Happy 25th Anniversary Jurassic Park!
Released June 11, 1993
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
Sweet Seals For You, Always
trying on a metaphor
cherry valley forever

No title available
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸

@theartofmadeline

Kaledo Art

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
Three Goblin Art

titsay

oozey mess

PR's Tumblrdome
Monterey Bay Aquarium

祝日 / Permanent Vacation
🪼
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
wallacepolsom

blake kathryn
Jules of Nature

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Türkiye

seen from Norway

seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from Japan
seen from Ireland
seen from China
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
@cannyoudigit
Happy 25th Anniversary Jurassic Park!
Released June 11, 1993
Calling All Future Archaeologists
When a site is excavated, a site is destroyed by archaeologists. It’s a vicious cycle to make a discovery only to immortalize it in modern techniques in an interpreted way (see Sir Arthur Evans’ work on Knossos) or to damage foundations or expose ancient artefacts incompatible with the atmosphere of today. The future of archaeology lies in many pockets, but like all things in the 21st century, technology runs the world. Photogrammetry has been successfully used in excavations to map distances between objects and create a map with the ability to be downloaded into a 3D diagram. This method is fairly inexpensive in comparison to many others, and variations can be used on land and in underwater archaeology. Alternatively, space archaeology and satellite technology has begun to be used in identifying an amazing amount of new sites never discovered before. Sarah Parcak has pinpointed thousands of new archaeological sites using this new technology. The sensors on satellites can detect infrared radiation and unusual buried structures emit a different radiation, making more sites possible to find. Technology continues to evolve over time and Parcak has represented just how fantastically it can be used. Photogrammetry and Satellite technology are just two of many different methods, however, they both can be employed to find archaeological sites and ultimately understand how to excavate before preserving them for future generations.
And History Repeats Itself
Antiochia ad Cragum was a city founded in the first century BCE around the rule of Roman Emperor Claudius Nero. This ancient Roman city is found in modern southern Turkey. At this site, a stone head of Medusa was unearthed. What archaeologists find so fascinating about this find was that it survived the destruction of all things Pagan by the Christians. One archaeologist boldly stated the “Christians living at Antiochia were destroying art in the same way ISIS is destroying remnants of the ancient past.”
Today this site is a sparsely populated outskirt town of Gazipas, and is now mainly wheat fields. It’s surprisingly new and fresh to archaeologists as it was only discovered in the 19th century, but not very well researched since then. Those who have researched the site although mention it may have been of economic use to the Roman Empire because of it’s trade and production of wine, agriculture and glass.
Next year the team hopes to excavate the city’s assembly area (for what we would call modern day government meetings) that may have doubled as a theatre.
The Game of Liu Bo
(Please note that the copyright laws of new.discovery.com prohibit their article being rewritten in anyway. However, it was too interesting to pass up sharing with other board game enthusiasts)
“Then, with bamboo dice and ivory pieces, the game of Liu Bo is begun; sides are taken; they advance together; keenly they threaten each other. Pieces are kinged, and the scoring doubled. Shouts of ‘five white!’ arise.” (Translation by David Hawkes).
2, 200 years ago, Song Yu wrote about what an ancient board game, newly discovered from a 2, 300 year old tomb near Qingzhou City in China, was like.
Recently archaeologists found a 14-faced die made of animal tooth and game pieces which they have attributed to Song Yu’s description. Twelve faces of the die are numbered from 1 to 6 twice in an ancient Chinese writing called seal script and two are left blank. These game pieces were found in a heavily looted tomb next to a skeleton archaeologists assume is a grave robber.
The tomb has a staircase that descends into the burial chamber, and in antiquity this would have been hidden under dirt. During the 3rd century BCE, a state called Qi was ruled by Qin Shi Huangdi. This tomb is thought to be built to bury the aristocrats from the state of Qi. After Qin Shi Huangdi conquered Qi and three other states, he had unified all of China and became the China’s first emperor. It was then after this conquest that he started to build his own tomb which was guarded by the terracotta army.
(As a side note, it is really quite fascinating and upsetting that it takes so long for archaeologists to publish their findings. It’s great that their research and hard work gets publicly announced, however, specifically with these game board pieces, they were excavated in 2004 and only just got published in 2014 and then translated this year.)
“Third time’s the charm... Right?”
“How does the city of Rome work?” Seth Bernard asked today at the Archaeological Institute of America presentation at Brock University. For a majority of his presentation he focused on how building techniques changed and developed over time in ancient Rome and studied their usage of tufo giallo. Furthermore, Bernard explained architecture drove economic booms and the techniques were affected by population growth.
With every building, Bernard walked his audience through the progression (although it was a rather slow evolution) of Roman architecture with different monuments and how Romans seemed to be trying to attain a good in-between. He chose 4 monuments and compared them. For example, Bernard stated “tufo giallo” was mentioned by Vetruvius as best under covered places (locis tectis), however Romans did not realize this (or seemed to care very little). Through his architectural case studies, he clearly showed how the first buildings were far more daring in structure compared to last buildings which were more carefully conducted for long lasting foundations.
Seth Bernards’ discussion was far more entertaining than any short blog post can do justice. He was entertaining and imaginative, even going so far as to include Livy’s account of a cow climbing up a three-story building only to fall off the roof and leaving his audience with an entertaining thought of how wide doorways must have been, the possibility of multiple levels and how could a cow even possibly get up there!
Mummified Pets?
In ancient Egypt, families would mummify their deceased so they could progress into the afterlife. The ancient Egyptians held their animals in an extremely high regard. Herodotus even reflected in his traveling history that the Egyptian culture was opposite and backwards to the Greeks, but acknowledged the importance of animals in their society. It is no wonder then that since the first millennium BC, mummifying animals was a big part of Egyptian culture. They were not only huge in their role as food and pets, but also for religious reasons. There were 4 main purposes to mummifying animals: to allow pets into the afterlife, to provide food in the afterlife, to act as offerings to a particular god, and because some were seen as physical manifestations of the gods that the Egyptian worshipped.
Wealthier citizens had the opportunity to splurge on elaborate coffins shaped like creatures to hold animals mummies, According to Archaeology Magazine these ancient Egyptians more than likely believed these creature-coffins held the souls of the gods. So, not only do these animals get put through an extensive embalming process, there was also a market for buying these mummified remains in even lavish bronze coffins in a variety of animal gods.
Thirty of these animal mummies have been rediscovered in The Brooklyn Museum's traveling exhibit! Make sure you go check them out.
*Image taken from the Brooklyn Museum. The below image is a coffin of a mummified cat that is believed to be related to the Egyptian god Bastet.
Dentistry in Antiquity
It’s great we can say that with today’s technology we have safer and less daunting dentist appointments than what we can assume happened to this poor lad. Paleo-archaeologists have examined a molar of a man found in Northern Italy and found the chipping was from a stone tool to remove decayed material.
The earliest dental work is now dated to 14 thousand years ago; through the discovery of a molar of a male, found in Italy in 1988. Scientists have concluded that this practice of dentistry was long before the individuals death as the enamel is worn away in the area of the cavity.
The archaeologist who studied these dental records was Benazzi who continues on to say that the common practice would have been to remove teeth by wooden and bone toothpicks.
So the next time everyone goes to see their dentist, don’t give them such a hard time for picking at your teeth; it could be much worse. And while you’re at it, make sure you give yourself a hi-five for not living in antiquity.
Tomb of Askia
In the Circle and Region of Gao, a 17-metre pyramid Tomb of Askia was built in 1495 by Askia Mohamed, the Emperor of Songhai. It symbolizes the riches of the empire from the 15th and 16th centuries, through the control of trade in salt and gold. The pyramidal tomb is included within a complex that was built when Gao was the capital of the Songhai Empire.
The Tomb of Askia was built when Islam was adopted as the official religion and reflects local building traditions that also creates a unique architectural style influenced from North Africa. These particular architectural traditions are similar in sites like Saneye, Gounzourey, Koima and the Kankou Moissa Mosque. Most importantly, this pyramidal monument reflects the local populations relationships with one another.
This site is a UNESCO heritage site and alike all other heritage sites, it belongs to the state and is under their care and responsibility. Gaos’ plan for preservation of the Tomb of Askia is redeveloping the surrounding wall of the prayer area, and assure better visibility, and while also improving the sites’ authenticity and improve the use of it as an educative and tourism resource to the Circle and Region of Gao.
Ian Morris wrote “archaeology is culture history or is it nothing?” This Tomb proves how culture and tradition adapts and grows into the history of a state that should be preserved and protected.
Nothing “mini” about it!
There is a collection of 5 sites in the heart of the tropical rainforest belonging to the Guaranis people. San Ignacio Mini, Santa Ana, Nuestra Señora de Loreto and Santa Maria Mayor (all in Argentina), and the Ruins of Sao Miguel das Missoes (in Brazil). There are extraordinary remains of these 5 “Jesuit missions” and each are endangered in their own way.
The San Ignacio Mini exhibits all characteristics of a UNESCO heritage site and deserves to be preserved and cared for. These ruins (depicted below) are in fact remains of a Guaranis church. A Roman Catholic priest lived in harmony with indigenous people in the 17th century and indigenous plants are plainly depicted in the church architecture, along with symbols of old Catholicism. The church decorations even go so far as having an individual carrying a flag and a plant, symbolizing the harmony and equality of the past and present.
This site is also known for the archaeological find of a John the Baptist statue, and home to the Jesuit farmer who was the first known to befriend the Guaranis people and learn their language, creating the first Guaranis dictionary.
This site of San Ignacio Mini is a treasure of cultural and religious history for the indigenous people of Argentina and deserves to be preserved in the best way it can be.
What are your opinions for San Ignacio? Would making it into a tourist destination keep its preservation as is, or would it create the possibility for greater preservation with more funds? Or do you think tourists would destroy it? If such a site ages this well by itself, one can only imagine the splendour it would be under preservation and loving-care.
A Will and A Way
Individual farmers have battled the harsh faming conditions of a small volcanic island off the coast of Portugal. Only accompanied by 3 other similarly small islands is the volcanic island of Pico, a mystical place of island vineyard culture. This island has “Outstanding Universal Value” for it’s preserved and authentic property of over 500 years. Enclosed on the island are stone-walled fields, buildings like homes, wine cellars, churches; pathways and wells.
As defined by UNESCO, the Island of Pico is considered as a heritage site because of it’s amazing preservation. The wine industry that has evolved on this island does not threaten the heritage of the site (as the vineyards are run by independent farmers), however Pico is pressured by the importing of stone for re-building purposes.
Although Pico is an extremely small island, it holds quite an admirable plan for preservation. Not only will the government be in charge of restricting new building plans, they also further promote the maintenance and recovery of the vineyards. By instilling these plans, the government has created an atmosphere where the people of Pico do not feel threatened or like they’re being held under command.
Singapore Botanical Gardens
Poetically, the Singapore Botanical Gardens is in the heart of Singapore. Most of the Gardens is in a National Park and parts in other nature conservation areas. This site was just made a UNESCO heritage site on the 4th of July 2015. It’s known for it’s display of evolution of a British tropical colonial botanic garden, and has become a modern world-class scientific institution for research, conservation and education.
Since its creation in 1859, the Singapore Botanical Gardens represents an evolution of a diverse variety of historic features, plantings and buildings. It is also known for its contribution to the expansion of plantation rubber in the 20th century and according to UNESCO it “continues to play a leading role in the exchange of ideas, knowledge and expertise in tropical botany and horticultural sciences”.
The Botanical Gardens is protected primarily through the Planning Act of Singapore. This regulates conservation and development and requires permits for new developments over a 40 to 50 year period. It also is prepared to ensure its presentation of the site’s “Outstanding Universal Value”.
A Cerulean Trip Down Under
Australia has many UNESCO World Heritage Sites. While many are extremely beautiful and tropical in appearance, nothing is more breathtaking than the Great Barrier Reef (or mentioned as “GBR”) off the coast of Queensland in Northeastern Australia.
In 1981, the Great Barrier Reef was deemed a Heritage Site as it is the most extensive coral reef ecosystem. The GBR displays many stages of reef development and is home to 400 types of coral, 1 500 species of fish and holds great scientific interest for the “sea cow” and large sea turtles (some over 120 years in age) that are threatened with extinction. The GBR covers over 348 000 square kilometres (longer than the Great Wall of China!) and is the only living thing on earth visible from outer space.
As it is an extremely popular tourist site, it is a complex issue to preserve and take care of the GBR. Queensland is responsible for the management of the reef under the Marines Park Act of 2004 and by the looks of it’s present state, we take off our goggles to the Queensland community!
Lecturing for Libya
Today Susan Kane was among fellow friends in Brock University’s Academic South lecture hall. It was both enlightening and downright frightening to listen to her approach the topic of something I hadn’t found interest in before today. She began with teaching me, and possibly everyone else, about Libya’s extensive past. From imperialistic take-overs to broadening job horizons, Susan talked about cultural heritage and training locals in proper archaeological methods and conservation. Furthermore, she admitted while there are many sites considered within UNESCOs cultural heritage, in Libya there is also a bad case of looting and both poor storage and protection of archaeological finds.
It’s easy to think what happens so far away (although, it’s just within the Mediterranean Basin) and what doesn’t directly affect you shouldn’t be on your mind. Today I learnt this is exactly what I should be focusing on.
Susan first broke down Libyan government and the transition into modern life in simple terms for those of us listening today. 42 years of tight dictatorship had limited the interested minds of the residents of Libya, especially around the site of Cyrene where she mentioned her excavation site was. With the help of well-needed funding, Susan Kane and others were able to educate and inform local residents in proper conservation techniques of their decaying archaeological heritage. It was in addition to this that we learned how the booming expansion of the local towns population made an expansion of homes necessary, and therefore resulted in the destruction of tombs and ancient necropolis.
There is no possible way Susan Kane’s lecture could be properly summarized in a short blog. She was extremely talented in getting her audience right in the heart, especially describing the horrors of destroying heritage and the lack of respect and care they should be given. One thing is for sure; Susan Kane has my vote of respect for accomplishing an effectively educational conservation and preservation program (that we talk can only about in class in theory), in a part of Libya that appears to surely benefit from it.
rare and ancient fossil
by Jay Daley
Tip of the Iceberg of Cultural Heritage
The monumental buddha statues in the Bamiyan Valley were destroyed by the Taliban. Removed in their monumentality, the buddhas were a symbol of enlightenment and meant to blend the classic styles of Grandhara Art. In March 2001, the buddhas were blown up by the Taliban under the leader Mullah Mohammed Omar.
After the Taliban declared them as idols, they were destroyed. They went against the ideal that “the only god is Allah, and all other gods shall be removed”. Considering it was decided as national law by the governing power of the time, within the ideals of “cultural heritage” this is considered within their power and the rights they hold.
Cultural heritage can be defined as an expression of meanings, values and claims placed on specific material that has ties to the past and present of a certain culture. In this case, the Taliban government decided these Bamiyan buddhas were not considered a “heritage” but a statement of religion. The question I pose to those who are interested in this topic, is the comparison to destroying other parts of heritage for this exact same reason. Should these buddhas even be reconstructed at a later date, or is their damage a new addition to their history?
In a discussion among peers, there was talk about the certain culture that the government specifically preferred to preserve rather than another. It really stimulated conversation that we could personally involve ourselves in. What is the difference between destroying these Bamiyan buddhas and choosing to neglect to preserve the Canadian residential schools, or Germans choosing to fill Hitler’s bunker with sand and make it a children's playground? Each of these sites have something to do with the cultural heritage of each country. Do we give complete rights of our heritage to our governments? Should we focus on preserving as much of our past, good and bad, as possible?
Sometimes I’m like “ancient greek plays are so old, how am i going to relate to the characters?” but then