That didn't last long, did it? Only a year ago I was commenting that I didn't think they'd hit their Christmas launch date, now they're talking about closing it down. Selling eBooks be hard.

PR's Tumblrdome
art blog(derogatory)
No title available

祝日 / Permanent Vacation

Love Begins

Kiana Khansmith
Xuebing Du
wallacepolsom
sheepfilms
Keni

No title available
trying on a metaphor
Monterey Bay Aquarium
DEAR READER

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
Stranger Things
$LAYYYTER

tannertan36
taylor price
No title available

seen from United States

seen from Singapore
seen from Pakistan
seen from Canada
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Brunei
seen from Estonia
seen from Brazil
seen from Italy

seen from Russia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Indonesia
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from Vietnam

seen from Spain
seen from Ireland

seen from United States
@davidnorthcott
That didn't last long, did it? Only a year ago I was commenting that I didn't think they'd hit their Christmas launch date, now they're talking about closing it down. Selling eBooks be hard.
Amazon has just killed Pricenoia. For 10 years Pricenoia has been helping Amazon customers find the best price for a product.
In these times of conversations about data, it's worth remembering how easy it is for Amazon (or Google, Facebook or Twitter, natch) to move everyone's goal posts.
The Times is not a-changin' fast enough. Back in July, The New York Times commissioned a task force to assess the publication's digital efforts to date and recommend ways it can...
Useful summary of the leaked internal NYT report into innovation (and where it felt it was failing). The full report is well worth a read, and is embedded at the bottom of the article.
Andrew Crofts has written 80 titles and sold some 10 million copies in a 40-year career, mostly under names far more famous than his own – until now
Dear KDP Author, Just ahead of World War II, there was a radical invention that shook the foundations of book publishing. It was the paperback book. This was a time when movie tickets cost 10 or 20 cents, and books cost $2.50. The new paperback cost 25 cents – it was ten times cheaper. Readers loved the paperback and millions of copies were sold in just the first year. With it being so inexpensive and with so many more people able to afford to buy and read books, you would think the literary establishment of the day would have celebrated the invention of the paperback, yes? Nope. Instead, they dug in and circled the wagons. They believed low cost paperbacks would destroy literary culture and harm the industry (not to mention their own bank accounts). Many bookstores refused to stock them, and the early paperback publishers had to use unconventional methods of distribution – places like newsstands and drugstores. The famous author George Orwell came out publicly and said about the new paperback format, if “publishers had any sense, they would combine against them and suppress them.” Yes, George Orwell was suggesting collusion. Well… history doesn’t repeat itself, but it does rhyme. Fast forward to today, and it’s the e-book’s turn to be opposed by the literary establishment. Amazon and Hachette – a big US publisher and part of a $10 billion media conglomerate – are in the middle of a business dispute about e-books. We want lower e-book prices. Hachette does not. Many e-books are being released at $14.99 and even $19.99. That is unjustifiably high for an e-book. With an e-book, there’s no printing, no over-printing, no need to forecast, no returns, no lost sales due to out of stock, no warehousing costs, no transportation costs, and there is no secondary market – e-books cannot be resold as used books. E-books can and should be less expensive. Perhaps channeling Orwell’s decades old suggestion, Hachette has already been caught illegally colluding with its competitors to raise e-book prices. So far those parties have paid $166 million in penalties and restitution. Colluding with its competitors to raise prices wasn’t only illegal, it was also highly disrespectful to Hachette’s readers. The fact is many established incumbents in the industry have taken the position that lower e-book prices will “devalue books” and hurt “Arts and Letters.” They’re wrong. Just as paperbacks did not destroy book culture despite being ten times cheaper, neither will e-books. On the contrary, paperbacks ended up rejuvenating the book industry and making it stronger. The same will happen with e-books. Many inside the echo-chamber of the industry often draw the box too small. They think books only compete against books. But in reality, books compete against mobile games, television, movies, Facebook, blogs, free news sites and more. If we want a healthy reading culture, we have to work hard to be sure books actually are competitive against these other media types, and a big part of that is working hard to make books less expensive. Moreover, e-books are highly price elastic. This means that when the price goes down, customers buy much more. We've quantified the price elasticity of e-books from repeated measurements across many titles. For every copy an e-book would sell at $14.99, it would sell 1.74 copies if priced at $9.99. So, for example, if customers would buy 100,000 copies of a particular e-book at $14.99, then customers would buy 174,000 copies of that same e-book at $9.99. Total revenue at $14.99 would be $1,499,000. Total revenue at $9.99 is $1,738,000. The important thing to note here is that the lower price is good for all parties involved: the customer is paying 33% less and the author is getting a royalty check 16% larger and being read by an audience that’s 74% larger. The pie is simply bigger. But when a thing has been done a certain way for a long time, resisting change can be a reflexive instinct, and the powerful interests of the status quo are hard to move. It was never in George Orwell’s interest to suppress paperback books – he was wrong about that. And despite what some would have you believe, authors are not united on this issue. When the Authors Guild recently wrote on this, they titled their post: “Amazon-Hachette Debate Yields Diverse Opinions Among Authors” (the comments to this post are worth a read). A petition started by another group of authors and aimed at Hachette, titled “Stop Fighting Low Prices and Fair Wages,” garnered over 7,600 signatures. And there are myriad articles and posts, by authors and readers alike, supporting us in our effort to keep prices low and build a healthy reading culture. Author David Gaughran’s recent interview is another piece worth reading. We recognize that writers reasonably want to be left out of a dispute between large companies. Some have suggested that we “just talk.” We tried that. Hachette spent three months stonewalling and only grudgingly began to even acknowledge our concerns when we took action to reduce sales of their titles in our store. Since then Amazon has made three separate offers to Hachette to take authors out of the middle. We first suggested that we (Amazon and Hachette) jointly make author royalties whole during the term of the dispute. Then we suggested that authors receive 100% of all sales of their titles until this dispute is resolved. Then we suggested that we would return to normal business operations if Amazon and Hachette’s normal share of revenue went to a literacy charity. But Hachette, and their parent company Lagardere, have quickly and repeatedly dismissed these offers even though e-books represent 1% of their revenues and they could easily agree to do so. They believe they get leverage from keeping their authors in the middle. We will never give up our fight for reasonable e-book prices. We know making books more affordable is good for book culture. We’d like your help. Please email Hachette and copy us. Hachette CEO, Michael Pietsch: [email protected] Copy us at: [email protected] Please consider including these points: - We have noted your illegal collusion. Please stop working so hard to overcharge for ebooks. They can and should be less expensive. - Lowering e-book prices will help – not hurt – the reading culture, just like paperbacks did. - Stop using your authors as leverage and accept one of Amazon’s offers to take them out of the middle. - Especially if you’re an author yourself: Remind them that authors are not united on this issue. Thanks for your support. The Amazon Books Team P.S. You can also find this letter at www.readersunited.com
This is very long, but you have to read it if you have any interest in the business of publishing and self-publishing.
The Bookseller is reporting PwC's latest analysis of the book market, which suggests that the UK e-book market will hit £1bn 4 years from now.
PwC's last report (some 5 years ago now) contained similar predictions that were all too conservative, many by quite some way. Here's hoping that this one is equally conservative :)
They're not quite as innovative as this piece makes out (Scalzi has been banging on - pretty negatively - about these types of contracts for a while), but it’s the first time I’ve read a publisher’s perspective.
Author who fails to understand digital fails to understand digital. Complains. Not quite the cautionary tale he was trying to tell, but one worth reading.
I missed this piece when it came out a couple of months ago. Given how print held up last year a 20% growth in e-book sales is impressive.
...price disputes aside I’ve got the sneaky feeling that one of the major stumbling blocks on this is that Hatchette want the personal data of all the folk who bought their books and Amazon doesn’t want Hatchette to be spamming their customers...
Not sure I agree, but it's well worth a read. We know that direct to consumer is a key strategy for all the big 5 - this piece digs into that a little, even if the author rather jumps to the conclusion he does.
Chief executive of 9,000-member UK group argues that while 'authors' earnings are going down generally, those of publishers are increasing'
Not sure if this comes from the Guardian's interpretation or a false causal link in the press release itself, but somewhere along the line in this article 'drop in earnings' is equated to 'reduction in number of authors'. I couldn't see anything to actually support that.
The article is also introduced with 'profits of publishers are increasing', yet in the meat of the article it simply says 'profits are holding up'.
There's another way to interpret this data. Same number of books bought, more books published and more authors writing them, less money to go round between the authors.
To fail better, to fail gracefully and with composure, is so essential because there’s no such thing as success. It’s failure all the way down.
Failure is our muse.
A simple index drawn from e-books shows which best sellers are going unread (we're looking at you, Piketty).
Lovely method of working out which books are going unread (by analysing the distribution of quotes through the book on Goodreads).
And unsurprisingly no one's actually finishing Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Who'd have guessed it?
Some great analysis here:
The big 4 genres make up 70% of the kindle bestseller list
In those 4 genres half of the bestsellers are independently published
Across those 4 genres Amazon's own imprints make up 9% (compared to the big 5 combined at 26%)
Fascinating.
I keep hearing "if you're writing you're winning" or similar, and I hate it. I can't write like that - if I come back to something and try to pick it up again I have to read the previous paragraphs through, and if they jar I can't write any more until I've edited it to my satisfaction.
It's great to hear someone stand up for editing as you go. And he's right - it's much harder to fix something that's gone astray if you've written 20,000 words after the wrong turn, than if you've only written 200.
On Hachette and Amazon
I've not bothered to link to much of the Hachette/Amazon spat. Little point, I think. But this sums it up rather nicely.
You know, if Hachette had bothered to build a website supporting direct sales, they could be roping in a lot of customers upset with Amazon.
— Mandy Brown (@aworkinglibrary) May 28, 2014