There is a lot I want to comment on right now, but I don't have the time
Except for this one little gem in which Stephan Guyenet gets called on for misrepresenting studies, outright lying, and willful inconsistencies he's certainly guilty of and acts like a teenage drama queen:
Now that this matter is settled, I'm going to open up a bit for my last comment.
I realize I said some insulting things about the people who read this blog. To those who didn't deserve it, I apologize.
The reason Peter's posts anger me is that ad hominem attacks like the ones in this post literally have the potential to endanger my personal safety and that of my family and friends. I'm not a particularly paranoid person, but there are some extremely intense zealots on the Internet, and some of them frequent Peter's blog. I won't exaggerate my own importance, but my picture is on the Internet and I am somewhat of a public figure, and it's not that hard to figure out where I work and where I live.
Folks like Peter and "ItsTheWoo" take particular pleasure in whipping others into a frenzy over my work. As a result you get extremely angry people accusing me of being a "bullshit artist" (above) etc. For example, here's one of the many ad hominem attacks Peter flung at me in the post above:
"BTW I notice over on Woo's blog that there has been some discussion as to whether Dr Guyenet is just dumb or being very deliberately misleading, ie conspiring to mislead. I don't do orchestrated conspiracy theories. I don't really do the financial drive thing either, not for some body who is still as wet behind the ears as Dr Guyenet certainly is."
Look, disagree with my views if you want, but my ideas get NIH grants, peer-reviewed publications, and presentations at professional conferences. I do make mistakes sometimes, but I am not a bullshit artist, nor am I dumb or attempting to mislead. With 11 years of full-time research experience under my belt, I am certainly less "wet behind the ears" than Peter who (as far as I know) has no research experience at all.
People post all sorts of nonsense on the Internet, and it isn't my concern. What is my concern is when people fire up the crazies and point them in my direction. I am literally concerned that someone is going to come to my door one of these days and hurt me or my friends/family because someone like Peter went beyond politely disagreeing and into ad hominem territory for his own personal amusement and/or ego defense. I am literally concerned that someone is going to try to stick a knife in my back at AHS while in a Hyperlipid- or "Woo"-fueled rage. It won't be Peter (might be Woo though), but as I said there are a lot of disturbed people out there.
To anticipate my critics, I realize that I went into ad hominem territory in my comments above, but please consider that 1) I do not make ad hominem attacks against Peter in my blog posts, nor do I plan to, and 2) Peter has been provoking me with ad hominem attacks, misleading claims, and fabrications for over a year. As Melissa McEwen said recently, "Sometimes it’s hard to tell if Peter is serious or just trolling". So yes, I was angry, and Peter got what he had coming for a long time.
So please, what I am asking this entire community with all candor, is that you feel free to disagree with me (including on my blog if you choose-- I welcome respectful debate), but stop the ad hominem stuff. It is irresponsible because it literally has the potential to put me and my friends and family in danger, and these kinds of attacks are not constructive and not necessary to make your point.
Good. God. How old are you Stephan? Aren't you in your 30's? What do you think this is, LiveJournal back in the early 00's? What are you going to say next after this little outburst, accusations of libel and making Internet Kill Myself kinds of threats? Grow the fuck up. If I was working on any project with you at all in the professionally I'd be incredibly embarrassed to be remotely associated with you because of your behavior here. You are being pathetic, manipulative and childish. You've been called out for your bullshit but since you can't admit you're ever wrong you pretend you're being Internet Persecuted instead.
If one actually bothers to read Wooo's blog (or Hyperlipid's, for that matter) it's very easy to notice that it's clearly free of threats, with mostly dead on criticisms. If anything CarbInSane is the one who really engaged in obsessive stalker-like nutjob behavior, I'll never forget the email exchange incident between her and Taubes she made public once and I feel bad for anyone who has the misfortune of living around her should they ever get on her bad side. Even worse, Guyenet associates himself with CarbSane, which makes him a complete hypocrite.
For anyone who actually bothers reading this blog, please read the rest of the thread for context, as dumb and long as Guyenet and his allies and enablers helped make it to be.
ETA: Some edits and stuff I should have added earlier, and don't count on me for anything right now due to my current pre-occupation with shallow pursuits.