Simon and Garfunkel scrapped shots, 60s
wallacepolsom
DEAR READER

Product Placement
sheepfilms

Kaledo Art

izzy's playlists!
we're not kids anymore.
No title available
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ

★
Cosimo Galluzzi

@theartofmadeline

Andulka
Cosmic Funnies
Claire Keane
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
NASA
Three Goblin Art
Show & Tell

Origami Around
seen from United States

seen from Sweden

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from Brazil

seen from Malaysia

seen from Singapore
seen from United States
seen from Portugal

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Türkiye
seen from New Zealand
seen from United States
seen from France
seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Singapore
seen from United Kingdom
@bunnydracula
Simon and Garfunkel scrapped shots, 60s
If Paul Simon and Art Garfunkel were beautiful
source
Bornean bearded pig (Sus barbatus) photographed by a camera trap
(x)
Times That Copyright Expansion Has Historically Fucked Over Artists On An Institutional Level:
Sampling rights becoming prohibitively expensive to use by small artists
Musicians being forced to sign over sampling rights to their record company, making any benefits they would hypothetically gain moot.
The Digital Milennium Copyright Act leading to the vidmaker-stomping nightmare that is ContentID
The DMCA leading to making it harder than ever to preserve media due to the way it prohibits tinkering with any locks the megacorps put on it, meaning it's way easier for artists' hard work to end up vaulted and lost.
The way basic chord progressions and musical styles have become copyrightable thanks to various lawsuits by the Marvin Gaye estate
The fact that the artists of the past used to be able to remix; adapt and iterate on art made within 56 years of them, likely created in their lifetimes, and now artists can only do those things with art produced nearly a century ago by people long dead.
New and independent artists being crowded out of the market by megacorp-owned IPs that would be public domain (and thusly convey less of an overwhelming advantage-via-marquee-value to megacorps) if the US had its pre-1976 copyright laws.
Times That Copyright Expansion Has Actually Materially Helped Artists On An Institutional Level:
????????
Times that Copyright Expansion Resulted In Something Kinda Funny:
When Metallica did a twitch concert and got a copyright strike on their own music as a direct result of their lobbying for copyright expansion
hacks true ending
"I’m a cancer survivor abt to lose housing. My last ask ever for communal support is for 3k, if folks wouldn’t mind chipping in to help w the transition out of my apt, moving costs of my life upending, & losing my home b4 surgery. Thanks everyone! I (we) tried.
P/V: nubulagalaxie"
via nubulagalaxie on twitter
this baby tawny frogmouth is hungry hungry hungry! hes taking it all!
Simon and Garfunkel scrapped shots, 60s
"CIMG0058" (2006), VINCENT DIAMANTE
if you are frustrated as an artist coming from fandoms you must learn how to lampoon orthodox media. it is simply a muscle that you can build up with practice
people think fanart is evil because they think borrowing and transforming work is a lesser form of art-making and “fan-made” works are therefore corrupting. obviously thats complete bullshit. fanart is inherently evil because it promotes media products
another thing is that when you criticize crossdressers / drag performers wholesale by emphasizing particular styles of dress or makeup associated with them as a "mockery" of womanhood, when your criticism hinges entirely on the framing of beautification practices associated with these labels as excessive, exaggerated, unnatural for an "actual woman", the standard of womanhood being invoked, consciously or not, is, *explicitly*, a white one—because womanhood is defined from the standpoint of whiteness and eurocentrism.
the bar for "passing" as a woman as a brown or black person is much higher, black and brown people are consistently expected to modify their bodies in "unnatural" ways to a much greater degree to emphasize their femininity, whether it's straightening their hair, silicone pads, wearing more makeup, more revealing clothing, undergoing cosmetic surgeries to shift fat around their body, etc
similarly, most of the practices and procedures decried as "mocking" and "misogynistic", as "defiling" womanhood, in so many posts by white transfeminists on this website are the same fucking practices used by women, cis and trans, who are not white, trying to make their womanhood more legible in societies that associate femininity with whiteness
when you decry the prevalence of "obviously fake tits and thighs and garish makeup" in drag, often paired with the assertion that the intent is simply to ridicule womanhood and no one could genuinely derive gendered actualization from it, it echoes much of the criticism levied at travestis and the prevalence of silicone injections among predominantly black transfeminine people in Brazil, who wished to emphasize a particular standard of beauty that may not be considered "natural" to white cis women in America.
this, the travesti's beautification practices being contrasted negatively with the emerging field of transsexuality, the push by medical institutions to make existing embodiments of what we now call transfemininity conform to the transsexual patient's more "natural" and "dignified" womanhood, which more closely resembles the eurocentric beauty standards set by American sexologists and captured by the Brazilian clinic, is intrinsically tied to the travesti's greater marginalization from cis society
think about what cultural expectations you're upholding by framing femininity and effeminacy and its associated practices as needing to defer to the sanctity of "actual" womanhood, whose womanhood is that, what groups of people this statement protects—does this logic actually become meaningfully progressive when you append "trans" to it?
poop or roadkill
poop
roadkill
bald