Boo.

Coachella Valley. 22. I woke up like dis. Instagram: Beezuhgee

[distractful]

The Breakfast Club (1985)

[obeytheprophecy]

[thequeenbey]

african kween.

[bernadettelogue]

[dailykwotes]

"What sculpture is to a block of marble, education is to the soul."

Joseph Addison (via dailykwotes)

[goodquoteco]

[dailykwotes]

"Opinions are made to be changed - or how is truth to be got at?"

Lord Byron (via dailykwotes)

[notmytmblr]

i dont think you realize how perfect this is.

[angrywocunited]

Groups like the KKK are Christian terrorist organizations.

They’re never labeled as terrorists, not even Christian terrorists.

Y’all are silent about Christian terrorism but will discuss Islamic terrorism to the extent of believing all Muslims are terrorists.  

[ruinedchildhood]

This could be us..

[ruinedchildhood]

but you playin.

[georgieharrisons]

Saw this on a thrift store and it made me happy

[maghrabiyya]

"pixie to goddess" holy fuck that is adorable

[milas-universe]

Pixie to Goddess was a great tag line lol

[sourcedumal]

I love that wording.

[asafo2020-deactivated20171024]

Before the Fame

[mickeyandcompany]

November 22, 1995 - Toy Story is released

[madamesosostris-deactivated2019]

[boygregory]

[wolfsheim66-deactivated20150621]

What’s the difference here?

[the-exercist]

The first woman is a real human being. She controls her own body and has her own personality. She has control over her own actions and can make autonomous decisions in her life. She also has to directly deal with the people around her and the bigotry, stereotyping and harassment that she is exposed to. She is real, she has emotions, she has thoughts, and she has rights. 

The second woman is fictional. She was created by other people who exert full control over her body, appearance and actions. Her sole purpose is to be literally bought and sold for the entertainment of an audience. She cannot make her own decisions, she cannot control her own body and she is not real. She is not responsible for her behavior or appearance: She is the product of the environment that she was created in. 

The first woman, by virtue of being a human being who identifies with the feminist movement and acts in accordance to those beliefs, is therefore a feminist. She is actively participating in feminism and is choosing to dress herself in a manner of protest that best demonstrates that she alone controls her body, and that no others have a right to access her body without her consent. She is a multi-faceted person who has agency, and part of that agency includes the ability to look sexy while refusing to consent to her own dehumanization. Her actions are not only one small part of what makes her a person, but she is also participating within a cultural trend of protesting rape culture. 

The second woman, because she is not autonomous and was designed by a series of outsiders, is sexist because she is the passive product of sexist content creators. She exists as an ornament. Her clothes were chosen as fan service so that she can be sexually available and gratifying at all times, most likely for straight male gamers. Her erotic appearance has little functional purpose other than to please an audience. And since she exists within an industry that is consistently criticized for ostracizing female participants and creating a large gap between the depictions of male and female characters, her appearance is simply one detail within a much larger array of sexist problems. 

Get it?