TV and Film Blog 2.
This week I independently watched clips from Peep Show to understand the acting techniques of acting straight to camera. I specifically watched clips from this show as to the best of my knowledge there is no other show like this one on TV that films people looking directly into camera but still manages to keep the show naturalistic. The camera angles were very few, it seemed as though the main ones used were the side on view of characters or the camera looking directly at someone as they looked directly down the lens. The latter was the more predominant angle used. The sound was clear and crisp and was combined with background noises to make the situations being shown in the scenes more realistic. The lighting throughout was artificial but seemed natural to the environment as the scenes I watched were all interior shots which would realistically be lighted with artificial light. The costumes represented that of today’s society and did not have any specific job apart from keeping the scene looking realistic through using naturalistic clothing. The location was the interior of a house which also reflected realism within the scene as the house used was an average person’s house laid out and furnished in a way that the average house would be so that the audience could relate further to the scene in question. The acting in the scenes I watched was extremely naturalistic but also comedic. The naturalism came between the conversations between characters which then became slightly un-natural when you could see the character was being pensive and not talking yet there voice was still overlaid on top of the picture in the scene. However, although this element mentioned seemed un-natural, it did not draw away from the overall scene feeling natural. The naturalistic way the actors performed down the camera as if talking to one and other never drew away from the naturalism either but enhanced it as it made me as the audience feel as though I was a bigger part of the show. The overall genre of Peep Show is comedy, however as it is so naturalistic and almost interview like, it appears to seem more like a comedy/docu-soap. The techniques used by the actors in the scenes from Peep Show reflected that of naturalism but used in a surreal portrayal. It was naturalistic because of the themes in the scene and the way it was set out, but the way it was presented was surreal as the actors were looking directly down the lens of the camera addressing the other actors in a documentary like way yet the scene of show in general is not nor does not reflect a documentary. As the camera was so close up to the actors’ faces, they needed to be highly aware of what facial expressions they would be using as the camera magnifies everything therefore any facial expressions would be magnified. There were always subtle expressions within the scenes but these were never over exaggerated which meant that they always seemed naturalistic and they never drew away from the action in the scene and did not distract the audience’s attention.
The techniques we learnt this week were acting directly to camera and performing a script from sight, both in a naturalistic style. The main technique I used today was naturalistic acting as both of the characters I played in today’s lesson were naturalistic therefore I had to reflect upon Stanislavski techniques to bring out the realistic format with my acting, especially for the sight-read duologue which was quite poignant as it was discussing troubles in family life including death and desertion, therefore to do this scene I had to reflect upon a sad time in my life to portray realistic emotions. When I worked on the monologue directly to camera I needed to naturalistically portray my character yet create comedy so I used similar techniques to those used in peep show by using how I say things and react to what I am saying to create comedy whilst saying things in a fairly serious and truthful way to keep up the naturalism in my acting. We were given the sight-reading script to briefly look over last week but we filmed it this week, over the course of time between the two sessions I tried not to look at this script as it was purely a sight-reading test. At the start of today’s lesson we were given a brief period of time to look over the duologue sight-reading script and we were given an exercise to complete in order to work on our reaction techniques. We were asked to individually read every line in the duologue to our partner so that they could naturalistically react to everything being said in order to use these reactions in the real sight-reading test. Sight-reading a script is a technique in itself that we were able to accomplish today as it is sometimes quite difficult to sight-read and be able to portray a believable character at the same time as thinking about what the next line is. These techniques that we learnt today would be useful to retain for future TV and film acting as there is a high possibility that as actors we may have to read a piece of script from sight for an audition to camera. Also, performing directly to camera can sometimes be quite off putting, however, by having practice at this style of acting it will make us more confident in performing to camera.
Today we continued to work on the sight-reading duologue as well as working on the naturalistic monologue directly to camera. I approached the duologue by not attempting to look at it over the course of the week up to this lesson to make it a fair sight-reading test to camera and to test and improve my sight-reading abilities, especially when under pressure performing with somebody else to camera. I approached the independent monologue by looking at Peep Show, a TV show where the actors perform naturalistically directly to camera whilst still creating comedy as this is the effect I wanted to give. In the duologue, I approached my character by reflecting upon a time where I was fairly sad as this monologue is quite poignant as it reflects death and desertion which creates pensiveness and anger within the characters. To keep this duologue especially naturalistic, I kept my natural accent so that the sight-read words flowed better. In the monologue I performed I initially decided to use a Cockney accent as I thought a 17year old Cockney kid talking about the official secrets act and killing people as though he is a spy would be quite comical. To create further comedy within the monologue I decided to say the whole monologue in a blasé style, even the section when I talk about killing people. The final line I say in the monologue is “oh and I can cook, any questions”, I say this line in a more surprised way as if this is more interesting and important than me saying I have killed people which therefore creates further comedy. I also wanted to make the way my character presented himself very nonchalant to create comedic elements which is why I was sat in a very informal way slouched over a seat not taking much interest in what I am saying apart from when I inform the camera that I can cook. My thoughts on the duologue scene reflected sadness as it is about two young people who seem to have had a difficult childhood with my character, Mike, having one of his parents dying and the other character having one of her parents appear to desert her. As mentioned, I wanted to produce poignancy to this scene and make it appear fairly awkward as the tension builds up between the characters. I wanted to make it naturalistic by showing that my character did not really know how to react to the situation he was being given therefore he was trying every possible outcome to get a response out of the other character in the scene which did not work and just made the scene more awkward up until the point he tries to compare his life to the other character’s life which encourages an argument. I wanted to show a contrasting them in my monologue directly to camera as I could have played this character in quite a serious way as I am discussing taking people’s lives and the official secrets act, but looking deeper into the scene, as the person in question is only 17 these are very unrealistic that he has done. For that reason I turned it into a comedy type scene inspired by the acting in Peep Show. To make it naturalistic, I did not address all of my lines directly to camera as this may not have worked as well as this technique works in Peep Show, so to further add to the blasé style of my character, I looked around the room uninterested until turning to look at the camera at the end of the speech to exclaim proudly that I can cook. The issues that were looked at in the duologue were death and desertion as mentioned previously. Me and Lydia reflected these issues in our duologue by making it quite poignant and reflective but at the same time awkward. We did this to show a naturalistic element to how a scenario like this would have played out in real life by building up the conversation as though no one knew what to reply to each other as though there was something causing tension, which is eventually brought up by my character when he tries to compare his situation of his parent dying to his opposites situation of her parent leaving. To make this scene more naturalistic, we both reflected upon times that we personally felt the emotions that we wanted to portray within our scenes to make our performance more realistic and engaging. In my independent monologue, the issue I felt overpowered everything was lies but at the same time murder and espionage. The fact my character claims he has killed people in different countries and is bound by the official secrets act would suggest he is of high importance and could most likely be an MI6 representative which would mean this monologue would have an underlying serious tone to it. However, at the very start of this monologue we discover that this person is only 17 and has only recently passed his driving test which would suggest he is lying to whoever he is addressing. For that reason I decided to treat this issue as comedy and play off it to create a contrasting performance to the duologue. This is why I decided to speak the whole monologue in such a naturalistic, calm and blasé way because what I was saying was extremely serious however, I said it as though I did not really care which made this monologue funny.
The main strength I had was the ability to take on two completely different characters in two completely different scenarios with two completely different sets of emotions. Even though this appeared a challenge to do, I feel I portrayed both characters to a high and believable standard which reflected two similar genres in two completely different ways. My ability to naturally take on different accents is good and enables me to play with my characterisation of different roles which also gives a definitive contrast to the characters I play. Being able to learn libretto quickly is another string point of mine which enables me to take on multiple scripts at the same time. I took on the sight-reading challenge well and I feel I was able to produce a good duologue with Lydia that was believable and naturalistic throughout whilst still possessing dynamics in the acting. This week the main weakness I had was in the sight-reading monologue as although I took on this challenge well and performed the duologue to what I thought was a good standard, I felt slightly distracted by having the sheet of paper to read from constantly next to me and at one point I got tongue-tied with a line because I knew what the line was in my head but I briefly looked at a completely different line on the sight-reading sheet which confused me slightly. I feel I covered up this mishap well though. In the sight-reading monologue I feel we could have added in more gestures and reactions to make the scene more interesting as because we were reading from a script, it was harder to add in these gestures when performing. I also feel that I could have made more of my blasé gestures and facial expressions in my independent monologue to create further comedic effect, however, I did receive the response I was trying to achieve from my audience throughout the way I initially performed the scene. The scenes I enjoyed the most were Amy’s duologue, Chantelle’s monologue and Kerry’s monologue as they were three contrasting pieces. Amy’s acting in her duologue was exceptionally good and felt naturalistic as it seemed just like I was looking into an everyday conversation that Amy was having with someone as she kept her natural tonality to her vocals. She performed this duologue in a completely different way to how me and Lydia performed ours as she used a more sarcastic and angered tone of voice to her opposite which worked just as well as the way me and Lydia interpreted our piece. Chantelle’s monologue was extremely good as it was extremely naturalistic and reflected her normal bubbly characteristics, I do however feel she could have shown slightly more contrast in her vocals as they were very similar all the way through. The gestures were sometimes a bit too exaggerated for camera acting as the camera magnifies everything, but these gestures would work exceptionally well in other types of acting. Kerry’s monologue was good as she said her libretto in such a blasé way too like I portrayed my monologue, although I think she could add further contrast to her vocals and facial expressions throughout her performance.














