Thinking in papermoon's

| 30 | (L)GB(T) | She/Her | 15 years in Aqua. Playing fighting games is my career, my 9-5 job is just a bad sponsorship deal. [ENG/ESP]

[stillons]

do it. you won't. no balls.

[bridgyrose]

@melonishus

[leviathan-supersystem]

I get how the whole "listening to music as a dick-measuring contest for who can listen to the most obscure band" thing can get grating sometimes but I don't think people realize just how vital that phenomenon is for new up and coming bands to get a foot in the door. it's understandable to be annoyed by hipsterism but unless you want all music to be industry plants and former child stars you're just going to have to accept it as part of the social ecosystem.

[leviathan-supersystem]

most of your friends probably won't go around hyping up your amateurish self-released bandcamp project, but you know who will? the most insufferable hipster jackass you'll ever meet.

[leviathan-supersystem]

[your best friend playing your music in front of someone else]: yeah haha this is my friend's band... i know it's kinda weird and rough around the edges but i'm kinda into it... if you're not tho i'll turn it off.

[pretentious music guy you've never met before playing your music in front of someone else]: yeah so i found this on bandcamp and it completely blew me away, no one is making music like this today, it's so raw and experimental and interesting, i can't believe they only have 3 listeners on spotify, they're brilliant, frankly if you don't like this music you should kill yourself,

[kayanonno]

露崎まひるさん（少女☆歌劇レヴュースタァライト）

[intelligentchristianlady]

A bus may have only a couple of passengers, especially at the beginning or end of its route. But let's also take fuel efficiency into account.

[foxoftheasterisk]

If there's one person on a bus because that person cannot or doesn't want to drive, the bus is succeeding.

[luckyladylily]

I read a study once on the fuel efficiency of various types of commuter vehicles (car, bus, train) on a per person basis and the number of people needed riding public transit to match the "efficiency" of cars is shockingly low. A bus needs to carry like 3-4 people to be fuel efficient, and trains require 2-3 per train car. Both often carry two dozen or more during peak hours, more than justifying any perceived requirements for efficiency for the train or bus to provide service the entire day.

[brightlotusmoon]

[beefbulgogi]

bocchi the YURI!??!?

[mai-arts]

Part 2

She also gets all the kisses!

Art commission by @gurrenprime

[crankybestie]

[gae-bolg-alternative-dot-exe]

Symphogear by gutalalaman

[vullen]

theyre girlfriends your honor. all of them

[pudica]

unimayburi

bsky | twt

[tranquil-slaughterhouse]

Well shit, the Republicans brought a certain anti-online porn bill back to the table.

The Interstate Obscenity Definition Act.

This should alarm you guys.

[tranquil-slaughterhouse]

Tell your rep to reject Interstate Obscenities Definition Act

Find Your Members in the U.S. Congress

Find your members of Congress by typing in your address on Congress.gov.

[mottsfiddle]

Here's a script from @/dieselbrain on Bluesky, use it to call your representatives

Source:

https://bsky.app/profile/dieselbrain.bsky.social/post/3lor4hs3ruc24

[alpaca-clouds]

This.

Look, always remember. Any sort of porn ban will be used to:

ban a variety of queer content (both trans and just other queer stuff)

ban certain health education content (especially on women's health)

create a precedent to charge minorities for any sort of content that will be argued to be then "pornographic"

will also very certainly create precedent to go against platforms like tumblr and AO3 and whereever you consume your favorite fanwork

will definitely also charge any depiction of "female presenting nipples"

Even if you think all porn is bad (you are wrong by the way), this stuff is never just about porn. Heck, chances are they would use such a law to in some roundabout way also prevent simple sex ed!

[naamahdarling]

There is no "chances are." The original Comstock Act was used to deliberately and specifically do that. Like, as a primary goal.

Their intention has very little to do with "porn", actually.

It is about silencing things most people wouldn't consider porn by labeling them corrupting to morality and therefore pornographic.

They get people on board by talking about pornography most people WOULD agree is pornography, and then don't define it, because "everyone knows" what porn is.

Yeah, sure, I guess probably there is that extreme end of the bell curve 99.9% of people would agree is porn. They want you focused on that. Not on the other side of the curve, which they are leaving themselves free to move wherever they like.

So yeah, when we have been saying that anti-porn lefties/liberals/Dems are literally enabling their own oppression, this is what we mean.

The fight to ban porn is NOT a fight about human rights or child safety. It's an excuse to prosecute basically anyone they want.

Don't fucking fall for this.

[dummy-dot-exe]

"Stay focused on the client, Ryuko-chan." by LaylaLetsYou@LaylaLetsYou

[gaarrus]

the trick for enjoying a new video game is avoiding the internet’s opinion on it 

[ichorsick]

[dummy-dot-exe]

by 치코@_clzh

[upathos]

just had to clip this part why is she so lame

[staardustkisses]

pathetic wet cat /aff

[dummy-dot-exe]

by 浮島ゴンザレス@gonzarez1938

[dizzyisdizzy]

you should draw Rosa from Pokemon………

Twintails 5ever!!!!