You don't know shit about ass
Stop being miserable online. Find joy okay
I don’t know shit about ass????
Stranger Things
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
Claire Keane
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
AnasAbdin
taylor price
trying on a metaphor

Janaina Medeiros

shark vs the universe
hello vonnie
Sade Olutola
Game of Thrones Daily
Peter Solarz
One Nice Bug Per Day
$LAYYYTER

@theartofmadeline
h
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

祝日 / Permanent Vacation
Monterey Bay Aquarium
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Kazakhstan
seen from Germany
seen from T1

seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from Spain
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Canada

seen from Malaysia
seen from Canada

seen from Canada
seen from Kuwait

seen from Australia
seen from Germany
seen from India
@digichips
You don't know shit about ass
Stop being miserable online. Find joy okay
I don’t know shit about ass????
you cant be talking like that bi woman
support bi women who aren’t attracted to women 🌼
Straight women*
Something I've seen in fandom spaces sometimes is people saying "Shipping this canon lesbian with a man is lesbophobic...unless you see the man as transfem."
Soooo all anyone has to say is "I headcanon [male character] as a he/him butch transfem" on all their shipping content with a canon lesbian character and a male character, and they're good to go? Maybe place a trans and lesbian pin somewhere on the male character's clothing? Impressive loophole. And anyone who complains about it can be called transphobes.
walls of text about the supposed internalized misogyny of yaoi fangirls and nobody considers maybe heterosexual women who are attracted to men just like to see two men fuck. because they are attracted to men. and aren't interested in f/f pairings because they are not attracted to women. does anybody hear me. it's dark in here.
Bruh...what's with all the incestual shit in anime lately? Four times I have started watching an anime made in the 2020s then BAM! There's a female character who's disturbingly obsessed with her brother or male character who's disturbingly obsessed with his sister. Awful bonus: one anime I watched had incestual implications between an adult and child...
I keep seeing the thumbnail for that “how Mean Girls demonizes hyperfeminity” video on YouTube, and I don’t want to form an opinion on something that my bone-deep revulsion prevents me from watching, but Jesus Christ.
There was a post on here to that effect a few years ago, also listing Heathers, Clueless and High School Musical as examples of “demonized femininity” while Elle Woods’ femininity is celebrated, and aside from my constant aggravation by this reactionary trend of a non-issue where everyone is pretending being feminine is under attack and women being gnc/butch is somehow more accepted, I think it’s interesting to note here that the feminine characters in question here are demonized for being bullies. Specifically the kind of bully that terrorizes other girls for, among other things, not adhering sufficiently to standards of femininity in the social panopticon-like paradigm we frequently see where women socially punish and ostracize one another for not meeting patriarchal standards sufficiently. It happened offscreen, but Regina tormented Janis into a mental health crisis for dressing alt and (possibly) being a lesbian, hence incorrectly female. They bully other girls for being insufficiently pretty, thin, fashionable, white, heterosexual. (Interestingly, if you look at some of cinema’s famous male bullies, your Biff Tannens et cetera, there’s an equivalent of choosing targets due to perceived failures of masculinity!)
The Let Women Be Feminine brigade rushing to these bullies’ defense, claiming they're only demonized for femininity and frequently calling the characters targeted by the hyperfeminine bullies “NLOGs” (because, I suspect, they know they can’t quite get away with saying the d-word anymore like they might have in the early 2000s), is very telling. It’s an affirmation and agreement with the bullies, and the essentialist patriarchal standards they’ve internalized and imposed on others.
I'll never buy into the idea that it is misogynistic to not care about gender-conforming female characters. The role of "Femininity" is be the dumping ground for servicial and boring traits, but instead of acknowledging that, people have taken to claim it's anti-feminist to not find them interesting.
And of course people do subconsciously know that "feminine" are the boring traits and "masculine" are the interesting traits. Because it doesn't matter how you present a female character, if she has charisma, assertiveness, dominance, has ambitions of power or pursues knowledge, etc. then people WILL say she has a masculine personality, on the other hand if she's dainty, weak, servicial, only ambition is having children or taking care of others, etc. They will say she has a feminine personality. But if you say the latter is not interesting you will be accused of "hating women that behave like women" as if saying THAT isn't misogynistic. Even when the latter character has more going on for her that you enjoy, ppl will criticize you if you "ignore her feminine side" aka the boring stuff.
There will ALWAYS be countless people complaining any time a female character exists that rejects a feminine role, it's just that now people learned to call it misogynistic to pretend to be progressive. Like when ppl complain X character would rather go fight or work outside (or any "masculine" role) instead of doing "women's work" and they will wax poetics about how important to society this "women's work" is. No matter how many times you correctly point out women's labor is objectively beneficial to society, that changes nothing if it is BORING. Chances are the story IS about cool battles and the female character deciding to be part of it is simply her remaining where the camera is at.
Everyone's always like "give it up for the soft girls and the sweet girls in fiction, all we ever get is abrasive girls in fiction these days" but like that's not even true??? We just get badly written girls with no personality and whenever there IS a true abrasive girl she gets torn apart by everyone on the internet. And frankly the number of times I've seen people be "oh I'm so happy we've finally gotten a female character in touch with her feminine side" is making me think there's a lot more than you guys are letting on anyway can we all stop being weird and just demand well-written female characters of any kind.
Reasons I think the hate campaign against JKR was successful in online spaces to the point that engaging with Harry Potter will get you labeled as a "bad person". Unlike engaging with Neil Gaiman's works, as Good Omens was trending recently.
Males, specifically TIMs, are leading the vilification of JKR. The trans-supporting women and girls see TIMs as the most oppressed of all 4ever and see the TIMs as an authority on all things oppression, so are following along.
These males send rape and death threats and I think the women and girls coming across that want to avoid their wrath. So if they are still interested in Harry Potter, they keep it on the down low.
JKR invalidates the TIPs genderfeels which directly affects them, unlike Neil Gaiman being a rapist which only affects some woman they don't know or care about.
It's mostly women making it known that Neil is a rapist. Some people might get scolded for still engaging in his works, but are probably not going to get rape threats (would be tone-deaf) or death threats.
And of course, JKR is a woman while Neil is a man. A man can be criminal and people will say separate the art from the artist. A woman can just have opinions you don't like and people will say she deserves to die and anyone who still likes her works will be deemed bad by association.
Even so, Harry Potter is popular worldwide and remains popular. Regular people who aren't terminally online continue to enjoy the franchise and buy related products. The hate campaign hasn't affected her sales. And even some TRAs virtue-signal how much they hate JKR while still enjoying Harry Potter, whether openly or in secret.
Hot take, but I don't think there's as many bisexual women on AO3 as many people insist. Not to the point that they outnumber straight women.
This came up due to seeing people complain about m/m vs. f/f in regards to the amount of fics on AO3. The claim being that most people on AO3 are bisexual when it comes to orientation, due to some demographic survey results floating around. And since that is the case, there should be near equal amounts of m/m and f/f fic on AO3.
And to that I say:
The whole "girl claims to be bisexual to seem cool" never truly died. At least not online, where you can say anything you want about yourself without it being true. It's kinda gotten worse due to the rise of gender ideology and the "queer" community being treated like a cool kids club for anyone who wants to be considered counterculture.
Bisexuality has been redefined by some as "a person attracted to 2 or more genders" So a woman attracted to "cismen" and "AMAB enbies" would be attracted to 2 genders. If she follows trans logic, she would probably consider herself bisexual even though she's straight.
There are straight women and girls who either mistakenly or try to convince themselves that they are also attracted to women. For example, a girl thinking because she likes the way a girl looks aesthetically, that must equal attraction to girls. Or a women believing if she was drunk enough, she could hypothetically kiss another women for men at a party, which supposedly equals attraction to women. Or the women and girls who are more interested in the wlw aesthetic of "girls are uwu soft~ skipping in a flower meadow holding hands~" and start calling themselves bi because of that.
Also other numbers on these surveys should count as part of the hetero category:
The effects of the "fujo discourse" from the 2010s can still be felt. Straight women and girls are seen as "evil yucky fetishizers hurting the poor gay men" by creating and enjoying m/m content. They feel ashamed and start believing that the "real" reason they like m/m so much is because they are actually a gay man. So a portion of the survey results that answered gay for orientation should be part of the hetero orientation.
On one survey I saw, "queer" as a option was the 2nd highest result behind bisexual. So yeah, a good portion of those people are actually straight.
At any rate, the majority of the world is straight, so it stands to reason that most people in fandom spaces overall will be straight too. The majority of AO3's user base is female. Straight women and girls are gonna be more interested in creating or reading m/m than f/f since they are only attracted to males.
"I'm a bi woman and my boyfriend is also bi, so we're a queer couple."
Hetero relationship.
"I'm a transman and I'm dating a transwomen, and since we're both trans, we're a queer couple."
Hetero relationship.
"I'm a transman dating a cisman and we're SO gay!"
Hetero relationship.
I'm a woman dating a transwoman and we're both lesbians!"
Hetero relationship.
"I'm a AFAB nonbinary person dating a AMAB nonbinary person and we're very queer!"
Hetero relationship.
"I'm a woman dating a man and we're very kinky, so we're queer!"
Hetero relationship.
"I'm a woman dating a man who likes painting his nails, so that means we're-"
Hetero relationship.
Female x Male = Hetero relationship. It doesn't matter how different and unconventional you think your relationship is from most hetero couples. It's primarily women I see insisting their hetero relationship is not like the others and is "queer" because it's not blatantly based on Christian tradcon values.
And yeah I get that bi people don't stop being bi when they're in a relationship with the opposite sex. But a female person dating a male person still makes the relationship itself hetero.
Okay, so you know the "gay trans men" who say things like "ew fujos don't interact, I don't want you fetishizing me!"
For one, it's a cope. These straight TIFs don't want to be seen as a "yucky fujo" and once they start thinking they are a gay man, they become self-righteous about liking m/m content. Then it leads these TIFs to denigrating straight girls who didn't delude themselves into thinking they are gay boys for liking m/m content.
But I also wonder if it's a roundabout way for these TIFs to express their disgust at the thought of a woman being attracted to them.
I come across tiktoks of these kinds of TIFs sometimes and they look like typical girls/women. They don't even have short hair nor dress in a masc way, so it's really hard to believe they think straight women would be interested in them.
But it is possible for a lesbian or bi woman/girl to be attracted to them regardless of how the TIF styles herself.
So maybe it feels good for these TIFs to be all, "ugh go away girls, I'm a gay boy, I like boys!" because they see lesbians and bi women/girls as gross, predatory or creepy.
People calling Kr/sie and Kr/selle sapphic ships is both a cope and a lie. I guarantee most of the shippers see Kris as male and thus, most of the time, they are het ships.
While there are shippers that are honest about seeing Kris as male (namely the male fans that treat Kris as a self-insert to be paired with the girl they prefer), a lot of shippers that refer to Kris as they/them still see Kris as biologically male, and it's evident in how artists draw Kris' appearance.
The cope comes from many of the shippers liking those two ships more than S/selle, the actual sapphic ship. I guess they feel bad about it, (and to be frank, a lot of f/f shippers act bitter about it and sometimes shame people over it) so they insist that pairing a they/them character with a female character is automatically sapphic. And just like that, they love yuri or whatever.
I may be swinging a bat at a hornet's nest with this post, but there's this sentiment on here that i've been starting to see increasingly more often and it's starting to piss me off.
It's the notion that the popularity of M/M ships compared to F/F ships within a fandom indicates a fandom-wide problem with misogyny of some sort.
I really thought this was common knowledge, but uh. People who engage in fandom culture online and people who write fanfiction as a hobby overwhelmingly happen to be people who are attracted to men. These are hobbies that tend to be quite common among women, actually. And the majority of women in the world are straight women.
Logically it might seem that if there are this many women who think yaoi is hot pumping out these fics then surely there must be men who think girl on girl is hot who would be pumping out F/F fics at a similar rate, but comparatively there aren't a lot of straight men who get into the hobby of writing fanfiction for some reason.
It could be because straight men tend to go to video sites for their porn instead, whereas women are more likely to consume porn in the form of erotica. It could be because women are more likely to engage in the fandom practice known as "shipping" for the same reasons why romance novels tend to be more popular among women than they are among men. It could be because they see that these online spaces tend to predominately consist of women and so they decide not to engage with it because it's a "girly hobby". Who knows.
But since the majority of people who write fanfiction happen to be women and the majority of women happen to be attracted to men, it's kind of a no-brainer that the majority of fics are going to be M/M. Like no shit.
And since gay men are less likely to avoid "girly shit" than straight men are and they are also attracted to men, their presence is also going to be adding to the amount of M/M fics there are.
And if people are attracted to men, of course men kissing each other and fucking each other is what they're gonna wanna read and write about. That's what they think is hot.
And part of why this narrative that M/M is more common than F/F because of misogynistic reasons is weird to me is because it sort of insinuates that it's misogynistic to be attracted to men. And not only is that notion homophobic, it's kind of misogynistic in and of itself because the majority of people who are attracted to men happen to be women.
What got me to write all this was seeing a post on my dash that had a screenshot showing the total number of spamtenna fics that are on AO3 alongside the number of suselle and krusie fics, and saying that the discrepency was because people don't wanna relate to or engage with female characters.
Like buddy, you are using shipping as a metric for that. Within a female-dominated hobby. And someone not being attracted to women doesn't mean that they hate women. If someone is attracted to men and not women, of course men kissing and having sex is what they're going to find more captivating than women kissing and having sex. And that's what shipping is, it's making fictional characters kiss and have sex.
If you're a woman who likes women I can understand how that might make you feel isolated within fandom spaces, since you are a minority within that space. But technically men who like men are also a minority within fandom spaces, they just share something in common with straight women that allows them to find community with each other: being attracted to men. And they can't really help being attracted to men. What causes the discrepency between the amount of F/F fics and the amount of M/M fics is really the lack of straight men within these spaces, because the majority of people in the world are straight. And is more straight men in these spaces really what you want?
Also, what's actually stopping you from writing a suselle fic. Seriously. There is no force of censorship out there that prevents F/F fics from being written that doesn't also prevent M/M fics from being written.
Fanfics on AO3 are not like cakes on display in a bakery that has a limited amount of display room; there can be as many cakes as you want there to be. Just because a lot of people there who like chocolate cake are making chocolate cakes doesn't mean they're forcing you to have chocolate cake or make chocolate cakes, and it doesn't mean they're stopping you from making any other kind of cake. There just happens to be a lot of people who like chocolate cake.
It's really, truly not that deep.
like who cares but it is amusing when i see posts that are like “nobody understands how severe fandom misogyny is” and im like true but the thing OP is talking about is always like. f/f vs m/m fic statistics. which like ok but something something the asylum where they raised me etc
"How can you be gender critical while watching this show or playing this game? The creator supports trans rights/has trans characters/is trans!!"
Because I don't care about the creator's pro-trans views. I don't care if the creator is a TIF or TIM either. It will usually have no bearing on whether or not I'll like their content. And I can disagree with their views while watching a TV show or playing a video game they created. The creator can even be obnoxious about their trans support yelling "terfs can't watch my show!" or whatever. It's nothing but virtue-signaling anyway. The creator knows full well they can't stop anyone from consuming their public creations.
Usually if there is a character under the trans umbrella, it's in the form of a they/them character who's gender identity has no relevance to the plot (and isn't necessarily meant to be nonbinary), so it doesn't matter to me. If a character starts explaining their nonbinary identity to another character, then I'll fast-forward through it, since I already know the explanation will be drivel and nonsense.
Now if there is a main character who has a whole "trans journey" plotline going "woe is me, people won't respect my genderfeels" that's focused on a lot? Then yeah I won't watch it. I tried before and it was unbearable.