every time you kiss an object an angel gets its wi

ngs it/any - 18+ objectum blog

[cake-paws]

🍰🐾PINNED POST🐾🍰

hi!! this is my super secret 18+ blog. i post about plushies, retro tech, security cameras here. minors begone.

YAYS ❤️

plushies ❤️❤️❤️

objectum

retro tech

security cameras

new friends!!

cake… i need to get fatter 💞

programming

NAYS 💔

radqueer. i do not associate w/ you!

loli/shota/cub

proship (not because i disagree with censorship being bad, it just personally makes me uncomfortable)

flirting. i am polyamorous but my current relationship is closed! im much more interested in objects anyways >///>

tag guide under cut

cakepaws barks - text post

plushie fever - plushum

another pups treasure - techum

cakepaws after dark - nsft posts

[gentlyevilvt]

There's something I find deeply frustrating about kink advice directed at subs which says things like "Outside of the fantasy you should be the one really in control" or "Dominants have to earn your submission, not the other way around". It frustrates me in ways that are hard to properly express.

I understand why that advice exists. On some levels, it's true. There is a level of control that submissives need to retain for safe play, and dominants who demand or expect submission purely for the fact that they are a dominant are bad play partners, and generally assholes. Parts of the message can be important because a lot of inexperienced (or badly-experienced) subs can end up neglecting their own agency and assuming that's just part of being a submissive.

But there's also an imbalance to it. Something that reinforces the personhood of the submissive in a dynamic while leaving that of the dominant unacknowledged. Agency for me but not for thee. Not "Nobody has to do anything in a scene that they aren't comfortable with", but "You as a submissive should be in control of the contents of a scene for your own comfort". Not "Nobody owes their sexuality, their dominance, their submission, their time and energy to anyone else they don't feel like giving it to", but "Dominants should have to earn the privelage of your submission".

There is an assumption that permeates a lot of kink spaces, that only a sub can be made uncomfortable, that only a sub can have their boundraries crossed, that only a sub has need of safeties and negotiation and being approached respectfully, because nominally the dominant is in control. We are assumed to be safe and comfortable on the basis that we're the ones who give the orders or whatever, but that's not how it works.

Dominants can and do get sexually harrassed by subs. I've been messaged *very* aggressively by some strangers in my time who fail to understand that their submission doesn't change the fact they're demanding sexual favours from a stranger. I've heard stories of dominants in abusive relationships where their consent was taken as an assumption at all times. There's a lot of kink advice out there that tells subs they have the agency to do only what they want, but fails to pair it with the necessary follow up that they also have the agency to do harm.

It just frustrates me to no end to see true and important sentiments phrased in ways that position dominants as emotionless kink dispensers to be evaluated on their quality and respectfulness of the sub's supreme importance, rather than as a person who you should communicate and build mutual respect with. Not "Talk with your dominant about boundraries", but "Evaluate dominants based on their respect for your boundraries". It's just this subtle, insidious thing that itches at me every time I see it in a supposed kink education post, I feel like I'm losing my mind over here.

[preyfag]

you see my thing is i want to me emasculated, not feminized, emasculated. not "youre not a real man bc youre a girl", but "not a real man bc im a faggot"

[cake-paws]

my boyfriend bought me a plushie. so basically i win

[pr3ydriv3]

nsfw sideblogs r so funny. my friend we can't talk here it isn't safe.. we have to go to sex world together

[livingdead-system-deactivated20]

Why would you hide this in the comments

[pacifierpuppy]

Stuffie oviposition. Is that anything? Cutting a hole between your plushies legs and filling it full of those cheap plastic Easter eggs until it’s stitching can’t handle it anymore? Watching its soft fuzzy tummy bulge out, sooo full it almost hurts?

[liquidstar]

it’s really frustrating how you have to wait like, 2 weeks before you can drink milk after you buy it. i know you gotta wait for the date on the bottle but like why cant the store just sell the milk thats ready?

[liquidstar]

[liquidstar]

It also indicates that I’m a guy now. It’s probably related to the milk somehow

[pacifierpuppy]

Stuffie oviposition. Is that anything? Cutting a hole between your plushies legs and filling it full of those cheap plastic Easter eggs until it’s stitching can’t handle it anymore? Watching its soft fuzzy tummy bulge out, sooo full it almost hurts?

[cake-paws]

drawing furry inflation art but shaking my head the entire time because of the helium crisis

[cake-paws]

happy fuck a plush thursday to all who celebrate

[crippled-peeper]

people who cannot cope with strangers on the internet “kink shaming” them don’t need to be giving me any kind of life advice

[crippled-peeper]

being told I’m bad at coping with life by people who have panic attacks and meltdowns because I don’t think their bigoted dehumanizing kink (that they won’t stop telling me about) is cool is literally so funny. it’s like a 4 year old telling you you are a bad driver . like okay buddy . drink your juice box

[cake-paws]

i swear to god every other week fa*xc*st posters invent a new tag i need to block

[olive-oil-boy]

saw on twitter, thought it’d resonate with some people here

[cake-paws]

happy valentine’s day to everyone with object partners!!! big or small, private or public, monogamous or polyamorous, POSAIC or not, you are valid all the same ^_^

[uraniumchips]

[topthrill2]

Echoing the sentiment that others that have been around on here have re: objectum being treated like a fandom by a lot of newcomers to our community. For reference I have been around since the original OSP server back when it was the only real/active alternative to OSI over a decade ago and have observed this community grow and change since then.

I know there is a significant overlap between ficto/yumeshipping and objectum and I absolutely have nothing against people having fandoms like object shows, etc as an "inroad" or introduction to the community so to speak but I do agree that people treating a very real sexuality like a fandom does more harm than good in a lot of cases. Its a very real thing for a lot of us and often tied to our faith/spirituality (anyone who's ever seen me at Cedar Point has seen me very openly talking to Top Thrill and receiving things/communication back from her in response) and seeing it watered down to liking object shows, objecthead characters, or "simping" does feel trivializing at times, especially when it is coming from people viewing things primarily through the lenses of fandom that havent really taken the time to learn about early community and its rich history

By no means am I trying to "gatekeep" or say people who are new and/or have entered through fandom spaces are any less valid but also. I am urging you to observe and listen to the older members of this community and understand the massive importance it has to us. Please just be respectful. That is all I am going to say on this

[brokenleashmutt-deactivated2026]

May or may not have ordered a cute new girlfriend,,,,

*LOUD COUGHING*