Nudist Values and Religion from Nudist Society
Nudism was… unconventional. Socializing without clothes was easy to mistake for some thing sexual, especially since nudity is used for sexual entertainment. The Catholic Legion of Decency campaigned to make nudism illegal, and New York and Ohio did criminalize it. (And nudism remains a class A misdemeanor in Arkansas.) Democrat, Al Smith, a Catholic made his objection to nudism part of his 1928 presidential bid. [more]
The nudists, of course, knew what a crock this was, but wrote rules to underline nudism’s unsexiness. The American Sunbathing Association at the time of Nudist Society’s publication prohibited alcohol, unnecessary body contact, photography without consent (no telephoto lenses), membership by convicted criminals, sexual deviants, or Communists, married persons without their spouses, improper conduct, cohabitation, fornication, or swinging.
Another nudist tradition is that everybody—from toddler to great grandparent, laborer to, um, management consultant—is on a first name basis. One reason for that is familiarity. Even then, nudism was seen as a leveler. “When nobody’s wearing anything, you can’t tell who’s a janitor and who’s a CEO.” Another reason is anonymity. You can be “Jack” or “Kate,” but the world’s full of Jacks and Kates. Nudists were worried about the people in the clothed world and how those people might treat them. “Good-natured” ribbing, family friction, job loss.
The book tells two stories about real-world consequences suffered by nudists whose secret leaked.
Somebody at a party identified a woman guest as a nudist. Later, and man cornered and propositioned her. The woman and her husband left, the man demanded, “Hey, what’s the matter? You’re a nudist, aren't you?”
A club on the Pennsylvania-Maryland line brought considerable business to the local economy. The local newspaper congratulated it on being a good neighbor. When the owner-editor found out that one of his mechanical staff was a member, he fired the nudist without notice. When somebody points out the irony, the owner said that nudists were alright as long as they paid their bills, but he didn’t want one working for him.
There’s something that I heard from a Sonoma County communard. There was a lot of nudity at Morningstar and Wheeler’s Ranch, and everybody was on a first name basis. In fact, knowing a friend’s last name was a token of intimacy. Very few people knew that your name was “Cornflower MacDonald.”
Respondents’ religious affiliations were, in numerical order Catholic (144), Methodist (92), Unspecified (74), Lutheran (72), “Protestant” (68), Presbyterian (67), Baptist (64), Episcopal (34), “Christian (33), Unitarian (27), Latter Day Saints (20), “Religious Science (19), Congregational (16), Christian Science (10), Church of Christ (8), Jewish (8-7), Seventh Day Adventist (5), Church of England, Four Square, and Vedanta (2 each), Salvation Army (1).
Nudist Society spends as lot of ink arguing about who can claim to affiliate this way or that. Were they one denomination, and then changed? Do they show up on Sunday, or did they just say they were this or that. It occurred to me as I was reading that the number denomination fielded may have had more to do with the number of adherents in the larger population, than a moral or philosophical alignment. Still, I was surprised not to see more Unitarians, and it surprised me to see some churches represented at all.
There’s one more nudist prohibition, one that the book doesn’t mention. That’s against talking religion of politics. Still, I’d like to have heard more about what accommodations the respondents made to reconcile faith and nudism. I’d also have liked to hear more about some issues that were waxing in the civic conversation of the day. Feminism is the big one. (Maybe there will be discussion later about who in a family decides it’s going to go nudist.) “Hippies” is another. (The book was in production at the height of the counterculture.) Contraception is adjacent. Free love. Pornography..










