I have no Idea who you are, but I love the fact that you used myself and my blog for your OKC, eHarmony, etc. post.
You're hilarious, informative and honest.. I had to use your article! Thanks for reblogging my post and keep up the great work :)
Peter Solarz
I'd rather be in outer space đž
todays bird
Mike Driver
Xuebing Du

Janaina Medeiros

â
Aqua Utopiaïœæ”·ăźćșă§èšæ¶ă玥ă
sheepfilms

â
Three Goblin Art

Kiana Khansmith
Show & Tell
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

blake kathryn
noise dept.
KIROKAZE

No title available
Jules of Nature
d e v o n

seen from United States

seen from Singapore
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Canada
seen from Vietnam
seen from Netherlands

seen from France

seen from Malaysia
seen from Spain
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@datersdigest
I have no Idea who you are, but I love the fact that you used myself and my blog for your OKC, eHarmony, etc. post.
You're hilarious, informative and honest.. I had to use your article! Thanks for reblogging my post and keep up the great work :)
#FashionFridays: Scoring a date!
So maybe you donât have a date tonight. Your crush is in your circle of friends and you want him to notice you. Youâre all going out for a friends' birthday this evening... what do you wear out for drinks?
COLOURFUL PANTS! As you probably already know, bright coloured denim is all the rage this season. Pick a bright red, cobalt blue, mint green or pastel yellow like the ones I'm wearing (Please ignore the duck faces):
Yellow pants: American Eagle
Grey t-shirt: TJ Maxx
Scarf: Pacific Mall
Purse: Holt Renfrew
Black shoes: (Toms knockoffs!) Ardene
AWW :(
#WisdomWednesdays: Lavalife, Okcupid, eHarmony, Match.com⊠Can you find love online?
                In most cases, the goal of online daters is to find a lasting relationship⊠I wonât account for creepers and those who are looking for sex. A 2006 study by Madden and Lenhart found that most couples currently in long-term relationships or marriage âmet through family and friends or in a work or school settingâ. Their study states that the most successful place to begin a relationship is in a social setting and that only 3% of couples meet through Internet-based. Though their research is 6 years old, it is hard to imagine any remarkable variation in statistics. If there is such evidence demonstrating a lack of success on dating websites, why is it a $4 billion industry?Â
                 It seems people are spending a lot of time sifting through their available options with very little pay-off in real life. Iâve previously mentioned a study by Frost which found that users spend over 11 hours a week searching profiles and writing or responding to emails, to typically result in only 1.8 hours of âoffline interactionsâ. I get that itâs much easier to be behind a computer, but how will these interactions lead to anything other than disappointment? You simply cannot tell how funny or affectionate someone is in cyber-space.
                 The Internet has had a positive impact on platonic relationships via social networking sites, but the failure rate of romantic relationships is due to this fundamental gap between wants and needs. The information that daters need to know in order to determine relationship compatibility is not available in an online setting. Generally, users ended up âhighly dissatisfiedâ when meeting offline because dating interfaces âfall short of providing the information users desireâ, according to Frost. The emotional, intangible attributes cannot be represented in a profile. Searchable characteristics, like height, income or religion, are objective⊠and after all, dating is all about feelings. You are looking for a partner, not presenting yourself to an employer.
                 Joe Renken has chronicled his own experiences with online dating on his hilariously cynical blog (http://blog.joerenken.com/). He narrows down different stages, from âexcitementâ to âdisappointmentâ and even a period of ârageâ during the dating process, concluding that the Internet is not an appropriate place to seek love. Having experimented with online dating, Renken discusses the ratio of online messages to actual offline interactions. In his personal experience, he says he e-mailed forty girls in the first three days he was on the dating website OkCupid. Of these messages, he only got six responses and only one of which resulted in a real-life date. Renken claims the process is âstupidâ and resulted in his feelings of ârageâ because of its ineffectiveness.
                 The process on OkCupid was horrible enough to deter Renken from trying any other form of online dating. His disappointing experience validates the argument that communication technologies can ever replace face-to-face interactions. Though the Internet can be a gateway to real-life connections, there are too many opportunities for people to deceive one another via false profile information and misleading message exchange or online avatars that allow users to take on a different identity. Considering all the time it takes to sift through hundreds of profiles, messaging back and forth, not getting a response⊠It all seems like one big headache. Not to mention, how accurate can a self-written profile be? Think of how much youâve fluffed up your own.
xo, Christine.
                 For more information on Madden & Lenhartâs study:
Madden, Mary, and Amanda Lenhart. âOnline Dating.â Pew Research Centre (2006): 1-35. Princeton Survey Research Associates International, 5 Mar. 2006. Web. 1 Jun. 2012.
#MISC
I tried to get my mind around the concept of happily ever after. As progressive as our society claims to be, there are still certain life targets weâre all supposed to hit. Marriage, babies, and a home to call your own. But what if, instead of breaking out in a smile, you break out in a rash? Is something wrong with the system? Or is it you? And do we really want these things? Or are we just programmed?
-Carrie Bradshaw
Sex and the City
#TipoftheDayTuesday: Think outside the box. Dinner & a movie is overplayed. Try snowboarding or rock climbing lessons, go to a concert or an outdoor food festival.
#UglyMondays: Relationship rant.
Being in a relationship is great and all⊠Iâm super happy for all you happy couples, but for the love of God, donât forget about your friends.
I stopped talking to one of my best friends this time last June. She began dating her first-ever boyfriend in February of last year and did a complete 180. She spent less and less time with her friends, even her roommates barely saw her. She fell head over heels in love, which is great for her⊠But to isolate yourself in a relationship is ludicrous.
Iâve dated my share of men⊠Some obviously more serious than others. I know how it feels to want to spend every waking moment with the person you are in lust with love, but forgetting to put effort in meaningful relationships that previously existed creates a kind of co-dependency with your current partner.
I remember when my friend Emma sent me a text message saying that she had just bought a home with her new boyfriend. No more regular sleepovers, not renting⊠No⊠BUYING a homeâŠ. Together. I told her I was concerned that she was rushing into a decision⊠and living together would complicate things, much less having pooled bills and mortgage payments with someone you havenât been with for 6 months⊠But apparently my honesty was not well-received.
Emma got upset with me for not being âhappy and supportiveâ, but come on. I know you are crazy in love, but donât be so crazy! It saddens me that we are no longer on speaking terms because I tried to give realistic advice. Iâm sure she feels great proving me wrong, since the two are still together, but it would bother me so much to lose a friendship over a relationship.
I remember an argument with one of my most recent exes, who said, âYou care more about your friends then you care about us. I ditch my friends all the time for you, and I feel like youâd rather spend time with them over me!â Itâs all about balance. Maybe I am so paranoid of being one of those annoying couples that I sway too far to the other extreme. In any case, I believe in making equal effort in all relationships, whether it be romantic or friendly.
Boys will come and go⊠and even if he is the one, itâs all about balance. Maintain a degree of independence. Make time for your friends.
xo, Christine.
As extreme as he is, I love this video Chris Crocker made on co-dependency. âBe your own boyfriend. Be your own girlfriendâ.
#UglyMondays
#FashionFridays: Summer nights.
There is nothing sexier than a laid-back summer dress. It screams low-maintenance, even if you aren't, and they're uber feminine... Guys love that!
I've seen a ton of maxi dresses at Winner's this season, so I picked up this taupe-coloured one:
Also check out these flowy maxi dresses, perfect for a summer night stroll:
Grey/Yellow dress: Mango (www.mango.com)
Blue dress: Cobalt Blue Strapless Plain Maxi Dress (chiarafashion.co.uk)
Peach dress: René Lezard Maxi dresses Oranje (www.zalando.nl)
xo, Christine.
#FashionFridays
#TherapyThursdays: How long should you wait before having sex with someone?
This is a tricky question. You surely donât want to be a Samantha from Sex and the City but you donât want to be overly prudish. Steve Harvey discussed a â90 Day Ruleâ in his book Act Like a Lady, Think Like a Man. Harvey suggests every woman should have a 90 day grace period before giving up what he refers to as âthe cookieâ. Now, Iâm fully aware of urges and Iâve even discussed animalistic needs in last weekâs #TherapyThursdays post. Iâm not so sure that waiting three months in entirely realistic either.
I canât say there is ever a âright timeâ to move things to that next level of intimacy. As clichĂ© as it sounds, wait until you are ready. Anyone with common sense can gage how much a person cares about you. If heâs only calling you late Saturday night after he comes home from the bar, you probably shouldnât give it up. Youâre a booty call and nothing more. If heâs taken you to dinner on more than one occasion, introduced you to his friends, remembered to wish you good luck on your exam⊠chances are, he truly cares about you.
My mother just recently told me to âappreciate the people who are wonderful, kind and thoughtfulâ. What Iâm trying to say is that you should use your own judgement, and sleep with people who are good to you and respectful. Remember your worth, donât do anything you donât want to do. And if you think itâs the right time, do what feels good!
Mama's advice:
xo, Christine.
#TherapyThursdays
#WisdomWednesdays: Marrying later.
I was asked by a dear friend of mine if it is weird that she does not want to get married, and I said, âNoâ. Modern women today have stronger convictions, more options, more aspirations, sexual freedom and more concrete reasons why they are not compelled to marry Mr. Right as of yet. I am not surprised by this trend and today, the median age for women getting married is 26. Sounds about accurate but only half of the adult population in America are married. Â
The tables have turned and women are more career-minded than ever before. A high 55% of college graduates are women between the ages of 25-29 and as of last year, 51.4% of all managerial and professional positions were held by women. Men were also outnumbered by women who attended grad school and single women between the ages of 22-30 earned 8% more than men.
There is no doubt that women are becoming successful in their respectful jobs, their earning potential is increasing and playing the field is becoming more apparent. Thanks to best-selling books such as, âAct Like a Lady, Think Like a Manâ and âThe Manualâ, these have become women`s bed-side table books providing them with more perspective on how women should conduct themselves in the dating scene. Likewise, movies such as, âFriends with Benefitsâ and âNo-Strings Attachedâ have also persuaded women to date casually. Â
For most men, marriage tends to fall under the âright timingâ. Once they have secured themselves financially and are ready to provide, they are more likely to settle down and propose.  Whereas for most women, marriage tends to fall under the category of the âright manâ, as if they are searching for the ultimate criteria. A woman may have it all with the exception of being with the man of her dreams, but where do you find the fine line between settling for less and settling down? Does she pick the good-looking guy with great character and values but not financially attractive? Or does she pick the average-looking guy whose values do not align with hers, is spoiled by his parents, is paid generously and could be a potential mate to settle down with. Or maybe, there is that âoverall packageâ walking just around the corner. There may not be the perfect scenario, but the possibilities are endless.  With the steep economic turn of our time; no wonder women are more restless, going back to school, taking more responsibility financially, and therefore marriage has taken a back seat. Why get married lavishly and get divorced anyways?
Cohabitation seems more feasible and less headache. There is always that negative stigma on women being single or not wanting to marry the man whom they are currently happy with. Marriage is interpreted differently from all walks of life. It could be following a tradition, a written formality, or partly just doing it âfor the kidsâ, as Brangelina have shared recently. Â Marriage may represent a sacred union, but it is also a decision whether if it`s really essential to a long-lasting happiness and companionship.
Once again, the lovely Maria Aliazon is contributing to Dater's Digest. This time, she explains this phenomenon of women marrying later in life.
Enjoy.
xo, Christine.
#WisdomWednesdays
Online dating insanity...
#TipoftheDayTuesday
Passionsearch dating tip of the day: If you fall in love, make sure itâs with someone who knows how to catch you.
#TipoftheDayTuesday: Don't kiss on the first date.
#UglyMondays: Jerry! Jerry!
Sometimes real-life is as f*cked up as an episode of Teen Mom mixed with a little Jerry Springer. Iâm not sure whatâs in our water, but bizarre occurrences are everywhere lately.
I was recently at my friend Jordanâs house watching Dr. Phil. The episode was about an 18 year old boy who got two 16 year old girls pregnant, one right after the other. I made a comment about how messed up the world has become and he proceeded to tell me about his neighbourâs dating disasters.
Apparently his 18-year-old neighbour, Chantal, just had a daughter on March 5th. I hate to judge, but any story where kids are having kids already gets to me⊠But anywhoâŠ. Chantal and her best friend Caitlin had known each other since elementary school. The two were literally inseperable.
In high school, Chantal started dating her babydaddy daughterâs father, Wesa. Almost immediately after learning that she is pregnant, Chantal finds out that Caitlin is expecting as well⊠Who is the father of Caitlinâs child? Wesa⊠(Jerry! Jerry!)
Needless to say, Chantal and Caitlin are no longer friends⊠and nine months later, Caitlin gives birth to a baby girl onâŠ*drumroll*⊠May 5th. Yep. The same day Chantal had a daughter.
Good on you, Wesa. Having two babies with two different women born on the EXACT. SAME. DAY.
Lawd have mercy, is this real life?! You canât write this stuff!
xo, Christine.
#UglyMondays
#FacePalm