from Vietnam
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Portugal
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@artphx
FROM THE ARCHIVES: Klara Hobza, Morse Code Communication (An Improved Attempt), 2005. Lights (in clerestory) and video documentation.
Great article about the contemporary arts scene in West Africa.
Artforum writer and ASU faculty member Dr. Julia Friedman review's SMoCA's "Economy of Means: Toward Humility in Contemporary Sculpture".
Michael Bortfeld, "Torusi", "Torusi II", "Unentitled", "Reverie du Pointe", 3D printed objects (FDM process)
Richard Bloom, "Updraft", steel, concrete, 2012
Michael Bortfeld, "For Science", wood, glass, steel, neon, brass, electronics. 2012
No Apologies
The exhibition No Apologies featured the work of several highly talented undergraduate sculptors. All of these artists utilized novel combinations of media including wood, metals, neon and glass to create intriguing pieces. The gallery was dazzling with such a diverse array of objects of so many different colors, textures, and sizes. There were some pieces small enough to fit together in a display case and some so large that they engulfed substantial amounts of floor space.
One of the most eye-catching pieces was “Parabolic Cloud Catcher” by Richard Bloom. It was a woven steel frame shaped like a giant teardrop with a spherical space in the center. This space was filled with a white latex orb that looked like a cross between a cloud and balloon. It hung from the ceiling suspended in the center of the room. It's simple shapes and large size reminded me of a large lantern that one might find in a home décor store. It was playful yet beautiful and thought-provoking.
On one of the walls opposite this structure was a piece that utilized steel and other metals in a completely different way. “EgoDistonics” by William Zev Wasserman featured a metal rectangular panel with a metal skeletal arm ripping a hole in the panel to reveal layers of steel mesh, metal bars, a hot pink neon tubes of light. The image was stirring and somewhat starting but quite enthralling. I found the use of neon in particular to be very innovative.
Scattered in a few places throughout the gallery were wood panels made by Audrey Miller. Upon first inspection, they appeared to be merely planks of wood. Once I looked more closely, I saw that she had carved out many of the swirling shapes in the panel to highlight the forms within the wood rather than molding it into a particular shape. The effect was strikingly beautiful. My appreciation was further deepened when I read her statement in which she eloquently described how she creates structures with wood by attempting to bring out the organic and interesting shapes within it.
Like many of the visitors to this exhibition, I was thoroughly intrigued by Elise Leutwyler's installation that engulfed the entire space in the back of the gallery. She had built was resembled a boat house near the water. It was a wooden shed balanced on pieces of a metal boat. Inside the shed were toys and pictures reminiscent of a very happy childhood. In her statement, she discussed her desire to create pieces and structures that evoke the joyful and relaxed attitude of childhood that is quickly forgotten upon reaching adulthood. By creating an entire space around this concept, she pulls the viewers fully into her artistic vision and captivates them accordingly.
There was so much to see in this show despite it being in a small gallery space with a limited number of pieces. Each piece had so much intricate detail with fascinating stories behind its creation. I am very optimistic about the futures of these young artists as they are already displaying extraordinary creativity within their discipline so early in their careers.
ASU Galleries
Hello, readers. My next slew of posts is going to be primarily about shows in the galleries at ASU. There are some really wonderful artists on campus who I think deserve more exposure. If possible, I'd like to get their work out there more because they are so talented and have great things to contribute to the artistic community.
~L
Published!
I have an article in the January issue of Java Magazine. Check it out!
http://javamagaz.com/January2012Page16and17.html
Jennifer Nelson's "Securing a Free State" at ASU Museum
Athens-based artist Jennifer Nelson does not make beautiful objects to be admired and pondered. Her art manifests itself in what she describes as “social choreography”. She creates art in the interactions that people have with ideas, their environments, their life situations, and each other. Despite, or perhaps because of, the fact that my eye had no particular place where it was intended to rest, my mind was free to contemplate what Jennifer Nelson was trying to tell me in her exhibit “Securing a Free State”.
In this body of work, she is trying to explore the second amendment of the United States Constitution through the lens of security and what it means to both individuals and collective societies. She steps beyond the political turmoil which concerns merely the ownership of guns and tries to find the meaning behind “bearing arms”. Throughout her residency at the ASU Art Museum, she organized outings to places such as sniper training facilities and shooting ranges. She arranged debates among experts on many sides of the issue and invited speakers such as practitioners of nonviolence and trauma therapists. In the interactions of these diverse individuals, she is attempting to discover how people protect themselves from violence and the role of society in preventing these crimes.
The space was organized around a central area which seemed to be a “safe” space. There was mellow lighting with soft carpet, an inviting pile of pillows, and a rocking chair. To the left, in a slightly harsher blue light, was a table strewn with books about the second amendment. The books were open to pages about topics ranging from the founding fathers' intentions in creating the second amendment, to the writings of victims of violent crime and their therapists. Behind these books were two television screens. Each screen had a person's face on it and they were angled toward each other as if in conversation. The word “Intentions” was frozen in block letters across each screen.
She was perhaps simulating the interaction between the victim and the perpetrator of a violent act. Though neither of the figures were physically engaged, the nervous eye-contact and the text led me to believed that this piece was seeking to explain the motivations surrounding the commission of violence. Perhaps neither person had any intention of hurting the other and things got out of hand. Or perhaps one person was merely trying to defend himself and similarly did not wish to be violent. Additionally, the piece explores the contrast between intentions and behavior that can occur in the context of these crimes.
On the other side of the “safe space” were three projections of people all of whom were victims of violence. Two of the three had been threatened with a fire arm and one had used a fire arm to defend himself from an attacker. Since they all talked over each other, I had to sit and listen for some time in order to hear all of their stories. Although, the blurred effect of their voices speaking all at once was strangely powerful. It sounded like the noise of a small crowd and drew attention to the fact that anyone could be the victim of violence and how scarily prevalent it is. On a separate screen, there was a five minute video of a policeman at a shooting range explaining proper firearm handling procedures. As I listened to the videos of the victims, the calm stillness in the air was periodically pierced by the sound of gunshots on the other screen. It was un-nerving to have the usual tranquility of the art museum disrupted in this way. In the context of the other works in the exhibit, this was highly effective.
Across from the video of the policeman was the interior of a bulletproof vest hung on a wall. Beside it was an explanation of how it works by diffusing the trauma of the bullet to the rest of the material so that one single area will not receive enough force to perforate it. I think that this object encompassed what Jennifer Nelson was trying to say through this project. The bulletproof vest is a metaphor for society and how everyone should take responsibility for the cancerous force of violence. The second amendment is about more than personal, self-defense. It is about how society should handle violence. It is not the responsibility of any single individual to create security. It is the responsibility of all of society to ensure the safety of everyone.
Though striking images can make lasting impressions on viewers, Jennifer Nelson's “Securing a Free State” managed to say so much about safety and violence without showing a single violent image. The ideas behind the piece were apparent and compelling and spoke for themselves. By attempting to explain a complex idea through simple images, Jennifer Nelson created a very powerful exhibit with the potential to change the way her viewers think about such important concepts as freedom and security.
Safwat Saleem, "Oh Shit: Lions!", from the "Oh Shit!" series
I just got a twitter account!
Follow me at http://twitter.com/#!/Art_Phx
phICA's "Declaring Independence": An Overview
The phICA (Phoenix Institute of Contemporary Art) show Declaring Independence focuses on the work of artists both local and from around the world who lack steady commercial gallery representation. This is a phenomenon which has become more prevalent in the art world as more artists are emerging and cultivating interesting bodies of work. In the past, the art world's barriers limited the number of people who could become artists in the first place. Today, becoming an artist is more akin to becoming a rockstar or applying for a place at Harvard University: anyone can try, but only a few will succeed. The pieces in this show focus on theme of the unrepresented artist and how this affects their work and their careers.
The exhibit, hosted by the Eric Fischl Gallery at Phoenix College and curated by Ted G. Decker, features the work of 23 unrepresented artists. Among the pieces featured are paintings, drawings, and a few sculptures. All of the pieces are individually excellent but collectively are somewhat dissonant as each artist has a very different point of view. However, the lack of congruity was appropriate and meaningful for this particular exhibit. The viewers' attention was very much drawn to the fact that all kinds of artists, including those who are exceptionally skilled, work without gallery representation.
Some of the works were individual segments of what had once been a larger show. The piece “Ziggurat With Chipmunk”, by Sue Chenoweth was highly visually striking in its own right but would have had more meaning in its intended context with several other pieces. Originally, the painting was a part of a larger series entitled Sky-hopping Adventures with Sue Chenoweth and The Collection. The show exhibited at SMoCA a few years ago and contained a series of paintings, all featuring chipmunks, arranged to resemble a board game. “Ziggurat With Chipmunk” is a whimsical landscape with the outline of a temple-like structure, a steep mountain topped with a multi-colored campfire and a winding path leading to the summit. In the bottom right hand corner is a chipmunk that is proportionally too large to be part of the landscape but functions as a sort of signature. According to the artist, it represents aspects of nature that though picturesque can be unpredictable and sometimes dangerous. As a child, Sue Chenoweth went on camping trips in the wilderness with her family. These experiences were very formative for her and contributed to the underlying themes of her art. The chipmunk, though cute and cuddly, could also be rabid, thus symbolizing the underlying wildness of nature.
Chenoweth is a process-oriented painter, meaning that she prefers to start painting and then see what emerges and works from there. She uses a variety of techniques in her work including painting, drawing, and graphic design techniques. Her work frequently utilizes transfers and letrosets, both now outdated graphic design materials. She uses these to create small designs that appear stamped haphazardly throughout the picture plane. The effect is striking as they seem to blend into the scene and are only visible upon close inspection as tiny, fascinating details. The composition is chaotic but in a way that is visually enticing.
I was also intrigued by Michael Marlowe's “Blue Collar Guy, Blue Collar Gal” which was placed between Sue Chenoweth's piece and a series of photographs. From far away, it resembled a piece of well-done decorative art with its background that resembled blue-tinted, varnished wood along with a series of big, bold shapes. Upon closer inspection, these shapes were not the twisted, modified circles that I thought they were. There were clearly penises and breasts folded into these circles in a way that created a subtle sexual undertone that could not be “un-seen” once noticed. I admired how he was able to create an image that was simultaneously simple and suggestive, beautiful and disturbing.
The lack of a common theme between the artists served as a unifying feature for the show . There were conceptual artists displayed alongside representational artists and classically trained artists beside the self-taught. Though this was effective, it was somewhat distracting from the excellent work on display. The show may have better served its purpose if more similar artists were selected so that the viewers could keep their focus on the work of the artists instead of that of the curator.
Mimi Jardine, "Not Cornflakes"
Claudio Dicochea, "de la Jacqueline y el Cesar, la Gloria (of Jacqueline and Cesar, G-L-O-R-I-A)", acrylic, graphite, charcoal, and transfer on wood
George Thiewes, part of "Expanding the Sculptural Field" exhibition at Phoenix Art Museum, November 11, 2006 - April 8, 2007
SMoCA Lounge Opening and VIP Party
This Friday night I was fortunate enough to get an invite to SMoCA's VIP party and the opening of the new SMoCA lounge. Artists, gallery owners, curators, and other professionals in the art scene milled about among the new installations decked out in their finest attire. Besides admiring all of the wonderful art, I got to see Lisa Sette, owner of the Lisa Sette Gallery. I met her at the Scottsdale Art Walk a few weeks ago and I was so excited that she remembered me! I also got to meet jewelry artist Mimi Jardine, whose work is, simply put, divine. You can buy her jewelry at http://www.etsy.com/shop/MimiJardine.
I was also introduced to sculptor George Thiewes and painter Claudio Dicochea. It was a wonderful opportunity to meet people whose work I had heard so much about and, of course, to hand out my shiny new business cards that had just arrived the day before.
The largest new installation was the People's Biennial in SmoCA's Gallery 4. It featured the work of artists from around the country who are thought to be under-appreciated or under-represented. The theme was quite similar to that of phICA's “Declaring Independence” exhibit which I discussed previously. I was the most intrigued by the work of Gary Freitas. He is a forensic psychologist by day and mixed media artist by night. He creates elaborate, visually stunning sculptural pieces out of old computer parts. His piece “Singularity Artifact 2.0” is a series on concentric circles constructed from old circuit boards. It was hypnotizing to look at as it somewhat resembled an eye. According to the artist's son whom I spoke with, Freitas is trying to explore the interactions between human and computer intelligence and how we are connected through our similar operating systems based on electronic circuits. Though the pieces displayed in the gallery were small and fairly simple, his house which doubly functions as his studio is apparently filled with hundreds of these structures many of which contain LED lights and are capable of interacting with the viewers.
In the adjacent Gallery 3 was the exhibit “Artists Tell Stories (Mostly About Themselves)”. These pieces focused on artists who create narratives within their work, often about their own emotions and experiences. There were photographs, drawings, prints, and even knit-wear in this exhibition. All of the pieces seemed to be infused with a sort of neuroticism that intensely drew me in. I spent the most time in front of a series of drawings by Deb Sokolow that were a part of a show she did in New York entitled “Notes on Denver Airport and The New World Order”. It tells the story of her trip to Denver airport in which she investigated conspiracy theories surrounding the building's construction. The drawing “Log of Events” had a written, detailed account of things she saw, people who she thought were following her, and her thoughts about various conspiracies. The text was adjacent to a schematic drawing of the airport with tiny, delicate notes throughout. I wasn't sure if I was staring into the mind of a lunatic or at a masterpiece. Either way, I was fascinated.
The eclectic quality of the new exhibitions made for a great opening night. There was something to suit every artistic taste and the combination of different styles both highlighted the diversity of the individual pieces and brought one's attention to the richness and diversity of contemporary art.
Both of these installations will be open until January 2, 2012.