I'm Alastor @cosmic-dust-poltergeist - Tumblr Blog

my addtion to the cat caine art i've seen floating around (idea/au by @katzebruh)

when youre aromantic you still get dead wife flashbacks but its just about that really fucking good sandwich you ate last week

yaomao052113

tatichiclete

Girl's night

wineonawhitetee

TADC doodle dump!! Featuring assorted comics and such!! This was fun :3

rabbitmylove

Girls, calm down.

witchesversuspatriarchy

Grandmas FTW ✨

dunroamins

Okay but for people who struggle with their co-ordination (me): GAME-CHANGER

anais-ninja-bitch

fuck it up granma

awlwren

[id: photograph captioned “This was how Granma showed me how to sew in a straight nine.” The photo shows someone sewing a simple running stitch parallel to the edge of the cloth. Their thumb rests parallel to both, just beyond where the needle is coming up, and two lines drawn on their thumbnail are matched to the edge of the cloth and the line of stitches respectively.]/end id.

maidenvault

Not “Only my reading of canon is correct” or “Interpretations are subjective and all valid” but a secret third thing, “More than one interpretation can be valid but there’s a reason your English teacher had you cite quotes and examples in your papers, you have to have a strong argument that your interpretation is actually supported by the text or it is just wrong and I’m fine with telling you it’s wrong, actually.”

mooncustafer

If the text says the curtains are blue you can argue about what that means; but if you’re going to claim they’re actually yellow you’d better have a really good argument.

xwilltruman

i know the curtains better than the author. thank you for coming to my ted talk

maidenvault

Fandom has such unresolved mommy/daddy issues about authors. If you apply a little reading comprehension skills to my original post you’ll see I didn’t say anything at all about the author. You guys always make “interpretation” about your beef with the author. You’re all obsessed with the author. This post is just about deciphering what is there in canon. Figuring out what is being communicated by the canon itself with all the words and images and basic formal elements that are there in canon. That’s all it’s about. It really doesn’t matter if the author intentionally put all those things there in a pattern that might support the idea that this one character’s queer. That’s not what this is about. What matters is if you can compellingly argue there’s a pattern of evidence there. Or not. Everyone is conspiring together to make me go insane still adding shit about authorial intent on my post.