Iâm not this Anon, but I too have been a longtime follower of your blog and though I really liked it in the past, I do have to agree that the amount of misinformation posted lately is disheartening. :( Here are a few of the recent things Iâve noticed:
-A number of the breed health responses are off, the worst case of this being the Doberman. I realize itâs impossible to be well-versed in the welfare problems of every single dog breed, but perhaps in the future you could research with credible sources and then link to those sources? This is a good practice to have in general. :)
-Another thing that I personally found problematic in the Doberman health post was the insinuation that because a health problem has a genetic (or phenotypic) test for it, it is somehow less of an issue in the breed and that itâs possible to âbreed outâ diseases by health-testing. This is a common misconception amongst dog breeders which arguably causes more problems than it fixes, so itâs disheartening to find a blog which is about animal welfare in breeding to support these views. The absolute best source to read about how genetic testing should fit into a breeding program can be found in The Genetics of the Dog edited by Ostrander and Ruvinsky in the chapter on genetic counseling for dog breeders. However, I realize that itâs an expensive text that not everyone can afford, so as a second choice I would recommend reading through some of the articles on the Institute of Canine Biologyâs website, in particular Managing Genetic Disorders: âJust eliminate the bad gene.â For something thatâs a little more accessible, I recommend this article: Health Testing in Dogs is Limited.
-The posts on dog licensing in the US are also incorrect. In every state, you must legally get your dog vaccinated for rabies and get the dog licensed every 1-3 years, so it is essentially a tax. Many areas, both in cities and counties, also have strict limits on the number of animals you can own without a breeding license. And yes, the government can and will seize your animals if you are breaking the law, and even euthanize them if you cannot or will not comply with the legal ordinances in your area (like mandatory spay/neuter laws or BSL). There are also special restrictions on dog breeders enforced by the USDA. Hence, there are not only legal puppy mills in the US, but USDA-approved puppy mills. Lack of legislation is not the primary issue, and in fact many responsible hobby breeders are hurt more by the USDA regulations than puppy mills are, because the USDA standards tend to favor a factory-farming setting over a raised-in-the-home setting. Some cities have additional requirements for pet breeders on top of the USDA requirements. A good resource on US dog and dog breeder laws is the AKCâs government relations page.
-I know you have already addressed this, but the working vs. show split post was at least 50% incorrect. Two that really jumped out at me personally were Azawakhs and Salukis, since both of these dogs are still being bred in their countries of origin as landraces! There are even several breeders just in the US that breed landrace drop-eared sighthounds using country of origin stock.
-The post on dwarfism in Dachshunds âbeing the least issue in breeding ethicsâ is extremely misguided. Ÿ of ALL Dachshunds have at least one calcified disc, thanks to their dwarfism, and ÂŒ will require some form of medical treatment. In two years of working at a vet I have seen 3 Dachshunds euthanized at 3 years-old or younger due to problems caused by severe IVDD. I know of several more that became partially paralyzed around the same age. The rate of IVDD in Doxies is outrageous even compared to other hypochondroplastic breeds like Corgis. It is definitely a welfare issue. Also, the assumption that the Doxieâs problems with IVDD are caused by extreme conformation rather than the dwarfism itself is incorrect. I have written on this in the past. Several studies have been done analyzing the various risk factors for IVDD in Dachshunds, and none of them found relative conformation (i.e. the length of the legs compared to the back) to be a statistically significant increase in risk for IVDD in the breed.
-The blog overall seems to focus really heavily on issues of extreme conformation in breeding, which is only a small part of the overall problem with genetic diseases in dog breeds. The reality is that only a minority of dog breeds suffer from qualzucht or sine qua non disorders, but all dog breeds are burdened with relatively high rates of genetic disease due to the poor population management practices encouraged by the closed registry system most large registries continue to utilize. This is dangerous because it can lull people into a false sense of security that because their breed is of moderate conformation or is bred for work over aesthetics, that they are somehow largely immune to genetic disorders. For a blog about animal welfare in breeding, it would make sense to address the major issues behind genetic disease rather than just the minor ones, as horrible as qualzucht is, and present a more balanced view of promoting health in breeding.
If youâre interested in learning more about canine genetics, here are some starting resources I recommend as basic background information on the subject:
-The Institute of Canine Biology
-Articles by Jeffrey Bragg especially Population Genetics in Practice: Principles for the Breeder and Purebred Dogs into the Twenty-First Century
-Canine Genetics and Epidemiology
-Canine Inherited Disorders Database - VERY useful for researching breed-specific health concerns, but itâs still good to compile multiple sources when researching breed health
-Hereâs my collection of canine genetics studies and articles; some of these are very specific whereas others are more broad.
-If you can afford it, Dr. Beauchat of the Institute of Canine Biology is teaching an online course on Basic Population Genetics for Dog Breeders which is scheduled to begin on September 1st. Only $95 for a 10 week course in such a specific subject taught by an expert in the field seems like a steal to me.