Social Justice Differences between the NFL and NBA
By Matthew Enriquez
Credits Ted S. Warren/Associated Press; Rich Kane/Icon Sportswire, via Associated Press
The National Football League has garnered quite a bit of flack these last couple of years. Since Colin Kaepernick began his campaign of protesting the national anthem back in 2016, the league has made it harder and harder to contribute to the social justice movements. While banning viewable protest, forcing players to stay in the locker room as opposed to being seen taking visible actions in peaceful protest, it begs the question: why is it so much harder to represent social justice movements in the NFL than in other sports?
To compare one sport to the other, the NBA, though it has a significant difference in the number of players and revenue it takes in, one could argue the fan base and politics engage with the two sports very differently.
A New York Times article âWhy the N.F.L. and the N.B.A. Are So Far Apart on Social Justice Stancesâ by John Branch provides clarity and arguments that because the two sports engage with their players differently, the partisanship of their fans, and how their organizations have dealt with political figures effects how they interact with social justice movements.
The article states some figures: there are about 450 players in the NBA and there are over 1600 players in the NFL (about four times as many). You can remember your starting five on your home teamâs basketball team, while many cannot remember even their whole home football teamâs defensive line. Because there are fewer players in the NBA and a lot of them are accessible via social media, itâs easier for them to communicate with their audiences. Lebron James engages much more to his audience on social media than, for example, Tom Brady does. It is also impossible to not mention a majority of the NBAâs are black while it differs in the NFL. This absolutely shows how they can interact with social justice movements.
According to the article. The NFL makes more revenue than the NBA and has higher ratings--although the NFLâs are steadily falling. And according to public opinion research, the NFL has the least partisan split in their fanbase; the NBAâs fanbase tends to veer toward the left. This allows for NFL owners to participate more in political matters and generally choose to side with Republicans and Trump whereas a majority of NBA owners donated to Hillary Clintonâs campaign in 2016 according to an Open Secrets article. These interactions affect how the fan sees both entities.
Lastly, we see more and more of President Trump in sports today. When you win a national championship in American sports, historically people have gone to see the president. In the Trump presidency, more frequently this has not been in the case. In last yearâs NBA finals, both teams--The Cleveland Cavaliers and the Golden State Warriors--both agreed prior to the finals even starting that neither of them would accept the traditional White House invitation. This issue becomes more complicated considering the president rescinded his invitation to the Philadelphia Eagles at the last minute to the Superbowl Champions.
While many variables play into how each player, organization, and sport participate in social justice actions, we as consumers respond to what is presented to us. Professional athletic organizations, whether they like it or not, are social influencers. Their emblematic power can sponsor positive change or hinder it.












