comradesystems

two systems with a lot to say about

[comradesystems]

If youre a kpop fan literally unfollow me 

[comradesystems]

Stop spamming likes on my posts if ur url literally has the term otaku in it I don’t want you here

[comradesystems]

Am I not being clear enough pls stop liking my posts I don’t want you here

[comradesystems]

Your username is fucking otakuchan I can’t with the low key racism and insensitivity to Japanese culture in the crowd 2day

[comradesystems]

Stop spamming likes on my posts if ur url literally has the term otaku in it I don’t want you here

[comradesystems]

Am I not being clear enough pls stop liking my posts I don’t want you here

[comradesystems]

Stop spamming likes on my posts if ur url literally has the term otaku in it I don’t want you here

[positybity]

I had to

[anxietyproblem]

[pack-of-rats-archive]

Questions for other people with DID/OSDD:

Please reblog with your answers!

1. Do you prefer "person with DID/OSDD" or just being referred to as a "system"?

2. How do you feel about other people asking who's front/ who they're talking to?

3. How do you feel about other people pointing it out if they notice you switch?

I'll reblog with my answers as well.

[pack-of-rats-archive]

1. Just call me/ us a system.

2. Sometimes uncomfortable but depends on the situation.

3. Same as above. Depends who's asking.

- RJ

[sf-sys-deactivated20231213]

1. I mean, I kinda prefer both?? But "person with DID" sounds kinda weird since there's more than just one person living in this body, if that makes sense? It's hard to explain.

2. Honestly? It makes us uncomfortable. Or, makes me uncomfortable, at least, because unless you're very close to us, the question is just plain weird and kinda triggers us so yeah... If you think you're talking to me (host) but another alter is out and you know about our DID then we will tell you. Does that even make sense? I don't know.

3. It would be scary and uncomfy for me tbh. Especially if someone just points it out when we're dissociated and in the process of switching (which for us is painfully slow). Though I'm glad not many people know about our DID so nobody can really point it out often.

-Host

[comradesystems]

1. "system" is just simpler but i dont really care if you call me a "person with did/osdd"

2. it makes us uncomfortable because if we arent telling you in the first place we probably dont know or dont want YOU to know, but were also VERY open about our fronters nearly all the time

3. i dont actually mind that, it makes me feel good and validated when people notice differences between fronters or when we switch

[comradesystems]

1) System, I hate ‘person with’ first, Same when people call me a ‘Person with autism’ you can just call me autistic, I wont be offended. it also makes language uncomfortable and hard for me. 2) UHHHHh I don’t know. Outside of my partner system and friends who are systems, I might say I am a system but I never will tell them whos fronting. With our partner system or places where my system is welcomed its cool, unless a little is fronting I likely wont tell you. I had a friend who would constantly push me to tell them and it made me uncomfortable. 3) Uhm, I’ve had it happen only once or twice? if youre gonna be weird and ask if I ‘need space’ like someone did when i was dissociating, No. it makes me uncomfortable. I am just a dude and sometimes me being just a dude with DID means me dissociating to hell and back over not much at all, maybe i just vibe with a song.if you notice i do switch you can ask me who fronts but im not really oblidged to tell you all the time? yknow? its a trust thing.

[comradesystems]

never thought id have to say dont follow us if youre a cocaine fetish account but hey please dont do that?

[pack-of-rats-archive]

Questions for other people with DID/OSDD:

Please reblog with your answers!

1. Do you prefer "person with DID/OSDD" or just being referred to as a "system"?

2. How do you feel about other people asking who's front/ who they're talking to?

3. How do you feel about other people pointing it out if they notice you switch?

I'll reblog with my answers as well.

[pack-of-rats-archive]

1. Just call me/ us a system.

2. Sometimes uncomfortable but depends on the situation.

3. Same as above. Depends who's asking.

- RJ

[sf-sys-deactivated20231213]

1. I mean, I kinda prefer both?? But "person with DID" sounds kinda weird since there's more than just one person living in this body, if that makes sense? It's hard to explain.

2. Honestly? It makes us uncomfortable. Or, makes me uncomfortable, at least, because unless you're very close to us, the question is just plain weird and kinda triggers us so yeah... If you think you're talking to me (host) but another alter is out and you know about our DID then we will tell you. Does that even make sense? I don't know.

3. It would be scary and uncomfy for me tbh. Especially if someone just points it out when we're dissociated and in the process of switching (which for us is painfully slow). Though I'm glad not many people know about our DID so nobody can really point it out often.

-Host

[comradesystems]

1. "system" is just simpler but i dont really care if you call me a "person with did/osdd"

2. it makes us uncomfortable because if we arent telling you in the first place we probably dont know or dont want YOU to know, but were also VERY open about our fronters nearly all the time

3. i dont actually mind that, it makes me feel good and validated when people notice differences between fronters or when we switch

[iapislazuli]

nobody:

the oscilating desk fan in my room:

[comradesystems]

TO CLARIFY LITTLES SHOULDNT BE SEXUAL.

[comradesystems]

@system-splintered

I genuinely hope for your own sake and the sake of your littles that you rethink your opinion.

Yes, hypersexual littles. Yes, hypersexual CSA victims exist. It is a natural reaction to sexual trauma just as sex repulsion is. Of course it’s not an intentional reaction. Of course it’s not something that should be hidden from the world or pretend doesn’t exist.

But if you fucking think that makes it okay to subject your littles to more trauma, please get some help.

Littles, while able to do more than a normal child, while having more cognitive ability than a typical child, are still functioning mentally below what a typical adult would. They cannot consent, even if they are hypersexual and desire sexual attention. Opening up your littles to sexual interaction is going to make them suseptible to predators and abuse. What they do in their private time is obviously no one’s business, but allowing littles to sexually interact with other people, ESPECIALLY ADULT SINGLETS, IS FUCKING ABHORRENT.

We have hypersexual littles and what that means is we have to protect them more from people who want to hurt and use them. We don’t hide them. They aren’t a secret. But their existence doesn’t mean we should enable them and put them out into the sexual world where they’ll only be further traumatized. If you think that’s okay, genuinely, I hope your system is okay, because holy fuck, dude.

[comradesystems]

k so you argued on a post about Littles not being sexual. saying nobody should police you. we responded pointing out how you’re wrong. and your response is WOW YOU ‘DUMB FUCK BITCH’ LITERALLY NOBODY IS DOING THAT. I’m too old for this shit. grow the fuck up and stop subjecting your little alters to abuse and stop being an agressive little bitch when you get called out like the trash goblin you are.

[comradesystems]

@system-splintered oh, apparently this is a screenshot to you admitting allowing your little alters being sexual. I guess you're the disgusting dumb fuck bitch we think you are 😘💋

[comradesystems]

TO CLARIFY LITTLES SHOULDNT BE SEXUAL.

[comradesystems]

@system-splintered

I genuinely hope for your own sake and the sake of your littles that you rethink your opinion.

Yes, hypersexual littles. Yes, hypersexual CSA victims exist. It is a natural reaction to sexual trauma just as sex repulsion is. Of course it’s not an intentional reaction. Of course it’s not something that should be hidden from the world or pretend doesn’t exist.

But if you fucking think that makes it okay to subject your littles to more trauma, please get some help.

Littles, while able to do more than a normal child, while having more cognitive ability than a typical child, are still functioning mentally below what a typical adult would. They cannot consent, even if they are hypersexual and desire sexual attention. Opening up your littles to sexual interaction is going to make them suseptible to predators and abuse. What they do in their private time is obviously no one’s business, but allowing littles to sexually interact with other people, ESPECIALLY ADULT SINGLETS, IS FUCKING ABHORRENT.

We have hypersexual littles and what that means is we have to protect them more from people who want to hurt and use them. We don’t hide them. They aren’t a secret. But their existence doesn’t mean we should enable them and put them out into the sexual world where they’ll only be further traumatized. If you think that’s okay, genuinely, I hope your system is okay, because holy fuck, dude.

[comradesystems]

k so you argued on a post about Littles not being sexual. saying nobody should police you. we responded pointing out how you're wrong. and your response is WOW YOU 'DUMB FUCK BITCH' LITERALLY NOBODY IS DOING THAT. I'm too old for this shit. grow the fuck up and stop subjecting your little alters to abuse and stop being an agressive little bitch when you get called out like the trash goblin you are.

[comradesystems]

TO CLARIFY LITTLES SHOULDNT BE SEXUAL.

[comradesystems]

@system-splintered

I genuinely hope for your own sake and the sake of your littles that you rethink your opinion.

Yes, hypersexual littles. Yes, hypersexual CSA victims exist. It is a natural reaction to sexual trauma just as sex repulsion is. Of course it's not an intentional reaction. Of course it's not something that should be hidden from the world or pretend doesn't exist.

But if you fucking think that makes it okay to subject your littles to more trauma, please get some help.

Littles, while able to do more than a normal child, while having more cognitive ability than a typical child, are still functioning mentally below what a typical adult would. They cannot consent, even if they are hypersexual and desire sexual attention. Opening up your littles to sexual interaction is going to make them suseptible to predators and abuse. What they do in their private time is obviously no one's business, but allowing littles to sexually interact with other people, ESPECIALLY ADULT SINGLETS, IS FUCKING ABHORRENT.

We have hypersexual littles and what that means is we have to protect them more from people who want to hurt and use them. We don't hide them. They aren't a secret. But their existence doesn't mean we should enable them and put them out into the sexual world where they'll only be further traumatized. If you think that's okay, genuinely, I hope your system is okay, because holy fuck, dude.

[comradesystems]

crying because I didn't notice we posted the fucking clown image

[comradesystems]

sorry it was just the "Think comprehensively as an adult" that got me and there's been a lot of "discourse" about it lately in DID spaces sorry sorry

please read the entire post before making assumptions

[comradesystems]

TO CLARIFY LITTLES SHOULDNT BE SEXUAL.

[comradesystems]

I'm sorry but your last post may have came off wrong to me but you don't think littles should be sexual right... like they are still littles even if they aren't literally children..

nothing about it was sexual or came off that way???? i said ‘when they act like an asshole.’ where would you even. grab that implication