TIME IS RUNNING OUT.

titsay

Kiana Khansmith
No title available
ojovivo
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
One Nice Bug Per Day
Game of Thrones Daily
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
d e v o n
Misplaced Lens Cap

Love Begins

祝日 / Permanent Vacation
noise dept.
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
Cosmic Funnies

No title available

Discoholic 🪩
$LAYYYTER
Show & Tell

izzy's playlists!
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Italy
seen from Palestinian Territories

seen from Türkiye
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Italy
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Chile
seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from Qatar

seen from United States
seen from Brazil
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Portugal
@dancelolz
TIME IS RUNNING OUT.
Two weeks...
The world didn’t end but we had fun! #exitvisa14 @thplacelondon
A Dance For the End of the World (Day)
I want to make a dance about (for?) the end of the world. I am aware of the hugeness of this. It sounds like a terrible idea and it makes me cringe every time I have to say it out loud. It also seems like a completely impossible theme to do justice to? One that will take years of research and preparation, a long rehearsal period and big, fat arts council bid.
So lets try making it in a day. 10 hours to make a dance about the end of the world. Lets pretend that we are in the middle of armageddon, and we have chosen to spend our last day on this earth in the studio, dancing and talking and being silly.
I often had a nightmare as a child (and still occasionally now), which I cannot fully explain; an overpowering feeling of imminence and a sinking feeling deep in my chest, as if everything that has ever existed is ending in that moment. Lets seek out this sense of impending doom, replicate it in the studio with a ridiculous time limit and see if it sticks to the dance. An impossible experiment. Sounds like fun!
512hours - Marina Abramovic
On entering the Serpentine, the nice person on the door says to me, “enjoy yourself”. I immediately wonder what that is supposed to mean in the context of an art show, or a performance. I often hear people saying how much they ‘enjoyed it’ and question whether enjoy is what they actually mean; particularly in more meditative, challenging or abstract works. In the absence of enjoyment or entertainment, I hope to feel that I am being communicated with, that the artist is being generous with their ideas, and that my presence has been considered.
Regardless, if you ‘enjoyed’ this exhibition, you were doing it wrong. It was engineered for you not to. Everything was meticulously controlled, from the fact I had to leave my watch in my locker outside, to the droll tasks we were given by the rather solemn-looking front of house staff inside. “Hold this” - he put a vanity mirror in my hand and held it up to my face - “and walk backwards”. Sigh.
I imagine people championing this piece of work because of its participatory nature - “isn’t it wonderful, the audience becoming part of, and co-creating the work?!” But I have to say I’ve never felt so alienated before in a gallery: it was nothing short of miserable. The three rooms of the space contained roughly 100 people carrying out one of three non-tasks: sitting and staring at plain, block-colour canvases, or sitting staring at a wall with a blanket around their shoulders, or walking around holding a mirror. If you’re going to give us something to do, at least think of a few more. I was in there for 15 minutes and got given that stupid mirror three times. I felt almost as awkward as the ones lingering around Marina looked - those hoping to receive an instruction from the queen mother, holy Mary and Madonna of performance art herself. As soon as I see her I feel very aware that I do not buy into her elusive fiction or celebrity.
The exhibition has widely been described as a space where ‘anything goes’. This was certainly not the case. All of our agency was removed, and our time constructed for us. The space was in a state of forced silence and seriousness, and the audience participated in passive reverence to Abramovic. If this was an exercise of group ‘presence’, this community practiced it in solitude. As I gazed across the space at the rest of the obedient spectators I felt alone.
So no, I’m sorry. I did not enjoy this piece of work as I’d hoped to. And if enjoyment is not important, I did not feel like it was generous, generative, considerate or communicative either. I imagine however, that the real art will happen when this constructed paradise falls down and someone actually tries to enjoy themselves. Maybe thats all the frame exists for. For the moment when someone strips off, slaps her, or bursts into song. I was clearly too polite to do it myself, and too bored to wait.
I'm performing a new work this coming Wednesday. Come!
Ensemble (2014)
This is a little teaser trailer for my new solo, which will be performed on 22/01/14 at The Place, London. Details here:
https://www.facebook.com/events/1402812786625630/
I wrote something in reaction to Bellyflop mag's last night of 'Fringe'. I had a blast.
Some thoughts about a work I saw last night...
"Project O is a collaboration between Alexandrina Hemsley and Jamila Johnson-Small that aims to comment on the general fallout from being black, mixed and female and making visible positions of otherness, so that they will eventually no longer seem 'other'."
They danced for themselves and they danced to entertain. They expected as much from their audience as they gave. I watched as they straddled the line between empowerment and objectification, between being themselves and what they were expected to be. They were enjoying themselves, moving freely - and then their jerking, frantic movement suggested otherwise.
The two rolled their hips and slowly plie’d to the floor, stack of books balanced on each near-motionless head. A projection of a jungle formed the backdrop, plush tiger and potted palm trees framing the stage. I feel implicit in their sexualisation and exotification. Not in a way that makes me feel guilt or pity, but in a way that makes me sure this is not for me to dismiss as someone else's problem. In a way that makes me reject the defensive "but, I'm not racist/sexist/whatever" bullshit that is so commonplace.
They were dancing in wigs, gold hotpants, balaclavas and lots of black. They were dancing nude. They were nude for me, because I was watching. They were nude because being nude is great. The were nude because they didn't have any clothes on.
I watched them. I watched myself watching them. I watched audience members who had been drafted onto stage both watching, and not watching them. I was surprised at the accuracy with which you could guess whether a particular volunteer would look directly at them as they danced - those who were sat with their bodies facing the two performers would not choose to look away, but those who were angled even 45 degrees away from them stared blankly ahead (nervously sipping their free O-brand beer). I guess you could wonder when was the last time, as an audience member, that your seat didn't directly face the source of your entertainment.
I listened to pop and rnb song lyrics in a way I haven’t before. Ima read that bitch…
There was some insanely powerful imagery. They read with their vaginas, danced on chairs, split-leaped, sat on laps, pissed on books. Seriously these girls have ovaries. It was so inspiring to watch something so sure of its existence, so free of apology. This work was vital - and by that I mean both necessary, and full of life. It was threatening. The stage was a mess by the end, strewn with books and white paper, wigs and a pink faux-fur rug. As messy as race and gender so clearly is.
O is on until Saturday, every night at the Yard Theatre in Hackney Wick. You should go and see it because it is important, and also because its way more fun than I made it sound.
Suddenly Everywhere is Black with People - Marcelo Evelin @ Robin Howard Theatre, 11/10/13
They were already going when I entered the auditorium. A huddle of nude, black painted bodies, hands held, arms crossing, swapping and turning around around a the dimly lit stage. Fluorescent grey tube lighting formed a container in which they herded and were herded by an uncomfortable crowd.
I immediately was stifled by my own self conscious thoughts: Why should I move? But why stay completely still? Why is that man so close to them? Why are they laughing? Oh fuck now I'm laughing and theres nothing funny about this. I guess I 'fell in' at some point and forgot about those things, and others. I was relieved to stop noticing gender, sex, race, power - even 'moves' and dancers. It was just a mass of body and I loved to notice the generality of its formation and passing through space. It is so infrequent that abstraction is so appealing and satisfying in its own right. I was intrigued by the mystery of their interactions with audience. We were voyeurs, and then participants, and then invisible, and then subject. There was lots to look at.
And then they had an orgy. They were violent. Panting, groaning, kissing, writhing, running, pushing.
The human condition reduced to primal desires. How original. Male and Female, ethnicity and hierarchy were suddenly plain to see. It was that obvious, I didn't even see it coming.
Hallo Spaceboy by Jacob Hobbs @ Surya, Pentonville Road
Hobbs strolls casually onto the tiny, underground stage in a rubber suit and a giant, transparent dome-helmet. He’s stranded in space, the air is running out, and our astronautical protagonist has just enough time for one last wank, a few rock songs and a bit of a boogie.
From the start it is an absurd journey - pill popping, gasping for breath and screaming into his mic, but the spaceboy quickly attempts to put us at ease: “If I was really in space, I’d be going blip bloop, blip bloop!” He reels off a gargantuan list at light speed. Later he talks us through a solo, which he apparently isn’t good enough to dance himself: imagine me writhing and twisting upwards from the floor, “like some kind of emotionally unstable, mentally bothered plant”. Contemporary dance disses and self-deprecation are abundant and hilarious. Somehow, his self-doubt and breaking of the fourth wall doesn’t turn him into a complete loser - perhaps this is down to how genuine and relatable the autobiographical moments are.
They say that in space no-one can hear you scream, but Hobbs’ charismatic voice filled the space with a palpable ease. A powerful rendition of Bowie’s ‘Rock n Roll Suicide’ formed the climax of the piece, before his own theatrically exaggerated death. I particularly enjoyed the closing image of him walking into the light (the corridor towards the loo).
I’d seen this piece once before as part of ‘Resolution!’ in the Place’s Robin Howard Theatre. In this very different context, a tiny bar near Kings Cross (sorry - I mean just past the andromeda galaxy), completely different elements were allowed to shine. In Resolution I was entertained by its craft and cleverness. And of course by the fact that it wasn’t the same pigeonholed, genre specific stuff I’m used to seeing there. The anarchist in me also wondered how many people have actually commented on the shit-ness of leaving dance training, on that stage? In this smaller venue however, where entertainment is key and expectations are low, I found myself able to chill a little. I stood back and simply basked in the glory of his rousing performance (FYI that is rousing, not arousing - I know we got to see his bum, but lets not get carried away...)
In the huge and impersonal Place Theatre, Hobbs roaring “ARE YOU READY TO ROCK?” reads as a comic gesture, and of course the audience choked back a few laughs. But in this smaller venue it is a genuine prompt for the standing audience, who shout excitedly in reply. It was strange to hear people around me wonder aloud about the genre of this piece, because for me I didn’t question its dance-ness. Perhaps its because I know he is a trained dancer - in fact he told us that. Arguably there wasn’t a whole lot of ‘dancing’ in it, but from the get-go you could see he is a ‘doer’. Not that he isn't a talker or singer, but watching him struggle to don ass-less biker’s leathers was an event in itself. The comedy oozed from his pores as easily and profusely as his sweat. This is a performer who is used to speaking with his body, and I believe every wriggle and squirm.
In some of the quieter moments I did feel a perceived need to fill a silence that wasn’t awkward yet. These conversational and physical embellishments occasionally undermined his very believable performance. I didn’t really need a slurp and an "ahhh", to know he was drinking from a straw, for example. This was probably a product of the space's intimacy - there really was no hiding form the audience - but in the wake of such theatrical overtness, the few silences could have been milked a little more. Alas, I am being picky.
I enjoyed the hell out of this piece, and would love to see it a third time. And I promise it's not just because its given me an opportunity to say, assless chaps.
Last week I finished editing the new issue of 'Garble', the dance magazine run by students of London Contemporary Dance School. I interviewed visual artist, Franko B, which is a great read, if I do say so myself. Find the full issue here.
I do not want to be a critic.
I am not a 'young' or 'aspiring critic' just because I write about dance.
I don't want to be a part of this crazy idea that critics are an impartial, objective judge of work.
I am taking part in a discourse shared between artists about the art they make, in a field where we all know we are not impartial; it's all subjective, and I'm probably going to have my favourites. The notion that critics apparently aren't victims of this is strange and quite amusing to me.
I use the words 'I' and 'me' because I know that this is simply my opinion.
When critics start going to watch dance outside the Sadler's/ROH/Place circle and stay up to date with what is actually happening in the dance world, I'll start aspiring to be one, plus maybe then we won't need choreographer/dancer/writer hybrids and the critic will be relevant.
Franko B - Because of Love.
This new work was emotional and shocking, but not at all in the way I had expected. Images were quieter and less charged than the nudity and blood-letting of his other works. I think the experience felt more deeply relatable and inclusive as a result. He was generous to the audience in a way which was profoundly different to what I can ever recall seeing on stage. Watching him stare somewhat passively outwards made me consider the typical role of a performer - who often tries to convince us they know exactly what they are doing, that they are proficient in something, have something important to say, or that they are doing something really clever. I don't know, maybe that is what theatre is.
But of course, this work isn't theatre - I guess it is called performance art or live art or body art, and such a difference is inherent in the genre. However, this was a work performed in a theatre, and so it is difficult to view it as anything but - there is clearly so much baggage carried in this black box. We expect certain things, and when those expectations aren't met or are challenged we really notice. Silences are more overwhelming and a performer's gaze is more painful. The fragility of his position was heartbreaking and I felt a more genuine emotional reaction than I've had in that auditorium before. I think this was partly due to an inability to switch off my theatre brain - empathy kicks in, that feeling of being vulnerable on stage. I guess vulnerability, pain and a fear of failure are human conditions, but as a performer they seems even more pertinent.
It was hard not to watch this in the same headspace as any other thing you might expect to see at the Place theatre, or any theatre for that matter. But once expectations drained away and the dance lens was removed, I was left only with another person's presence, an experience, and some real emotion. It was a quietly surprising evening which I won't forget.
As an audience would you rather watch something perfectly polished and well executed, but which ultimately has been done before - or something with a fresh spark or 'potential', but which isn't fully realised?
As a maker, an with a limited and set period of time, would you rather create something formulaic which fits comfortably within your constraints, or try something you would really like to watch?
Speaking mainly of student work, it seems those pieces which are completely recognisable but are slick and 'finished' (whatever that means), are valued higher than those which try to challenge genre, conventions or form, but don't quite hit the spot. Surely there is value in both? Particularly when you don't have to consider a paying audience? Or even if you do?
Should we compromise?
Last night was the best night of my life. I met my idol and she aint no choreographer.
My idol is Brooke Candy, and last night I saw her perform at Madame Jojos in Soho. It was awesome.
As I was making the long walk of shame to afternoon class today, wearing last night's contact lenses, ripped jeans and generally hanging out my arse, I began thinking about this strange relationship we have with dance. Why is it that it takes an armour-clad foul-mouthed American rapper to get me this excited? Why is it that last night I felt no shame in jumping up onto the stage and running into the back to meet and gush all over my lady-crush and tell her how much my life has been enriched by her very existence? Maybe it was the alcohol. Actually I'm pretty sure it was 99% tequila, but why is it that we cannot commit to adoring and looking up to the choreographers and dancers we admire, like we do with musicians or all the other gods? Are was so above the rest of the celebrity loving population? I mean ,of course I get fired up when I see some great dance, but I would never ask for a choreographers autograph, nor would I stand through two shitty support acts in a sweaty, packed club, to see a half an hour piece. Yes contemporary dance is a a relatively fringe genre, but we apparently like it. Why so serious?
Of course, a gig is an entirely different beast to a contemporary dance piece, and it would be very easy to conclude that instantly gratifying trashy-pop-culture pushes a completely different button to dance, in all its fine-art seriousness. However on inspection, I don't think I really wanted anything different from Brooke Candy than I might from a choreographer. When I go to see a performance, I want to be excited, to be shown a strong aesthetic statement, maybe be thrown a political image or two, to be tickled and perhaps tested. I wanted to recognise some things and also be surprised. I want engaging performers. I got all of this last night, and like in dance, I was under no illusions that I'd be able to sing along. I can think of a couple performances I've seen recently that have achieved all of those things, but I calmly wrote about them, contemplated their successes and chatted quietly to peers, instead of obsessing over moments and chucking all the photos on facebook.
Equally as a dance maker, why don't I go all-out, make something extravagant, bursting with swag (I really shouldn't say that word), crowd surf at the show, get a pop star ego, let go and make a piece where we stomp around wearing creepers and swing our weaves (seriously you need to watch Brooke's music videos). I think really it comes down to being far too polite - polite in that this dance world, which I have barely scratched the surface of and am somewhat in awe of, seems to require you to apologise quietly and pay your dues on the edge, before you can do anything drastic or step on toes. Of course being considered and open to learning is essential in honing a craft, but for once it would be nice to go out with a bang. I guess I'm just bored of all this apologetic stuffiness. Anyway, maybe its all in my head; I'm not entirely sure what I'm even proposing, and am pretty sure most of this rant is based on a hilariously tentative connection (see, apologising again). But answer me this, wouldn't It be just smashing if de Keersmaeker came on stage at the end of a performance and got a woop woop from the audience, perhaps used one of those tshirt cannons and did us a little victory dance? We could all cheer and shout and stand up, out of our seats, maybe go meet her afterwards and get a photo? No? Just me?
P.S what is up with google/youtube today? I can't check my spellings, link to videos or anything :(
Intermission (2012)
A collaboration with designer, Charlotte Fone. Dancers: Nina von der Werth, Francesco Ferrari, Heather Stewart and Ryan Munroe.