fluffle_puff (pedophile/groomer)
google doc version:
!! content warning for the following being mentioned (nothing explicit shown) !!
pedophilia/grooming
sex between minors and an adult
fluffle_puff is a predator who has gotten away with grooming underaged girls for over a decade. he groomed his current girlfriend when she was 15 and then had sex with another 16 year old girl. he was in his late 20s to early 30s with both victims. both still talk to him and believe he’s innocent due to his manipulation of them.
fluffle (will be referred to as mike) started grooming his current girlfriend- befishprod- when she was 15 years old and he was 27. befish had a typical teenaged crush on him, mike indulged this and ADMITS he liked her romantically at this time, and then became romantically involved with her despite her being underaged + himself being 11 ½ years older than her. this is textbook grooming behavior by pedophiles and a huge abuse of power.
mike himself admits in his server that he was interested in her when she was 15 (and very likely lying about dating her later). regardless, he started dating her when she was a underaged and expressed interest in her as a partner years earlier. he tries to brush it off as a “complicated situation” and “nothing happened before 18” when rightfully confronted.
(screenshot source; video below, also contains a recording where befish verbally confirms/talks about it, which is what lead to it becoming public. it’s not necessary to watch the whole video, it’s just here for context/evidence: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=IyJ7Ps5CkHQ)
the second victim, starsystarshine, met mike via befish and developed a crush on him; she was 16 and he was 29. since befish turned 18, she and mike took a “break” from dating, and mike used this opportunity to groom starsy. he then met her in person to have sex with her.
some messages she exchanged with him from an anonymous source. these are FULL of emotional manipulation from mike. I physically felt ill reading the last two.
I spent years trying to help starsy recognize her abuse by mike, as she kept blaming herself, but she fled back to him right after I made my first tweet about his grooming. that’s why I’m not keeping her anonymous anymore; they are back to talking, thus she is still in danger.
this was my last conversation with her about mike, at the end of the month she suddenly blocked me and I noticed that mike was suddenly following her on twitter again. the way she switches between blaming him and herself shows she still suffers trauma from his actions.
neither of the girls are at fault; they were two teenagers who developed immature feelings for a grown man who took advantage of their young, impressionable nature to satisfy his sick attraction. I don’t doubt he has taken advantage of even more teenaged girls behind the scenes.
and if any weirdo freaks try to argue: “um, actually!!! mike’s home state says age of consent is 16 so it’s actually perfectly fine!!!” - it is not, as mike is a figure of authority! he has always had power over both befish and starsy, and he abused it for sex.
the law isn’t always right, either: it’s illegal to own more than 6 dildos in texas. you think that’s a logical law, lmao? federal law also states one must be 18 to purchase/view/engage in erotic/pornographic content, and that should apply to the age of consent as well. if you think it’s normal for a 16 year old to be having sex with someone 10+ years older than them, you are- frankly- a sick pervert.
mike’s platform/power over these girls is what’s prevented him from being rightfully called out as a pedophile for so long. both victims are still in his grasp & fully believe they’re at fault for having sex with him. they were underaged. they could not consent. mike knew this.
this is unquestionably an abuse of power by a grown man with large internet influence and recognizability. very few know about this & I’m tired of it being slept on. I can only imagine how many other teenagers he groomed that no one else knows about.
don’t harass befish or starsy. they need help, not condemnation. they are victims and need help seeing that, not condemnation.
