
PR's Tumblrdome
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
Interview Vampire Daily
RMH
Doug Jones

Kiana Khansmith
Mike Driver
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
Cookie Run:Kingdom Official!
TMBGareOK. The Official They Might Be Giants tumblr
Noah Kahan

bliss lane
art blog(derogatory)
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ

pixel skylines

No title available

Love Begins
No title available

blake kathryn
No title available

seen from France
seen from United States

seen from Bangladesh
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Spain
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Italy
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Indonesia

seen from Malaysia

seen from Germany
@britishrfblog
It blows my mind how unlikeable Will and Kate have become since Charles's coronation. Despite being separated from Harry and Meghan, and having overwhelmingly positive press coverage, they have become freaking caricatures of out-of-touch rich people. Just some rapid-fire things I gleaned from THIS article:
Moving into a larger, 8-bedroom mansion is now painted as "downsizing" by The Times. Literally using a word that has the opposite meaning of what they're doing.
Another justification is that Kate had cancer, so she should be able to move into a new Georgian mansion for a "new start". Something I have noticed is how KP brings up Kate's illness to justify things (new homes, missed work, vacations) that would otherwise look bad. KP has no problem weaponizing her illness to frame her as more sympathetic and not deserving of reasonable criticism. Fergie has also had cancer (twice!) does that mean she's entitled to stay at Royal Lodge with Andrew and behave however she likes? Kate and William's choice to buy a new mansion might have been motivated by her sickness, but it's not absolved by her sickness. It's still out of touch and extravagant regardless.
The no "live-in" staff is stupid, and you are stupid if you believe it. They evidently still have staff, regardless of whether or not they "live in".
We don't know how much in taxes William pays, what he writes off, or what practices he employs to pay the right amount, but we're suddenly supposed to believe he is so conscious of taxpayer money when it comes to buying another home for himself and his family. This grown man needs a new house to "think" as if any action is happening up there to begin with.
They are appealing to the British middle-class sensibilities by owning six properties, working less than 1/6th of the year, and vacationing multiple times each season, sometimes on multimillionaire mega yachts.
The monarch not living in London, but instead in a secluded rural estate with far less public accessibility and visibility, is actually Bad. There is a reason British monarchs have mainly lived in London.
How can we trust the media to report on these two accurately when they can't even be criticized? Their laziness and entitlement is getting more brazen with each year because they feel they can basically do whatever they want. And, yeah, I think they can.
27 August 1993
British Royal Family - The Prince and Princess of Wales seen in a newly released video by Kensington Palace. It celebrates the healing power of nature and changing seasons | May 12, 2025
So is this what they do now? They periodically release ads?
These two need to focus on substance, not fluff.
Credit: The Duchess of Sussex
No, Meghan Sussex Isn’t Losing Popularity - The Data Exposes the Real Bombshell
Meghan Sussex’s popularity in the U.S. is being questioned by GB News, which claims she ranks lower than Kate Middleton, Prince William, and King Charles. They called it a “bombshell poll.” But once you move past the headlines and examine the numbers, the story unravels fast. The narrow margins and selective reporting don’t align with broader media trends, Google search interest, or long-term…
Prince Harry loses his Security Detail UK Court Case Battle Over Protections for him and his family when visiting the UK.
"In a recent interview with the BBC, Prince Harry, the Duke of Sussex, made clear that he wants to be reunited with his family, among other things. But it appears they do not want the same. King Charles and Prince William have made clear through their actions and their royal leakers that they have no desire to reconcile with Harry. They, including Queen Consort Camilla, have even mocked and laughed at Harry for suggesting the parties meet with a professional mediator or family therapist.
"For the rest of us to watch a very public, world-famous family repeatedly pick on one of their own, especially when that person has done everything to seek love, healing, and reconciliation, is deeply disappointing. Prince Harry has borne the brunt of a toxic dynamic, and like so many scapegoats, he’s been left out in the cold not because of his failings, but because of the family’s. It sounds just like what they did to his 'mummy,' Princess Diana. How sad that instead of learning from the past, the royals seemed hell bent on repeating it."
Prince Harry confronts painful truths in a high-stakes legal battle over his security, deepening his rift with the royal family and revealin
"Prince Harry is reeling from the aftermath of a legal battle that has forced him to confront the painful reality he’s never fully escaped since leaving the U.K. in 2020 — a reality that lies at the heart of his ongoing rift with the royal family.
"Feeling 'exhausted and overwhelmed,' Harry told PEOPLE as he left court on April 9 that his 'worst fears have been confirmed by the whole legal disclosure in this case — and that’s really sad.'
...
"When Harry departed the Sandringham Summit in January 2020, he did so with the understanding that his security would remain in place. Court documents revealed that, in letters from the Queen herself, she expressed support for Harry and Meghan’s need for 'effective security.' Yet, just one month later, the government committee responsible for state-funded security, RAVEC, informed them that this would no longer be the case.
"In the years since, Harry has immersed himself in the process, including learning about RAVEC, the body responsible for the decision-making. One of his core beliefs, PEOPLE understands, is that the removal of security for him and his family when they stepped back from the working royal family was a deliberate tactic of control — a way to force them back into the fold. Rather than bringing the Sussexes back, the removal of security instead revealed to Harry the lengths to which they were willing to go, and it became the final straw. The prince admits that this realization 'was difficult to swallow.'
...
"Harry has found a way to move on and forgive much of what’s happened since 2016 — but there’s one thing he simply cannot forgive: the events surrounding the legal battle regarding his and his family's safety. 'People would be shocked by what’s being held back,' Harry says."
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/royal-family/2025/04/11/prince-harry-police-protection-withdrawn-trap-royal-family/
The final section to this piece is extraordinary. I suspect it will be quickly suppressed by the Firm, therefore I'm screenshotting as well as excerpting:
Before I give the transcript, note: This entire section is unsourced, meaning the Telegraph is essentially offering up its editorial voice to say they believe this is true. Meaning: they heard it from Harry directly.
This is a naked threat from Harry to tell what he knows unless security for his family is restored. Transcript, emphasis mine:
"For all of the bad tempered interviews and settling of scores, the Duke wants peace with his family and peace with the press. But he knows there has been too much conflict, too much water under the bridge.
"So much has changed in these intervening years. His father has cancer, but the lack of trust in the Sussexes means that he does not know how much time he has left.
"The Duke would love to return more frequently to see family and support his charities without having to hide in hotels. Win or lose this appeal, he is aware that he may not get what he wants.
"Even a victory will not force Ravec to simply rewrite its policy to suit the Sussexes. There will be a window in which things could be changed, but it is not in his hands.
"Regardless of the outcome, the Duke will hope that by drawing attention to the way the committee operates, the system might change and become more transparent.
"If he can’t fix it for himself, perhaps he can fix it for others.
"Whether or not he has an appetite for pursuing the case still further, beyond the courtroom, remains to be seen.
"There would be nothing stopping him talking publicly about the experience and what he has learnt, putting together the pieces of the puzzle, writing a second book or making a podcast.
"He will be acutely aware that to do so would cause further upset.
"But the Duke believes that if he has uncovered an injustice, he should try and fix it.
"He is unlikely to rest until he feels vindicated.
"A palace source said: 'These are matters of security and government policy and, as usual, it would be inappropriate to comment or intervene on either.'