headphones on

brb, i gotta go dance to this beat

[politijohn]

Source

[loveridden1999]

[jeremiu]

[politijohn]

Source

[louisegluckpdf]

i love hearing about the declining birth rate like yesss that is a major problem considering our dominant economic model. a problem i plan on contributing to 👍 joining the war on declining birth rates on the side of declining birth rates

[ahmadlashinew]

Some of you are looking for our campaign in order to help us spread it to reach it, and some do not look for us. I hope everyone will help me to reach my voice to the world and help me. I suffer from hepatitis and my mother suffers from diseases in the heart, sugar, pressure and nerves. Help us and reach our voice to help us.

[premierhazel]

There's no point in arguing with zionists. No point in pointing out contradictions in their arguments, or showing the facts, or explaining the real history. They don't care. Don't treat their arguments as genuine or serious because they aren't. Treat these modern day nazis the way you would any other nazi.

[caldoderuby-deactivated20260127]

[fellahimedia]

the boat with aid that greta thunberg is on is being surrounded by a drone but they refuse to retreat

[fellahimedia]

Zionists inserting a narrative that the iof didn't shoot palestinians waiting in line for aid do not concern me and I will not be baited to argue about it because the only ones denying it is the iof and I will not argue with people who continue to take iof claims at face value when we all watched the IOF spokesman point at a calendar and said that it it was a list of terrorist names. And they still believe the iof after that it somehow didnt make western journalists and zionists hesitate or question the credibility of the iof and I never believed them in the first place but im certainly not gonna argue with people with poor critical thinking skills. Like if I had known nothing of palestine but I saw the news reporting that the "idf spokesman mistakenly alleged a calendar to hold the names of Hamas" i would've came up with the simple conclusion that they expect ppl too stupid to verify and the iof must lie alot

[illusoryfem]

[the-real-loser-otaku-girl]

Im just a bunny! Dont make me get a job! Dont give me responsibilities! I should just sleep and frolic!

[fellahimedia]

guys this is so crazy to me i feel like we're regressing if we, despite the history of this country droning and bombing civilians and covering it up to, are still led to believe at face value that the people killed were "justified targets this time around!" And now that trump is in charge well the guy and his fascist crew certainly believe who theyre bombing are all guilty, right?

In 2009, the Obama administration conducted "the first known U.S. cruise missile strike in southern Yemen . . . That strike, which killed 14 alleged "militants," also killed at least 41 civilians, including 21 children and nine women, five of whom were pregnant at the time."

The Obama administration would continue to claim that their drone strikes were "exceptionally surgical and precise" and "do not put… innocent men, women and children in danger" but we know then and now there was mass civilian casualties.

In 2013, the administration launched four Hellfire missiles in a counterterrorism operation in Yemen. The Obama administration claimed all killed were militants and terrorists, witnesses said the administration killed a wedding procession

We know that the Obama administration would define militant as any "military aged male" to drastically lower the "non-combatant" death

Biden continued this policy. In 2021 there was footage showing a drone strike killing civilians, seven of the ten those killed children. In fact civilian deaths are so rampant that this "mistake" continues to happen. In Syria, the biden admin claimed to kill an al-Qaeda leader then find out they killed a father of ten children

Now, with the lack of accountability, may we ask why the hell we should believe that this airstrike the TRUMP administration sent killed only the "bad guys". He killed civilians in Yemen before

Whats even more just disappointing is that people not only believing at face value what the administration will say who they target, but the complete pivot from "progressive" people being against droning to just not caring. I was in class this semester and my professor thought it would be a fun learning exercise to ask the class how many civilian deaths would they be alright with if it killed so and so top dictators and people kept their hand up for 100+ civilians. I had to disrupt that shit and say "so would any of you would have raised your hand if it was you and your family at risk of being killed because canada claimed they needed to bomb your town to eliminate a terrorist group and they cant help but kill civilians because its just war?" and surprise i was met with silence.

Can we bring back being against droning? can we make that a mainstream belief again wth.

[bruntalism]

[seabassapologist]

You’re right and you should say it

[morrithal]

[tamamita]

[fairuzfan]

not only this but arad "served" during the 1967 naksa which displaced 300,000 people and COMPLETELY emptied the villages of bayt nuba, imwas, and yalo. like he participated in an event that was (until the last year) one of the biggest iterations of the nakba ever.

[fellahimedia]

for anyone claiming that Palestinians citizens of Israel have "equal rights" why do you conveniently leave out that there are only 3 entities that control the transfer of land and one of them the Jewish National Fund will only lease out land to Israeli jews? that it is extremely difficult for a Palestinian citizen of Israel to obtain a permit to build a home and therefore tens of thousands of Palestinians citizens of Israel are at risk of losing their home? or conveniently leave out that Israel counts east Jerusalem Palestinians of which no more than 5% have citizenship while the rest have "permanent resident status" that can be revoked anytime?

[elbiotipo]

"It's mere routine for imperial powers to strike terrorists oceans away" could it be not though? I think it would be nice if they would not bomb people.

[elbiotipo]

"but the Houthis are bad"

This does not excuse bombing civilians, nothing ever does

Maybe you should try other means to dealing with such groups instead of just hoping they'll just explode

That's not even the issue here because that chat revealed that bombing Yemen is about political posture rather than any strategic aim. This is something that is said almost explictly

And there's people still defending this. Por favor no sean tan pelotudos.

[elbiotipo]

I mean the best thing that leak did is to prove that US airstrikes are not about protecting the country or fighting terrorism but for posturing the US as a strong country (all the comments about dick measuring with the Europeans)

You would think people picked up in that hypocresy but they didn't and that's because in a sense they still think that bombing people is acceptable.