Misplaced Lens Cap
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
Monterey Bay Aquarium

#extradirty
Cosmic Funnies
No title available
Cosimo Galluzzi

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣

Love Begins

JVL

blake kathryn
Today's Document

祝日 / Permanent Vacation

Andulka

tannertan36

No title available
taylor price
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
Sade Olutola
🪼
seen from United Kingdom
seen from France
seen from United States
seen from Lithuania

seen from United States
seen from Azerbaijan
seen from Azerbaijan
seen from Azerbaijan
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@dailyriddle
Okay but will you get this one?
In unity, I stand with my kin,
A guardian for what lies within.
Alone, I'm small, but with others, I click,
Assemble me wisely, for I am not a stick.
What am I?
bruh I was like the answer is obvious then I read your name and now I’m just confused
anyone wanna try this riddle from The Exeter Book? I really like it, but I would have lost any riddle game if anyone had asked me any of these (they are obscure and not authoritatively given answers, there’s just some that people kind of agree are the correct ones apparently)
Ahhhh riddle 51. I like this variant of the translation from ye olde english! Mainly because it’s difficult here. A lot of the time, instead of ‘vessel of gold’ the translation would be “Plated gold”, which makes it more obvious that the author is referring to the nib of ye olde quill. They were often gold plated to prevent rusting, since nibs are very heavily dependent on a thin slit of metal giving rise to capillary action, which draws the ink along to the tip. “ofer faeted fold feower eallum” translates into “Over plated gold four all (of them)”. In addition, the starting line of the riddle, in old english, is “Ic seah wraetlice wuhte feower” or “I see/sawe strange creatures/beings four”. I only point this out because the word strange “wraetlice” is a pun on the word “Writere” and words that share its’ root. This riddle is fun because in old english it actually tells you the answer in the first line.
Answer: Writing, the written word, words on a page, provided a pen and three fingers holding it are doing the writing (you normal pen holders out there are being represented, yay!) ((four finger deathgrip for life babeeeey))
riddle
there are ten people.
they are going to be put in ten separate rooms with no way of communicating.
at random time intervals one of them (also picked at random) (repetition is possible) will be brought in a central room.
in this room there is only a table and a game card (you know the way it is facing at the start).
after someone is brought into the room, they are allowed to turn the card (face down or face up). they cannot manipulate anything else nor leave anything in the room.
they hare then asked if all 10 people have already entered.
the possible answers are "yes" "no" and "I don't know".
if they answer no or I don't know they are brought back to their room and nothing happens.
if they answer "yes" and they're right they all win the game.
if they answer "yes" and it's wrong they all loose.
they have an hour to come up with a strategy to win 100% of the times.
how do they win?
(the answer exists and I'll give it if you ask, but in the meanwhile, have fun!)
-🤹🎪
Oooh riddles! Okay let's see here.... yeah I got nothing. Anyone wanna try?
This is a variation of a puzzle with lightbulbs instead of cards! So mostly the puzzles involving a series of people operating with imperfect info who manipulate an object involve understanding patterns, cooperation, and often either binary states or parity (evens and odds). In the lightbulb version, all the prisoners nominate one guy as the counter, and he is the only guy who is allowed to turn the light off. If anyone else walks into the room and sees the light off, they turn it on (but they only do this once, after that, upon any revisiting of the room, they never do anything ever again, or it ruins the count). If it’s already on, they do nothing. Every time the ‘counter’ walks in and sees the light on, they turn it off and add +1 to their count. Once the count reaches 9 (which is 10 including the counter) they can safely answer Yes and everyone goes free. Same solution, but you flip cards instead!
It’s one of those toughies that requires you to think outta the box for sure.
I give up
I am rubbish at this 😂
You aren’t rubbish at all! This is something that is lexically obscure, because not everyone describes umbrellas the same way. An umbrella is either ‘up’ or ‘down’, i.e. open or closed. When the umbrella is ‘down’/closed, it is narrow and can fit either up or down a chimney. When an umbrella is ‘up’ or open, it is wide and can do neither. So in this riddle, the first ‘up’ or ‘down’ in each statement is in reference to the direction of movement, and the second ‘up’ and ‘down’ is in reference to a state, i.e. open or closed. Hope that helps.
The Vigenere Cipher
Way back when, this code was pretty solid. You’d have a word as a key - say, Horse. Then you’d treat each letter as a corresponding number to offset your message (if we’re counting A as 0, “H-O-R-S-E” becomes “7-14-17-18-4″). Then you offset each letter in the message by the corresponding number
“Hello World!”
H+7 = O E+14 = T L+17 = C L+18 = D O+4 = S Space is ignored but uses the 7 W+14 = K O+17 = F R+18 = J L+4 = P D+7 = K ! is also ignored but would use the 14 if the message continued.
So “Hello World!” becomes “Otcds Kfjpk!”
If the encrypted message is short, this can be quite tough to crack, but if it’s a couple pages and you suspect it’s a Vigenere you can generally break it with a multi-step process:
1) You break up the text the same way the code does. If you happen to know the key’s length you make a set of substrings. In the “Hello World!” example this would be
“O d”, “tK!”, “cf”, “dj”, “sp”
In a multi-page document each of these substrings would be quite long.
2) You then assume the most common letter of the language corresponds to the most common letter in the encrypted message. So if your most common letter in the first substring is D, you’d assume it’s being offset by 25 (aka “offset by -1,” since it’s an alphabet and you wrap around) because the most common English letter is E. To decrypt you’d offset the whole substring by [26 - offset] (in this case being 1).
3) Once you’ve done this for every substring, you collate the letters again and it reconstitutes your message.
4) With computers, at this point you can probably eyeball-crack the problem of not knowing the key length. Get the computer to perform steps 1-3 on the suspicion that it’s length 2, then 3, then 4, all the way up to 9 or 10. Then print out the first 100 characters from each result. If your target was a Vigenere Cipher, one of the messages is intelligible and the others aren’t.
++good advice
A-
?...18...9...4...4...12...5...?
?...13...5...?
?...20...8...9...19...?
-Z
Substitution ciphers do run the gamut from A to Z lmao