Haha name change uwu
Sweet Seals For You, Always

tannertan36
RMH
Stranger Things
trying on a metaphor

Andulka
sheepfilms
Show & Tell

#extradirty

⁂
styofa doing anything
Misplaced Lens Cap

Janaina Medeiros
TVSTRANGERTHINGS

pixel skylines
hello vonnie
AnasAbdin

★
🪼
Cosmic Funnies
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from France
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Thailand

seen from Greece
seen from United States

seen from Greece

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from T1
@deadly-queen-uwu
Haha name change uwu
this one’s for you jimmy fallon
when i saw this shot i also immediately knew i had to draw this scene as well! <3 (it's a big drawing so zoom in for details <: )
College Will Byers (insp)
Found this while scrolling my blog and couldn't help but smile knowing he looked very similar to this before the suffers edited his hair in post.
i honestly think byler stands as one of the most blatant cases of queerbaiting the industry has produced in the last decade. and i don’t say that lightly. this isn’t a case of fans “reading too much into it” or projecting subtext where none exists. this is a case where the text itself deliberately builds a queer emotional arc, frames it with all the cinematic language of a romantic storyline, and then cannibalises that arc to reinforce a straight couple that was already structurally unstable.
they took a queer character’s feelings, his longing, his emotional labour, his narrative vulnerability, and used them as scaffolding for a relationship he isn’t even part of. they lifted will’s emotional beats, his confessions, his heartbreak, and simply stamped el’s name on top like it was an interchangeable sticker. from a craft perspective, it’s not just sloppy; it’s narratively unethical. it treats queer interiority as a tool rather than a story. it treats a queer character’s pain as a convenient emotional engine for a heterosexual romance that couldn’t sustain itself on its own terms.
and the thing is, this isn’t subtle. it’s not buried in symbolism or blink and you’ll miss it gestures. it’s right there in the blocking, the framing, the colour theory, the dialogue, the emotional pacing. it’s the kind of thing you’d pause in a lecture hall and say, “okay, class, here’s what happens when a show wants the cultural capital of queer representation without committing to the narrative responsibility of actually following through.”
it’s genuinely one of the worst cases of queerbaiting i’ve seen in mainstream tv, not because the queerness wasn’t explicit, but because it was explicit, and then it was repurposed to prop up a straight romance that the writers were too afraid to let fail on its own merits
as someone with a degree in television and a background in cinematography and narrative analysis, i genuinely cannot understand what the duffers were doing with mike and will. the sheer amount of intentional groundwork poured into their dynamic wasn’t accidental, and wasn’t something you can dismiss as audience projection. it was craft. it was design. it was the kind of layered visual storytelling you only build when you’re setting up a payoff.
the costuming alone charted an emotional arc, colour palettes shifting in tandem, mirroring, contrasting, signalling internal states long before the characters verbalised anything. the blocking and framing consistently positioned them in ways that highlighted intimacy, tension, longing, and narrative centrality. the camera lingered on them with a specificity that, in television language, means something. you don’t shoot two characters like that unless you’re building toward a reveal or a culmination.
and then there’s the emotional architecture: years of subtext, coded longing, parallel arcs, mirrored traumas, narrative foreshadowing. every tool in the tv writer’s and cinematographer’s kit was pointing toward byler as a deliberate, slow burn queer storyline. it wasn’t just possible, it was textually supported by the show’s own visual grammar. even the pink sky in the field scene, that gorgeous, deliberate wash of colour, was doing thematic heavy lifting.
which is why the lack of follow through feels so jarring. from a craft perspective, it’s almost nonsensical. you don’t invest that much visual and emotional capital into a relationship you plan to abandon. from a storytelling perspective, it’s a structural rupture, a setup without a payoff, a thematic thread left dangling. and from a queer audience perspective, it’s heartbreaking, because this could have been monumental. byler had the potential to be an epic queer narrative with genuine depth, history, and emotional resonance. it could have been groundbreaking.
instead, it feels like all that potential was discarded at the last minute. years of careful build up rendered pointless. a beautifully constructed arc left unresolved. and i can’t make sense of it, not academically, not narratively, not emotionally. it just feels like such a waste of what could have been one of the most compelling queer storylines in mainstream genre television.
THIS IS FUCKING ME UPPPP
as someone with a ba hons in film and television, that “friends? no thanks… best friends” line feels like a slap in the face to mike and will’s relationship, not even in a romantic sense, but in terms of the friendship the show originally framed with so much intention. seasons 1 and 2 gave us one of the most emotionally coherent boyhood bonds on screen: mike refusing to stop searching for will, refusing to leave his side, grounding the narrative with a sincerity that felt almost cinematic.
and when you look back at the rain fight through that lens, it becomes even more cruel and unnecessary. the scene is framed with the emotional weight of a breakup, shot like a rupture the audience is meant to feel in their chest, and yet the narrative pretends it’s just a spat between friends. it’s impossible not to see how deliberately it mirrors the emotional grammar of eyewitness: the rain, the miscommunication, the rawness, the way the camera lingers on the hurt. it’s a perfect parallel, and it makes the later dismissal of their bond feel even more jarring.
season 3 fractures their dynamic for no real narrative reason. it wasn’t character development, it was convenience, and it showed. by season 4, the framing practically begged us to notice that something had shifted, the camera lingered differently, the emotional beats were shaped with purpose. and in season 5, that tiny moment on the field visually suggested a change in their dynamic was finally coming. they even chose to show mike first on will’s tape, which is an editorial choice that signals emotional priority.
and then… nothing. as if none of that groundwork mattered. as if the years of careful setup, the rain fight, the parallels, the van scene. the emotional framework, were just disposable.
it’s infuriating because the potential was right there. not just for a beautifully crafted friends to lovers arc, but for a genuinely rich exploration of a friendship evolving under pressure, grief, and growing up. they had all the pieces for something resonant, and they just let it slip.
Byler finale comic or something part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Last part
THEY FRIDGED MY GIRL, EL!
So they just ignored how they purposely wrote mileven problematically , and instead of letting them break up , or even having El fake her death to find happiness elsewhere . They instead just let mileven kiss (hand wave their issues with an empty speech) and then immediately kill El off (after they shot Kali ).
What was the point of Hopper’s speech where he says Kali/El shouldn’t have to off themselves, and that they deserve a happy ending (despite life being unfair to them) ? Guess it was pointless. Can’t let El/Kali : the victims of government oppression and abuse ever get a “happy ending”. In fact , both die due to the government . What an uplifting message during these fraught political times. 🙄 This is the opposite of an uplifting message for ab*se survivors: "break the cycle" by offing yourself??????!!!!
And even after 18 months … Will and Mike never get closure or even bring up the painting ? They ignore the cyarno trope all together? Mike even hangs the painting up in his room cause he’s still oblivious and thinks his dead girlfriend commissioned it . Mike is wearing those ugly glasses cause he’s channeling his final form as his oblivious father (who is blind to everything around him) . And it’s implied Will eventually gets a bf who doesn’t speak or have a name . And is on screen for less than 0.5s. And all Will did was glance at him. Yeah. The writers were cowards .
This is why we can’t trust straight dudes to write woman or queer relationships.They chicken-ed out on byler . And said: let’s queerbait and kill the main heroine ( so we don’t have to follow through on breaking up mileven ). Since we’re afraid to follow through on the og plan: let’s just kill her instead (so no one is allowed to ever criticize the main ship ever again) . Also, el says “I love you “ right before she dies . And mike still doesn’t say it back 🙄. I'll never forgot how you compared mileven to ted/karen in multiple seasons . And In s4 you made countless parallels to mileven and El/Brenner . You can't gaslight us , and claim they were some great love .
Also , they never explain how hopper is allowed to be the police chief again. They had a funeral? What was the cover story to allow him back in Hawkins PD?
Don’t even get me started on the other plot holes … so many plot holes.
I will be doing a more rational breakdown of the Duffers problematic writing choices later (when I’ve calmed down). I actually wrote a whole break down of those issues before the finale just in case so it’ll probably be out on Friday. And no it’s not just about byler (that’s only 1 bullet point of like a 25 bullet point list). The duffers didn't subvert tropes like we expected them to. They literally tried to bring back old problematic ones.
Glad , I was a pirate for the last season
Wait, other than this being the best scene in the epilogue AND the best shots in that scene... I'm also just now realizing -- does this mean that the reason that the core four cast + max was able to: a) make their final scene their wrap scene b) let them be able to end the whole thing together, in a hug, which led to apparently their sleepover on set together (that Gaten, Finn, and Caleb talked about in another interview) was because of Noah, again? Fuck.
No one and I mean absolutely no one, comes close to understanding what the fans needed through all of the bullshit as much as Noah Schnapp.
Even with past political differences, I hope he gets involved in writing because my god he knew these characters better than their creators which is insane. He knows the emotional weight that scenes can carry without relying on cheap fakeouts and deaths. Because come the end of that episode I was so disheartened but that final scene in Mike's basement gave me a twinge of closure that I didn't think I was going to have.
We were always just 'noise to them?
The Stranger Things creators reveal why they never pivoted toward a romantic relationship between Mike and Will, despite intense fan specula
It just gets worse. Not only did they avoid answering the question with honesty ("we couldn't outright shut it down because then we would have lost money/viewers) but they likened all we loved about deep diving into their show as just 'noise'.
I hate these men I'm being so serious. I will never consume anything these two chucklefucks make ever again, join me btw 💙💛
i wasn’t manifesting anything, i was literally analysing the cinematography, the blocking, the colour theory, the narrative beats, all the stuff i was trained to look for during my TV degree. the signs were there because the show put them there.
the duffers absolutely queer baited the audience. everything I learned academically about visual storytelling was pointing toward a byler slow burn, and then they completely abandoned their own setup. we didn’t hallucinate subtext; we didn’t “make up” a ship. they built it, then pretended they didn’t, and the result reeks of homophobia.
they didn’t subvert expectations, they ignored their own narrative groundwork. that’s not clever writing, that’s just bad writing. they tore down a storyline they spent years constructing, and now the overall story makes zero sense.
Thus bugs me more than it should...
Remember our famous colour theories? Blue and yellow. 💙💛. These are Mike and Will's colours when paired together. It's been like this since season 3 I think, right? (Correct me if I'm wrong). So pray tell, why is Will's binder-name orange 😮💨 It's like one final slap in the face for even thinking the colours in the show mattered and I just, ugh. That's it. That's the post.
Not even ship related
I'm writing this at almost 5 in the morning as I stayed up late to watch the final and have just been kind of sitting with my thoughts. I've shipped byler since season 2 and while I am extremely disappointed in the ending we got as a byler, I am even more devastated in the ending as a queer person.
I saw a lot of myself in the character of Will Byers. For so many reasons, too heavy to get into right now. But this character meant a lot to me. I believed everything he was being put through would pay off. That pining after his best friend would amount to something. That we as the audience would see him get the love he always believed he didn't deserve.
But this all rested on the writing of the Dipshit brothers. Instead of that? They reduce his love to a crush, have him get over said crush in the matter of hours and give him a fate even worse than death, worse than epilogue boyfriend- An *implied* epilogue boyfriend. Through his once-crush's storytelling. It's such a slap in the face to Will's character and to his fans who **knew** this ending for him was a bad one.
I've realised now that the dipshit brothers simply could/would not give queer stories justice as the straight, white men that they are. This isn't only evident in Will's storytelling by the way, because in case you failed to notice, Robin also gets slapped in the face. The woman she found herself head-over-heels with, the woman who brought her so much joy, remember Vicky? Because just as their relationship began (offscreen), so to does it end (offscreen)
Honestly? These endings for these 2 feel homophobic asf and lack any nuance or depth. They never cared enough to develop Robin and Vicky in the same way as the other relationships on the show. And they didn't care enough about Will's character to send him off in a way that should show every gay kid out there that they deserve to be loved romantically.
They told us and we didn't listen. They said some fans who watch the show are watching a different show. We watched a show for outcasts *as* outcasts when we should have been watching a show created on the idea of what an outcast is from the brains of two brothers who were simply nerds who saw themselves as such.
I genuinely believe we've been queerbaited. No one will ever convince me otherwise. Peace for now.