I’m always soft for you, that’s the problem. You could come knocking on my door five years from now and I would open my arms wider and say ‘come here, it’s been too long, it felt like home with you.
Azra T (via help-n-quotes)
The Stonewall Inn
Sweet Seals For You, Always

izzy's playlists!
Not today Justin
Keni
tumblr dot com
No title available
RMH

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
untitled
One Nice Bug Per Day
sheepfilms
hello vonnie
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵

Product Placement
art blog(derogatory)
𓃗
KIROKAZE

Andulka

#extradirty
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from South Africa
seen from Vietnam

seen from Philippines
seen from Venezuela
seen from Ethiopia
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Germany
seen from Türkiye

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia

seen from Mexico

seen from Greece
seen from United States
seen from Switzerland
seen from Argentina
seen from Argentina
@artsomnia
I’m always soft for you, that’s the problem. You could come knocking on my door five years from now and I would open my arms wider and say ‘come here, it’s been too long, it felt like home with you.
Azra T (via help-n-quotes)
“Blue Nude (I)” (1952) by Henri Matisse x “Blue Nude” (1902) by Pablo Picasso
Santa Cruz Sentinel, California, March 10, 1932
once u accept “men are trash” as a universal immutable truth u can never be let down again. there is no “he’s different” like i PROMISE you he is not.
Rick Sanchez, Don Draper, and BoJack Horseman are three examples of a popular male character trope: the intelligent, talented, toxic, disconnected, detached man who fails to connect with others and is consistently and wildly self destructive in his quest to fill an emotional void with anything but human connection. The problem with this character archetype lies with the fans, insofar as a lot of people, a specific subset of men in particular, miss the entire point of the character.
They’re so easily sucked in by the flashy veneer of masculine bravado on the surface of these damaged characters that they fail to understand why the characters are presented this way: you do not want to be like them. You are not supposed to identify with them positively or see them as someone to emulate, you are not supposed to sincerely root for them to win most of the time, they are antiheros.
In spite of being the protagonist Rick, Don, and BoJack are almost never the “good guy” in any given scenario, they are almost always selfishly motivated, and explicitly harming innocent people for their own gain. The rare moments of redemption usually don’t last.
Idolizing and lionizing these characters as an ideal or something to aspire to entirely misses the concept of the characters, and worse, celebrates behavior that is explicitly shown to be toxic and harmful.
If you identify as “a Rick” then the entire concept of the show has gone completely over your head. The creators of all three shows position their characters clearly, and get more blatant with each season.
To be clear, seeing negative traits in yourself and identifying with the struggle to improve them, or wanting these characters to change and grow is not what we’re referring to here, but rather the explicit support for and celebration of these characters as they are. This isn’t even a critique of the characters themselves. All of whom are well written, interesting, and complex, but rather it’s a critique of how we see and interpret these characters. This archetype applies to many characters like Sherlock, House, and Archer, and is also mirrored in family members like Beth to Rick or Mycroft to Sherlock. Liking these characters is fine. Enjoying them ia fine, but acknowledge what they are.
she really wasn’t kidding about johns underwear
the saga continues
Using Ne
- random bursts of energy that can last anwhere from 10 seconds to 10 hours
- getting bored easily
- acting like a hyperactive child when we find an interesting subject to discuss
- being indecisive because of all the perspectives we have to consider
- also being unable to pick one side of an argument
- forgetting basic stuff like eating and sleeping
- being unable to explain anything coherently and linearly
- wanting to explore everything, learn everything and do everything, because the world is so full of possibilities and wE MUST EXPERIENCE THEM ALL
Stephen King’s IT is a boggart from Harry Potter. He becomes what ever you fear the most and the only way to get rid of him is to stop being afraid. The whole movie is just a bunch of muggles trying to get rid of a boggart without using magic.
bro its beddy-bye. its nighty-night, dude
As much as I use my smart phone I don’t think I have ever seen it in any of my dreams
Is there anything more satisfying than finding a tiny toad?
I’m talking real small. Mad tiny. The ones that look too little to exist.
From the Dining Table // Harry Styles
(source)
Dylan just failed a morality test literally designed for 4-year-olds
A sigh near a hiking trail. (Source)