Notes on Building a Judicial Election Tool
In 2016, WNYC set out to help New Yorkers "Judge Your Judges."
The plan was to help increase access to nonpartisan voter information about judges by prototyping data aggregation tool that makes information about judicial candidates easy to find and navigate.
Or, in other words, give people a sense of all those unfamiliar names on the judicial ballot -- who could affect policing, divorces and everyday life for everyday people.
The Knight Foundation supported this effort with a prototyping grant.
Judicial elections are the one of the least understood, least voted-in contests on the ballot, despite the fact that judges have a direct impact on individuals and communities. Few voters know the candidates, their purviews, a court’s history or the problems it faces.
We hoped that increasing voters' local knowledge and participation in these life-impacting elections might get them more civically involved by showing concrete effects of their votes - how their vote impacts them.
In the end, I often brought us back to this scenario: "Imagine a voter standing in line at the poll and with no idea about the judicial elections. What can we give her to help make an informed choice?"
So many questions. We needed to dig, and fortunately we had the help of a bunch of investigators. They were Alex Gerald, Charles Innis, Gonzalo del Peon and Caitrin Sneed -- students at the New School University's Journalism + Design program, who were in a class taught by journalist Sarah Ryley specifically for this project. That class was made possible with a grant from the Revson Foundation.
The class set out to answer several questions:
What would help people make their judicial election choices?
What is each court supposed to do? What are they actually doing?
What impact does a judge have on the outcome of a case? Can we quantify it?
How does the judicial selection process work?
Who were the delegates in the most recent races?
How much influence do voters have on the outcome?
Have there been any efforts to reform the process? What came of them?
Which races would make the most sense to focus on?
The students conducted surveys at the courthouse, shadowed reporters who cover the courts, interviewed attorneys, interviewed judges, called judicial delegates, talked to lawyers groups and got as much information online and on paper as they could.
Among their findings were that people at the courthouse would like information on candidates' resumes and backgrounds before they go to the polls.
The class also found out that the New York State judicial election process is so complicated that even seasoned lawyers didn't fully understand it.
The work of these students provided the base for reporting of a series of stories by WNYC reporter Kat Aaron leading up to the primary and general elections in New York City.
The WNYC Data News team, joined for the summer and fall of 2016 by student Alex Gerald, to build an address-based voter guide. The guide, for what we believe was the first time, included names and information about delegates -- the folks who ultimately decide who the New York judicial candidates will be.
WNYC has openly published the code and base data for the voter guide so that others may use it in future guides. In the near future -- and certainly before the next election season -- we hope to make it more plug-and-play and easier to repurpose.
The hope of our original grant was to create and test methods for getting this information out to people beyond our listening audience, including non-listeners who face arrest, eviction, foreclosure, collections, custody fights and divorce proceedings. Our prototype allowed to do some user testing on paper and cardboard models, and we did extensive user testing on our site. But we weren't able to explore as far as might be possible with a project devoted to only that -- something that may be easier now that we have prototyped building resources in general.