Simply Cryst

Strictly for assignment purposes 😉

[cryst-writes]

Tumblr, the GOATED Platform

PS. GOATED = Greatest Of All Time.

To wrap up my blog for this assignment, I've chosen to talk about Tumblr itself.

And honestly? I think it's the perfect platform to end on.

Throughout this whole assignment, I've written about all sorts of topics. Podcasts, slow fashion, Minecraft communities, face filters, crowdsourcing, influencer controversies... and somehow, all of them found a place here. Looking back, I don't think there are many platforms that would have allowed me to jump from talking about Ariana Grande's concert crowdsourcing one week to Minecraft fandoms the next, it would’ve been too “jumpy” of a topic.

Tumblr really is just THAT platform that lets us talk about basically anything we like.

One thing I appreciate most about Tumblr is the freedom it gives users to express themselves. Whether it's sharing opinions, fangirling over creators, posting niche interests, or simply documenting random thoughts, there always seems to be a space for it. According to Bianchi et al. (2022), different social media platforms encourage different levels of self-disclosure, and Tumblr has often been associated with allowing users to express themselves more openly and authentically.

And honestly, I felt that while doing this assignment.

Every week, I had the freedom to choose topics that genuinely interested me. I wasn't worried about whether a topic was "trendy enough" or whether it would fit into a specific content niche. Instead, I could simply write about things I cared about, and that's what made the experience enjoyable.

Another thing that makes Tumblr special is its overall vibe. Kender (2022) describes Tumblr as a platform that users often perceive as more welcoming and community-oriented compared to some other social media spaces. While no platform is perfect, Tumblr has always felt a little more relaxed to me. People come here to share interests, thoughts, fandoms, and creativity rather than constantly chasing algorithms and engagement.

Speaking of fandoms, Tumblr has practically become iconic for them. As Stein (2025) explains, Tumblr has played a significant role in shaping fan culture and fan aesthetics online. Whether it's fan art, edits, theories, memes, or just people collectively screaming over their favourite characters, Tumblr has created a space where fandoms can thrive. And honestly? That's part of its charm.

So, thank you Tumblr.

Thank you for giving me a place to talk about things I love, share my thoughts, and complete this assignment without feeling restricted. It may not be the biggest social media platform today, but it will always be one of the most unique.

And with that, we've reached the end of this blog. 💙

Now if you'll excuse me, I'll probably go back to scrolling through Minecraft posts, concert clips, and whatever random niche interest catches my attention next. 😌✨

Until next time, Tumblr. 🫡💙

For now~

References:

Bianchi, M., Fabbricatore, R., & Caso, D. (2022). Tumblr facts: antecedents of self-disclosure across different social networking sites. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 12(9), 1257-1271. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe12090087 

Kender, K. (2022, October). Tumblr is Queer and Twitter is toxic: speculating about the vibe of social media spaces. In Nordic Human-Computer Interaction Conference (pp. 1-8). https://doi.org/10.1145/3546155.3547279 

Stein, L. E. (2025). Tumblr fan aesthetics. In The Routledge companion to media fandom (pp. 175-186). Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003373025-20 

[cryst-writes]

Crowdsource, but like a Family <3

When most people hear the word "crowdsourcing," they probably think of companies asking the public for ideas or feedback. And yes, that's technically true. Crowdsourcing involves drawing contributions, information, or participation from a large group of people (Liu, 2021). 

But I think social media has given crowdsourcing another meaning too! Sometimes we're not solving problems or generating ideas, we're simply collectively building an experience.

It feels like everyone is in the moment together even when we're all miles apart.

As of the newest event, Ariana Grande's Eternal Sunshine Tour has started! As someone living in Asia, I could not attend it (heartbroken 😭), but I got to witness so much of it through TikTok.

And honestly? I think that's one of the most fun parts of social media.

Even some of the funniest moments from the concert quickly spread across the platform. For example, TikTok user @giacomobeub shared that he attended the concert dressed as a little flower pot. And I must say, I absolutely loved the outfit.

@arianagrande IM SO READY!!! Oakland N1 #ArianaGrande #eternalsunshinetour #Oakland

What I found even more wholesome was the comment section. People were sharing stories about spotting him at the concert, taking photos with him, or seeing him appear in other people's videos. Suddenly, this one random concertgoer became part of everyone's Eternal Sunshine Tour experience.

To me, that's crowdsourcing at its best.

One person posts a video. Another person shares a different angle. Someone else uploads a funny interaction. Before you know it, people who never attended the concert can almost piece together the entire event from everyone's contributions.

And that's exactly what happened with Ariana's tour.

Even I, someone sitting thousands of kilometres away from the venue, felt involved. I got to see the performances, the fan projects, the funny outfits, and all the little moments that made the concert special.

Karachiwalla and Pinkow (2021) explain that crowdsourcing thrives because people are motivated not only by rewards, but also by interaction, participation, and the love of community. Honestly, I think that's exactly what happened here. Nobody was getting paid to post their videos. People simply wanted to share their excitement with others.

Of course, crowdsourcing is not always perfect. It can spread misinformation just as quickly as it spreads joy. But when used positively, it creates something really beautiful. As Du et al. (2024) discuss, crowdsourcing has significant social implications because it allows people to collectively contribute knowledge and experiences.

In this case, what was being shared wasn't information…it was happiness.

Now that's the kind of crowdsourcing I like. 🌻✨

References:

Du, S., Babalola, M. T., D’cruz, P., Dóci, E., Garcia-Lorenzo, L., Hassan, L., ... & Van Gils, S. (2024). The ethical, societal, and global implications of crowdsourcing research. Journal of Business Ethics, 193(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05604-9 

Karachiwalla, R., & Pinkow, F. (2021). Understanding crowdsourcing projects: A review on the key design elements of a crowdsourcing initiative. Creativity and innovation management, 30(3), 563-584. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12454 

Liu, H. K. (2021). Crowdsourcing: Citizens as coproducers of public services. Policy & Internet, 13(2), 315-331. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.249 

[cryst-writes]

Marketing with RedNote be STRUGGLING

Y'all ever submit a post, get it rejected, edit it, submit it again, get rejected AGAIN, and then sit there wondering what exactly you did wrong? 😭

Because that was literally me during my internship when I had to manage content on RedNote.

And that's when I learned something very important: social media governance is REAL.

I would like to point out that I personally think 小红书 (Xiǎo hóng shū), also known as RedNote has the heaviest social media governance.

Of course, these governance rules help promote creator originality and authenticity, as the platform has targeted accounts using AI-hosting tools (Li, 2026). However, RedNote's extensive moderation system can also create challenges for users and marketers navigating its content restrictions (Johnston, 2025).

Talking from my personal experience, I had a social media management and marketing role during my internship. It was for a dental clinic, and of course, RedNote was one of the platforms we used for advertising. 

Here's the thing: RedNote is VERY, VERY strict when it comes to content that could be interpreted as promoting "medical beauty standards." You may ask, "How is dental related to that?" Apparently, it does!! 😭 Dental is considered a sensitive topic too, and I definitely did not know that beforehand. The amount of trial and error I went through just to get certain posts approved... oh my. Not to mention the shadowban too! (Yes, they often shadowban accounts)

I remember having to be extra careful with wording, images, and even before-and-after comparisons because there was always a possibility that the content would be flagged. Meanwhile, the exact same post could be perfectly acceptable on Instagram or Facebook. It really made me realize how different social media governance can be across platforms and countries. What is considered normal marketing on one platform may be considered sensitive or restricted on another.

But then again, RedNote's governance framework also promotes creator originality through copyright protection and anti-plagiarism policies, requiring users to credit other creators and properly label sponsored content (Wu, 2021).

Still, as someone who had to deal with these regulations firsthand, I can confidently say that marketing on RedNote is not for the weak. 😭 Every post felt like a mini challenge, and sometimes I was genuinely surprised by what could and could not be posted. But I guess that's the trade-off: stricter governance means more work for creators and marketers, but it also helps maintain the platform's credibility and user trust.

Would I complain about it again if I had to manage another RedNote account? Absolutely. Would I understand why the rules are there? Also yes. 🤷🏻‍♀️

References:

Johnston, E. V. (2025). When Regulation Backfires: Cultural Infrastructure and the Mass Migration from TikTok to RedNote. In 12th International Conference on Communities & Technologies (pp. 28-43).

Li, J. (2026). RedNote targets AI-run accounts with new governance rules. Chinadaily.com.cn. https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202603/10/WS69b0230ea310d6866eb3d0c5.html 

Wu, X. (2021). A qualitative analysis on Xiaohongshu: Conspicuous consumption, gender, social media algorithms and surveillance.

[cryst-writes]

The Community That Raised Me 🌿

Gaming communities, most people think of them and immediately go, "OH, TOXIC FANDOM..."

Well, today I'm gonna get into a very heartwarming community: Minecraft!

I know, I know, you're gonna say, "Isn't Minecraft toxic too?" Well, it depends. And today it's gonna be about Lizzie (LDShadowLady). Literally my mother 😭

She has built her community around a very family-friendly environment, often collaborating with her partner Joel (Smallishnbeans) and friends such as Oli (OrionSound), Jimmy (SolidarityGaming), Scott (Dangthatsalongname), and many, many more.

As Barbour (2023) stated, "it was the kind of content I was comfortable allowing my daughter to watch largely unsupervised, as the emphasis was on light-hearted fun, collaboration and creativity."

Honestly, I love watching her videos. Her community is incredibly supportive, and that's something that feels quite rare nowadays, especially online.

A very fun fact about Lizzie's community is that while she was "secretly" pregnant during TwitchCon, the REAL fans did not leak it. Most of the fanbase, including me, genuinely had no idea about it.

"Commenters across the internet were left stunned that ShadowLady had a baby, with many remarking how they'd watched her throughout their childhood and young adulthood" (Glaze, 2025).

And I think that says a lot about the community itself. In an era where people rush to post everything online for attention, many fans chose to respect her privacy instead. They understood that some moments belong to the creator, not the internet.

Even when someone leaked the pregnancy, people were quick to remind that it was Lizzie's news to share when she was ready. It really shows the level of respect that exists between Lizzie and her community.

Besides, in their series Empires SMP by fWhip, even though there are "rival-ish" roleplays and conflicts built into the story, Lizzie always keeps things light-hearted and fun rather than genuinely aggressive. She has consistently made an effort to keep her content family-friendly... although some of her friends, such as OrionSound, MythicalSausage, and even SmallishBeans, her husband, occasionally push that boundary a little more (Empires SMP Wiki, n.d.).

Of course, no community is completely free from drama. Every fandom has disagreements from time to time. But compared to many online gaming spaces that are, I would say, controversial, Lizzie's community feels like a breath of fresh air.

I think that's why so many people, including myself, have stayed around for years. It isn't just about Minecraft anymore. It's about the memories, the creativity, and the comfort Lizzie has brought to viewers throughout different stages of life.

And honestly? In a world where online communities are often criticised for being toxic, it's nice to know there are still corners of the internet that feel a little like home. 🩷

References:

Barbour, K. (2023). Minecraft YouTubers. In Women and Persona Performance (pp. 127-147). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33152-7_7 

Empires SMP Wiki. (n.d.). Fandom. https://empires-smp.fandom.com/wiki/Empires_SMP 

Glaze, V. (2025). LDShadowLady breaks the internet with surprise baby reveal. Dexerto. https://www.dexerto.com/youtube/ldshadowlady-breaks-the-internet-with-surprise-baby-reveal-3234920/ 

[cryst-writes]

Not All Face Filters Are About Beauty

Face filters, most people think of catfishing, heavy filters, changing the whole face and all that.

But today, I would like to get into a part of face filters many had not really put their minds onto…

Live Streaming Face Filters.

From what I have researched, face-filter gifting features appear to have evolved from Chinese livestreaming platforms' virtual gifting systems, which later incorporated AR-based visual effects and were subsequently adopted by global platforms such as TikTok Live (Zhang et al., 2019; Qiu & Klug, 2021).

I'm not gonna lie, it is a very smart move by them. Face filters really help in tempting gifts during livestreams. Audiences and fans love seeing streamers react when a filter suddenly appears on their face, therefore more and more people would send gifts that trigger these effects.

For example, a pair of Thai actors during a livestream.

hqbwgqhahHQHQHAHQHABQHAHQHAHQHAHQHAHHQQHHQ #perthsanta #perthsantaedit #perthtanapon #santapongsapak #perthppe #santapp #perthedit #santaedit #fyp #foryou #เพิร์ธแซนต้า #เพิร์ธธนพนธ์สุขุมพันธนาสาร #แซนต้าพงศภัคอุดมโภชน์

Personally, I love seeing those interactions too. It is quite fascinating how a simple face filter gift can spark interactions between fans and actors, and even between the actors themselves. Sometimes it creates funny moments, playful teasing, or unexpected reactions that viewers end up talking about long after the livestream has ended.

The same thing can happen in group livestreams.

A random filter popping up can suddenly change the whole atmosphere of the stream. One second everyone is calmly talking, and the next thing you know they're laughing, joking around, or trying to figure out who sent the gift. It creates spontaneous moments that feel natural and entertaining.

这算直播事故吗？！6.7万人看恐龙逃生哈哈哈。#一看就入迷直播 #喜悦直播 #颜值 #整活

Click on above to watch!

What makes this even more interesting is that these filters are no longer just visual effects. They have become a form of communication. When viewers send a gift that triggers a filter, they are not simply giving money to support the streamer. They are actively participating in the livestream and influencing what happens next. In a way, viewers become part of the entertainment itself rather than just passive audiences.

It is crazy how effective these face-filter virtual gifts really are. According to Horton and Wohl's concept of parasocial interaction (as cited in Lin, 2021), viewers tend to develop one-sided relationships with media personalities and often express their support through purchases and interactions. In livestreaming, sending gifts becomes one of the ways fans show their loyalty and affection towards creators.

So honestly, while face filters are often criticised for promoting unrealistic beauty standards or encouraging people to hide their real appearance, livestream face filters seem to serve a completely different purpose. They are less about changing how someone looks and more about creating engagement, interaction, and memorable moments between creators and audiences.

Pretty impressive for something that most of us once only used to put dog ears on our faces.

References:

Klug, D., & Qiu, H. S. (2021). Motivations and expectations for virtual gift-giving in Douyin live streams. AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research, 2021. https://doi.org/10.5210/spir.v2021i0.12194 

Lin, L. C. S. (2021). Virtual gift donation on live streaming apps: the moderating effect of social presence. Communication Research and Practice, 7(2), 173–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2021.1889190 

Zhang, X., Xiang, Y., & Hao, L. (2019). Virtual gifting on China's live streaming platforms: Hijacking the online gift economy. Chinese Journal of Communication, 12(3), 340–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2019.1583260

[cryst-writes]

Not a Recent “Recent” Scandal on TikTok

Question… Have you guys heard of Clara Dao…

Yes, THAT Clara Dao. If y’all never heard of her, let me give you a brief introduction. According to Mesa (2025), Clara Dao built an online presence centred around body positivity and embracing her flat chest, eventually gaining more than 8 million followers across platforms such as TikTok, YouTube, and Instagram. Her content inspired many people to feel more confident in their own bodies, especially those who related to her insecurities and experiences.

Very positive right… until things took a HUGE turn, and I mean HUGE.

On 2025’s April Fools’, she posted a video titled “I had a b00b job.” and I kid you not, of course it went viral. Even though the caption clearly stated “happy april’s fool”, many people still believed it, or at least had suspicions about it. Since the video was posted on April Fools’, people waited to see if she was joking or not until she uploaded another video on the 3rd of April stating that her “b00b job” was still there.

According to Gupwell (2026), she revealed that people began calling her a “fraud” after her boob job, especially because her platform was originally built around embracing her flat chest and promoting body positivity. People felt betrayed, and to many followers, it felt contradictory and insensitive, even if it was meant to be a joke.

Things got even messier because she was already facing criticism before this for allegedly promoting unhealthy eating habits and unrealistic body standards. This caused many followers to question the authenticity of her message and whether her actions aligned with what she had previously advocated online.

In the end, she did upload an apology video:

She explained that she was in a very egoistic mindset whenever the public commented on her body, to the point where she did not fully consider how her actions could negatively affect the people who genuinely looked up to her and found comfort in her content. She admitted that she became too focused on proving a point and defending herself instead of thinking about how her audience would feel.

But still, lots of people decided to stop supporting her due to her actions not matching her words… while others continued defending her by saying, “It’s her body, her choice.”

And honestly, I can kind of see both sides.

On one hand, yes, people absolutely have the freedom to do whatever they want with their own body. But on the other hand, when your entire platform is built around advocating for a certain message, audiences are naturally going to hold you accountable for it too. 

Overall, this is genuinely such a controversial discussion to have, and even until now, I still see people debating about it in her comment sections. And personally… I don’t think people are gonna let this slide anytime soon, not to mention she somehow has decided to open an OF account… I am NOT going into that tho, as I myself did not take a look at it yet so I am unsure of what contents are inside, leaving no discussion right now.

So yeah… any thoughts?

References:

Clara Dao. (2025). a (late) apology. . . [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iwr7EXoRezc 

Gupwell, K. (2026). “I used to flaunt my flat chest but now I’m called fraud for having boob job.” Daily Mirror. https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/real-life-stories/i-used-flaunt-flat-chest-36752632 

Mesa, V. (2025). She Built a Platform for Body Positivity. Then She Lost Thousands of Followers When She Opened Up About Her Boob Job (Exclusive). People. https://people.com/influencer-speaks-out-about-backlash-following-breast-implant-surgery-exclusive-11820508

[cryst-writes]

An Overall Discussion on Slow Fashion & Influencers 👗

I’d like to ask, does the term “slow fashion” actually click with anyone’s lifestyle? I believe some will… but let’s be real, most of us probably won’t 🤓

Just for context, slow fashion basically refers to a more conscious and ethical approach to clothing, focusing on sustainability, quality, and mindful consumption instead of just buying whatever is trendy at the moment. It’s about thinking twice before purchasing, and being aware of how our choices impact the environment and society. Studies have shown that slow fashion is closely tied to ethical values and conscious consumption, where people consider not just style, but also about social responsibility (Lira & Costa, 2022; Domingos et al., 2022).

Talking about social media influencers and slow fashion together though, I do believe most people would have at least one influencer in mind. And for me, that influencer is Mia Maples. If you are someone who loves watching YouTube and fashion contents, you’ll know her! She’s someone who consistently promotes more mindful consumption, especially through her clothing review videos. She is always looking out for any sustainability actions performed by the brand itself. For example, in her most recent brand reviewing video, “Watch BEFORE You Buy from Peppermayo”, she dives into their website to search for any statements or actions regarding sustainability.

She also often promotes thrifting in her contents, which aligns closely with the idea of slow fashion. And honestly, influencers like her play a huge role in shaping how audiences will think and behave. As discussed by Ozuem and Willis (2025), influencers today are increasingly shifting from promoting fast fashion to advocating for more sustainable consumption, using their platforms to influence followers’ attitudes and choices.

But here’s the thing… as much as I adore the idea of slow fashion reality hits. In today’s economy, not everyone can afford to fully commit to it. Sustainable clothing is often more expensive, the closest example in our real life is Uniqlo… they aren’t the cheapest brand as we know. And when you’re trying to balance budget and lifestyle, sometimes… price just wins. And that, I feel, is the biggest challenge of slow fashion. It’s not that people don’t care, it’s that not everyone has the privilege to choose it.

So yeah… basically, while influencers can inspire change and raise awareness, the actual adoption of slow fashion still depends on individual circumstances. And overcoming that gap is quite a challenge. It’s a nice idea, a meaningful movement… but also a complicated one. 🥹

References: Domingos, M., Vale, V. T., & Faria, S. (2022). Slow fashion consumer behavior: A literature review. Sustainability, 14(5), 2860.

Lira, J. S. D., & Costa, M. F. D. (2022). Theory of planned behavior, ethics and intention of conscious consumption in Slow Fashion Consumption. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 26(5), 905-925.

Ozuem, W., & Willis, M. (2025). Social Media Influencers: Transition from Fast Fashion to Slow Sustainable Causes. In Sustainable Digital Marketing for Fashion and Luxury Brands: Theory and Practice (pp. 211-236). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.

[cryst-writes]

Talking ‘bout Podcasts Community 🎙️

Y’all, as someone who loves podcasts, I’ve been thinking about how they’ve evolved… especially when it comes to the communities forming around them online… hmm🤔

Obviously we all know that podcasts are at least an hour long, some may even stretch up to 3 hours, crazy right. And well, since the rise of short form videos, podcast channels have been creating clips of their podcasts to post on social media like TikTok to attract and gain more audiences. This method has proven to be highly effective, allowing podcast creators to gain visibility much faster than before. For example, our local podcast @sembangseram on TikTok, also known as Safwan Nazri Podcast on YouTube, shows quite a difference in engagement between platforms, highlighting how audiences today are more drawn to short, easily digestible content.

More importantly, what I’m trying to say is, posting these clips on social media really does help them gain exposure but also build a community. Where? Well, the comment section. People go there to discuss about the clips, share their opinions, and even debate with one another. They might leave their own thoughts or reply to others, therefore creating a chain of interaction that keeps the conversation going. 

Now I know you might ask… doesn’t YouTube have comments too? Yeah, it does. But I feel like with longer videos, people usually wait until they finish everything before saying something. There’s just more to process. But with short clips, it’s straight to the point, once it ends, people already have something to say and just drop it in the comments immediately. Engagement like these simply reflects how TikTok communities are shaped by emotional connections and interaction, where users are “tied” together through shared responses to the contents (Bickham et al., 2026). In a way, the comment section becomes a small community where people feel involved, heard, and connected.

However, here’s the big deal, these spaces don’t just encourage discussion… they also encourage strong opinions. Since interactions happen without face-to-face communication, people tend to express more openly, or worse, aggressively. TikTok, as a platform, also plays a role in shaping how users behave. As said by Xu et al. (2025), its features and structure influence how people communicate and respond to content, reflecting certain “platform values” that guide user interaction. Simply said, without physical presence or accountability, people may feel more comfortable sharing blunt or controversial takes, especially when it’s out of context.

And… well, this is where things can be quite messy... While podcast clips are meant to attract audiences, they can also be easily misunderstood without the full context. A short 30-second or one minute clip cannot fully represent a whole hour discussion, yet it is often judged as if it does. And how does it usually end? Yup, just a bunch of backlash, criticism, or even calls for cancel culture. To step it up, TikTok’s features, such as stitching and replying, can amplify this behaviour by allowing users to respond directly, sometimes in a confrontational or mocking way. As Fichman and Amidu (2025) explain, these features can contribute to “reciprocal trolling,” where users engage in cycles of negative interaction and conflict. What starts as a simple discussion can quickly turn into hostility. 

Additionally, let’s be honest, online communities can sometimes develop gatekeeping behaviours too, where people judge others’ opinions or decide what is considered a “right” or “wrong” take. Creating an even more toxic environment where people feel pressured to conform or risk being attacked. Tompkins and Guajardo (2026) highlight how algorithm-driven platforms like TikTok can shape these dynamics, influencing which voices are amplified and how communities regulate themselves.

In the end, podcast clips on TikTok show both sides of social media. On one hand, they create opportunities for connection, discussion, and community-building. On the other hand, they also amplify negativity, misunderstandings, and conflict. But then again, this is simply just my opinion. 😉🤷🏻‍♀️ Quote, if it turns into a fight, I’m choosing peace over being right 😭

References: Bickham, C., Chu, M. D., Yuan, A., Lookingbill, V., Mohammadi, E., Murray, S., Lerman, K., & Ferrara, E. (2026). Tied In on TikTok: Tie Strength and Emotional Dynamics in Algorithmic Communities. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2603.22504 Fichman, P., & Amidu, G. (2025). The roles of collapsing contexts and TikTok’s features in reciprocal trolling. Information, Communication & Society, 28(8), 1442–1462. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2024.2391820 Tompkins, J. E., & Guajardo (née Brown), A. M. (2026). Gatekeeping the Gatekeepers: An Exploratory Study of Transformative Games Fandom & TikTok Algorithms. Games and Culture, 21(2), 213–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/15554120241244416 Xu, Y., Karppinen, K., & Pantti, M. (2025). Platform Values and Strategic Positioning: An Analysis of TikTok’s Community Guidelines and Public Communications in 2018-2024. Observatorio (OBS*), 19(4), 46. https://doi.org/10.15847/obsOBS19420252705

[cryst-writes]

Sharing our group’s photos during Progression Event 😆 It was a great mix of teamwork, laughter, and learning 🎥