#DismantleDukePlantation

No title available

PR's Tumblrdome
No title available

bliss lane

pixel skylines
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
Show & Tell

Kiana Khansmith
One Nice Bug Per Day
ojovivo
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵
Noah Kahan
EXPECTATIONS
Interview Vampire Daily
h
d e v o n
hello vonnie
No title available

No title available
NASA
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Netherlands

seen from Malaysia

seen from Germany

seen from India
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from Türkiye

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Brazil

seen from Canada
seen from Türkiye
seen from Brazil
@dukeenrage-blog
#DismantleDukePlantation
#DismantleDukePlantation
#kickoutcavanaugh #dismantledukeplantation
#dumpdepinto #dismantledukeplantation
TAKE OUT THE TRASK
#DUKEYOUAREGUILTY
On August 30, 2014, Duke University Executive Vice President, Tallman Trask hit a parking attendant with his car and hurled anti-Black racial slurs at her before driving away in his silver porsche on his way to watch the Duke/Elon football game. We find it deplorable that it took more than a year for Ms. Underwood to finally get a formal (if completely insincere) apology and hire an attorney to represent her case. Furthermore, it is outraging for us, as students, to discover the shameful lengths that the administration went to in order to silence Ms. Underwood and keep Trask, one of the most influential figures on Duke’s campus—and in Durham and North Carolina at large—from accepting any sort of accountability and facing consequences for the harm he caused.
Notably, this news story surfaced only two days after students were informed that our tuition would increase by 4%, increasing the cost of tuition for one year at Duke to $65,703 [more on prior tuition increase]. These two events are not at all unrelated: in his position as Executive Vice President at Duke, Trask is the principal administrative and financial officer, in charge of university budget, financial affairs, procurement, and debt. This further demonstrates that our university operates within and is totally complicit in systems of oppression such that it allows someone like Trask, who has exhibited a history of violent, bigoted behavior, to not only assume one of the highest levels of university administration, but also to take leadership in decision-making that directly impacts the lives of marginalized students, faculty, and workers.
Trask’s personal and professional history is a perfect example of how Duke has no real investment in bettering the lives of marginalized people. This includes Trask’s direct involvement and instrumental role in the 2005 sexual assault case filed against four Duke lacrosse players, despite personally having past allegations of sexual violence filed against him. He also convenes the advisory group tasked with commemorating Julian F. Abele, the African-American architect who designed much of West Campus, despite his anti-Black bigotry. These stark contradictions reveal what we already know about Duke University as an institution. Time and time again, Duke has chosen cover-ups over change, profit over progress, and its reputation over the safety and wellbeing of its students, workers, and the broader Durham community.
The Office of Institutional Equity conducted an investigation of the case, in an opaque and sparse manner. They did not interview Holloway, a key witness who heard Trask use a racial slur, but they managed to determine that there was not enough evidence to corroborate its use. Allowing a corrupt institution to investigate itself translates into enabling the violence that is fundamental to its very existence. The OIE has never demonstrated any transparency or commitment to ensuring equity and seeking justice; it has a track record of minimizing and hiding harassment and discrimination. In the past, the OIE has retained a housekeeping supervisor accused of harassment and discrimination, has been placed under investigation for a Title IX violation of handling sexual misconduct and harassment, and conducted a meager investigation of workplace discrimination and harassment in the case of former Duke faculty member, Dr. Jason Mendez. The interests of the OIE lie not in the truth or in correcting inequity, but rather in protecting the brand and reputation of Duke; it exists to cover up the structural violence that Duke enacts, instead of naming, bringing to light, and dismantling that violence.
Duke’s administration, and the institutional entities it controls, blatantly disregards the lives of university employees, especially those of contracted workers, staff, and non-tenure faculty. The role of the Duke University Police Department in concealing the information about the incident between Ms. Underwood and Trask highlights the way in which policing exists neither for justice nor safety, but rather to maintain positions of power and protect those who occupy them. DUPD is entrusted with this task. How can we trust this private police department to “keep us safe” when the people who are supposedly endowed with that responsibility are dedicated to upholding structures of domination that exist and thrive off of violence against so many of us? We see then how the state and capital come together in insidious ways in order to uphold capitalist white supremacist hetero cis-patriarchy—a private police force, embodying the legitimacy of a state institution, refused to issue the report Ms. Underwood was legally entitled to and purposefully omitted the details that would otherwise hold Trask publicly accountable for his violent, racist actions.
The fact that Steve McLaurin, the owner of McLaurin Parking and Transportation, called Ms. Underwood on her personal phone number for the first time with an intention to intimidate her into settling for a mere apology from Trask, is indicative of not only a white man’s power to actively silence a Black woman in order to sustain his own power and secure his profit, but also the direct role of capital in the active policing of Black and Brown people.
Furthermore, Trask’s leadership in facilitating Duke’s vigorous involvement in the ‘revitalization’ of Downtown Durham—that has relied on increased policing of both Black and Brown communities around Duke’s campus and in Durham—illustrates the oppressive connections that have always already existed between Duke University and the larger community. Institutional power, capital accumulation, and policing function in tandem to displace communities of color from their historic neighborhoods, replacing them with high-end boutiques, restaurants, and apartments that only generate more profit for the wealthy. None of these practices promote the safety of people of color or low-income people.
In particular, Trask had a particularly acute influence in the construction of the Durham Performing Arts Center, located with tragic irony right across the street from the Durham County Detention Facility, which imprisons mostly Black and Brown people merely for their inability to post bail. The juxtaposition of these two buildings, facing each other, points to a direct relationship between the wealth and affluence of some and the material poverty and systematic marginalization of others.
Trask must be immediately removed from his position of authority and leadership at Duke University without any additional settlements or compensation. Trask must provide full reparations to Ms. Underwood for the harm he has caused, which includes compensation for her medical and legal expenses.
Our imaginations are necessary to combat the constant violence that we face. We demand that staff, students, and faculty are able to live without the fear for their personal safety, without the repetitive and continuous trauma of these atrocities, without the threat of the self-perpetuating, self-reproducing, centralized, racist, patriarchal power of high-ranking administrators on this campus that continue to act with impunity. We believe in the world that our radical re-imagining creates, that allows everyone to live and embody their whole selves, and to thrive.
WE ENVISION A UNIVERSITY NOT RUN BY PAPER-PUSHING ADMINISTRATORS, BUT RUN BY STUDENTS, FACULTY, AND STAFF FOR OUR OWN SELF-DETERMINATION.
WE ENVISION A UNIVERSITY WHERE TUITION, INSTEAD OF INCREASING, CEASES TO EXIST.
WE ENVISION A UNIVERSITY WHERE ALL LABORERS, NON-ACADEMIC AND ACADEMIC, ARE PAID FAIR COMPENSATION FOR THEIR LABOR AND ARE TREATED AS VALUABLE PEOPLE, NOT AS DISPOSABLE BODIES.
WE ENVISION A UNIVERSITY WHERE THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES ARE COMPLETELY ELECTED BY AND REPRESENT ALL STUDENTS, FACULTY, AND STAFF.
WE ENVISION A UNIVERSITY WHERE THE DUKE UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT DOES NOT EXIST.
WE ENVISION A UNIVERSITY WHERE THE COMMUNITY DEFINES WHAT HARM MEANS, NOT THE STATE.
WE ENVISION A UNIVERSITY THAT DOES NOT EXPLOIT AND INVADE DURHAM.
WE ARE COMMITTED TO MAKING THIS VISION A REALITY. EXPECT US. JOIN US.
DUKE ENRAGE
STATEMENT COMING SOON
On Dsig/KKG “Incarceration" Party: Abolish Prisons Abolish Greek Life
Trigger Warnings: imprisonment, police brutality, prison abuse.
“As a people I feel like the system is killing us off one by one. Fucking up our futures just so the cycle of incarceration continues. We’re looked at as just another dollar more than just another human being”
— 2015-07-21 LB an inmate in the Durham County Jail from Amplify Voices
On February 17th, 2016 Delta Sigma Phi Fraternity and Kappa Kappa Gamma Sorority hosted their annual incarceration-themed party, “Kappa Kops”, in which people dressed up as police and prisoners, complete with a cage/jail cell and a mugshot photo booth, where partiers could pose with their fake guns, cops outfits, and inmate costumes.
However, this is not surprising. Duke—and by extension, Duke students—occupy a privileged position, a position made possible by the everyday policing, surveillance, and imprisonment of less privileged and overly criminalized bodies. The original intentions of fraternities included attracting the “right” kind of people, which didn’t include those of lower class status and race, both demographics which are disproportionately affected by the criminalization and negligent imprisonment. Instead, those who attended the party engaged in a mockery of people whose lives are touched by the prison industrial complex in tragic, violent ways.
The prison system is not a joke, the crisis of mass incarceration facing this country is not funny, and those who suffer because of it—primarily Black and Brown people—are not a subject of ridicule.
IFC and PanHel have come under fire before for racialized situations that the fraternities and sororities have been in. Just last year, the Oklahoma chapter got national backlash for their video in which they sung a blatantly anti-black chant that has been taught through the entire organization, and Duke made a conscious effort to conceal the fact that this chant was also sung at a black student weeks later.
It is astounding to us. The public discourse has been filled with widespread critiques of the U.S. prison system and the law enforcement, the highly publicized moments of police brutality—that represent only the most visible moments of the routine forms of state-sanctioned violence—and the mass youth-led mobilizations to recognize the value of the lives historically deemed to be criminal and therefore disposable.
Yet, our fellow classmates find it appropriate to so callously “party” around a theme that has brought pain, suffering, and violence into the lives of so many. Their acts normalize a system that enacts brutality and violence against low-income communities and communities of color—right here, down the road, in Durham.
The timing of this party is particularly insensitive because of the recent struggle against the vile human rights abuses inside the Durham County Jail, less than a mile away from Duke’s campus. The party took place only a few weeks after the death of Matthew McCain, the third inmate in a year to die while detained at the Durham County Jail.
The cause of death for both Matthew McCain and Dennis McMurray, an inmate who died in the jail earlier last year, was murder by medical neglect, perpetrated by jail personnel. In addition to the routine abuse experienced by inmates in the Durham County Jail at the hands of correctional officers, inmates experience routine medical neglect.
The for-profit healthcare corporation that operates in the jail, Correct Care Solutions, is currently under investigation for its complicity in inmate deaths in three other jails and prisons. This is just one example of the larger systemic way in which prisons operate in surveilling, brutalizing, disenfranchising marginalized communities.
We know that these Greek students are protected by the same police state they are able to seamlessly dress up as for their entertainment. They can do this because their bodies are not vulnerable to these systems of power that devastate the lives of so many in Durham, across the state, and the country at large.
What mechanisms allow for such a radically different image of police and prisons that while Durham residents and many members of our Duke community are terrorized by these institutions, Greeks are able to dress up as sexy cops and take mugshots for profile pictures?
Violence and trauma become images for consumption rather than the lived realities of millions of people, some of whom we know and love.
We call to abolish prisons and abolish Greek life because they both serve to uphold a social order founded on white supremacy, cisheteropatriarchy, and capitalist accumulation of power and wealth, and the violence enacted on the bodies of black, brown, queer, trans* and low-income folks necessary to uphold the social order. We hope you’ll join us in coming together to resist these institutions. We imagine a world without violence, in which safety is not defined by putting other human beings in cages, in which systematic dehumanization is not mocked and consumed.
We must remember, in the words of Fanny Lou Hamer: nobody is free until everybody is free.
GUEST SUBMISSION: “Carpentry of the Oppressed: A People’s Guide to Shutting Down Duke”
On March 9, 1960, the All-University Student Leadership Group published “An Appeal for Human Rights” in local newspapers, including the Atlanta Constitution, Atlanta Journal, and the Daily World. Making it plain, the authors criticized the “snail-like speed” by which this country ameliorates the existing conditions of Jim Crow segregation. Denouncing the innumerable inequalities in education, employment, housing, voting, hospital, law enforcement, they called out those in authority for assistance in the complete and unequivocal abolition of these injustices.
On November 20, 2015, Concerned Students, in conjunction with minority groups, released “Demands of Black Voices,” a comprehensive list ranging from racial bias, to mental health, to representation, to wages, institutional inequalities, among others.
But despite the grandiloquent language of these tireless activists, both demands fall of deaf ears. To quote Sister Ashley Benn, “Demands have been made since the 1960s, and although we just give you a list of demands, and yes I know they are a lot, and yes I know that it just doesn’t take a day…I know it takes some amount of time, it doesn’t take 50 years.” Praise is long overdue to la mujer de color.
The current generation must learn from our forbearers’ struggles. We can be as clear as day, but still, nothing will happen.
There will be those that ask, but why won’t anything happen? Because in the spirit of Brother Gil Scott Heron, the movement will not be on the starting five of the Atlantic Coastal Conference. The movement will not be on the front page for winning the Nobel Prize. The movement will not have a 20 minute harangue at commencement. The movement will not illumine in brisk evenings some obscure marketing firm in the middle of the Bryan Center Plaza. The movement especially will not dissolve in its token 15 minutes of fame, within the white noise of complacency. The movement is not a Duke conversation, sino que it is a demand.
Never mind the paternalist condescension of President Brodhead, “In a university, you have to actually think through and work them out what can be done…” Never mind the premier talking head of this university performing a micro-aggression that ridiculed all our efforts before the fact. As if we absentmindedly outcry our pain. As if our screams are impulsive. As if we never lived under the koan of white supremacy, that “If a person of color falls, does it make a sound?” If dark bodies litter the streets, does this country give a damn? The answer: no not until the sewage of our flesh clot their pocketbooks.
Hence the Mizzou Activists naked assertion, “We’re gonna be loud as fuck.”
A month prior, on February 1960, the Committee on Appeal for Human Rights (COAHR) co-spearheaded, along with the Student Non-Violent Coordinating Committee, the desegregation of local restaurants and hotels in Atlanta, as the city hailed as supuestamente “too busy to hate.” The pragmatic mayor, William B. Hartsfield, thanked the students for “letting the white community know what others are thinking,” but took no immediate steps to address grievances.
On March 15, after a series of carefully orchestrated sit-ins at ten lunch counters and cafeterias throughout the city, students suspended the sit-ins for upcoming negotiations with representatives of the business community. The representatives showed little interest in compromise.
After a month of planning, students campaigned a new set of sit-ins targeting a number of businesses, including the Magnolia Room restaurant at Rich’s Department Store, the city’s largest retailer. After vociferous tensions, including counterdemonstrations by the Ku Klux Klan, COAHR expanded the boycott to “bankrupt the economy of segregation.” They added an additional tactic: demonstrators arrested would refuse bail, in order to crowd jails. The result: sales figures decline 13%, downtown businesses lost $10 million. And suddenly, to the stroke of the almighty dollar, white business leaders met privately for a settlement.
Students deviated from a politics of recognition, to that of siphoning, figuratively bleeding the power structure to death. The historical lesson is simple, “Hit them not in their hearts, but in their wallets.”
Ahora preguntarás, what about Duke? That same restless spirit is evident, upon historical excavation.
April 1968, in the week following Dr. King’s assassination, as the racial fabric of Amerikkka ripped itself apart, a series of events transpired on Duke’s campus known as the Silent Vigil. A cadre of students, after lengthy discussions amongst themselves and advice from some faculty and administrators, marched to Duke President Douglass M. Knight’s home. They presented a list of demands including: Knight’s endorsement of a newspaper ad stating “we are all implicated” in King’s assassination, his resignation from the segregated Hope Valley Country Club, increased pay for non-academic employees, a collective bargaining committee for workers, among other concerns.
But note Knight’s words of legacy. Given the power of the board of trustees, he proved incapable to make binding administrative decisions. He “often had no authority but no power.” Es decir, Brodhead can and will not assist in these demands, if not due to private apathy, but due to top-down puppetry. In the words of underground rapper, Immortal Technique, “my issue isn’t with the white man I see, but with the white man I don’t see.” Namely, that committed social actors, from Knight to Dean Ashby, must fight against reactionary opinions among senior administrators. “There was a great many members of the Duke constituency who didn’t care whether Martin Luther King lived or died; they felt he was disruptive.” Such is our position. We are addressing a talking wall that invests millions of dollars to see us, if not destroyed, subdued.
Conversation is damage control at best, and slow death, forestalling the movement until leaders graduate or tire themselves. President Brodhead, as Duke’s talking head, anticipates the sweeping tides calling for his resignation. Mizzou then is not so much a school, but an epicenter, a historical conjecture of the Ferguson protests--and more broadly, the BlackLivesMatter movement—catalyzed ostensibly because the Football team indefinitely boycotted playing time. For the overseers of this ivory plantation, their beloved cash crop almost disappeared.
And until we threaten this school with the same penalty for exploiting our bodies, nothing will change but the day. The businessmen will trade their suits for lab coats, the doctors hear their cue. Progress is a white lie that will be administered at inauguration ceremonies, toasted at fundraiser dinners-- the melatonin of the Amerikkkan dream. Desperate and exhausted, the ethnic body will eventually the liberal prescription. Sedated, the churchgoers of the preaching choir can rest easy for a few hours.
But by nightfall that dream dies, after four hours of bleeding out on the street because ninguna pinche ambulancia ever came. It dies clinging to its detention center, on the false promise that Obama granted amnesty to all indocumentados. It dies selling loose cigarettes at Staten Island, from attending a swimming pool party in Texas, from driving with a busted tail-light, to praying in Charleston. The congregation holds steadfast to that dream, until it’s literally beaten out of them.
The diagnosis is cyclical and simple: racial insomnia. We’re woke, because we can’t sleep.
We’ve had conversations, we’ve talked about these issues. The problem is those in power choose not to act about it.
Don’t get it twisted. This whole question of diversity is a giant farce, nothing more than a power point slide for the Duke brand; where every fiscal year, I set aside my reservations and put on some cultural performance that makes you look good, while I get nothing in return. Whether Marriot workers, a one year Program in Education faculty (te extrañamos Dr. Jason Mendez), or an undergrad, to be a person of color is to always be reminded that your labor is deemed more valuable than the rights you deserve. Because we are expendable.
And to my quierida gente de color, my celebration of dark skin, I say: in this deathbed of culture, we are its fleeting heartbeats. Multiculturalism is nothing but the management of difference, one commodifed for brochures. Engaged in a futile politics of recognition, we’re hunched low, we fight for scraps. Divided amongst ourselves, we apologetically dismiss each other’s struggles. It’s not under my timetable, that resources are meager. Yes, precisely because the white pie chart allotted the very minimum to placate outbursts. Precisely because we exist only for their lamination.
To my beloved students of color, and all others silenced, as the movement ensues, I plead: in this borrowed limelight, do not confuse justice with concession. Amidst all this blinding opulence, do not forget that 50 years ago, five black American integrated this campus in large part due to economic pressure from esteemed endowments explicitly threatening to withdraw their donations unless the school admit them. Our politics does not exist in a vacuum, but within a complex matrix of supremacist hatred, liberal dismissal, and the shameless worship of capital [prestige].
Así que to Hell with respectability. A la verga con realizando mi miseria! Duke, me cansé de rogarle, nunca me quisiste. You tar and feather my culture, so quite frankly, I might Tar Heel my brown ass out of here. But no se te olvide, I ain’t no traitor, because you betrayed me before my chanclas ever stepped here. But before I leave, jamas pararé, until I knock you down a few pegs, so that you may see our unpaid labor, quietly draining our spirits. Pagados bajo la mesa.
So what now? Ahora te dejo con unas palabras: James Forman, Executive Secretary of SNCC, said, “We can present thousands and thousands of bodies in the streets if we want to. And we can have all of the soul force and the moral commitment around this world. But a lot of these problems will not be solved until that shagged-old place called the White House begins to shake and gets on the phone and says, ‘Listen George [Wallace], we’re goin’ put to in jail if you don’t stop that mess.’ It’s not just the sheriff of this country or the mayor of the police commissioner or George Wallace. This problem goes to the very bottom of the United States. And you know, I said it today, and I will say it again, ‘If we can’t sit at the table, let’s knock the fucking legs off!’”
Con Ojos al Premio (With Eyes on the Prize),
Antonio López
#DukeYouAreGuilty: To Hell With Your Task Force!
Duke Enrage is a coalition of students who have come together in solidarity to collectively resist and dismantle the oppressive systems that attempt to deny our capacity to be whole. Duke Enrage is unaffiliated with any other student organizations or coalitions, such as Concerned Students 1969.
In our previous statement, On Recent Incidents, we voiced our opposition to the administration's intentional ineffectiveness in addressing the latest acts of terror on campus and its subsequent complicity in the perpetuation of (anti-Black) white supremacist violence. Following the administration’s policy of silence on multiple acts of racist, cisheterosexist hate speech, we rise to demand structural change -- just as those before us have protested administrative inaction such as in 1968, 1969, 1971, 1972, 1988, 1997, 2003, 2012, 2013, and 2014.
On November 20, 2015, a group of “Concerned Students” issued demands to the administration. The administration’s primary response has been to create a “task force”— one which will not even be fully formed until the Spring Semester and will not offer its policy “suggestions” until April 2016. The creation of the Task Force gives no concrete solutions to structural violence on campus or even a timeline for concrete solutions. It reveals itself as yet another committee designed for the sole purpose of discarding student demands while appearing to be well intentioned and beyond reproach. This was self-evident in Dick Brodhead’s ‘non-response’ to Concerned Students 1969, in which he completely dismissed these students’ demands and deferred to the task force. We see through it. This “task force” offers no real solutions to structural violence, instead creating a fallacious impression of action that prevents students from criticizing the administration for its complete inaction and ineffectiveness. If the administration honestly believes that the creation of a task force would be sufficient to placate our anger or diffuse our determination, it is sorely mistaken. We have questions and we will not back down.
1. What distinct qualifications do Kelly Brownell and Linda Burton possess that make them uniquely qualified to address issues pertaining to the prevalence of racism, misogyny, and cisheterosexism on our campus?
While Burton holds a secondary appointment in the Department of African and African American Studies, Burton’s research centers on childhood development and family structures in rural low-income families. Entirely irrelevant, Brownell’s research focuses on public health, nutrition, and obesity prevention. What was the criterion for the appointment of these faculty members in a professed effort to address all-pervasive white supremacist racism and anti-Blackness at Duke University? The question is of course rhetorical. Brownell and Burton are token puppets selected to protect administration’s agenda. Furthermore, why didn’t Brodhead solicit the input of students in the creation of the Task Force? How can he then claim that this Task Force will address our concerns when students have been shut out of the discussion from the very beginning? It has been clear to us that it is the intention of the administrators to convene the most innocuous task force possible — a move that ensures that the status quo remains unchanged while Duke University remains in a position to claim that perfunctory changes, resulting from a task force, amount to progress. This has been done before, time and time again, as the University has convened one committee after another. For that reason, the administration purposefully failed to solicit student input — that most accurately represents student concerns yet threatens campus order — and failed to make the Task Force selection process fully transparent.
2. Why hasn’t Brodhead sought the leadership of Duke’s highly distinguished faculty in the fields of race, ethnic, and gender studies instead?
Interestingly, faculty members with lifelong specializations in issues of race and racism, as well as other identity-based oppressions, have been hired by Duke University, where they teach us every day. If the administration is serious about changing the status quo using this Task Force, the least it can do is appoint qualified leaders to head it. Yet, while the consultations of these faculty are highly sought and recognized by national and international institutions, the administration remains conveniently unaware of their professional qualifications. It has always been administration’s conscious, calculated decision to keep these faculty members at a distance.
3. Does Brodhead really think that “making recommendations by April 2016” constitutes a course of action?
Shall we remind him — yet again — that Duke has yet to fulfill at the very least 25+ demands made by student organizers over the last five decades? Students have already made the “recommendations,” time and time again. Still, the administration is ceaseless in its commitment to ignore and placate us. The administration uses the language of “recommendations” to avoid addressing student demands at all costs. Once again, we call it what it is — a pacifying tactic that seeks to create an illusion of action, while Brodhead and the administrators absolve themselves of any responsibility to directly address the students, our demands, and act on them now.
4. Is Dick Brodhead in need of a history lesson?
Is that the reason he continues to use the language of “bias,” “hate,” or “intolerance” to describe systematic violence that is foundational to this institution and this country? The language of bias and hate implies that there are exceptional, extraordinary instances that constitute systems of oppression. As we — the students, faculty, and staff — have been saying at forums, at town halls, and in committee meetings for years, white supremacist violence is a constant force that permeates our daily experiences on this campus. The decision to center the task force on issues of “bias” and “hate” is intentional: it tangentially refers to, but fails to truthfully name, the most egregious manifestations of oppression, while ignoring the ways in which the institution itself is intimately implicated in the daily acts of violence and silencing against its marginalized communities.
5. Why do Brodhead and the administrators continue to evade their professional, compensated duties by alluding to “our collective responsibility”?
Brodhead writes, “administrative actions cannot solve all the problems we face.” In fact, in the form of institutional reforms, administrative actions can solve many of our problems; but that would actually require Brodhead and his administration to perform such actions, many of which are concrete steps demanded of Administration by Concerned Students 1969 and other groups in Duke’s history. A task force that seeks “a productive dialogue” is a waste of our time and our energy. Has the administration not heard us? We are tired of your “dialogue.” We are tired of conversing on unequal terms, in which you hold access to resources necessary to make institutional changes. We are tired of being pacified, and we are tired of reminding you that “dialogue” does not amount to action, responsibility, and accountability. It is your job to implement institutional reforms, and you can start by meeting the 25+ demands made by marginalized students over the past 50 years.
6. Why do Brodhead and the administrators think that we would actually believe that they are doing all in their power to address violent campus culture?
We know all too well that when Duke University’s reputation is threatened, it quickly takes necessary action. We remember how the University swiftly created one of its favorite neo-colonial trademark programs, DukeEngage, as a response to the lacrosse scandal that severely damaged Duke’s reputation. We are not fooled — if Duke can mobilize and create a program with a $30 million endowment in a singular year, it can as easily mobilize to make tangible, effective institutional changes demanded for and by the students and marginalized members of the community. Duke University can do far more than offer us to “dialogue” with one another. Yet, it continues to use the pretense of such dialogue to absolve itself of responsibility and, instead, does nothing.
7. When will Brodhead and the administrators address the demands issued by Concerned Students 1969 and other student organizations, such as Mi Gente and Asian American Alliance, on November 20, 2015?
We demand the transparent consultation of students, faculty, and staff affected by campus violence in every process of the Task Force on Bias and Hate Issues, which as an institutionally recognized and created force, will specifically be anti-racist, feminist/womanist, anti-cisheteropatriarchal in its vision and implementation. We demand that faculty, students, and staff who have backgrounds in critical and cultural studies and/or a track record of organizing experience lead the Task Force, instead of assigned Task Force members choosing the students who will serve on the Task Force. Finally, we demand that all participants on the Task Force receive financial compensation for the significant amount of labor required of them in this work.
WE SEE THROUGH YOUR “TASK FORCE” AND WE DEMAND REAL INSTITUTIONAL SOLUTIONS TO STRUCTURAL VIOLENCE. IF YOU CAN’T DO YOUR JOB, WE WANT YOU OUT.
www.dukeenrage.tumblr.com
On “Recent Incidents”: #DukeYouAreGuilty
Not yet halfway through the academic year, Duke University has — yet again — reminded us of the violence foundational to this institution. On October 18, a group of male students shouted racist hate speech and slurs outside the dorm room of an Asian-American woman. On October 23, a poster advertising #BlackLivesMatter event featuring Patrisse Cullors was vandalized with an anti-black racial slur. On November 5, a homophobic death threat was written on a wall in a dorm targeting a first year student. In response, Larry Moneta, the Vice President of Student Affairs, had the audacity to refer to this violence as nothing more than a series of acts of “copycat hatred.” Hate crimes are consistently labeled as mere “incidents” by the administration and little to no action is taken. These acts of terror are emblematic of the larger landscape and culture of Duke University that actively reproduce practices and expressions of violence against its marginalized students — the everyday realities many of us know too well.
When this erasure and oppression comes to a rupture, manifested in an act of phenomenal violence, the university pretends that it is an unexpected aberration, as if the university itself has not created, maintained, and continued to actively build the space that allows these antagonisms to exist. Each time a rupture of violence occurs, the people who are targeted are expected to come up with solutions to their oppression, a process that demands extraordinary emotional, physical, mental, and spiritual uncompensated labor. We denounce the exploitation of students, faculty, and staff who are called upon to perpetually reiterate and seek public validation of their experiences in the name of “discussion” — as if their pain has ever been taken into consideration by the administration. Duke has made it clear that it has no regard for the lives of marginalized peoples.
The administration’s passive, delayed reactions to these hate crimes epitomize its continuous silencing and dismissal of students’ concerns about their safety and welfare. If closed-door boardroom meetings, campus conversations, forums, and the like were effective, as the administrators wants us to believe, students would not be forced to confront racial slurs, vandalized posters, or homophobic death threats on campus — all of which happened this semester. Duke fully knows the actions it needs to take, because we, those who came before us, and those who came before them, have told them what to do, time and time again. But the university continues to ignore these demands and attempts to placate and distract us with “community conversations” and empty promises.
We are not interested in another “conversation.” We know that Duke has ignored all conventional avenues of action for change. We recognize that the creation of various institutional entities (whether task forces or diversity committees) with the sole purpose of “making recommendations” is a pacifying tactic that the administration has utilized, over and over again, to shelve the actual demands made by students over decades of student organizing. We do not have faith in the institution that has been unrelenting in its refusal to honor and fulfill our demands, while masquerading under the guise of “dialogue” that was never meant to include us.
We see through you. Administrators exploit ideals of “diversity,” “inclusivity,” and “collective responsibility” to absolve themselves of the violence that they both produce and maintain. By doing so, they try to sell us an illusion that all of us are conversing on equal terms, when truth is that they maintain a monopoly on access and resources necessary to enact transformative institutional changes. We understand that at the end of the day, Duke’s priority will always be its control of power and reputation over the well-being of non-normative members of our communities.
We carry, within us, the institutional knowledge and memory that you seek to obliterate. We know that you would love nothing more than for student coalitions to fall prey to intimidation, exhaustion, or compliance. When that fails, you wait for us to graduate and disappear. You can no longer pretend that you hold the interests of the marginalized at heart while continuing to foster an environment that only functions on the concept of temporary appeasement. These are the tactics that you have used to erase our labor, to suppress our dissent, but this time, we know better.
We know our history of resistance and your history of oppression. We remember that Duke was built on the stolen land of indigenous peoples acquired through genocide and settler colonial violence. We remember that the resources that built this institution were plundered from the backs of black and brown labor. Duke University was built with money generated by slave labor. This place was never meant to be for us, nor to serve us.
We dwell in a long tradition of resistance; we are descendants of those who refuse to be silenced. We celebrate all those who struggled and all those who dreamed of being free. We stand on the shoulders of those who have come before us, and we commit to honoring and continuing their work, for the sake of those who will come after us.
We are direct descendants of the People of Color Caucus, and we refuse to let their hard labor and truth-telling voices disappear into a quiet silence. We recognize not only the People of Color Caucus, but the countless students that led the struggle before them. We honor, lift up the forgotten names, and invoke the strength of all those who came before us: the first five Black students who in 1963 courageously stepped on this campus, still rotting with its white supremacist anti-Blackness; those who occupied the Chapel Quad en masse in 1968; Black students who fearlessly took over the Allen Building in 1969; those who protested U.S. imperialism and the cruelties of the Vietnam War in the 70’s, those who demanded the university divest from apartheid South Africa in the 80’s; those who led the demands for the hiring of Black faculty in 1988, and many countless others. Full of indignation, unwavering in our commitment to get free together, we rise up as Duke Enrage.
As we build upon the history of student movements, we recognize that we are at a momentous threshold. At this time when protests are occurring all over college campuses in the country and abroad, we embrace our collective power and our duty to fight. University leaders and administrators have lost their jobs, and we know that you fear for yours. You expect us to yield and to accept a semblance of your “efforts” as a resolution to our outrage. We will not back down. Remember, we hold the power in this movement and we are here to use it. Expect us.
A group of unaffiliated, concerned students presented the administration with a list of demands, titled Demands of Black Voices, during a student-led discussion on November 20, 2015.
We are in full solidarity and support the demands of these Black students. #DUBetter
On November 20, 2015, the Department of Cultural Anthropology at Duke University published a collective letter of support — “an open letter of love to our students” — in the Duke Chronicle.
“The ultimate offense of it all—the contorting of body and behavior to offset the deficit in another. There is a spiritual injustice in the adjustment. But now young black folks are refusing alteration or the mollification of conformity and are simply demanding justice.”—Charles Blow
Inspired by the events on Duke’s campus, and Rae Paris’ “An Open Letter of Love to Black Students,” we write to mark our solidarity with calls for fuller accountability on matters of social justice at Duke.
“We’re writing to tell you we see you and hear you.”
We write too to tell you that we see and hear your sense of injury in the face of events of the last year and more—the racist and mortally threatening Sigma Alpha Epsilon chant reportedly directed at a black student; the hanging of anoose outside the Bryan Center; Jerry Hough’s (James B. Duke Professor of Political Science) ill-informed published comments on a May 2015 New York Times editorial, “How Racism Doomed Baltimore”; and the defacement of the Patrisse Cullors #BlackLivesMatter poster this term—injuries that have come into public view that cannot stand. We also know there are countless other such injuries that remain in the shadows, unknown to us, that make you feel unsafe and harmed as black students on Duke’s campus.
Anti-black racism at Duke is not of course isolated. You surely have friends, siblings, cousins and other loved ones who attend other Predominantly White Institutions—whether Yale, Georgetown, the University of Missouri (“Mizzou”) or indeed Northwestern—and feel themselves to be too often in harm’s way as well.
We know there are hostilities and aggressions that likewise organize the experiences of many other kinds of students on Duke’s campus. These include the Kappa Sigma Fraternity’s 2013 “Asia Prime” Party; campus sexual assault; the preclusions to reporting; the threats to life and bodily and emotional integrity that come with homophobia and targeted declarations of mortal harm to specific students, not least to Jack Donohue; as well as the fears of many Muslim students—these and many other anti-sentiments organize aspects of your time here. These are the ones we know about. There are surely others.
Whatever the race, religion, (trans)gender, sexual orientation or indeed class position of students, we know that such differences—differences that ought to be celebrated, differences that make for the richest of both emotional and intellectual experiences on campus—can, and often do, place you in harm’s way. These harms are psychic and physical, deep and painful and take on significance in the living out of daily life on campus. We feel compelled to say, again, “We see you and hear you.”
But what can we do for you and with you? You expressed your outrage during the Friday, Nov. 13, 2015, noon conversation with senior Duke administration. Black folks, queer folks, many folks “are refusing alteration or the mollification of conformity and are simply demanding justice.” These sentiments extend to your allies. Allies likewise feel that the demand of conformity is no longer reasonable, permissible, livable. As faculty, we want you to know that you should feel you can lean on us, rely on us, demand things of us. We hope you will see us as providing a safe space, and that whatever tools we have at our disposal, in the cause of social justice, are your tools too.
That Duke is one among many institutions that must confront the fact of racism, homophobia, sexism, classism and sectarianism and do so now, suggests that we stand at a threshold, a moment of opening, of possibility for us all.
This column is collectively authored by the Department of Cultural Anthropology.
On November 13, 2015, Duke University's President Dick Brodhead convened (yet another) "community conversation" following a number of racist and homophobic hate crimes, or so-caled "recent incidents," that took place on Duke's campus. Yet, Duke is yet to fulfill at least 25+ demands made by students over five decades, ever since Black students occupied Allen Building in 1969. We walk out in protest. We salute student protesters around the country and the world, and we stand in solidarity with you. We won't be placated by "forums," "task forces," or "town halls." We demand institutional changes NOW. We are here and we are watching. ------------------------------------------------------------- MIC CHECK Let it be known that on this day Duke administrators still refuse to name the violent, racist, cissheterosexist acts against marginalized people on this campus as anything more than “recent incidents” Hate crimes need to be addressed with institutional changes not “community conversations” or fruitless investigations We are tired of being targeted Of telling you why the campus that you run is unsafe As if this hasn’t happened before You should know better You use our faces on brochures Pretend diversity means safety You have created a space For us to fear for our lives And you continue to maintain that space DUKE YOU ARE GUILTY
We, those before us, and those before them, have always been talking! Duke has never listened. We remember that Duke is yet to fulfill at the very least 25+ demands made by students over the last five decades of student organizing, ever since Black students occupied the Allen Building in 1969.
“recent incidents”
“recent incidents”