THAT is big dick energy
hello vonnie
we're not kids anymore.

blake kathryn
will byers stan first human second

gracie abrams
trying on a metaphor
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
Noah Kahan

★

@theartofmadeline

titsay
KIROKAZE

roma★
cherry valley forever

shark vs the universe
almost home
Today's Document

JVL
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
taylor price

seen from Bosnia & Herzegovina
seen from United States

seen from Canada

seen from Malaysia
seen from France

seen from Belgium

seen from United States

seen from Vietnam
seen from United States

seen from Indonesia

seen from T1

seen from Canada
seen from France

seen from Austria
seen from United States
seen from France
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United Kingdom
@dr-adhd
THAT is big dick energy
I can’t stop laughing at Carrie being told “NO” by Mark. Also, Harrison Always Knows Best.
This is from a documentary called “From Star Wars to Jedi” released in 1983. Thanks @wookieekisses because I found that bit thanks to your post!
They’re figuring out the beats of the scene –while Harrison is tied up–.
So what Mark said about them basically having to make everything up themselves (with Harrison as impromptu leader) is true.
The original films were only good by accident and thats why none of the prequels or sequels worked
The original films were good because a lot of non-George-Lucas people worked hard to make them so. Carrie, Mark and Harrison fixing the dialogue wasn’t an ‘accident’. Marcia Lucas didn’t fix three films in edit by ‘accident’.
The prequels and sequels didn’t work because they thought that George Lucas was the genius behind the films, when they were a success despite him, not because of him.
Transgender lesbian woman tears gender stereotypes apart in viral video
You have probably heard it before: “Wearing a dress does not make you a woman!”
Over at twitter, Eva, a lesbian transgender woman, published this amazing video in response, showing the world what kind of stupid stereotype this is (embedded above).
Eva writes:
Jokes aside, early on in transition I would worry so much about if I wasn’t trans enough because I genuinely enjoyed some of the ways I was masculine before I came out.
Re-contextualizing that through the frame of lesbian masculinity has made me feel so much more at ease, and it’s made me so much more comfortable with those parts of myself than as I ever did trying to express them as a man.
I love my shoulders. I love my arms, my muscles. I love wearing suits. I love being tall. I love having a deeper voice. I love having a strong jawline. I also love having long hair, gentle curves, and painting inch long wings over my eyes. I love being trans
Via LGBTQ Nation.
"Weird energy in here today" I say, referring to the inside of my brain.
It’s going to be a bad night.
Look, if it’s a real ghost, the busters get custody. If it’s just a real estate developer in a costume it’s out of their jurisdiction so we gotta hand things off to these meddling kids and their dog.
How is it that the ghostbusters get first crack at it in your mind? How many mysteries have they solved? You got any idea how much shit they’d get in for frying some disgruntled insurance salesman with a metric fuckton of nuclear plasma, killing him instantly? No, fam–the scooby gang’s going in first, and if it turns out it’s a legit ghost, they call in the ‘busters to SWAT its ass. That’s how it works.
This is like order of operations but for supernatural shit instead of math
mornings in republic city
< Gasps softly <3_<3
Oooooo. This looks DELIGHTFUL.
:D
If there is lesbian romance in this series I shall definitely be watching it
I am already getting gay vibes here so I hope I’m right
Here’s the unfortunate news about this show...
Producer, Joss Whedon
Nooooooooooooooooooooo
hey guys what’s the plan for that harry potter tv series that’s coming up. how do we use it to fuck jkr so far up the ass she turns into professor sprout. what’s the move i’m ready and i want to punch terfs so what are we doing
i sent a time sensitive email. immediately forgot about it. and missed the reply that was sent 5 minutes later. so i my reply was an hour later and now it’s been another hour and they haven’t gotten back to me and i think it’s too late.
the culprit
The Structure of Story now available! Check it out on Amazon, via the link in our bio, or at https://kiingo.co/book
.
.
.
We previously explored how dramatic tension, dramatic irony, and promises can be used to keep the audience engaged. These are essential tools to have in our quest to write a great story. Now, let's learn about another dramatic tool: mystery.
A mystery arises when desired information is missing.
When the storyteller implicitly promises that missing information will be revealed (i.e. that a mystery will be solved), the audience typically wants to stick around for the reveal of the information.
When we think of mysteries in the context of story, we typically think of the detective story. There may have been a crime of some sort and the "detective" character is tasked with identifying the criminal and unraveling the crime (by uncovering the missing information).
This type of story is what we might call an "active" mystery. But there can also be "passive" mysteries. Let's consider both.
Active Mystery
An active mystery is the kind we associate with the mystery genre. A character feels they *need* specific information in order to carry out some other plan or to accomplish some other goal.
For instance, consider a scenario where a character's spouse was killed. Now the character wants justice. But they don't know who the killer is. We've now created an active mystery. Missing information (i.e. the identity of the killer) is needed in order to reach another goal (i.e. to get justice).
A character may need to know the location of an object, the identity of a criminal, the identity of a victim, or how a crime occurred, etc. They may need this information in order to seek revenge, recover a valuable item, save someone, fix a vulnerability, etc.
With an active mystery, a character typically knows exactly what they're looking for. Their larger goal drives them.
Passive Mystery
A passive mystery is the kind where a character is unwinding a thread of mysteries as they pursue their curiosity. They typically don't know *exactly* what they're looking for. They just know they've found a trail of breadcrumbs and it appears to be leading somewhere interesting.
Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone finds the main characters pursuing a passive mystery. We may find passive mysteries more often in children's books, where childlike curiosity drives the "detective".
Raising a passive mystery is all about presenting obscured, partial, clouded, and veiled information. We want to show a piece of the whole.
An example of a passive mystery is when someone says something like, "There are only two sources I trust—and one of them is my cat." Another example is when we hear one side of a juicy conversation but critical pieces are being left out.
The other key to creating a passive mystery is to ensure that the "detective" is naturally curious. Perhaps they have a childlike curiosity or imagination.
With a passive mystery, a character typically *doesn't* know exactly what they're looking for. Their curiosity drives them.
Mystery vs. Thriller
As far as genres go, a mystery becomes a thriller once suspense is introduced. In other words, there has to be an active element of impending danger in order for a mystery to become a thriller. This is typically driven by an opponent/antagonist. We'll explore thrillers in the future.
A mystery is a powerful tool in our dramatic toolbox to keep the audience seeking more information. Let's look at how we can create active m
hey guys maybe next time you call out a terf you can put the 1500 screenshots of transmisogynistic hate speech under a cut. providing evidence is important ig but just putting that on the dashes of your trans and especially transfem followers with no warning can be wildly triggering and is not okay. just a thought
for anyone who is maybe not totally literate in how tumblr works (anyone like me) i would like to expand on this a little bit, just in case you just need someone to tell you how to do these things. i myself only recently learned most of this, so i totally understand. here’s what op is referring to:
cuts
a “cut” in terms of tumblr posts is when a poster will intentionally cut off the last part of a post and give the reader the option of a) clicking on the post to read the rest of it or b) scrolling past. once i learned how to do it i started putting them on pretty much any of my posts that were getting too long. i have a short attention span and have a hard time reading long posts, so i wanted to give people that option, but it can also be used for other reasons, such as to separate possibly triggering content like op says. to add one to a post, all you have to do is hit enter, type :readmore: (EXACTLY that, it’s basically just coding), and then press enter again. if you do it right it should turn into a dotted line, and then everything underneath it will only be visible if the reader wants to see it.
tw tags
tw (trigger warning) tags are important because as a tumblr user, not only can you follow tags you like, but you can block tags you dislike. so when posting or reblogging something that can be triggering (such as transphobia), you can make sure you’re doing your part to protect your friends and other tumblr users by identifying these triggers in the tags. it’s not really enough to just mention it in the post, because it can and will still show up on their dash. try to tag as many variants of the tw as you can. (ex: #tw transphobia #transphobia #tw transphobe #transphobe #tw transphobic #transphobic #tw terfs #terfs). you can then add any other tags to your heart’s content.
terfs
i actually encountered a terf (trans exclusionary radical feminist) for the first time on my own blog today. they referred to one of my poems as “dumb and gross”, and i went to investigate their blog because i couldn’t imagine what could cause such a response. a very small portion of it was outright transphobia, and if i hadn’t scrolled far enough i may not have figured it out. so, when trying to identify a terf, here are some red flags to watch out for:
misandry. it can be cleverly disguised as feminism if you don’t know any better, and terfs do this in a couple of ways. they may insinuate that men are inherently bad, i.e. ‘men trying to attract women is predatory’, even though wanting to be attractive is a natural human desire.
anti-porn, anti sex work, or anti-bdsm. while i agree that the sex industry does have a lot of unresolved issues, terfs believe that all porn is anti-woman, that bdsm is “abuse” or “trauma training”, even though it is performed between two consenting adults, and that sex workers are victims of male desire. for example, i saw a post where someone complained they could no longer support a leftist local band because the lead singer had promoted his girlfriend’s onlyfans account, and this was equated to him selling her. yikes
gatekeeping feminist issues. for example, feminists believe that wearing makeup is a personal choice. terfs may take this to an extreme and say that wearing makeup of any kind is bad because it reinforces the idea that a woman’s natural face is not good enough, and will cite the patriarchy. this is just an example, but terfs can do this with almost anything so long as it’s fairly commonplace, regardless of how other women may feel about it. see also: styling hair, shaving/waxing, skirts. all of which are personal choices
islamophobia. terfs will insist that muslim women are forced to wear hijab, as well as completely misinterpret countless other aspects of muslim culture. i say this as a woman who was raised christian. it is so obvious. they will lament that women wear such “oppressive” clothes and emphasize how brave ex-hijabis are. i know exactly who needs to hear this but wearing hijab is a personal choice, muslim women’s clothing choices do not concern you, and many muslim women see the hijab as liberating: it means she is in charge of who can look at her.
a disproportionate emphasis on women’s issues. terfs may ignore any feminist issue that doesn’t specifically center around women. feminism is the idea that everyone should be equal and free of the confines of the patriarchy, regardless of your orientation, race, or gender identity. feminism doesn’t discriminate, but terfs do. they may dismiss the crisis that is men’s mental health, even though that crisis is a direct result of the patriarchy and that everyone—yes, even men—suffer under it. they may dismiss the struggles of a minority group in order to highlight women’s issues, i.e. a post i saw complaining that black people could vote before women could.
and of course, unacceptance of other gender identities. this may present in the form of “women positivity posts” that center a little too much around typical female anatomy, or stating that women have “gender trauma” while ignoring the trauma and struggles of trans and non-binary folk.
this is not everything to watch out for, just off the top of my head. of course if you have anything you can add please do! go forth and destroy terfs, and keep your friends safe while you’re at it.
Missing you already…
:(
I hope she comes back to see them again soon
Demolish the nuclear family norm. Destroy the idea that your only option is to live alone until you move in with a romantic partner with the intention of marrying.
Realize that burdens are easier shared, and humans aren’t solitary creatures. Remember that living with others you can share resources, share skills, share responsibility.
If you are dreading the idea of living alone, realize you don’t have to.
Move in with your friends, create your own little commune. Support eachother and split costs. Complement eachothers shortcomings. Be there for eachother. Coexist.
Dealing With Executive Dysfunction - A Masterpost
The “getting it done in an unconventional way” method.
The “it’s not cheating to do it the easy way” method.
The “fuck what you’re supposed to do” method.
The “get stuff done while you wait” method.
The “you don’t have to do everything at once” method.
The “it doesn’t have to be permanent to be helpful” method.
The “break the task into smaller steps” method.
The “treat yourself like a pet” method.
The “it doesn’t have to be all or nothing” method.
The “put on a persona” method.
The “act like you’re filming a tutorial” method.
The “you don’t have to do it perfectly” method.
The “wait for a trigger” method.
The “do it for your future self” method.
The “might as well” method.
The “when self discipline doesn’t cut it” method.
The “taking care of yourself to take care of your pet” method.
The “make it easy” method.
The “junebugging” method.
The “just show up” method.
The “accept when you need help” method.
The “make it into a game” method.
The “everything worth doing is worth doing poorly” method.
The “trick yourself” method.
The “break it into even smaller steps” method.
The “let go of should” method.
The “your body is an animal you have to take care of” method.
The “fork theory” method.
The “effectivity over aesthetics” method.
I honestly don’t understand why there aren’t more people who, when given the platform to discuss minimum wage, don’t simply distill it to the simplest of facts:
A forty hour work week is considered full time.
It’s considered as such because it takes up the amount of time we as a society have agreed should be considered the maximum work schedule required of an employee. (this, of course, does not always bear out practically, but just follow me here)
A person working the maximum amount of time required should earn enough for that labor to be able to survive. Phrased this way, I doubt even most conservatives could effectively argue against it, and out of the mouth of someone verbally deft enough to dance around the pathos-based jabs conservative pundits like to use to avoid actually debating, it could actually get opps thinking.
Therefore, if an employee is being paid less than [number of dollars needed for the post-tax total to pay for the basic necessities in a given area divided by forty] per hour, they are being ripped off and essentially having their labor, productivity, and profit generation value stolen by their employer.
Wages are a business expense, and if a company cannot afford to pay for its labor, it is by definition a failing business. A company stealing labor to stay afloat (without even touching those that do so simply to increase profit margins and/or management/executive pay/bonuses) is no more ethical than a failing construction company breaking into a lumber yard and stealing wood.
Our goal as a society should be to protect each other, especially those that most need protection, not to subsidize failing businesses whose owners could quite well subsidize them on their own.
Wages are a business expense, and if a company cannot afford to pay for its labor, it is by definition a failing business. A company stealing labor to stay afloat (without even touching those that do so simply to increase profit margins and/or management/executive pay/bonuses) is no more ethical than a failing construction company breaking into a lumber yard and stealing wood.
Always reblog.