The "man of movement" has nothing eternal, and therefore nothing firm, so as a consequence thereof he has not the courage to become the recognizable individual who wills something and will take risks for it. Essentially he does not act at all, in the outcry he makes a feigned sally, his activity culminates in shouting out something. As when children are at play and one of them suddenly shouts, "Why not play this game?" the man of movement shouts, "Why not do this now?" Thereupon when they have become many, when the majority is on their side and the cause is forced through – then the man of movement is for the first time really recognizable, for he goes about with New Year's congratulations and says, "It was really I who stood at the head of the Movement and the New Direction." Sometimes it comes to pass that men behold with wonder several men going about with congratulations, each one of them saying, "It was really I who stood at the head of the Movement, etc." So it appears that there was not merely one but several men at the head. This comical confusion contains a deep truth, namely, that no one at all stood at the head, and therefore the one is as much justified as the other in going about with congratulations. A true extraordinarius who stood alone, forsaken, pointed out in the pillory of the special individual, a true extraordinarius who was recognizable by the fact that he was executed -well, it is a matter of course that after this he cannot very well go about with congratulations – but neither can he be mistaken for another.