See what pastebin.com/qFv8Yc8C brings to light for more

[the-abyss-watcher]

I have a question. Though I know you tend to be roundabout, so I'm asking if you can answer it as a yes-or-no question.

I was wandering your self-imposed code of ethics for dealing with issues in your groups and found this in the data.

Are these really the terms and conditions that they would be following if they made such a thread/conversation, based on you using your position in such a situation to authoritatively bestow the terms and conditions upon the participants if such a thread/conversation was made about you?

Yes.

[the-abyss-watcher]

The reason I don't draw Gravity Falls fanart.

simple. I don't draw children. it's a HUGE rule of mine. ALL of my OC's are eighteen and older even the small cutesy ones.

I also don't draw realistic people at all.

That's not a bad rule.

[the-abyss-watcher]

I have another one of those questions, one where you're urged to answer it in a thirty-six word format so as to not be roundabout like you often are. In conversations where people ask why your English seems broken, the four reasons often given are...

Your first language isn't English, but was Morse Code, then a pidgin portion of English, then Toki Pona, then the other half of English, then the other kinda-languages (Dothraki and Kokanu) you know.

You are neurodivergent, which supposedly affects your thinking, which supposedly affects your speaking.

You do a lot of writing, which guides the way you say certain things as writers tend to code-switch when talking about linguistically disassociative or "meta" things.

You are selectively mute, which means the linguistic you when writing has not synced with the linguistic you when talking, and this has caused them to run amok.

What would you need to typically contribute to the talk when people belittle this part of the conversation?

What those aligned with me point to isn't untrue, and consideration/expectation thereof would be canon to any teachings of mine. The laws of communication state what works isn't broken, especially to proclaimed political manifesto specialists.

[casualxlfanatic]

None of those justify writing borderline incomprehensible word salad that comes off as desperately trying to sound clever rather than actually communicating.

[the-abyss-watcher]

Spoken like another someone who doesn't give a fig about each part of what was just said. The kind of thing I've predictably dealt with and which isn't new to anyone.

[everythingbutopposites]

Civility, reliability, and time coding issues aside, I see their attitude so-to-speak towards your situation isn't afraid of showing off how common it is.

[the-abyss-watcher]

And people wonder why the thought of bending to them doesn't resonate with me. Especially with what they will spin as a matter of ego, as one may see. I am not how I'm painted. Even if they're upset I'd willingly recreate my stance a third time (not intentional how that ended up) as it's not like any other does everything justice.

[everythingbutopposites]

If I may ask because I'm not on the same page, what even makes selective mutism what it is and distinct from simply being reticent/laconic/reserved/quiet or "a person of few words" (like how Ferb wouldn't say he is selectively mute)? Does it differ from situations like mine (having personality-based issues but being able to say a heritage-based social role helps me) where a certain circumstance might help with satisfying articulation? Is everything here entangled in one such circumstance? How do that and switching between languages even factor into each other if that's truly what it is? Does it affect nonverbal things you share? And how does this all affect parenting? What do you say on the matter regarding how it's a label of relevance to come forth with in this way?

Of course, if you may answer in the one hundred forty four English word way you're urged to answer in even by your pharisees so as to not be roundabout (I can surmise you are equipped for "high context" communication, as would be typical of someone whose languages are English, Dothraki, Morse Code, and Toki Pona and by extension Kokanu to a fault, all of these being the easy ones and good for people who want to be lite about bilingualism) as might be an issue.

Side note, I see the issue with time coding did not originate from that end.

[the-abyss-watcher]

Aside from the fact I could say "you two, Brutus" for how you asked, it could refer to multiple things, though (traditionally, as it was with me, hence why I bring it up) it's supposed to be diagnosed if in the stereotypical sense, even if diagnostics and the "phenomenon" are mutually exclusive. Consider one certain hater of mine once went on record as remarking I'm "unable to be interrogated" in the same breath used to say I "have the saddest possible 'valid' driving force for compulsive liar status", am "suspiciously utmostly OCD coded", and that I'm "an awkward on duty, godmom to two confused kids" (am told I'm not). All else can be answered with it being pointed out that the weight of the driving "social loadedness" aspect is never negligible when weighing different approaches against each other which each question implies divergences regarding.

[the-abyss-watcher]

Kiwifarms and it's helpers are now ban evading on Tumblr. if you see their accounts including catgirls report them for ban evasion.

Among other things.

[the-abyss-watcher]

I have another one of those questions, one where you're urged to answer it in a thirty-six word format so as to not be roundabout like you often are. In conversations where people ask why your English seems broken, the four reasons often given are...

Your first language isn't English, but was Morse Code, then a pidgin portion of English, then Toki Pona, then the other half of English, then the other kinda-languages (Dothraki and Kokanu) you know.

You are neurodivergent, which supposedly affects your thinking, which supposedly affects your speaking.

You do a lot of writing, which guides the way you say certain things as writers tend to code-switch when talking about linguistically disassociative or "meta" things.

You are selectively mute, which means the linguistic you when writing has not synced with the linguistic you when talking, and this has caused them to run amok.

What would you need to typically contribute to the talk when people belittle this part of the conversation?

What those aligned with me point to isn't untrue, and consideration/expectation thereof would be canon to any teachings of mine. The laws of communication state what works isn't broken, especially to proclaimed political manifesto specialists.

[casualxlfanatic]

None of those justify writing borderline incomprehensible word salad that comes off as desperately trying to sound clever rather than actually communicating.

[the-abyss-watcher]

Spoken like another someone who doesn't give a fig about each part of what was just said. The kind of thing I've predictably dealt with and which isn't new to anyone.

[everythingbutopposites]

Civility, reliability, and time coding issues aside, I see their attitude so-to-speak towards your situation isn't afraid of showing off how common it is.

[the-abyss-watcher]

And people wonder why the thought of bending to them doesn't resonate with me. Especially with what they will spin as a matter of ego, as one may see. I am not how I'm painted. Even if they're upset I'd willingly recreate my stance a third time (not intentional how that ended up) as it's not like any other does everything justice.

[the-abyss-watcher]

They were trying to Imitate you said, but that is not the case here at all. This was the original reason LambyDal / Dance and I have drama. she is petty that someone else drew a centaur a few weeks later. I drew mine 1020 she drew hers 9/17 , this makes me think she never even looked at my art and relied on friends who told her lies.

Please post this as I have people severely confused on why we have drama in the-first place. the bottom image is me over laying or attempting to do so to prove this centaur belongs to me, the other centaur belongs to her. my bad one is the 10/20 . Kiwifarms made this drama so much worse when Lambydal could have flat out asked to see my art, and she'd laugh her ass off trying to figure out how mine looked remotely like hers.

THIS ends , now. I didn't copy hers in the slightest, kiwifarms members are not supporters, they just want the entertainment.

Leave me alone, and realize I told the truth already.

I haven't been bothering you.

[the-abyss-watcher]

I have another one of those questions, one where you're urged to answer it in a thirty-six word format so as to not be roundabout like you often are. In conversations where people ask why your English seems broken, the four reasons often given are...

Your first language isn't English, but was Morse Code, then a pidgin portion of English, then Toki Pona, then the other half of English, then the other kinda-languages (Dothraki and Kokanu) you know.

You are neurodivergent, which supposedly affects your thinking, which supposedly affects your speaking.

You do a lot of writing, which guides the way you say certain things as writers tend to code-switch when talking about linguistically disassociative or "meta" things.

You are selectively mute, which means the linguistic you when writing has not synced with the linguistic you when talking, and this has caused them to run amok.

What would you need to typically contribute to the talk when people belittle this part of the conversation?

What those aligned with me point to isn't untrue, and consideration/expectation thereof would be canon to any teachings of mine. The laws of communication state what works isn't broken, especially to proclaimed political manifesto specialists.

[casualxlfanatic]

None of those justify writing borderline incomprehensible word salad that comes off as desperately trying to sound clever rather than actually communicating.

[the-abyss-watcher]

Spoken like another someone who doesn't give a fig about each part of what was just said. The kind of thing I've predictably dealt with and which isn't new to anyone.

[the-abyss-watcher]

Lamby flat out already admitted the banner is not her work. It's a coloring page there for I have done nothing wrong. Except learn from Disney.

Both sides should acknowledge their sources.

[the-abyss-watcher]

I have another one of those questions, one where you're urged to answer it in a thirty-six word format so as to not be roundabout like you often are. In conversations where people ask why your English seems broken, the four reasons often given are...

Your first language isn't English, but was Morse Code, then a pidgin portion of English, then Toki Pona, then the other half of English, then the other kinda-languages (Dothraki and Kokanu) you know.

You are neurodivergent, which supposedly affects your thinking, which supposedly affects your speaking.

You do a lot of writing, which guides the way you say certain things as writers tend to code-switch when talking about linguistically disassociative or "meta" things.

You are selectively mute, which means the linguistic you when writing has not synced with the linguistic you when talking, and this has caused them to run amok.

What would you need to typically contribute to the talk when people belittle this part of the conversation?

What those aligned with me point to isn't untrue, and consideration/expectation thereof would be canon to any teachings of mine. The laws of communication state what works isn't broken, especially to proclaimed political manifesto specialists.

[deviantartdramahub]

Jesus Christ!

[exactlybeardedninja]

You know you effed up when you get a Jehovah's Witness to say the lord's name in vain and the Latter Day Saint to do the sign of the cross.

And I'm guessing it must be "how to offend your dragon" week because this comes at the same time as another new campaign of distaste.

This in turn is being done due by people acting on findings that the subject is a certain other person.

The two main competing factions that are your haters having spoken, if I were to say I have a question for you about this where you're urged to answer in exactly thirty-six words so as to not be roundabout like you often are, what would be the best way you can explain your own objections?

[the-abyss-watcher]

Hypocrites or double standards or willful blindness aside, I don't cut corners in leading conduct and can't remember the last time cultural backgrounds, medical situations, spiritual convictions, political leanings, experiences, or so on had any bearing.

[casualxlfanatic]

Good for him. Imagine teaming up with Triagonal, who dismisses documented evidence, including archived webpages of their own behavior toward minors as mere "rumors", and acts as if evidence somehow expires once it's been cited.

He did his homework, saw through Triagonal's rambling and gaslighting, and wanted no association with a 26-year-old self-described machiavellian who spends all day of every day feeling sorry for themselves and talking to themselves on alts, impersonated one of their own siblings, stalks and lusts after minors, and is estranged from their own siblings for good reason. What Triagonal still refuses to learn is that actions have consequences.

Meanwhile, most of Triagonal's supposed "slanderers" (read: people who call out Triagonal's misconduct and slander) are living far happier, more productive lives than Triagonal ever will.

Triagonal - Artists Aware

Stay classy and NEVER contact the subject of a PSA. Report, block, and move on. This information is here so you can proactively protect your

[the-abyss-watcher]

You say that like there couldn't be more to what happened (this is where context, pretext, subtext, the circumstances, the time that elapsed, the part of the time that has elapsed that has been spent being plagued by vigilantes, and any amends made [that make some of what's going on in the aftermath questionable] come in [aspects which, in the PSA being waved around along with everything it's inspiring cause it to fall apart due to not properly factoring them in if one actually looks and thinks closely], with it also being really weird of someone to brag other people are living happier lives after implying they [the person claiming the other is unhappy] can be said to be the main one contributing to the "unhappy" person's unhappiness by targeting their livelihood and character in everyday life and in any way possible, if not also putting words in their mouth like when they claim someone meant something concerning in associating with the "machiavellian" label, as well as claiming that they stalk the people described to be stalked or pretended to be anyone without proof). I say it like this to be polite; the shoehorning of some kind of cathartic response is obvious. Which then leads to the response you get that you claim to be dissatisfying.

This is why declaring objections (which is not the same as gaslighting; take its very existence as a practice as a sign of that) exists as a practice during trials, if only people did not present their cases and claims in ways where the closest thing to being able to give such feedback would be like talking to thin air. Then this issue would be settled in ways nobody seems to anticipate.

[exactlybeardedninja]

So if I were to say I'd like to ask a question where you're urged to answer in exactly twelve words so as to not be roundabout like you were here just now, in TLDR terms, what's the whole background behind the situation?

[the-abyss-watcher]

A few years-old, apologized-for utterances snowballed into excessive gossip sects.

[deviantartdramahub]

Does it strike nobody as a red flag that not only did one part of the fediverse shut down last year all because they constantly have had to deal with the bulk of Triagonal's haters/slanderers but now another one is succumbing to the same fate due to the same clique of haters doing the same thing on any new names associated with her? They're taking their hate of Triagonal out on the whole singularity (would explain why they mistake everything that breathes as Triagonal).

It does to me.

[everythingbutopposites]

Just imagine the thoughts going through their mind as they realize they fell for a fad that is no longer in fashion. I'm sure it doesn't frustrate you that you think we have to share a planet with such losers.

[the-abyss-watcher]

Which aspect? Not that the authoritative response to my concerns about everyone's pervasive culture of toxicity don't give away the part of my take that's important.

[the-abyss-watcher]

Like flynn ryder they can't get my chest right. I know a lot of women have asymmetry mine is just severe. I AM CLOTHED THIS CAN BE SUBMITTED.

[casualxlfanatic]

Good for him. Imagine teaming up with Triagonal, who dismisses documented evidence, including archived webpages of their own behavior toward minors as mere "rumors", and acts as if evidence somehow expires once it's been cited.

He did his homework, saw through Triagonal's rambling and gaslighting, and wanted no association with a 26-year-old self-described machiavellian who spends all day of every day feeling sorry for themselves and talking to themselves on alts, impersonated one of their own siblings, stalks and lusts after minors, and is estranged from their own siblings for good reason. What Triagonal still refuses to learn is that actions have consequences.

Meanwhile, most of Triagonal's supposed "slanderers" (read: people who call out Triagonal's misconduct and slander) are living far happier, more productive lives than Triagonal ever will.

Triagonal - Artists Aware

Stay classy and NEVER contact the subject of a PSA. Report, block, and move on. This information is here so you can proactively protect your

[the-abyss-watcher]

You say that like there couldn't be more to what happened (this is where context, pretext, subtext, the circumstances, the time that elapsed, the part of the time that has elapsed that has been spent being plagued by vigilantes, and any amends made [that make some of what's going on in the aftermath questionable] come in [aspects which, in the PSA being waved around along with everything it's inspiring cause it to fall apart due to not properly factoring them in if one actually looks and thinks closely], with it also being really weird of someone to brag other people are living happier lives after implying they [the person claiming the other is unhappy] can be said to be the main one contributing to the "unhappy" person's unhappiness by targeting their livelihood and character in everyday life and in any way possible, if not also putting words in their mouth like when they claim someone meant something concerning in associating with the "machiavellian" label, as well as claiming that they stalk the people described to be stalked or pretended to be anyone without proof). I say it like this to be polite; the shoehorning of some kind of cathartic response is obvious. Which then leads to the response you get that you claim to be dissatisfying.

This is why declaring objections (which is not the same as gaslighting; take its very existence as a practice as a sign of that) exists as a practice during trials, if only people did not present their cases and claims in ways where the closest thing to being able to give such feedback would be like talking to thin air. Then this issue would be settled in ways nobody seems to anticipate.

[the-abyss-watcher]

PROOF I AM NOT WILLOW! Dates!

I was on Discord ALL day talking to my friend. I am warning people about Zyke at this point in time. I have other logs to prove that Willow is not me.

Why am I in two places at once here? Clearly one is not me. Pyrinka IS my Discord and @the-abyss-watcher can attest to this.

I spent all day on Discord that day. their story is phoney.

That moment when it doesn't cross anyone's mind that I may be Willow.

[the-abyss-watcher]

Can you ask your haters who recently (as of June 5th) updated their slander piece about you (who also happen to take pride in the belief that everything they say is backed by proof) to prove I am an "alt" or alter ego of you (as well as the claim that any of us who have been accused of being associated with you have been showing "pedo behaviors" ever since us joining the community, with their latest screenshots they like to spin around being from six years ago)?

As a magic trick enthusiast, I genuinely want to see what they can pull off in defense of that (unless they are talking about non-issues that got them banned from communities larger than Side 7 for attacking you over, in which case there isn't much of a case).

Ironically in the conversation they are trying to attack out of association with you, you have famously said yourself: You will know the people in a room consist of a suspect surrounded by wise people when the suspect defends themselves and either does a service to everyone and enlightens them or does a disserves to themself by digging themself into a hole.

In fact, that's a quote or piece of wisdom that would make for a good topic to ask you about in regards to your code of ethics (ironically the same code of ethics they are attacking), so we can treat it that way (in this style of the content they're attacking, if you could answer in a way where you're urged to answer in a five word answer that also includes the answer to my other questions here, is it, and the logic of the rest of what I'm saying, canon to your code of ethics, which you use as a code of honor for yourself and a TOS for all your group functions?)

I've actually examined the "code" just to see what could've been violated with everything on the "defense" side is doing, and I struggle to find what's being violated, both in the case that the accusations are false as well as the "provable" version of the opposite, especially if apologies that have been given have been factored in. Are you too questioning of their assertion that you're doing anything that violates your own code enough that you too would like to see them cite what part of it is being violated?

More than anything, in classic artist fashion, just because it surprised me once I thought about it, I want to emphasize how peculiar it is they don't realize that the fact that they are attacking you for talking about a code of ethics (which has been said before to be a habit you picked up as a form of self-checking after all the times they accused you of being a narcissist or a sociopath, with their complaints about this coming after you listened somewhat and changed from making the majority of your content Emily-related after they had been attacking you for that and giving her too much of a voice, which in turn comes after they attacked you for making it server-related) just shows they're disguising the fact that what's really going on is that they just cannot come to a deal on what would make them happy about topics you engage in, which wouldn't be a big deal to a normal person (since it's not exactly trolling, you're just boring them) unless, I don't know, they were stalkers looking to strike gold with you (beggars cannot be choosers; someone who isn't even supposed to be putting their nose in things shouldn't be complaining about what they've stuck their nose in). Not that you can be blamed for not making people happy when repeated points like "there is no expiration date for [what we're accusing you of doing]" (with everything here and elsewhere addressing everything that particular individual giving that point said, aside from the part about backtracking which is answerable by the fact claims in the past about interactions that have been called out have been different from what is currently being presented currently) imply the very motive of the haters is that the hate is non-negotiable.

And the piece of wisdom I just mentioned is what has been cited as being the reason you're even giving this individual ("Emily") a voice, and that, as has been mentioned (to the chagrin of her accusers who are pulling an Anakin), one, nobody in this situation is perfect (with you not supporting one side "unquestionably"), and two, if "Emily" says something that breaks TOS, she could be reported and banned and nobody on either side except for "Emily" would care, and that the community shouldn't (and mostly doesn't) put the burden on the messenger, as is the way.

Yes to all these questions.

[casualxlfanatic]

A page full of receipts directing to your own content of you incriminating yourself isn't slander. "Slander" to you is what "medical malpractice" is to Emily Cassidy. You two would benefit from consulting a dictionary.

All your sockpuppet accounts use the same phrases, arguments, niche obsessions, targets, posting style, and behavior. They also just so happen to know exactly when to wake up after months of inactivity to come and defend you. The similarities are obvious and the pattern keeps repeating. Nobody but yourself cares this much about you so-called "code of conduct". Humans are not robots who have to rely on a self-made "code" to behave normally, and the fact you think that you even need one, as ineffective as it is, is abnormal.

You keep dismissing it as just "screenshots", but there are also numerous webpage archives. Goshfrog is right. Evidence doesn't expire, and those actions raise serious questions about a person's character. This isn't harmless mischief, it involves stalking minors online, minors who you were fully aware were minors while you were an adult, and making inappropriate comments toward them. Heck, you even doubled down once other forumers pointed out how inappropriate your comments were.

Your code means little when your actions say otherwise. Given your history of slandering others and defending people who abuse innocent people, your conduct speaks far louder than any stated principles.

You openly identified yourself as machiavellian, then tried to dismiss or downplay it when others pointed it out. Given its close association with narcissistic and psychopathic traits, it's understandable why people would view that as concerning. This is to say nothing of your habitual gaslighting and refusal to take accountability.

Some people getting banned on platforms with well-known, easily-abused AI moderation that is vulnerable to mass-reporting doesn't prove innocence. You aren't actually concerned about the TOS, given you outed yourself as wanting to get a teenage artist banned for reasons purely out of slanderous, jealous spite, which failed to get her banned, because she happened to be on sites that were human-moderated, she proved the art is hers, and everyone saw through it. In your case, human moderators were confirmed to have reviewed your history in depth before taking action and banning you.

Triagonal - Artists Aware

Stay classy and NEVER contact the subject of a PSA. Report, block, and move on. This information is here so you can proactively protect your

[the-abyss-watcher]

Of all the times participants in the community that is my recurring haters could show up again after what could be called a prolonged absence.

Addressing what you said in your unprovoked comeback...

You already start off with an invalid point as I'm looking at the word and it says "the utterance of false charges or misrepresentations which defame and damage another's reputation", which would be relevant to (among other things) all the times words have been put into my mouth, all the times where a diagnosis has been applied to my mind as a way to rationalize what many of you cannot handle, all the times where settled issues have been unburied for their reputational value, and all the times where people associated with me have been judged simply based on that association (made ironic with the fact there have been times when you ignore actual instances of identity being the same), which is the whole of the entire PSA you're waving around at the end.

None of that makes a correlation causation. Otherwise, it would serve as proof that you and the people whose PSA's you wave around (like at the end of what you say here) are one and the same. Am surprised you seem dissatisfied at the idea of someone having a codified ethical MO, even though it has been shown you and your allies don't adhere to one even when not codified (it's called discipline for a reason).

Dare I ask how you square "humans aren't robots" with "evidence doesn't expire" as if humans are supposed to be static? Because if I'm not mistaken, that implies this isn't what that's about here. Not to mention the existence of something is proof of its own existence, not of the circumstances behind it.

Show me a single part of it I went against without making up for it (according to the "code"). Simply giving guilty people a voice or associating with them is not itself support of them or a violation of the "code". That's your "code" you'd be talking about there.

The word "machiavellian" can mean a few things; a methodology, a "medical condition", a "philosophy" of sorts, a part of this "philosophy" (people can be a mix of things), and a mindset, among other things. None of these are actually specified, so even if I meant anything concerning by that, not only are your concerns of what I meant by that unfounded insofar as you don't know what I mean, but each action should be judged based on its own self anyways, right? So then why even bring that up? That's not me downplaying anything, that's me standing up for my authority to speak for myself, something which will take you back to point number one. As for taking accountability, in a way you would find relatable if your defense to nobody having ever condemned or apologized for any of the disrespect that you or your allies have yourselves dealt (to people associated with me), I will take accountability for things I deem were wrong of myself, which I have done (which many will say makes this a matter of you calling the kettle black there).

Your statement that automatic means of removing people "not proving innocence" is loaded. Being banned from a community never proves guilt or innocence. Neither does not being banned. What being banned proves is that they don't want you in their boundaries. There is nothing wrong in of itself about that. What's wrong is when you ban evade, as then you are violating boundaries. And there is where you might claim I've ban-evaded in that way, but this is untrue. I wouldn't even assert with 100% certainty that you have, but your allies have, and you've done nothing. Delegating the authority to decide these boundaries to AI doesn't invalidate them. Even if what you describe about getting someone banned (which moreso describes what your allies have tried to do regarding me, maneuvering their judgment to do as you and/or the allies wish in order to get back at me in an indefinitely-defined manner, all the while getting upset when this wouldn't work as well as you currently imply it does) was actually what was going on, it doesn't disprove I care about TOS (quite the opposite).

[everythingbutopposites]

For the record, despite claims from your haters that we're one and the same in any sense of the word, you would never make the same word mistakes or as many word mistakes as us either, such as "disserves" instead of "disservice" or "too questioning" instead of "also questioning".

Not that people who do so much as claim that someone cannot be understood when that's not an issue should be using how they communicate as a sleuthing tool in the first place.

I also wouldn't even talk about "Cluster B" medical conditions like NPD and BPD (even to defend the existence of people who have them like how you defend them, and thanks for being an ally) due to the sheer stigma surrounding them. In a world where society prides itself on being progressive, they seem to have succumbed to a catch-22 or feedback loop with the side effect of making them go backward in terms of progress, fueled in part by the fact the same communities we are caught in the core crossfire of (the communities where the attitude of rule by the masses validates the removal of those who don't adhere to the attitude, and vice versa) also (as a side effect of this validation feedback loop just mentioned) define "narcissism" and related conditions based on opposition to what they'd call communal values, which serves as another feedback loop as you realize that things such as "thinking of everything as a transaction", "sticking to one's beliefs until a debate proves otherwise", "prioritizing rigid forms of rule adherence", and "measuring one's own moral standing based on a lack of outstanding violations of boundaries" (you know, things which would seem understandable to anyone who isn't so mentally intertwined with community-dependent forms of thinking that they override the concept of each person having boundaries with each person having to accept what everyone around them accepts) are considered a part of the thought process associated by said communities to their label of narcissism which they project onto others (similar to how places like Soviet Russia would consider people as having psychiatric conditions if they stood by certain opposing ideas which semi-ironically held associations with "narcissism", albeit in a way which is a sub-issue of how people tend to be so forgetful that people of different mental types exist that they will build their community structures with only one type of person in mind, which is on its own a classic issue especially in the creative community).

Thank Wakan Tanka for my routine I'm able to be found donning here for making my Cluster B existence more palatable.

Communities whose members (again, ironically), in turn, don't see how or why one might accuse them of narcissism if they spend their days fishing for street cred (with emphasis on the fact they're hunting for street cred of all things on its own) by attacking others whose values conflict with theirs (regardless as to whether they hold up in a debate), as they are so immersed in the "philosophy" of honor being the holiest principle that they would press a button to send a missile (after possibly making it themselves) to blow up the moon if enough peers thought it would be cool enough. It's why influencers exist and why we have situations like the Avatar and TADC dilemmas, and it reminds me of the adage that intellectually lazy people (in this case, these people) are "mentally unfit" (and that you become mentally fit through mental exercises and mental gymnastics), especially ones like them who can't make up their mind. Ironically with the same people often saying they think Mr. Beast has gone too far and that he will do too much for views, not realizing they're looking in an ideological mirror when they look at him, one that's only slightly exaggerated as for them it's about street cred (the kind that would compel them to accuse you and your people like your neurodivergent friends, err, independent thinkers of being narcissists due to them using you as someone to talk through, being consequently absent-minded of the fact that you doing so at least prevents the critics from having to deal with them more directly in the event that the friends are as difficult as the critics claim).

Is everything I just said not the train of thought on the matter canon to the code of ethics, to the extent that there is an excommunication-endorsing war of wits declared against those who perpetuate the issues I describe?

[the-abyss-watcher]

It wouldn't not be canon, if that's the answer you're looking for.

[the-abyss-watcher]

CatgirlsAreLove on most sites, avoid this person notice how I called her out for her bull shit lies.

she's nothing but a troll. avoid her.

Any specifics?