The Value of Taking Time
I am often amazed that anyone reads my weekly blog and even more surprised when you write to me about it! Over the weekend, a parent wrote to me following last week’s blog to recommend a podcast: Revisionist History by Malcolm Gladwell. In the episode titled ‘Puzzle Rush’, Gladwell explores an intriguing question: why do we place such a high value on speed when it comes to thinking and learning? Click here to play podcast. This is especially relevant as we are in the examination season.
The episode centres on the experience of sitting the US Law School Admissions Test (LSAT), a highly pressurised exam where success depends not only on getting the right answers, but on doing so quickly. Gladwell challenges whether this focus on speed really reflects the skills that matter most; particularly in professions, like law, that demand careful, measured judgement.
He goes on to describe two types of thinkers: those who work quickly and instinctively and those who take a more deliberate, methodical approach. The former often flourish in timed environments; the latter may arrive at equally strong, or even better, answers, but needs longer to do so. The concern is that our systems, especially assessments, tend to reward speed over depth.
This idea is illustrated through the chess game ‘Puzzle Rush’, in which players solve problems against the clock. The faster you are, the higher your score. Yet, as in many areas of life, speed can come at a cost, as mistakes increase and deeper thinking is squeezed out.
As a school, this raises an important question: what kind of thinking do we most value and encourage? Clearly, there are times when working quickly is important: examinations are time-bound and fluency matters. However, education is not simply about producing quick answers; it is about developing understanding, resilience and the confidence to grapple with complexity.
Some of our pupils will be naturally quick thinkers. Others will be more reflective, preferring to test ideas, reconsider and refine their thinking. Both approaches have great merit. Indeed, many of life’s most important decisions, and most meaningful learning, come not from speed but from careful thought. At Bablake, we aim to strike a thoughtful balance. We prepare pupils for the realities of exams, including the need to work efficiently. At the same time, we place emphasis on depth of understanding, encouraging pupils to think critically, ask questions and take intellectual risks without fear of ‘not being quick enough’.
We also recognise that confidence can be shaped by these experiences. A child who feels rushed may doubt their ability, when in fact they are simply someone who thinks best with time and space. Helping pupils understand how they learn is just as important as what they learn.
Perhaps the key thing for us all to take from this - parents, teachers and pupils alike - is that fast is not always better.
In a world that often demands immediacy, there is real value in slowing down, thinking deeply and getting things right. Encouraging our children to develop that confidence and to take their time when needed, may ultimately serve them far beyond the classroom.













