- I'm CyanShade, but you can call me Cyan
- 17 years old
- She/Her
- Multifandom (mostly post Inanimate Insanity stuff)
- I have sideblog - @cyanheroacademia
- and Bluesky (CyanShade)
- My art tag - #cyan art
- Not-art posts - #cyan talks
- English is not my first language so sorry if I said something wrong
-I LOVE cats!!!🐈
DNI:
nsfw, proshippers and basic DNIs(zoos, pedos, racists and etc)
If you like my art, please like and/or reblog it (not forcing of course)
You can also ask me anything or send art request. I draw everything (ships and crossovers too) but I don't draw:
NSFW
Proships
Other weird stuff
Remember that I'm allowed to ignore reguest if I'm not comfortable with it
The Justy Chapman and Jazzy Oliver Situation [Part Two]
Part One: Link to post
Part Two: (You are here!)
in part one, we spoke about justy chapman's allegations and their inappropriate relationship with hiraeth, the teenager justy has been speaking to in private.
under the read more of this second part, i will be copying and pasting my tweets about jazzy oliver's involvement and why her actions lead to her rightful termination.
fair warning. these next few sentences are a bit of a live reaction from me when this was all unfolding. reminder, i'm copying and pasting my orginal tweets.
i knew the osc had issues with parasocial relationships and being all too willing to immediately forgive someone's predatory behavior the second it looks like there's room for doubt. but i didnt think jazzy oliver would be one of those people. i'm so deeply disappointed
jazzy youre a full grown adult. how can you look at a situation where a teenager who had legitimate claims of being groomed by justy, distanced from them, and suddenly retracted these claims after reconnecting with justy and speaking privately for months- and not question it??
this isnt how a situation like this should be handled, and its definitely not something you should publicly boast about and give your young impressionable audience the idea that what justy did was okay just because the teen they flirted with said its okay that it happened now.
jazzy making the decision to platform justy was one that went virtually unchallenged for two days. shortly after i posted about it, she made a response post.
jazzy thought justy "only groomed one teenager" and thought that was okay + worth overlooking and didnt think she was expected to actually look into the situation before immediately reconnecting with & promoting an accused groomer to her audience.
instead of making the effort to look into the situation or do any research, as a responsible adult would when handling such a sensitive situation with serious allegations, jazzy instead immediately took the opportunity to befriend and platform justy chapman after hiraeth defended justy's inappropriate behavior. jazzy declared justy innocent and her best friend without looking into the situation even once.
this was jazzy's response after people confronted her for platforming justy. she defends herself for saying she didn't know there were multiple victims and only knew about the one victim. as if that makes it okay.
jazzy oliver these sorts of claims against an adult in a predominantly young community are serious and you, as an adult, are expected to at least look into the situation before immediately befriending an accused groomer and claiming that you're best friends now.
you cant say "i dont keep up with drama" when you're actively dismissing the claims against an accused groomer and immediately boasting about your friendship with them. how was befriending them a higher priority to you than checking on the actual grooming allegations.
you cant just sit and wait around for someone to correct you or spoon feed you information. if you care as much about grooming allegations like you claim maybe actually look into the situation rather than immediately befriending the groomer and telling everyone how great they are.
your excuse that you thought there was "only one victim" is horrific. so its okay when only one person got groomed? suddenly its only an issue when multiple people were hurt? is one person not enough?? what kind of point are you making here other than you didnt care to check??
your excuse was that you rush your judgments. okay. why was the judgment you made IMMEDIATELY in favor of the groomer and NOT the victim??? how can you claim to care about grooming allegations when your first instinct was to declare the groomer was wrongfully accused??
i want you guys to pay attention to the language she uses in this. when referring to the groomed teenager, she only ever calls them "the accuser". but when referring to herself and her own experience, she calls herself "the victim". this freudian slip is really telling.
even when shes saying she had no idea, even when she's being told justy's actions were predatory and inappropriate, she never once refers to justy's victims as "victims." only "accusers." the only victim she labels here is herself.
soon afterwards, jazzy oliver would continue posting to bluesky and refusing accountability, as well as suicide baiting her young audience after being told she handled the situation extremely irresponsibly
jazzy you cant try and claim arguing about a tv show and platforming a groomer are the same thing. this isn't "internet drama," these are serious grooming allegations of an adult acting inappropriately with young fans and endangering them. this isn't about your personal feelings.
you can believe in people but you need to actually do the research and actually look into a situation before coming to the conclusion that someone is innocent. immediately jumping to defend a full grown adult with multiple allegations without doing ANY research is ridiculous.
you didn't just make a mistake, you acted extremely irresponsibly and endangered your young audience and several people are pointing this out and holding you accountable for platforming a groomer. you need to take this opportunity to listen and own up to what you did.
jazzy oliver you didnt even "shut away internet drama," you made the decision to publicly defend justy chapman without looking into the situation to begin with?? that's not "shutting drama out" that's intentionally refusing to do any research just so you can befriend a groomer!
the OSC exploded in an uproar of disblief and anger over jazzy's horrendously irresponsible handling of the situation.
it wasn't long before animation epic was made aware of the situation, and they made the decision to fire jazzy oliver for endorsing someone who they rightfully fired for engaging inappropriately with significantly younger fans.
however, jazzy oliver hides these details from her fans. she omits the truth about what she did and downplays it in an attempt to garner sympathy and to make animation epic's decision to fire her seem "unreasonable."
she leans heavily into the belief that she, for whatever reason, should not have been expected to look into the situation before speaking in favor of an alleged groomer. with a situation as serious as this one, any reasonable adult would know to look into it before coming to conclusions in favor of someone with grooming allegations.
but jazzy puts the responsibility of gathering information on the situation on others; claiming that someone else should have told her instead. she completely shrugs off all responsibility.
shortly after being fired, jazzy oliver's partner jordan (voice of teddy) made the decision to step down from animation epic in solidarity with jazzy oliver.
stephanie pines, friend and irl roommate of jazzy oliver and jordan also made the decision to step down from voice acting as microphone.
jazzy oliver was the only one who was fired. her partner and roommate made the decision themselves to leave animation epic, siding with jazzy even after her brash platforming of an ex-crewmember-turned-groomer.
jazzy oliver would continue her immature and tasteless spiel on bluesky after getting fired, making jokes about how she can now publicly post about her more explicit "yaoi" roles in other projects she's involved with. completely ignoring the fact her audience is made up of minors.
in a strange fit of revenge, she even made an attempt to take down michael huang; one of the creators of BFDI and TPOT. someone who was completely unrelated to her firing.
like in many of the instances where she was caught up in controversies, jazzy made an attempt to paint others as transphobic/homophobic/bigoted to try and garner sympathy. however this attempt backfired extremely, and she deleted the post shortly afterwards.
in the end, animation epic released a statement regarding justy chapman and jazzy oliver, addressing the reason in why justy was fired, and why jazzy was fired for platforming them. they also confront hiraeth for the "inaccuracies" and "untruths" presented in his video debunking justy chapman's grooming allegations, and for the fact that it does not tell the full story.
thus concludes the jazzy and justy controversy, and why neither jazzy nor justy were "innocent" or "wrongfully fired." both are full grown adults who should have known better and handled everything extremely inappropriately.
Addressing Pankiepoo's Statement to the Allegations: Proshipping, Defending groomers, Racism, etc.
[Evidence of all Claims Below] Part 1
IF YOU CARE ABOUT WHETHER OR NOT THE ALLEGATIONS AGAINST PANKIE ARE TRUE OR FALSE, YOU'LL READ THIS THREAD IN IT'S ENTIRETY AND LOOK AT THE EVIDENCE PROVIDED.
i'm copying and pasting this from my other account. tumblr only allows 30 images per post so i'll be splitting this into two posts.
in this thread i'll be addressing pankie's statements (seen below) to the allegations that were brought up against him (seen here).
first off: pankie claims that he did not see/know about the proship content his partners were engaging with, and therefor he should not be held accountable. however, there's evidence showing that pankie was present + participated in these types of conversations with his partners.
pankie claims he separated from these two in september/october. i was skeptical of this because: pankie only started to PUBLICLY say this when a fight broke out in the proship servers/gcs they were in, and threats of exposing each other publicly became a reality.
this fight went on for months, and was detailed in a doc released by one of the members in the proship server/gc exposing pankie, ren/razz, and clowntainment, as well as pankie's complacency in the situation. the overall fight was over ren's gaslighting + manipulation
this fight took place in a proship environment, with only the secret proshippers in the server/gc being aware of it. however, it spread far enough that people outside of it started to notice weird things. multiple people would question pankie about it. this was pankie's response:
pankie was also approached by concerned friends who saw ren interacting with proship content such as zoophilia and pedophilia. in the response below you can see pankie claiming he had no idea. however he was confronted for previously dismissing ren's behavior and saying it wasn't his business
notice how pankie keeps claiming he has no idea about anything and he's not involved at all, as well as the dates that he made this claim. he even tries to claim that he has no idea what his friend is talking about but ALSO says it's personal and he shouldn't say anything.
pankie is doing everything to distance himself from his boyfriend's behavior, and doing everything to claim he has no idea what the "situation" is, and that he has no idea ren liked proship things. even though pankie was active in the proship servers/gc his partners were in
now for this next part of the thread im going to show you how pankie has handled situations like this in the past; where he was approached by victims who asked for his help regarding groomers in his server or friends who tried to tell him he was acting inappropriately.
a 13 year old in pankie's art server told pankie that their groomer/abuser was in the server, and requested that pankie take action. they provided evidence as well. however rather than remove the groomer, pankie suggested the victim leave instead, and warn their own friends.
because the groomer was 15, pankie didn't believe the grooming allegations the victim was telling him about. even though the 15 year old admitted to it themselves and all of their victims were around 11-12 years old or younger.
rather than removing the abuser/groomer, pankie suggested the idea of just closing down the chat in the server so that no one could talk. the groomer was allowed to stay, and pankie left the victim with no choice but to leave.
not only was the groomer allowed to stay and the victim was forced to leave, but the groomer reached out to the victim to try and address the doc they made about pankie and the situation, and even confirmed that they and pankie had gotten closer and became friends.
tumblr won't let me add more images, so i'm going reblog this with the second part.
Addressing Pankiepoo's Statement to the Allegations: Proshipping, Defending groomers, Racism, etc.
[Evidence of all Claims Below] Part 2
IF YOU CARE ABOUT WHETHER OR NOT THE ALLEGATIONS AGAINST PANKIE ARE TRUE OR FALSE, YOU'LL READ THIS THREAD IN IT'S ENTIRETY AND LOOK AT THE EVIDENCE PROVIDED.
for this next example of how pankie handles situations in which others tell him he's acting inappropriately, i'm going to provide context. pankie is white. born and raised in sweden, and 100% white. here's proof of that.
at 16 pankie dated a 14 year old. i bring up this age difference because despite being the younger one, pankie's 14 year old partner and their partner's friends had to be the ones to tell pankie he cant say racial slurs (like the N word) since he's white
however, pankie wouldn't take the situation seriously and would pretend to have changed but would "accidentally" say racial slurs again and joke about it. he'd even try to tell his then partner to say racial slurs too, despite them being white as well and uncomfortable with it
his ex stated that pankie's way of handling conflict was with "a lot of avoidance and making light of it to make it seem less serious." we can see he still does this in the below example, and we can see his avoidance when confronted about his partner's proship behavior as well.
pankie tried to claim that he had no idea that his boyfriends were into any of this. but i have also started to hear that pankie is now changing this to say that ren and clowntainment were the "masterminds" behind everything and pankie was uninvolved. this however is false.
in september, when the situation was coming out, i confronted clowntainment. he tried to deny knowing, but in doing so he revealed that pankie and ren originally excluded him and had a gc where they'd roleplay extreme/proship fetishes they wrent sure they could trust him with yet
WARNING FOR NSFW TEXT IN NEXT TWO SCREENSHOTS:
while clowntainment's claim that he had no idea about their proship behavior is completely false, since there are screenshots above from june/july proving otherwise, it does show that pankie + ren were already engaging in that kind of stuff without his influence
theres also word that pankie has tried to claim that clowntainment forced him into a relationship with ren, but this is false as well. he even disproves this himself in his own statement? pankie met ren first, dated him first, and then they invited clowntainment as their third
pankie also claims that he would never put children in harm or expose them to sexual content, and that he wishes people would tell him if he made a mistake. but when questioned for turning an nsfw fetish drawing "sfw" by editing the expression, pankie doubles down and defends himself.
what pankie conveniently left out is that this wasn't just a "suggestive drawing" turned sfw. it was an explicit drawing in a collection of nsfw macro/micro fetish drawings. pankie took the least explicit out of the bunch and edited it to share with their minor audience
(CENSORED NSFW BELOW)
i shouldn't have to explain it but taking nsfw fetish images and editing them to look innocent just so you can show it to your fanbase, which you KNOW consists of minors, is extremely predatory. it exposes unwilling and unknowing people (AND MINORS!!) who did not consent to engaging with fetish material.
it's a complete overstep of boundaries and ignores consent entirely. this is a tactic that many people use to get people to unknowingly engage in their fetish.
Addressing Pankiepoo's Statement to the Allegations: Proshipping, Defending groomers, Racism, etc.
[FINAL THOUGHTS]
lastly, pankie says he tried to reach out to me so that misinformation could be "corrected." ive had him blocked for several months, so he sent people to try and speak to me. it wasnt a matter of "correcting" misinformation, but trying to get me to delete the thread. he wrote them a copy pasta to send me and asked that i delete the thread because of "misinformation" about him still being in contact with ren and clowntainment.
however, whether or not pankie is still in contact with ren and clowntainment does not change his previous involvement.
he and his partners lied about not being proship. he was proven to be involved. he allowed groomers in his servers. he won't take accountability. i'm not deleting any of this.
inanimate insanity must be terrifying from poppys perspective. Everyone hates you cause you look like some guy named cobs who, one of the leaders of the society is responsible for killing and also they ate him.
