Triagonal (on one of their sockpuppet accounts on Discuit), who is a 26 year old self-identifying machiavellian, pathological liar, and predator who also lusts after 14-year olds on internet forums and enjoys harassing other teenagers, while stealing art, selfies, and usernames, while also impersonating their own siblings (who disowned them for all the right reasons), supporting other art-thieving, impersonating abusers such as Emily Cassidy on multiple sockpuppet accounts while pretending to be neutral, gets really offended when they don't receive constant attention.
Stay classy and NEVER contact the subject of a PSA. Report, block, and move on. This information is here so you can proactively protect your
I was browsing one of Triagonal's Xitter alts and came across a recent post. Compare it to the photo of Triagonal on Buzzlyart, the one they didn't realize could be brightened. Once the enhanced version came out, they quickly went into damage control and deleted the original from their profile. But sure, that supposedly wasn't you, even though your reaction says otherwise.
Whose selfie have you stolen, Tynan? She looks like a teenager and is in a school uniform. Does that girl know that a 26 year old is stealing her selfies and claiming to be her? The photo even looks like you might've intentionally cropped it so that it'd be harder for people to reverse image search it.
There have been other occasions where you've shared staged or edited other people's selfies, like this one that appeared on your DeviantArt account. It was even pointed out by someone on Discuit.
Note the badly photoshopped/edited hands. This doesn't look like a "selfie", this looks more like a frame from a vlog.
Triagonal gaslighting the people putting 2 and 2 together, which is nothing new for them.
Stay classy and NEVER contact the subject of a PSA. Report, block, and move on. This information is here so you can proactively protect your
Casualxlfanatic: While accusing someone they have no proof of being Triagonal of being Triagonal only to accuse her of selfie theft (complete with pictures) when one is a meme anyways, doubles down on Triagonal supposedly being wrong in her defense on "her profile" and implies they think the black haired "brightened silhouette" which was said to be a Halloween prop in silhouette form (so not meant to be her) must absolutely be usable in brightened form as an indicator of what someone looks like (as if brightening doesn't ever corrupt the image) and must absolutely be her, all the while implying they don't think any of this violates photo privacy/ethics or photo physics.
Also Casualxlfanatic: Goes to preach that their target, who isn't even the one doing the thing Casualxlfanatic is concerned about (but is said to be because Casualxlfanatic has concluded without waiting for proof that the person doing it must be Triagonal), is disregarding the rules of photo privacy/ethics and photography physics in simply pointing out a phone reflection in the photo uploaded by their friend and the fact it suggests who is MT, also claiming it's not her.
As long as I've been accused of being your target too (which is literally the absolute only thing your history has you talking about), let's make a deal on behalf of Triagonal, who I am representing as long as I am accused of being her. We will all publicly settle on the approach/explanation you want us to for MT's photo if you would be so consistent as to allow the same to happen to the same/parallel (or as you might call it if you were feeling angsty, closest parallel) one for Triagonal's so-called self-portrait. Because it might as well be used as proof your position is your position on the other one. Deal or no deal?
Too cowardly to provide your own handwritten verification like MightyThistle has for her selfies, you spend your lonely, sleepless nights trying to impersonate her boyfriend and obsessively rambling to yourself, trying to convince yourself her thriving life is fake because she exposed you, yet you still can't grasp that the phone reflection is her boyfriend, not her, because your level of understanding is on par with a Flat Earther's understanding of gravity.
Good for him. Imagine teaming up with Triagonal, who dismisses documented evidence, including archived webpages of their own behavior toward minors as mere "rumors", and acts as if evidence somehow expires once it's been cited.
He did his homework, saw through Triagonal's rambling and gaslighting, and wanted no association with a 26-year-old self-described machiavellian who spends all day of every day feeling sorry for themselves and talking to themselves on alts, impersonated one of their own siblings, stalks and lusts after minors, and is estranged from their own siblings for good reason. What Triagonal still refuses to learn is that actions have consequences.
Meanwhile, most of Triagonal's supposed "slanderers" (read: people who call out Triagonal's misconduct and slander) are living far happier, more productive lives than Triagonal ever will.
Stay classy and NEVER contact the subject of a PSA. Report, block, and move on. This information is here so you can proactively protect your
I take it there are several shades of slander you're not comprehending. I understand by now, after a bajillion exchanges with this "Triagonal" that make you seem like a broken record, that she isn't saying nothing happened and that she is saying the nuance of the supposed guilt is going through one of your ears and out the other.
Because of how relentless you, your friends, and possibly everyone observing this conversation thinking your side is the side to take are, let me burst that bubble with an analogy, which I will use to explain it like you're five.
This is tank man. You may have heard of him.
So, I know other users have previously uploaded this video, but I couldn't find a version that features as much of the available raw footage
This happened in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese equivalent to Times Square. This was from June 3rd and June 4th of 1989.
To this day, the Chinese government frowns upon people talking in depth about it. There are memes too about it. You might find people repeating "nothing happened in Tiananmen Square" as a joke, but also you might find people in China using workarounds to portray the massacre, such as drawing giant inflatable ducks walking down the road it's on.
You see that? That is censorship.
Is planning out a drawing of the event with giant inflatable ducks worth a felony charge? No. Do people do it? Yes, ones who feel so compelled it's like a hole in their heart. But does that make it a priority? No. Which is why, deep down, most people like you wouldn't. And here is where I say "exactly".
Does China ban people from other countries who do this? Yes. Even in the way I'm doing right now. If you go there, and they find out, you are either deported or imprisoned. They can even do it based on incomplete proof, which means now anyone falsely accused of being any of us are now at risk if we went there. But is it someone's right to point fingers? Exactly.
Is it gaslighting to say nothing happened? Yes. But was it gaslighting when a part of the narrative became that those responsible changed? Was it gaslighting when a part of the narrative became that there was more context involved in that, and that the tank drivers weren't going out of their way to commit an atrocity? Was it gaslighting when a part of the narrative became that not every participant in the events were participants in the atrocities and that people exaggerate the guilt of the tank drivers in their minds? Was it gaslighting when a part of the narrative became that the gang of four was responsible for permeating Mao's decisions? Was it gaslighting when a part of the narrative became that the video has misleading elements that makes it unusable as proof that this happened as was portrayed? Would you judge someone who, in their youth, was a part of the cultural revolution, but who, in their later years, became your next door neighbor?
All of these questions and their complex answers are a feature and not a bug of history, and it would be more alien to be avoidant of that kind of respect for all events.
What I'm getting at is every single bit of logic spoken by Triagonal to you is something you treat as alien to anyone you think of as having a good sense of judgement, and yet the opposite approach is codified in their mindset popularly known dilemmas. You normally would not do one. Why do the other?
I am curious about your take (and the take of certain kiwifarms members who are watching) on whether the Tiananmen Square events happened, are deserving of being the inspiration for a crusade on Chinese officials, and were handled properly by the Chinese; please do tell me without telling me (in what many would call litmus test style).
I just may be ready to make sure all of you get the sought-after reaction from China.
This message was the brainchild of Triagonal, who, true to her word about not dangling events over people just for the sake of it, does not believe China should be crusaded Liz Fong-Jones style (or that it isn't ridiculous that kiwifarms feels compelled to treat her like Moby Dick) or that anything actually happened in Tiananmen Square. And her reblogged response to this will cement this.
No amount of bizarre rambling about China and internet drama on your alts will win you sympathy for a downfall that you brought entirely upon yourself.
Some who read this blog might be interested in how I'm getting on cause it's been like half a year!! E gads where does the time go? Fuck LMAO
Things in my life are on an upward spiral right now! I've been mad busy. I went on a first date with my boyfriend yesterday! It lasted 7 hours. The film was 2 and a half haha. He's so fuckin adorable I could eat him up. Seriously though, we kissed and cuddled in the cinema so much it's not even funny haha. He paid for the tickets and food we got at the arcade cafe even though I begged him to let me pay for the food he got me. Guy's a proper old fashioned good lad who you know has been raised right and knows how to treat a girl. We went shopping together and got some fresh drip toward the end. The feelings are mutual and we're now working out what we wanna do for a second date!
We got a new cat too! 3 days ago actually! My family adopted her and she's so loving it's nuts. We're looking to find a person to take care of her when we go on holiday which might be sometime in late summer. We haven't decided where we're gonna go yet, but we've got plenty of time! I've also been making a lot of pin/sticker designs in the last few months and showing them around to people. I've gotten such good feedback on them I'm thinking about starting a pin/sticker shop as a side thing I just need to get a brother scan and cut machine and some other sticker making stuff. Little nervous since I've never done this shop stuff before and it's all new to me LMAO but it's worth a shot!
It's great to see you in my inbox. We messaged a bit back when I first started this blog to expose Triagonal's misconduct, and I want to say a huge congratulations to you. You deserve all of this happiness, the great date, the cat, and the sticker shop. Definitely go get that ScanNCut machine. You're an excellent artist.
For newcomers, Mighty-Thistle is a girl who played a vital role in exposing Triagonal's slander via a Google Document that is full of webpage archives, and essentially becoming Triagonal's Lamby. The contrast here is glaring. Just five days after I posted about Triagonal crying on Reddit over being rightfully rejected for abusive behavior, you shared a wholesome update about being genuinely loved. Because Triagonal's life is a mess of their own making, they cannot handle seeing others thrive and will likely view your happiness as a targeted psychological attack.
I have to say now, for people who claim to be "dealing with Triagonal" based on what they see as a sense of justice and not just someone to use as a punching bag, especially considering there were so many other less suspicious ways for you to do so, you kind of flew too close to the sun when it came to "checking in". Twice if counting the fact a certain Side 7 user has been supposedly chronicling her adventures in order to be able to further rub it in that her life is going better than Triagonal's, considering the hidden accidental details that come with photography.
Nevertheless looking quite nifty if I do say so myself. Dare I even say it looks reflective (in a surprising way) of the posh experience I'd hope to have on a date. And you'll be the first to say nobody has the right to gaslight our lying eyes, right?
The 26-year old pedophile, Triagonal, still takes MightyThistle's happiness personally on their granddreampaper alt while avoiding reflecting on why MightyThistle has a better life and no Kiwifarms thread.
As convenient as the claim is that she's an "alt", repeating it (or the pseudo-backed claims about being a deviant, or anything about taking anything personally) is not any more true just because it was repeated some more.
I am not an alt (so you are being true there), and it seems the word "reflective" somehow had to automatically mean I was referring to any actual reflections (hence the backlash about that), which you were right in saying I wasn't referring to. Though as long as actual reflections have been brought up, I feel compelled to briefly slip in the two cents that reflections don't work like is claimed in the defense of the pictures as being of the BF. It couldn't be as the face is too far into the depth of the side of the reflection to be of the person holding the phone. It had to have been the photographer, holding the camera in a lowkey style, like you (the-abyss-watcher) do in a similar instance of your own reflection being shown.
One small thought while I'm at it since it comes to mind. These photos are meant to demonstrate a good time is being spent, and yet the description of some of the photos say selfies of the two people in the relationship won't be shown because they'd be too "special", all the while everyone gets up and arms and meticulous, saying body parts like the legs aren't off-limits and neither is being the reflection's interpreter as being the very person you wouldn't want to share selfies of? That's a classic beginner's sign of deception. It's like that one joke they often show in movies where the woman will do bedroom activities with the man but only when the lights are turned off, or where Houdini will escape the milk vessel but only when the curtains are blocking the view of said vessel. It shows it's fake and that there is fabrication afoot, all from a new photographer I'd actually otherwise not consider bad at all (the only other issue being she takes pictures of people without their consent who aren't memes, doing cosplay, celebrities, etc. which would imply they were ready to have their picture taken; even "the-abyss-watcher" doesn't do that). I'm inclined to side with the people who aren't banned from Tumblr for slander and harassment, slander which they can't help but repeat after even mentioning the ban.
I have a question I'd like to ask where you're circumstantially urged to answer as a six word answer so as to not be roundabout like you often are. You'd agree with all of that, wouldn't you?
Bitter over MightyThistle's relationship and life, a lonely pedophile, Triagonal, continues to obsessively ramble to themselves on their alts, wishing it was fake. In their denial, they confidently misunderstand photo privacy, how reflections work, and the difference between a reflection of MightyThistle's boyfriend on his phone, and a clear photo of his face.
Are any of the things you have cited or can cite proof of my feelings (a rhetorical question within a question since I speak for myself and my own emotions, and I am not how you describe me in your claims about "bitterness" or "jealousy"), that any of it even strictly sounds like bitterness or jealousy, that any of the people you equate with me are as close to being synonymous with me as you claim, or that the adjectives you apply to me (especially the P word) are applicable just because of a single pair of exchanges from years ago?
By your logic, there are a number of people who are on your side who would fit your bill, but then again, I am respectful of others' voices and am not one to go by the logic you're going by.
All that said, I'm into the same art medium. I wouldn't misunderstand any of it at this point (when normal expectations are applied), be it the physics of it or the ethics, with "GrandDreamPaper" including key expectations about the ethics even if nuance could've been added.
Not that one couldn't now point out to those who believe the things you say that there is the kind of conflict of interest in your words that suggests you yourself don't believe them, which I say in part because consistency is a part of normal ethics (as opposed to just photography ethics) and in part because anyone giving people a pass for doing the kind of photocommentary you've done would shoot themselves in the foot if it contained what "GrandDreamPaper" did and they weren't one to give "GrandDreamPaper" a pass. That moment when such a discussion as this also has an accidental favorable (for me) effect for my identity, am I right?
Triagonal confuses camera operation with understanding screen reflections, just as they're confused about why evidence they're a pedophile never expires. News at 11.
Some who read this blog might be interested in how I'm getting on cause it's been like half a year!! E gads where does the time go? Fuck LMAO
Things in my life are on an upward spiral right now! I've been mad busy. I went on a first date with my boyfriend yesterday! It lasted 7 hours. The film was 2 and a half haha. He's so fuckin adorable I could eat him up. Seriously though, we kissed and cuddled in the cinema so much it's not even funny haha. He paid for the tickets and food we got at the arcade cafe even though I begged him to let me pay for the food he got me. Guy's a proper old fashioned good lad who you know has been raised right and knows how to treat a girl. We went shopping together and got some fresh drip toward the end. The feelings are mutual and we're now working out what we wanna do for a second date!
We got a new cat too! 3 days ago actually! My family adopted her and she's so loving it's nuts. We're looking to find a person to take care of her when we go on holiday which might be sometime in late summer. We haven't decided where we're gonna go yet, but we've got plenty of time! I've also been making a lot of pin/sticker designs in the last few months and showing them around to people. I've gotten such good feedback on them I'm thinking about starting a pin/sticker shop as a side thing I just need to get a brother scan and cut machine and some other sticker making stuff. Little nervous since I've never done this shop stuff before and it's all new to me LMAO but it's worth a shot!
It's great to see you in my inbox. We messaged a bit back when I first started this blog to expose Triagonal's misconduct, and I want to say a huge congratulations to you. You deserve all of this happiness, the great date, the cat, and the sticker shop. Definitely go get that ScanNCut machine. You're an excellent artist.
For newcomers, Mighty-Thistle is a girl who played a vital role in exposing Triagonal's slander via a Google Document that is full of webpage archives, and essentially becoming Triagonal's Lamby. The contrast here is glaring. Just five days after I posted about Triagonal crying on Reddit over being rightfully rejected for abusive behavior, you shared a wholesome update about being genuinely loved. Because Triagonal's life is a mess of their own making, they cannot handle seeing others thrive and will likely view your happiness as a targeted psychological attack.
I have to say now, for people who claim to be "dealing with Triagonal" based on what they see as a sense of justice and not just someone to use as a punching bag, especially considering there were so many other less suspicious ways for you to do so, you kind of flew too close to the sun when it came to "checking in". Twice if counting the fact a certain Side 7 user has been supposedly chronicling her adventures in order to be able to further rub it in that her life is going better than Triagonal's, considering the hidden accidental details that come with photography.
Nevertheless looking quite nifty if I do say so myself. Dare I even say it looks reflective (in a surprising way) of the posh experience I'd hope to have on a date. And you'll be the first to say nobody has the right to gaslight our lying eyes, right?
The 26-year old pedophile, Triagonal, still takes MightyThistle's happiness personally on their granddreampaper alt while avoiding reflecting on why MightyThistle has a better life and no Kiwifarms thread.
As convenient as the claim is that she's an "alt", repeating it (or the pseudo-backed claims about being a deviant, or anything about taking anything personally) is not any more true just because it was repeated some more.
I am not an alt (so you are being true there), and it seems the word "reflective" somehow had to automatically mean I was referring to any actual reflections (hence the backlash about that), which you were right in saying I wasn't referring to. Though as long as actual reflections have been brought up, I feel compelled to briefly slip in the two cents that reflections don't work like is claimed in the defense of the pictures as being of the BF. It couldn't be as the face is too far into the depth of the side of the reflection to be of the person holding the phone. It had to have been the photographer, holding the camera in a lowkey style, like you (the-abyss-watcher) do in a similar instance of your own reflection being shown.
One small thought while I'm at it since it comes to mind. These photos are meant to demonstrate a good time is being spent, and yet the description of some of the photos say selfies of the two people in the relationship won't be shown because they'd be too "special", all the while everyone gets up and arms and meticulous, saying body parts like the legs aren't off-limits and neither is being the reflection's interpreter as being the very person you wouldn't want to share selfies of? That's a classic beginner's sign of deception. It's like that one joke they often show in movies where the woman will do bedroom activities with the man but only when the lights are turned off, or where Houdini will escape the milk vessel but only when the curtains are blocking the view of said vessel. It shows it's fake and that there is fabrication afoot, all from a new photographer I'd actually otherwise not consider bad at all (the only other issue being she takes pictures of people without their consent who aren't memes, doing cosplay, celebrities, etc. which would imply they were ready to have their picture taken; even "the-abyss-watcher" doesn't do that). I'm inclined to side with the people who aren't banned from Tumblr for slander and harassment, slander which they can't help but repeat after even mentioning the ban.
I have a question I'd like to ask where you're circumstantially urged to answer as a six word answer so as to not be roundabout like you often are. You'd agree with all of that, wouldn't you?
Bitter over MightyThistle's relationship and life, a lonely pedophile, Triagonal, continues to obsessively ramble to themselves on their alts, wishing it was fake. In their denial, they confidently misunderstand photo privacy, how reflections work, and the difference between a reflection of MightyThistle's boyfriend on his phone, and a clear photo of his face.
The twenty-six-year-old pedophile Triagonal talks to themselves on their multiple blogs because they are jealous of MightyThistle's happy life and lack of a Kiwifarms thread while struggling to comprehend a simple phone reflection of her boyfriend.
Some who read this blog might be interested in how I'm getting on cause it's been like half a year!! E gads where does the time go? Fuck LMAO
Things in my life are on an upward spiral right now! I've been mad busy. I went on a first date with my boyfriend yesterday! It lasted 7 hours. The film was 2 and a half haha. He's so fuckin adorable I could eat him up. Seriously though, we kissed and cuddled in the cinema so much it's not even funny haha. He paid for the tickets and food we got at the arcade cafe even though I begged him to let me pay for the food he got me. Guy's a proper old fashioned good lad who you know has been raised right and knows how to treat a girl. We went shopping together and got some fresh drip toward the end. The feelings are mutual and we're now working out what we wanna do for a second date!
We got a new cat too! 3 days ago actually! My family adopted her and she's so loving it's nuts. We're looking to find a person to take care of her when we go on holiday which might be sometime in late summer. We haven't decided where we're gonna go yet, but we've got plenty of time! I've also been making a lot of pin/sticker designs in the last few months and showing them around to people. I've gotten such good feedback on them I'm thinking about starting a pin/sticker shop as a side thing I just need to get a brother scan and cut machine and some other sticker making stuff. Little nervous since I've never done this shop stuff before and it's all new to me LMAO but it's worth a shot!
It's great to see you in my inbox. We messaged a bit back when I first started this blog to expose Triagonal's misconduct, and I want to say a huge congratulations to you. You deserve all of this happiness, the great date, the cat, and the sticker shop. Definitely go get that ScanNCut machine. You're an excellent artist.
For newcomers, Mighty-Thistle is a girl who played a vital role in exposing Triagonal's slander via a Google Document that is full of webpage archives, and essentially becoming Triagonal's Lamby. The contrast here is glaring. Just five days after I posted about Triagonal crying on Reddit over being rightfully rejected for abusive behavior, you shared a wholesome update about being genuinely loved. Because Triagonal's life is a mess of their own making, they cannot handle seeing others thrive and will likely view your happiness as a targeted psychological attack.
I have to say now, for people who claim to be "dealing with Triagonal" based on what they see as a sense of justice and not just someone to use as a punching bag, especially considering there were so many other less suspicious ways for you to do so, you kind of flew too close to the sun when it came to "checking in". Twice if counting the fact a certain Side 7 user has been supposedly chronicling her adventures in order to be able to further rub it in that her life is going better than Triagonal's, considering the hidden accidental details that come with photography.
Nevertheless looking quite nifty if I do say so myself. Dare I even say it looks reflective (in a surprising way) of the posh experience I'd hope to have on a date. And you'll be the first to say nobody has the right to gaslight our lying eyes, right?
The 26-year old pedophile, Triagonal, still takes MightyThistle's happiness personally on their granddreampaper alt while avoiding reflecting on why MightyThistle has a better life and no Kiwifarms thread.
Triagonal, posting on their everythingbutopposites and inquisitron alts, treats race and truth as changeable, and denies being a pedophile despite archived comments to and about a minor.
Triagonal, the eternally-rejected groomer is so upset that Mighty-Thistle, who called them out for pedophilia and other misconduct, now has a boyfriend that they made a Side 7 account named "Razorshroom" to impersonate him in her journal comments, archived it minutes later (check the timestamps), then posted a link to it to their Tumblr as an "Inquisitron" alt-self-ask.
...only to denounce anything you might call suspicious? Prove it (in some ways, I'm genuinely interested/curious). Perhaps while proving a single noun, verb, label, name, or adjective applied is true. Which is (along with the PSA's, and not just for the reasons I am about to mention, which I say as they make the same mistake) also cast into doubt (one might even say... indicatively false) because I'm not them and because the other person involved gave even less "objection" than the person you are accusing, despite showing activity after that (which almost sounds like you're lying about any remaining disingenuous nature in this, in the "coincidental" style of a hater or jealous person). This sounds how a lot of people think everyone who is suspicious is everyone else who is suspicious (have you not seen what kinds of shenanigans the art community is known for).
I'm not ignoring anyone though. And they're right about the absence of "a single noun, verb, label, name, or adjective" applied being true. Possibly that has to do with the indirect way the original message was criticized.
You're being obtuse on purpose, on your main instead of your Inquisitron alt this time. You knew I meant Mighty-Thistle ignoring your bait, bait even a 15-year-old would find cringey. You're pushing 27. Embarrassing.
None of what you said just now is true either (pushing 27 what? I'm not pushing anything.)
You use the word "embarrassing" like a single thing you've said has been proven beyond speculation. I'm not any of the people you claim, and you don't speak for anyone's intent or reasoning without their permission.
Triagonal, the eternally-rejected groomer is so upset that Mighty-Thistle, who called them out for pedophilia and other misconduct, now has a boyfriend that they made a Side 7 account named "Razorshroom" to impersonate him in her journal comments, archived it minutes later (check the timestamps), then posted a link to it to their Tumblr as an "Inquisitron" alt-self-ask.
...only to denounce anything you might call suspicious? Prove it (in some ways, I'm genuinely interested/curious). Perhaps while proving a single noun, verb, label, name, or adjective applied is true. Which is (along with the PSA's, and not just for the reasons I am about to mention, which I say as they make the same mistake) also cast into doubt (one might even say... indicatively false) because I'm not them and because the other person involved gave even less "objection" than the person you are accusing, despite showing activity after that (which almost sounds like you're lying about any remaining disingenuous nature in this, in the "coincidental" style of a hater or jealous person). This sounds how a lot of people think everyone who is suspicious is everyone else who is suspicious (have you not seen what kinds of shenanigans the art community is known for).
I'm not ignoring anyone though. And they're right about the absence of "a single noun, verb, label, name, or adjective" applied being true. Possibly that has to do with the indirect way the original message was criticized.
You're being obtuse on purpose, on your main instead of your Inquisitron alt this time. You knew I meant Mighty-Thistle ignoring your bait, bait even a 15-year-old would find cringey. You're pushing 27. Embarrassing.
Triagonal, the eternally-rejected groomer is so upset that Mighty-Thistle, who called them out for pedophilia and other misconduct, now has a boyfriend that they made a Side 7 account named "Razorshroom" to impersonate him in her journal comments, archived it minutes later (check the timestamps), then posted a link to it to their Tumblr as an "Inquisitron" alt-self-ask.
...only to denounce anything you might call suspicious? Prove it (in some ways, I'm genuinely interested/curious). Perhaps while proving a single noun, verb, label, name, or adjective applied is true. Which is (along with the PSA's, and not just for the reasons I am about to mention, which I say as they make the same mistake) also cast into doubt (one might even say... indicatively false) because I'm not them and because the other person involved gave even less "objection" than the person you are accusing, despite showing activity after that (which almost sounds like you're lying about any remaining disingenuous nature in this, in the "coincidental" style of a hater or jealous person). This sounds how a lot of people think everyone who is suspicious is everyone else who is suspicious (have you not seen what kinds of shenanigans the art community is known for).
Triagonal, the eternally-rejected groomer is so upset that Mighty-Thistle, who called them out for pedophilia and other misconduct, now has a boyfriend that they made a Side 7 account named "Razorshroom" to impersonate him in her journal comments, archived it minutes later (check the timestamps), then posted a link to it to their Tumblr as an "Inquisitron" alt-self-ask.
Triagonal admits to Machiavellianism and wants you to disbelieve your lying eyes, yet can't explain what 'context' supposedly disproves they're a pedophile who harasses minors while frequently posting on r/teenager_polls at 26.
Triagonal asks themselves on their sockpuppet account Inquisitron whether or not people are terrorists for believing that Triagonal, a self-confessed manipulative pedophile who stalks minors, is going to Hell.
Triagonal, a 26-year old self-identified machiavellian and pedophile, uses the sockpuppet account everythingbutopposites to push false equivalences, unaware that only other pedophiles defend pedophiles.
Triagonal's Squaretangular account was permabanned because Triagonal is and forever will be a ban-evading pedophile who will not be getting through the pearly gates.
On their sockpuppet account, where they play the usual "asking for a friend" role, Triagonal, who identifies as a Latter-day Saint, wonders whether they'll be denied the Celestial Kingdom because they can't find love (for all the right reasons). The post was made on June 8, the same day they left this comment on their main Reddit account.
I wouldn't worry about that, Triagonal. Even if you did find someone, pedophiles who lust after 14-year-olds aren't exactly making it through the gates.
Triagonal is still being ghosted by their 6 siblings, which upsets them. They posted this in r/Teenager_Polls. Triagonal turns 27 years old this year. Triagonal really wants to talk to unsuspecting teenagers and wants teenagers specifically to feel sorry for them.
