Getting emotional about theory again.
... though in this case the deviation may seem slight indeed - the cultivation of a quiff, the acquisition of a scooter or a record or a certain type of suit. But it ends in the construction of a style, in a gesture of defiance or contempt, in a smile or a sneer. It signals a Refusal. I would like to think this Refusal is worth making, that these gestures have a meaning, that the smiles and the sneers have some subversive value, even if, in the final analysis, they are, like Genet’s gangster pinups, just the darker side of sets of regulations, just so much graffiti on a prison wall.
- Dick Hebdige in intro to Subculture
Sort of similarly, a couple weeks ago I watched every half-assed youtube Clash documentary I could find and there’s one where Joe Strummer, in his 40′s, is talking about how absurd their ambitions were but that he’s proud that they tried anyway. Obviously the pathos is on overdrive because he died too early and he has such a soft spoken, reflective, good guy way of speaking, as a middle-ager. Ok fine, I have to find it now.
We were always of the Left, but having said that, we didn’t have any solutions to the world’s problems. I mean, we were trying to grope in a Socialist way towards some future where the world might be less of a miserable place than it is, but... if Karl Marx was unable to do it, there’s no way that four guitarists from London could do it. So... we were, like, groping in the dark. You have to think to yourself, what would you do if you did rule the world? It’s a tough question and I don’t think we had an answer to it, not that we should have done. But we did try to put our minds... pose those sort of questions, whatever good that was, we did try.