Itās become a habit for me to write something to myself to celebrate my own birthday. A habit which demands me more silence and quietness than any other day. Just like this year, I finally made myself out of town and try to feel some breeze I scarcely get. In the place which I considered the best gift I could give to myself with this current condition.
Here, I spent most of my time by doing nothing and think about the most absurd idea which I got from Jung. I brought his āMandala Symbolismā with me and read it heavily. Ā The idea of āwhole manā struck me as itās not what I have in mind. I think that a great man or in this case whole man is a man who has strong principle and idea. A man who do everything which blazes his heart and do it right away with everything he has. Yet, Jung said it is not what a whole man does because to be a whole man or human it means one must be as big as the universe.
Sure, it is understandable if you ask what does it mean to be as big as universe because it is tremendously abstract and can mean everything. As in this book he talks more about symbols, so as big as universe is a symbol as well. A symbol which he relates with many Greek Gods symbolism, like Hermes. Before I make you more confuse than what I initially intended, thus Iāll explain it shortly.
To be as big as universe means a man contains everything in him and outside of him. It means one can only becoming big not when he choose something over another, but when he accepts everything. When he accepts more and more the things which usually oppose one another, he expands. Expanding like the universe and he is the imitation of the universe itself as universe never rejects, only accepts. The planet might be vanished but it does not mean the universe rejects it, the planet died because itās the time for it to die.
I know, you think this writing should not be my comment to Jung book, but about my birthday. Yet, his book answer my deepest question I lately ask to myself. In maturing years I feel I become more inflexible to my own choices. I think I have to possess a clear purpose in life and keep on striving to achieve it, then Iāll be the āwhole manā I always want to be, but it is not. It only leaves me with more confusions whether whatever I do is worthy and whether or not this is what I always want to do.
Consciousness loves onesidedness and it never liberates us, that is what I got after reading his theory about Mandala. Whatever happened to me also happened to his patient who felt struck in her life. She felt that for whatever she achieved, she didnāt feel any climax in her life. Jung didnāt say it is because she couldnāt feel grateful for a great life she had, instead he said it is caused by her consciousness which denies every important messages from her unconsciousness. A message which applies to everyone that ego (consciousness) is nothing but working under the universal law (unconscious).
His theory might be confusing and not readily understandable, but the message is clear and simple. A man, with his thinking and feeling ability, tends to choose one over another. He thinks by thinking he will be better or at least feel better, but instead he feels the otherwise or he finally can not feel anything at all. Fighting forces are always within us, from thinking to feeling, and conscious to unconscious. One can only be the highest potential he could ever be by accepting all the forces equally simply because they are identical.
I am me and I am the anti-thesis of me as well, and I am me. This logic hardly acceptable for consciousness as it loves onesidedness, either/or. Yet, consciousness will never set you free because it is itsā job, to constrain you with the reality. Only the unconsciousness which has the power to reveal many unknown dynamics of the universe which we barely understand up until now and it is the source of limitless energy.
This new realization leaves me with the understanding that there is no should in this world. There is no one fully understand the world which has any authority to set you about what is right and what is wrong. Whatever I do is never be right/wrong, but right and wrong. The act explains more than the word we make to make sense whatever we do. Rationalization never helps because it means we have to reason with whatever we choose and we can not bear if what we chose is wrong, hence we rationalize. Denial is dangerous as well because when we deny something, we deny a part of ourselves who knows that the other part might be right for us.
Yes, I am twenty-one now. I know in every birthday there is a culture to hope something good to happen this year and the years follow, but I donāt think it is necessary anymore. If I work under the law of universe as what Jung said, it means wherever I go is whatever myself (whole-man-being) needs me to be. There is no need to hope because it will happen in one way or another. Whatever comes to me, it is never be good or bad, but both and needed. I might not know why things come the way they do, and maybe never will, but the understanding that I need them already sets me free.