PROJECT #3 DOCUMENTATION & STATEMENT
‘SWEPT’ by Lindsey Garland, Naomi Likayi, Bree Goodwin & Elle Kilgore
Conception:
The idea started with the question of what made a public and private. We explored the question within various contexts including safespaces, Western conquest, stickering, and personal use. We knew we wanted to conceptualize taking a public space and claiming it as our own, but we weren’t exactly sure what we wanted to say, or how we wanted to say it.
Next step:
Originally, the idea was to create stickers of variant size (depending on the site), wherein we, the group, would claim our name and what was held at the site (i.e. “Lindsey’s Pond”) The idea was to question the validity of the, so to say, “steaking a flag in the dirt” method of claiming earth, which is very rooted in the motif of Western Manifest Destiny. We jokingly named the title that, based on a loose notion. When presenting it to class, the joke fell flat, and we’d hadn’t had a solid idea of what exactly we wanted to do.
Leading research:
We next started to look into the methods of ‘claiming’ public space without due process (that is, without state or government recognizing it as officially private land belonging to whom had ‘claimed it.’)
An article debriefed bootleg trail-blazing, mentioned there was a demand for certain trails to be made, and that it apparently became the duty of the people demanding it to create them.
Another article pondered:
“Consider private claims to the lands and resources owned and managed by the federal government. Once established, these claims-of which there are hundreds of thousands-seem, in many instances, to take on a life of their own.”
The article later went on to explore how a site can retain the durability of it’s claim in tandem with how the history of the site and the American legal system give a place its vibe or “character.”
Next, an article about a young man’s art project was found. The title of the project is #SetintheStreet and rudimentarily, the piece was of domestic settings set in the middle of a public space. This included a family’s dinner table on the side of a wall, a bathroom on the side of a brick wall and a cozy living room set up in front of the side of another heavily graffi’ed building.
This started to generate a more concrete methodology of how we were going to say something. We knew we wanted to plant it publicly... but the question still lingered on what subject matter we’d choose.
Using words came back as a theme when a blogpost detailing the use of typography and words in site-specific areas was found.
So, we were going to use words in public to send a message about something. It was time to decide what the message was going to comment on: the ‘sweeping’ of the homeless in Portland.
Founding research:
It started with a Willamette Weekly article chronicling two women pitching a tent in front of Charlie Hale’s house after he’d announced it legal to set up camp in the public arena (with certain stipulations, that is.) They specifically interviewed homeless persons of what they thought of the new policy, citing Right 2 Dream and The Springwater Corridor (two well-known homeless camps in PDX.)
There were also articles found discussing the repercussions of sweeping homeless camps, pleas for more humane measures and the implications of homeless seclusion.
Finding our purpose:
We knew what we wanted to talk about, and what we wanted to say, wasn’t so much specifically rooted in on one side or the other, but rather, a plea to begin the discussion in general.
Within Rose City Park’s neighborhood lies a site where a very concentrated homeless camp once was. The camp was there for a considerable amount of time, until it’d been swept, pretty much instantaneously. The feeling was eerie. A once populated area, neutralized and fenced, it begged the question “where did these people go?”
The invocation had to be rooted in a phrase. “Swept” seemed most appropriate. It evoked a story, to those in the community and those outside. It is profound in it’s simplicity. To have the rug “swept out from underneath you” or to “sweep something under the rug” falls heavily in line with the motifs of the disenfranchised homeless plight.
Reaction:
While erecting the piece, there were mixed reactions. From subtle drive-bys to peace signs, and genuinely concerned onlookers.
Final thoughts:
Lindsey:
Naomi:
Bree:
Elle:
Video on ‘Swept’ done by Lindsey Garland:















