Reconciling Social Justice and Babywearing
Hello! I'm a multiracial/ethnic Latinx Deaf PanQueer Femme. Prior to becoming pregnant and becoming a mother, I had identified as an intersectional social justice activist for several years. Intersectional social justice is infused in my personal and professional lives, but not without cost. I've faced professional repercussions for my involvement in social justice, and I've went from being a social butterfly to someone who carefully cultivates a small circle of chosen family and friends who share similar liberation politics. But social justice frameworks of understanding and analyzing the world has remained steadfast for me, with the frameworks continuing to expand and become more complex over time. I have always thought of raising children as creating agents of change for future generations; and that's the main principle that guides me as a parent. Though my LO is now only a few months old, I continue to keep imagining ways I can raise consciousness as our child grows up, with empathy, compassion, and prioritizing the liberation of self and others.Â
My descent into BW was not expected. My LO was born in early March, and during pregnancy I figured that my mamihood obsession was going to be cloth diapering, and worked to build up a stash. I obliged with accepting some secondhand stretchy wraps, but neatly rolled them up and put them in a box in the baby's dresser and ignored them. It was not until I grudgingly attended a local cloth diapering event, after realizing that I didn't have the patience or perseverance to cloth diaper, that I asked for a woven wrap demo, and was taught one with a volunteer sign-language interpreter present (a rarity to have such access at events, which I hope to get into in another post).Â
Back at home, I practiced a bit with the Moby some more, with the sling, and a few more times with the Lenny Lamb wrap I bought at the cloth diaper event. Wanting to geek out on Lenny Lamb, I went on their website and... ahem. Saw their calavera wrap designs. I froze. I'm Latina. DĂa de Los Muertos is sacred to me. Anti-cultural appropriation is a major family value of ours. But now I owned an item from a company that culturally appropriates. What do I do? That was the first signal that I was getting myself into something completely different than the "SJ world" I created for myself and am trying to create for my growing family. Based on my brief personal experiences and observations, here are some main things I've noticed about BW in the U.S. that comes in direct conflict with my SJ values.Â
This topic is definitely discussed in some BW spaces, but not enough. And, of course, any CA discussion brings in the chorus of It's not theft, it's INSPIRATION! Racism isn't a real thing. Race has nothing to do with BW. But I think it's pretty! So I'm a bad person because I like my Oscha?Â
A remaining aspect that still feels problematic to me is the practice of: "this person from x group created this textile, so we can now wear it and it is not CA." Here are some of my thoughts on this:
- Ownership, permission, and sharing are main tenets of anti-CA practices. Honoring the ownership of the products, belief of a marginalized group; being granted permission to use/carry out said products/beliefs; and there being a spirit of sharing AFTER ownership was honored/recognized/credited and permission was granted.Â
-When we have a wrap created by person of x group, it seems at first glance that there is ownership/permission/sharing. I offer: if a person from a privileged group - y group- responsible for the systematic marginalization of people from x group wears a wrap with a pattern created by a person of x group, does that not perpetuate the practice of people from y groups wearing alllll the wraps of allll the marginalized groups? I feel it is too easy for me to go to a BW meetup with a wrap with textiles not from my own cultural group, and for a BWer with no desire to learn about CA politics and anti-racism to go, "hey that is super pretty! I'm gonna add to my extensive appropriated wrap collection now!" In this instance, it becomes clear that ownership/permission/sharing becomes easily lost in a large, competitive market like BW and woven wraps. Most people are gonna be assholes about CA and actively resist and gaslight people who speak out against CA. Therefore, how sustainable is it for us to wear textiles created/inspired by from groups that aren't our own, if it may indirectly perpetuate CA in other instances?
But to complicate the narrative: at the same time, if we see European brands -cough cough Natibaby cough cough Hoppediz- actively exploit marginalized groups without ownership/permission/sharing, why wouldn't we support a member of x group creating something from their heritages, because it's better than a mega-business/corporation completely stealing from their cultural groups? My kneejerk reaction would be, of course! I'd rather support the person from x group's creation and products rather than exploitative mega businesses who have no interest in collaborating with x groups.Â
But how do we keep track of ownership/permission/sharing? For me, I still refrain from wearing patterns clearly from cultural groups that are not my own, because of my own principles and also because I do not want to inadvertently perpetuate CA practices. In fact, I even go as far as to not wear any calavera print products, because of my white-presenting privileges and the fact that most people will assume me to be a white woman wearing "sugar skulls" and go "oh wow, that is so cool! I'm gonna get one too!"- and not think about anti-CA or anti-racism. It's too slippery of a slope, in my perspective.Â
Capitalism and Consumerism
As a former socialist/remaining anti-capitalist, the BW market was a complete and total trip to me. But I dove into it, and hard. Because while I'm anti-capitalism, I recognize that I life it every day, and I am complicit with capitalism. My credit cards are happy. My mental peace about our finances are not.
Many moments in the past few months, I've had to tell myself to pause and say "why am I lusting after this wrap? Why am I crushed that I missed the release? Why am I emanating so much bitterness and jealousy when I see pictures of people who scored? Why do I feel like I am lacking something when I have more than several wraps already?" I've had to take these psychological steps in order to ward off toxic consumerism; and I'll be honest, it doesn't always work. I offer a perspective that our postpartum struggles, the struggle we have in getting social and even private recognition and validation for our psychological turbulence as new parents or parents of multiple children, becomes channeled into some heavy-duty turbulence. Scoring is a high. Chasing an unicorn is a high. Petting a new purchase is a high. Taking 500 selfies with new wraps is a high. But when we crash, we crash. How many of us have felt very alone in those crashes? I think we should talk about that some more. And for others living out SJ principles, we should talk about how to honestly unpack and be resilient about the daily effects engaging capitalism has on our mental well-being.Â
Though there are deeply divisive perspectives on this issue, a main struggle I still have after a few months participating in the market is the concept of "market value" (MV). No matter how you slice it to me, the way I react to MV practices is that it's a grossly capitalistic way to exploit consumerist desires and obsessions/fetishizations. To rob the opportunity of others to pay retail or below because of high desirability is not okay. When done to make a profit, it's rooted in an individualistic pursuit that leans on the loss of another person. Now, others have said that they do MV to fund emergencies, dire situations. I would react by saying that this is part of the cycle. Fostering product fetishization, marking up products from their retail prices, creating a culture of consumerism, exacerbates dire family situations that need funds. What if we kept costs low and brands didn't play off on the psychology of materialism by hyping up new, limited releases? What if we were operating in a culture of care and collectivism instead of competition and scarcity? For those reasons, I do not price my resales at MV. I price at retail or below. I try to avoid the higher-end wraps, though I am continually tempted. But I work on living out values of collectivism rather than scarcity.Â
It also is worth a mention that consumerism and materialism takes us far, far away from the BIPOC [Black, Indigenous, and Peoples of Color] roots of BW. Very far away. It makes act of BW shells of their long, ancestral heritages. And that in itself is an injustice.Â
Like I often have received, I'm sure some will read this thinking I am angry, I am unrealistic, I need to bend. That's okay- those reactions are their own usual chorus. I share my thoughts out of, I feel, duty. There are many more layers and aspects of BW that require critique and unpacking. I believe we need to make those topics public discourse in the BW community. Because when we do this, we are actively honoring the roots of BW, and resisting it becoming commodified, whitewashed, decontextualized, gentrified. And I personally feel it is my responsibility to do it as the product of my lineages. I hope more will join in an create an authentic decolonial BW movement.Â