he/his/him (CAUTION: AROMANTIC AND CYNICAL), 20+, INTP 5w6 sp/sx, Melancholic-Choleric, Chaotic Neutral, Seer of Doom, Taurmini, actually a Luddite, 95% doesn't want to be disturbed.
Note to others #13: Oftentimes I find myself get very annoyed with apocalyptic conspiracy theorists. They had this prideful thought that an apocalyptic, catastrophic event is going to strike humanity unawares, but ONLY they are going to survive; like as if they had some unnaturally inhuman immunity to catastrophic events that will affect and impact THE ENTIRETY OF HUMAN SOCIETY.
It's honestly so overdone, too cliche, and too downright bland that I suppose bland food tastes far better than their next crispy conspiracy babble. It's no wonder too many people will end up being too depressed to live normal lives on the next few years --- what can you seriously expect when the blind continue to lead the blind???
Age may render capabilities dull, but the willpower to tell the truth, even when nations would rather prefer to lie, isn't something to be underestimated with.
I don't even care to read the Bible anymore (or spam Bible verses), but I know worshipping the Orange Toxic Dump and Caligula reincarnate is FAQING IDOLATRY.
Donald Trump likes to present himself as the President of Peace but beneath the spin, a wrathful and narcissistic ’God complex’ looms.
(Image: Julia Demaree Nikhinson / The Atlantic / Getty)
Trump defended this AI-generated image depicting him as Jesus Christ, saying he thought it was ‘a picture of me being a doctor.’ Following widespread backlash, Trump deleted the picture from his Truth Social account.
(Image: @realDonaldTrump/Truth Social)
The Parable Of The President
Trump’s criticism of Pope Leo XIV reveals that to him, religion is primarily about power, not morality.
The most notable subject in Donald Trump’s Truth Social posts this week was Pope Leo XIV, who has been critical of Trump’s attack on Venezuela and war in Iran. The posts illustrate that Trump views religion much the way he views everything else: as something that can serve him but does not create any obligations on him.
By David A. Graham
The Atlantic - April 13, 2026
Shared from Apple News
Trump’s criticism of Pope Leo XIV reveals that to him, religion is primarily about power, not morality.
•
•
Related article >>
President Donald Trump posted an image of Jesus embracing him on his Truth Social account Wednesday, just days after widespread backlash over a similar image (above).
(Image: @realDonaldTrump/Truth Social)
Trump posts a picture of Jesus hugging him days after his AI-deity image drew widespread anger
President Donald Trump has posted an image of Jesus embracing him to his Truth Social account just days after widespread backlash over an image he shared depicting himself as the Messiah.
The new image, which appears to be AI-generated and was originally posted on X by a Trump supporter, depicts Jesus with an arm around the president’s shoulder and one hand on his chest in front of a halo of light and an American flag. Their heads are leaning against each other and both have their eyes closed.
Trump posted the picture Wednesday morning with the message: “The Radical Left Lunatics might not like this, but I think it is quite nice!!! President DJT.”
By Isabel Keane
The Independent - April 15, 2026
Shared from Yahoo News
Trump posted the picture to his Truth Social social media platform Wednesday morning with the message: ‘The Radical Left Lunatics might not
•
•
Related article >>
Pope Leo XIV prays at the Basilica of Our Lady of Africa in Algiers on Monday.
(Alberto Pizzoli / AFP / Getty Images)
On war, peace, the President and the Pope
It’s a shame the Trump vs. Pope Leo mess makes serious discussion of ‘just war’ theory impossible.
President Donald Trump’s Truth Social posts on Sunday night smeared the 267th bishop of Rome as “weak,” falsely accused the Pope of indifference to narco-terrorism and a nuclear-armed Iran, and tried to set Leo against his brother Louis.
Bad enough, to be sure, and certainly unworthy of a president, even by today’s debased standards. But this latest eruption of rhetorical lava from Mount Trump was quickly followed by another Truth Social post (subsequently deleted): an illustration in which the president was portrayed as a Christlike figure dressed in biblical-era robes, healing a sick man while light shone from his (presumably pierced) left hand.
And if that is not blasphemy, it is at the very least blasphemy-adjacent.
In an impromptu news conference on his flight to Africa on Monday morning, Leo responded like an adult to the inevitable questions about all this, insisting that he was “not a politician” but the messenger of the Gospel, adding: “I do not think the message of the Gospel should be abused as some are doing.” Surely the Pope could be forgiven if he had Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth (and perhaps others in the administration) in mind here.
Hegseth, after all, had recently compared the extraordinary rescue of a downed American aviator to the events of Good Friday, the entombment of Jesus on Holy Saturday and Christ’s resurrection on Easter. And Pastor Paula White-Cain, senior adviser of the White House Faith Office, has more than once described the president in messianic terms.
Opinion by George Weigel
The Washington Post - April 13, 2026
Shared from Apple News
It’s a shame the Trump vs. Pope Leo mess makes serious discussion of “just war” theory impossible.
•
•
Related article >>
Trump's spiritual advisor Paula White-Cain sparks backlash for comparing his life to Jesus Christ.
President Donald Trump in prayer with his personal spiritual advisor Paula White-Cain.
(Photo: The Associated Press)
Trump’s spiritual advisor sparks backlash for comparing president’s life to Jesus Christ
Donald Trump's personal spiritual adviser has sparked backlash after comparing the billionaire president's life to that of Jesus Christ’s, during an Easter lunch event at the White House.
Paula White‑Cain, a televangelist who has served as Trump’s spiritual adviser across both his presidencies, used her Wednesday address to draw parallels between the legal battles and assassination attempts he has faced and the trials endured by Christ.
With the president standing behind her, and to whom she turned to address personally, White-Cain said: “Jesus taught so many lessons through his death, burial and resurrection. He showed us great leadership, great transformation requires great sacrifice.
“And Mr President, no one has paid the price like you have paid the price. It almost cost you your life.
“You were betrayed and arrested and falsely accused. It’s a familiar pattern that our lord and savior showed us,” she said.
White-Cain was first officially appointed to the White House in 2019 as a religious advisor under the Office of Public Liaison, but has reportedly been in contact with Donald Trump since 2002, after he rang her having seen her on TV.
She has become a key part of the Trump administration's efforts to retain evangelical votes, and was also selected to speak at the president's inauguration in 2017.
However, she has routinely been at the centre of controversies. In 2020, she delivered a sermon calling on Jesus Christ to "command all satanic pregnancies to miscarry", and has also previously declared the White House is "holy ground", and also that "to say no to President Trump would be saying no to God."
By Harry Cockburn
The Independent - April 3, 2026
Shared from Apple News
Paula White-Cain says Trump was 'betrayed and falsely accused' in a 'familiar pattern that our lord and saviour showed us'
•
•
Related article >>
Why not require cognitive and psychological tests for everyone in government?
(Photo: Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images)
Teleportation, aliens and cancer-busting soda - it’s not just Trump going cuckoo, his officials are too
As the president’s men rave about paranormal events and Diet Coke, it seems the US’s only hope is extraterrestrial intervention
People often criticise the Democrats for being overly cautious and never getting anything done. But this week they’ve surprised us all by unveiling concepts of a plan for getting Donald Trump out of the White House.
On Tuesday House Democrats introduced legislation that would create a commission to assess whether Trump is unfit to serve and should be removed under the 25th amendment. I don’t need to tell you what precipitated this: Trump is growingly increasingly erratic, threatening genocide one minute and posting pictures of himself as Jesus Christ the next.
Opinion by Arwa Mahdawi
The Guardian - 17 April 2026
As the president’s men rave about paranormal events and Diet Coke, it seems the US’s only hope is extraterrestrial intervention
•
•
Related article >>
Stephen Colbert to Trump: ‘Why would you start a beef with the Pope?’
Late-night hosts dissected Donald Trump’s ability to anger Christians around the world with his attacks on Pope Leo XIV, as the White House tries to spin his AI-generated Jesus photo into anything other than a disaster.
By Guardian staff
The Guardian - 16 April 2026
Late-night hosts discussed Trump’s attacks on the pope as the White House tries to spin his AI-generated Jesus photo into anything other tha
•
•
Related YouTube videos >>
YouTube video >> The Late Show with Stephen Colbert: Holy Crap! He’s the Antichrist [CBS 14 April 2026 / 12min.+58sec.]:
Some of Donald Trump’s most ardent supporters are concerned that he may be the Antichrist, a top official at FEMA might have a substance abuse problem, and Stephen uses The Get It On Cam to encourage Americans to raise the fertility rate.
•
•
YouTube video >> Jimmy Kimmel Live: Blasphemer-In-Chief - Trump Should Be the New Ayatollah, No One Believes His Jesus Pic Lie & MAGA Reacts to Pope Attacks [JKL 16 April 2026 / 12min.+20sec.]:
Donald Trump is angry at Pope Leo XIV because he dared to criticize his war on Iran which puts the MAGA-sphere in a tight spot, no one believes Trump’s “doctor” explanation for the Jesus picture he posted, JD Vance claims that the post was just a joke, and now Trump is trying to make some money off of it too!
•
•
YouTube video >> Ronny Chieng's The Daily Show: JD Vance Laughs Off Trump’s Jesus AI & FEMA Official Teleports to a Waffle House? [TDS 14 April 2026 / 10min.+ 27sec.]:
Ronny Chieng dives into JD Vance's ill-prepared excuse for Trump’s Jesus AI, the VP telling Pope Leo how to pope, RFK Jr. utilizing his best asset for podcasting, and Trump saying he’ll “look into” FEMA head Gregg Phillips's Waffle House teleportation claims.
*Trigger warning: Ang artikulong ito ay naglalaman ng mga sensitibong paksa tulad ng sexual harassment at pang-aabuso.
Mahirap gumalaw sa mundong bawat kilos ay binabantayan, hinuhusgahan, at pinipintasan dahil lamang sa iyong pagkatao. Dulot ng pag-iral ng isang patriyarkal na lipunan, ating napababayaan ang kahalagahan ng mga karapatan ng mga babae at kanilang mga kontribusyon sa ating mundo. Para maiwasan natin ang pagkalimot, kinikilala ang Marso bilang Buwan ng Kababaihan upang ipagdiwang at palaging ipaalala sa atin ang patuloy na pagsulong ng kanilang halaga.
May ilan nang hakbang sa pagkilala sa mga kababaihan sa ating bansa, tulad ng programang “Serbisyo Para Kay Juana.” Naglalayon itong magbigay ng mga benepisyo para sa mga babae gaya ng diskwento sa make-up at personal care na mga produkto, at libreng sakay sa MRT (Philippine Commission on Women, 2026). Ngunit, sapat na nga ba ang mga ito para ipaalala sa lahat ang diwa ng Buwan ng Kababaihan at bigyang-wakas ang salinlahing isyu ng misogyny at sexual objectification? Ang sagot: Hindi.
Misogyny at sexual objectification sa kontemporaneong lipunan
Ayon sa Merriam-Webster Dictionary, ang ibig sabihin ng misogyny ay “hatred of, aversion to, or prejudice against women.” Bunga ng sexism, hangga’t mananatiling patriyarkal ang ating lipunan, patuloy ring iiral ang misogyny (Sunny & Sreenivasulu, 2022). Bunga ng misogyny, lumilitaw ang sexual objectification: ang pagtingin o pagtrato sa ibang tao bilang sekswal na bagay lamang (Loughnan et al, 2014).
Lubhang bulnerable ang kababaihan sa iba’t ibang anyo ng pang-aabuso, lalo na sa usapin ng sekswal na karahasan. Ayon sa UN Women (2025), tumatayang isa sa tatlong babae ang nakaranas na ng pisikal at/o sekswal na karahasan, at halos 15 milyong babae naman ang nakararanas ng pwersahang pagtatalik mula sa edad ng 15 hanggang 19. Kahit ang mga datos na ito ay nakatutulong upang maunawaan natin ang kalubhaan ng sitwasyon, nararapat na alalahanin na hindi lamang simpleng estadistika ang mga tao sa likod ng mga numerong ito—sila ay mga biktima ng kanser na misogyny.
Sa kabutihang palad, nagkaroon ng malaking hakbang noong 2019 sa pag-abante ng mga kababaihan, o kahit sinumang nakararanas ng pang-aabuso dahil sa kanilang Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity, & Gender Expression (SOGIE). Ang Republic Act No. 11313, o mas kilala bilang ang Safe Spaces Act, ay isang batas na ginawa ng kababaihan para sa proteksyon ng lahat. Isinulat at ipinasa ito ni Senador Risa Hontiveros upang ipagbawal ang pambabastos tulad ng catcalling, paggamit ng misogynistic, transphobic, homophobic, at sexist na slurs, paggawa ng gender-based na online sexual harassment, pati na rin pag-uusig o stalking sa kahit saang lugar na bukas sa publiko. Layunin ng batas na ito na maprotektahan ang kababaihan laban sa sexual harassment at objectification.
Mambabatas o mambabastos?
Habang patuloy na isinusulong ni Senador Hontiveros ang mga batas na nilalayong mapanatiling ligtas ang mga pampublikong lugar, may isa namang kongresista ang siyang sumisira sa pundasyon at progresong nakamit ng batas na ito.
Habang nasa isang impeachment hearing laban kay Pangalawang Pangulo Sara Duterte noong Marso 3, gumamit ang kinatawan na si Bong Suntay ng malaswang analohiya na may kinalaman sa kanyang pagnanasa para sa aktres na si Anne Curtis. Bagaman si Curtis lamang ang tinutukoy, ang epekto ng pahayag na ito ay hindi lamang nakatuon sa kanya, kundi muling tumatapak at sumusugat sa pagkatao ng bawat Pilipina (Jairo, 2026).
Para sa ilan at ayon din sa depensa ni Suntay, hindi ito dapat sineseryoso dahil ito’y biro lamang at nananatili ang kanyang pagnanasa sa kanyang imahinasyon. Para naman sa nakararami, ang kanyang malaswang “biro” ay nakaiinsulto, insensitibo, at manhid. Kahit ito ay parte lamang ng kanyang “imahinasyon,” ibinubunyag ni Suntay ang kanyang tunay na pagtingin kay Curtis—hindi bilang isang tao, ngunit isang bagay na ginagampanan lamang ang kanyang sekswal na pantasya.
Mas nagiging mabigat ang usapan dahil si Suntay ay hindi lamang ordinaryong mamamayan—isa siyang mambabatas. Bilang mambabatas na kumakatawan sa boses ng taumbayan, ang pahayag na ito ay isang malaking insulto sa kanyang tungkulin at sa mga taong kaniyang nirerepresenta sa Kongreso. Ang taong inaasahang magtatanggol laban sa sexual harassment ang siya ring nagpapakita ng mentalidad na sinusubukang pigilan ng mga batas tulad ng Safe Spaces Act.
Hindi pa rin malinaw sa iba na ang pahayag ng kongresista ay porma ng diskriminasyong nagpapalakas sa kultura ng pambabastos dahil sa pagtingin nila sa babae bilang bagay na ginagamit para sa kanilang pleasure. Hindi nila nauunawaan na ang ganitong pagtrato sa mga babae ay objectification at misogyny na mismo. Maaaring sabihin na simpleng bagay lamang ito, ngunit ito ang sentro ng pag-igting ng ganitong maling kaisipan.
Kasunod ng insidenteng ito, ilang netizens ang ibinaling ang sisi kay Anne Curtis, sinasabing matagal nang nakaugnay ang imahe niya sa pagsusuot ng mga revealing clothes—tulad ng ilan sa kanyang mga naunang magazine covers, kaya’t tila ginagawa siyang responsable sa sekswal na pagtingin sa kanya (Pinugu, 2026). Bagaman may katwiran naman ang punto na si Curtis ang pumili ng kanyang mga susuotin, nagiging patunay ang aktres na hindi dapat nakasalalay sa pag-apruba ng iba ang paraan ng pagpapahayag sa sarili, kahit pa madalas ipinapalagay ng lipunan na nakatuon lamang ito sa kagustuhan ng mga kalalakihan.
Sa mata ng lalaki
Ang nangyari kay Anne Curtis ay hindi isang hiwalay na insidente kundi manipestasyon ng isang mas malalim na sakit sa ating lipunan. Madalas na ang mga kababaihan ang nagiging biktima ng diskriminasyon na nakaugat sa misogyny, kung saan laganap ang kaisipang sila ay itinuturing na mga sekswal na bagay (Kellie et al., 2019). Isa sa mga salik nito ay ang tinatawag nating Male Gaze Theory, na tumutukoy sa pagtingin ng kalalakihan sa mga babae bilang “objects of sexual desire” (Vanbuskirk, 2025). Ang male gaze ay tumutukoy sa paghubog ng imahe ng babae batay sa pagnanasa at mga pamantayan ng kalalakihan. Ang mga manipestasyon nito’y madalas makikita sa pelikula, telebisyon, at panitikan, na sa kontekstong Pilipino ay lalong pinalalakas ng istrukturang patriyarkal at kolonyal. Ilan sa mga epekto ng konseptong ito na nakikita sa totoong buhay ay ang pamantayan ng kagandahan na nakabatay sa sobrang kapayatan o pagsusuot ng revealing clothes upang maging kaakit-akit di umano para sa kalalakihan.
Unang naging lantad ang male gaze sa Pilipinas sa pag-usbong ng mga “bomba films” noong panahon ng Batas Militar na may impluwensya mula sa Estados Unidos na nagtutulak sa pagtanggap ng mga karaniwang mga taboo na paksang sekswal (Soriano, 2021). Kahit nakatulong ang mga palabas na ito sa pagpapasikat ng iba’t ibang aktres, naging kapalitnito ang pagkapuno ng industriya ng pananamantala o exploitation ng kanilang mga artista, nagbabalatkayo gamit ang mga mababaw na plot o kwento at dami ng sekswal na eksena (Franco, 2025). Ang mga pelikulang ito ay unti-unting nagpanormalisa at nagpatibay ng male gaze sa Pilipinas dahil paulit-ulit na ipinamukha sa mga tagapanood na bagay lamang ang kababaihan. Gayunpaman, ang problematikong pagtingin na ito ay hindi limitado sa kalalakihan, kundi sa mga kababaihan din mismo.
Sa isipan ng babae
Ang penomena ng internalized misogyny, o ang pagtanggap ng mga babae sa mga sexist na kaisipan dulot ng paggalaw sa isang lipunang patriyarkal, ang puno’t dulo kung bakit may mga kababaihang ikinahihiya at minamaliit ang kapwa nila babae, pati na rin ang sarili (Anthony, 2018). Hindi ito isang isyu na kinakaharap lamang ng mga babae pagtanda—kundi isang danas na nagsimula noong isinilang pa lamang sila sa mundo.
Dahil nakaukit na sa isipan ng mga kababaihan ang gender roles at ang ideolohiyang mas mababang uri sila kumpara sa mga kalalakihan mula pagkabata, nailalabas nila ang kanilang mga hinanakit patungo sa kapwa babae (Ni, 2020). Mula sa pangungutya sa itsura at katawan ng ibang babae hanggang sa paninisi sa kapwa kababaihang biktima ng opresyon, mas umiigting ang internalized misogyny sa ating lipunan. Higit pa rito, nagiging rason din ang internalized misogyny sa walang-kamalayang pagpapaubaya ng mga kababaihan sa objectification. Kung patuloy na hihilahin ng mga kababaihan ang sarili at kapwa babae pababa, magiging parte lamang sila ng problema at patuloy lang din iikot ang siklo ng misogyny.
Abante, babae!
Nakagagalit at nakasusuklam ang lahat ng pambabastos, dahas, at pang-aabuso na araw-araw na nararanasan ng mga kababaihan. Hindi na dapat hingin ang basic respect sa mga kababaihan, sapagkat may karapatan silang igalang at tratuhin nang patas at makatao ng lahat. Makikita na walang pinipiling biktima ang ganitong karanasan; mapa-artista, estudyante, empleyado, o kahit sino man—basta babae.
Sa makabagong lipunan, nararapat lamang ang pagrespeto sa mga kababaihan bilang mga tunay na indibidwal na may damdamin. Hindi sila mga bagay lang na umiiral para sa kasiyahan o pag-apruba ng iba, bagkus tunay na mga tao—may puso, utak, at mga kakayahang higit pa sa inaasahan ng lipunang kanilang kinagagalawan. Bagaman nakalaan ang isang buwan para sa pagdiriwang ng kababaihan, hindi dapat dito lamang nakatuon ang pagkikilala at pagbibigay-dangal sa kanila.
Buwan ng Kababaihan man o hindi, nararapat lang na ipagpatuloy ang diwa ng women empowerment. Panahon na upang puksain ang objectification, ipaglaban ang karapatan ng kababaihan, at patuloy na umabante patungo sa mundong titignan na rin ang mga babae bilang tao, hindi bagay.
//nina Faith Mendoza, Reine Asprec, Athena De Los Reyes, at Kath Sison
Mga Sanggunian:
Anthony, S. (2018, November 16). Internalized Misogyny: What does it look like? How do you stop it? - UMKC Women’s Center. UMKC Women’s Center - Advancing gender equity. https://info.umkc.edu/womenc/2018/11/16/internalized-misogyny-what-does-it-look-like-how-do-you-stop-it/
Franco, K. (2021, September 24). The rise of romance novels, ‘bomba’ films
and media escapism during Martial Law. Philstar Life. https://philstarlife.com/news-and-views/411534-romance-novels-bomba-films-martial-law?page=3#
Jairo, B. (2026, March 7). Anne Curtis breaks silence: Suntay is “poster boy” of misogyny. RAPPLER. https://www.rappler.com/philippines/anne-curtis-statement-bong-suntay-lewd-remarks/
Kellie, D. J., Blake, K. R., & Brooks, R. C. (2019). What drives female objectification? An investigation of appearance-based interpersonal perceptions and the objectification of women. PloS one, 14(8), e0221388. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221388
Loughnan, S., & Maria Giuseppina Pacilli. (2014). SEEING (AND TREATING) OTHERS AS SEXUAL OBJECTS: TOWARD A MORE COMPLETE MAPPING OF SEXUAL OBJECTIFICATION. Seeing (and Treating) Others as Sexual Objects: Toward a More Complete Mapping of Sexual Objectification, 21(3), 309–325. https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM21.3.6
Merriam Webster Dictionary. (n. d.) Misogyny. Miriam Webster Dictionary. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/misogyny
Ni, P. (2020, May 17). 10 Signs of Internalized Sexism and Gaslighting. Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/communication-success/202005/10-signs-internalized-sexism-and-gaslighting
Pasajol, A. (2026, March). Bong Suntay’s wife “deeply sorry” to Anne Curtis: “I stand with you.” INQUIRER.net. https://entertainment.inquirer.net/656704/bong-suntays-wife-deeply-sorry-to-anne-curtis-i-stand-with-you
Philippine Commission on Women. (2026, February). 2026 National Women’s Month Celebration. https://pcw.gov.ph/2026-national-womens-month-celebration/
Pinugu, E. (2026, March). Women are not objects. INQUIRER.net. https://opinion.inquirer.net/190264/women-are-not-objects
Reyes, D. (2026, March). Suntay faces complaint over lewd remarks on Anne Curtis. INQUIRER.net. https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/2191629/rep-suntay-faces-complaint-over-lewd-remarks-on-anne-curtis
Rodriguez, I. (n.d). Laura Mulvey’s Male Gaze Theory | Definition and Examples. Study.com https://study.com/academy/lesson/the-male-gaze-definition-theory.html
Soriano, B. (2025). COLUMN | Male gaze, female gaze, and the fatigue of meaning. Explained PH. https://explained.ph/column-male-gaze-female-gaze-and-the-fatigue-of-meaning/
Sunny, N. & Sreenivasulu, Y. (2024, September 2). Internalized Misogyny: A Transnational Exploration of Select Literary Narratives. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383740529_Internalized_Misogyny_A_Transnational_Exploration_of_Select_Literary_Narratives
The LAWFIL Net. (2019, April 17). Safe Spaces Act. https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2019/ra_11313_2019.html
UN Women. (n.d.). Violence Against Women: Facts everyone should know. https://interactive.unwomen.org/multimedia/infographic/violenceagainstwomen/en/index.html#closing-6
Vanbuskirk, S. (2025). Understanding the Male Gaze and How It Objectifies Women. Verywell Mind. https://study.com/academy/lesson/the-male-gaze-definition-theory.html
Women are people, humans ---- not objects. This is the reason why even though YouTube and social media algorithm favors the male supremacist/abusive boyfriends/redpill incel chudslop narrative about "male loneliness epidemic", I ignore it and focus on maintaining an equal ground for women/females, men/males, straight, nonbinary and everyone else in-between.
VP Sara asks Supreme Court to stop impeachment hearing, citing misuse
By Erica Mae P. Sinaking And Chloe Marie A Hufana, reporter
Vice President (VP) Sara Duterte-Carpio has asked the Supreme Court (SC) to halt impeachment proceedings against her, escalating a confrontation with the House of Representatives as lawmakers move to investigate complaints that could oust her from office.
“The initiation process conducted by the respondents' House of Representatives and…
KAILANGANG MA-IMPEACH NG SARA NA YAN! 3 YEARS BAGO ULIT TAYO MAGLUKLOK NG PRESIDENTE. HANGGANG NGAYON WALA PA DING OPOSISYON NA NAGPAPAHIWATIG NG PAGTAKBO BILANG PRESIDENTE. KUNG WALANG MANGYAYARE NGAYON NA PABOR SA OPOSISYON BUKOD SA PAGKAPANALO NG KIKO-BAM, YARE NA NAMAN TAYO SA 2028 KASI FOR SURE MAGHIHIGANTE NAMAN ANG DUTERTE VS SA MGA NANGAPI SA KANILA. TANGINA NALANG TALAGA NAKAKAPAGOD NA NGA MABUHAY GANYANG KLASE PA NG GOV MERON KA.
Vice President Sara Duterte has formally declared her 2028 presidential bid, even as she faces fresh impeachment complaints and ongoing International Criminal Court (ICC) proceedings involving her father. Analysts view her announcement as a calculated effort to consolidate her political base while countering the risk of removal from her current office. The move also signals the definitive collapse of the “UniTeam” alliance.
Can you believe that this Green Ogre (or perhaps Wakwak) of Davao had the shining audacity to run for presidency, while barely doing any substantial work for the common good of all Filipinos as the current PH vice president??
The humblest yet bravest thing people like all the Trump voters can do, is to admit they fucked up and work their way into correcting their wrongs WHILE THEY'RE STILL HERE AND ALIVE. Burying themselves in their ungrounded pride won't help their case.
Note to others #34: The fact that the new (or rather current) Pope of the Roman Catholic church had to spread the message of ending the war ----- and possibly other acts of violence done in the Middle East, is in itself an inducement of relief, and (at the same time) a sobering reality. Had society had gone so low, that people had to look up to religious figures to know what humanity and morals had been lacking in international community decisions?? All while religion and zealotry being an existent part of the current issues in the Middle East (Judeo-Christian vs Muslim crusade)?
The real problem here isn't about the lack of correct moral guidance from religion. It's the lack of utilization of natural humanity within individuals (those in power and those who allowed the atrocities to happen) that led to these recent atrocities shocking the world.
We humans clearly don't need Hell in the afterlife (and it's no offense to those who believed in the afterlife, by the way). Because Hell is already happening while humans were still alive. Because some of us humans turned the world into living Hell. There's no need for a day of judgement, no heroes willing to save humanity, no powerful deities raising their hands against the world's tyrants. Societal destruction and downfall occurs likely because the humans in it had already actively chose to be their vicious, cruel, evil selves --- and couldn't be bothered to stop themselves for once to listen to their conscience (if they did have any).
Hello dears! 🇵🇸🍉🙏I am asking you to support my campaign to help me reach my goal. I am in dire need of your support now to help me stay alive and safe. Gaza is a very dangerous place both in terms of living and lives. The family consists of 20 members, most of them are young children. I need your financial support to enable me to get the basic needs for my family until the Rafah crossing is😭 reopened to transport my family to safety and peace. Please help a family stay alive through your small donations or through your shares to others. Thank you very much for standing by those in need. My campaign 90-ghoset has been documented🍉🙏
Hello dears I hope you are all well please help me!!!
I am Ahmed … Ahmed Fathi needs your support for Helping the Ahmed Fathi family achie
I just wanna eat rotten meat @d-lone-vultywr - Tumblr Blog | Tumgag
